One employee coordinated intelligence activities. Another worked to leverage US energy interests abroad. And a third was an expert on strategic competition with China.
They are just some of the more than 1,300 State Department employees fired last week, eliminating hundreds of years of institutional knowledge and experience.
The move has stunned America's diplomatic workforce, not only as their careers abruptly end but as they wonder who — if anyone — will fill in on what they call critical work to keep the US safe and competitive on the world stage.
Many of the positions and offices “abolished” Friday under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's dramatic reorganisation plan overlap with priorities President Donald Trump has laid out for his second term, such as combating visa fraud and countering China. Other cuts could have wide impact on everyday life, including processing Americans' passport applications.
Trump administration officials have defended the mass dismissals, saying they are overdue and necessary to make the department leaner and more efficient.
Where the State Department cuts are hitting Among the employees laid off are more than 100 people who worked in the Bureau of Consular Affairs, which is self-funded from passport and visa fees.
That includes half of a team that investigated passport fraud and 23 people who oversaw contracts to provide American citizen services, including processing passport applications, in the US and abroad, according to a list compiled by current and former foreign service officers and sent to Congress this week.
Others fired included experts responsible for dealing with visa fraud and money laundering in Russia and Eastern Europe as well as transnational criminal organizations and migrant worker visa fraud in Mexico and Central America.
A small team that had worked on multilateral engagements in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, including supporting Rubio's trip to Malaysia last week, also were fired as Rubio was flying back to Washington from Kuala Lumpur, according to the list.
A handful of employees said their small office was eliminated even though it was doing work on immigration that the administration had deemed a priority. They thought their jobs were safe, and several were on vacation when the notices started rolling in.
“It came out of the blue, and there's no one left to do what we were doing,” said one of the laid-off employees, who has more than 30 years of experience.
Fired employees speak out about their work In interviews with The Associated Press, more than half a dozen employees who got notice to clear out their desks described their work as crucial. For some, the government spent tens of thousands of dollars investing in their language skills, providing training or moving them and their families from one overseas posting to another.
They spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearing reprisal from the agency where they remain on the payroll until September.
"The American people aren't getting all of the facts about what the department has done," said a civil service officer working in intelligence who was fired last week.
The person said the intelligence work their team had been doing has now been transferred to an office that doesn't have the capacity to handle the sensitive material and coordination required.
One senior official, who was fired after 26 years in the foreign service, said their office was working to maintain US energy dominance abroad. Rubio testified at his confirmation hearing earlier this year that energy would be “a centerpiece of our foreign policy.” "The fact that they got rid of all the energy experts who would promote oil and gas sales overseas clearly undermines everything that they're saying," the official said.
At least seven intelligence analysts who specialized in Russia and Ukraine issues, as well as five fluent Chinese speakers, also were let go, according to two of the employees.
A staffer focused on strategic competition with China said the decision to lay off staff who had institutional and cultural knowledge of China and spoke the language could leave the US exposed.
He added that Rubio had recently labelled the country as “the most significant long-term risk to the United States.” The State Department says it needs to be nimble Although the dismissals were less severe than many feared, they're a major concern for staffers being tasked with additional duties to make up for losses in key areas like intelligence and research, consular affairs, diplomatic security, energy, and international and educational organisations.
Before a panel of deeply sceptical Democratic lawmakers, Michael Rigas, the State Department official who sent employees the layoff notices, tried Wednesday to allay concerns that the cuts would have a devastating impact on US diplomacy.
He denied allegations that the layoffs were conducted in a haphazard and irresponsible manner to the detriment of national security.
Rigas, deputy secretary of state for management, made the case to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the department with more than 76,000 employees worldwide had grown exponentially and that a massive reorganisation was needed to keep it relevant and nimble to respond to foreign crises and policy challenges.
The department “became large and began to lose its way,” becoming “ineffectual bureaucratically,” spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters Wednesday. She added that it wasn't “the fault of the people who were in those seats, but the structure itself.” Rigas said those laid off Friday are on administrative leave — foreign service officers for 120 days, and civil servants for 20 days — and they could have the opportunity to apply for other positions once a government-wide hiring freeze is lifted.
Booker confronts Trump administration official Some senators were not buying Rigas' argument, and sharp disagreements erupted into a shouting match after New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker accused Rigas of lying to lawmakers this week over the extent of the staff reductions.
Booker was visibly angry as he wielded a list of what he said were misstatements, half-truths or lies in Rigas' testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee a day earlier about the firings.
“I don't trust you, Mr. Rigas,” Booker said. “Your statements lack veracity.” “This is outrageous,” Rigas replied as he tried to respond over multiple interruptions from Booker.
Booker's list resembled the one compiled by current and former foreign service officers identifying certain eliminated positions that Rigas said had been largely spared.
“Sir, you have not been truthful,” Booker said. “I have watched you lie to this committee, I have watched you lie to the House committee.”
