Name: Meta drops NFT support on Facebook and Instagram
Uploaded: 2023-03-14T14:38:26.000+05:30
Duration: T00M31S
Channel: Editorji News Desk
Description: Facebook and Instagram will no longer support NFT transactions.

Haier 1.7 Ton Desert Rose AC review: fast supersonic cooling, AI-powered features, and strong energy efficiency. A premium 5-star inverter AC built for Indian summers, priced around ₹55,000, offering smart comfort and low maintenance.

Haier 1.7 Ton 5 Star Gold Decco Desert Rose Air Conditioner Review: When Cooling Gets a Brain

<section class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-(--header-height)" dir="auto" data-turn-id="813187f9-874d-41d5-8c68-7845016607b6" data-testid="conversation-turn-19" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="user"></section>
<section class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto [content-visibility:auto] supports-[content-visibility:auto]:[contain-intrinsic-size:auto_100lvh] R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-69ebcba9-4684-83e8-8d79-8220c3c049f4-6" data-testid="conversation-turn-20" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="assistant">
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(--spacing)*4))] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(--spacing)*6))] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(--spacing)*16))] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col gap-4 grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal outline-none keyboard-focused:focus-ring [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" tabindex="0" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="0fb30d4a-c88e-48a2-b382-0ba93e6c2d61" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-3" data-turn-start-message="true">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full wrap-break-word light markdown-new-styling">
The Haier 1.7 Ton Desert Rose AC delivers fast, intelligent cooling with AI features that adapt to your usage. It balances performance and efficiency well, making it a strong premium option for Indian summers around ₹55,000.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>

There was a time when buying an air conditioner was simple. You picked a tonnage, checked the star rating, and called it a day. But somewhere along the way, ACs started evolving into something far more layered. Not just machines that cool, but systems that observe, learn, and quietly adapt.
The Haier 1.7 Ton 5 Star Gold Decco Desert Rose Air Conditioner, priced at around ₹55,000, sits right at the center of that shift. It doesn&rsquo;t just promise cooling. It promises intelligent cooling, the kind that tries to understand your habits, your room, and even your presence.
And interestingly, the 1.7-ton capacity itself becomes part of that story. It&rsquo;s not just a spec. It shapes how this AC behaves in the real world.
<h2>Design: Premium Without Trying Too Hard</h2>
The &ldquo;Gold Decco&rdquo; finish could have easily gone overboard. But Haier keeps it controlled. The design leans toward understated luxury rather than flashy statement.
The indoor unit has a smooth, polished surface with soft curves that reflect light just enough to feel premium. It doesn&rsquo;t dominate the room, but it definitely upgrades it. This is the kind of appliance that blends into a modern setup without looking generic.
Even the outdoor unit carries more importance than usual here, not because of how it looks, but because of what it does. And that becomes relevant later.
<h2>Why 1.7 Ton Actually Matters Here</h2>
Before getting into features, it&rsquo;s important to understand what 1.7 ton means in this context.
This isn&rsquo;t your typical 1.5-ton AC, and it&rsquo;s not a full 2-ton heavy-duty unit either. It sits right in between. That positioning gives it a very specific advantage.
In real-world usage, especially in Indian conditions, this translates into faster cooling than a standard 1.5-ton AC while still being more energy-conscious than a 2-ton unit. It handles medium rooms comfortably, but also has enough headroom to deal with slightly larger spaces or harsher heat.
What you end up with is an AC that feels a bit more confident. It doesn&rsquo;t struggle when temperatures spike, and it doesn&rsquo;t feel like it&rsquo;s constantly playing catch-up.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/blaupunkt-65-inch-google-mini-qd-tv-review-the-surprise-package-of-2025-1763813560723" target="_blank">Blaupunkt 65-inch Google Mini QD TV Review:</a>
<h2>First Impressions: Cooling That Doesn&rsquo;t Wait</h2>
Switch it on, and the response is immediate. The airflow kicks in quickly, and the cooling doesn&rsquo;t build gradually. It arrives with intent.
Haier calls this Supersonic Cooling and claims it can deliver cooling in around ten seconds. While that number is clearly an ideal scenario, the experience still feels significantly faster than most ACs in this category.
According to the reviewer&rsquo;s guide, the system is designed to deliver up to twenty times faster cooling compared to conventional setups . Whether or not you measure it that precisely, the difference is noticeable.
And this is where the 1.7-ton capacity plays a role. That extra bit of cooling power gives the system the ability to hit comfortable temperatures quicker without feeling strained.
<h2>AI-AtmoX: The Intelligence Layer</h2>
At the core of this AC is the AI-AtmoX system, which acts as the brain behind everything. It&rsquo;s not just a feature, but a network of systems working together.
The AC tracks room temperature, external climate, usage patterns, and even how long you typically run it. Over time, it builds a behavioral understanding of your preferences.
This changes the interaction completely. Instead of constantly adjusting settings, you start noticing that the AC is already doing what you would have done manually.
It feels less like control and more like collaboration.
<h2>AI Climate Control 2.0: Comfort Without Micromanagement</h2>
Most smart ACs still rely on you to make decisions. AI Climate Control 2.0 tries to remove that layer of effort.
It continuously analyzes environmental conditions and adjusts cooling to maintain comfort while avoiding overcooling . The result is a more stable temperature curve.
You don&rsquo;t get those moments where the room suddenly feels too cold or not cool enough. Instead, the environment stays consistent.
Over time, you realize you&rsquo;re reaching for the remote less often. And that&rsquo;s when you know the system is working as intended.
<h2>AI Pre-Cooling: Timing Over Power</h2>
AI Pre-Cooling uses geofencing to detect when you are approaching home and begins cooling the room before you arrive .
This shifts the experience from reactive to proactive. Instead of entering a hot room and waiting for relief, you walk into a space that&rsquo;s already comfortable.
It&rsquo;s not about raw cooling power. It&rsquo;s about delivering comfort at the right moment.
Of course, its effectiveness depends on how accurately the system tracks your location. When it works, it feels seamless. When it doesn&rsquo;t, it quietly fades into the background.
<h2>AI Target Cooling: Precision Over Spread</h2>
Traditional ACs cool the entire room evenly. AI Target Cooling takes a more focused approach.
It directs airflow toward occupied areas using AI-driven inputs and installation data . This makes the cooling feel more immediate and intentional.
Combined with the 1.7-ton capacity, this creates an interesting effect. You&rsquo;re not just getting more cooling power, you&rsquo;re getting it delivered exactly where it&rsquo;s needed.
That combination improves both comfort and efficiency.
<h2>AI Human Detection: Quietly Saving You Money</h2>
This is one of the most practical features in the entire system.
The AC detects whether someone is present in the room and adjusts accordingly. If the room is empty, it gradually reduces cooling and can turn itself off after a period of inactivity .
This directly addresses one of the biggest inefficiencies in everyday usage. ACs running in empty rooms.
Over time, this feature alone can make a noticeable difference to your electricity bill. And it does so without requiring any effort from you.
<h2>AI Eco 2.0 and Power Monitoring: Making Energy Visible</h2>
Energy efficiency here goes beyond a 5-star rating.
AI Eco 2.0 dynamically adjusts performance based on how far the room temperature is from your set temperature . It continuously balances cooling performance with energy consumption.
Alongside this, Electricity Monitoring 2.0 gives you real-time insights into power usage, including cost estimates and usage trends.
Seeing your energy consumption in currency rather than units changes how you interact with the AC. It makes usage more tangible, which naturally leads to more mindful behavior.
<h2>Self-Cleaning System: Maintenance Without Effort</h2>
Maintenance is often ignored until performance drops. Haier tackles this with a dual self-cleaning system.
The indoor unit uses frost-based cleaning to remove dust and maintain hygiene, activating automatically after a certain usage cycle .
The outdoor unit features a cyclone cleaning mechanism that reverses airflow to remove dust from the condenser .
This is particularly useful because outdoor units are difficult to access. Cleaner components mean better efficiency, faster cooling, and less manual servicing.
<h2>Performance in Indian Conditions: Where It Justifies Itself</h2>
This AC is built for demanding conditions, and that becomes clear in everyday use.
The 1.7-ton capacity gives it enough power to handle high temperatures without feeling strained. It cools medium-sized rooms quickly and maintains performance even during peak heat.
It doesn&rsquo;t feel like it&rsquo;s constantly working at its limits, which is often the case with smaller capacity units in extreme summers.
Instead, it feels composed. And that composure translates into consistent comfort.
<h2>The Experience Over Time: The Real Upgrade</h2>
The biggest change happens over time.
As the AI system learns your habits, the AC starts behaving more predictably. It stabilizes temperatures faster, requires fewer adjustments, and maintains a consistent level of comfort.
Energy usage becomes easier to understand, and the overall experience feels smoother.
The AC gradually shifts from being something you control to something that works with you.
<h2>Where It Could Improve</h2>
The intelligence of the system depends on proper setup and consistent usage. Some features, like geofencing, may not always work perfectly in every scenario.
The benefits of AI learning take time to become noticeable, which means the experience may not feel dramatically different on day one.
And while the 1.7-ton capacity is versatile, users with very large spaces may still need a higher-capacity unit.
&nbsp;Final Verdict: A Smart Middle Ground Done Right
The Haier 1.7 Ton 5 Star Gold Decco Desert Rose Air Conditioner strikes a very interesting balance.
It combines slightly higher-than-standard cooling capacity with a deeply integrated AI system that actually impacts day-to-day usage. The result is an AC that feels both powerful and thoughtful.
It doesn&rsquo;t rely on one standout feature. Instead, it builds its value through a combination of speed, intelligence, efficiency, and automation.
More importantly, it shows where appliances are headed. Toward systems that learn, adapt, and quietly improve the experience over time.
<h2>Should You Buy It?</h2>
If you want an AC that cools faster than a standard 1.5-ton unit, adapts to your usage, helps manage energy consumption, and reduces maintenance effort, this makes a strong case.
The 1.7-ton capacity gives it that extra edge without pushing into overkill territory. And the AI features, when they settle in, genuinely improve how the AC feels to live with.
It&rsquo;s not just about cooling anymore. It&rsquo;s about how intelligently that cooling fits into your life.
&nbsp;

The OnePlus Pad 4 brings stronger performance, better battery life, sharper productivity tools and launch offers that make it worth a look.

OnePlus Pad 4 Review: Smooth, Powerful and Reliable

<h3>The OnePlus Pad 4 feels faster, lasts longer and works better for productivity, but its biggest upgrades are more practical than flashy.</h3>

At first, the OnePlus Pad 4 comes across as a safe, almost predictable update. It sticks to the same fundamentals that worked earlier, including a large display, a clean design, and dependable performance. The upgrades are there, though. You get a newer chipset, a slightly bigger battery, and a stronger push toward productivity-focused use.
What makes it interesting is that none of these changes stand out instantly. In my experience, they start to show only after a few days. The tablet feels more consistent, and it handles longer, work-heavy sessions with more ease.
After using it for a few weeks, it settles into a routine that just works. I found it easy to rely on, and at times, I reached for it instead of my laptop.
That said, it is not without compromises, and those only become clear once you spend enough time living with it.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 Pricing in India: Strong value with launch offers</h2>
The OnePlus Pad 4 starts at ₹59,999 for the 8GB RAM and 256GB storage variant, while the 12GB RAM and 512GB option is priced at ₹64,999.
With bank offers and instant discounts of up to ₹5,000, the effective pricing becomes more appealing. The base variant drops to ₹54,999, while the higher-end 12GB+512GB model comes down to ₹59,999, which makes it easier to justify given the hardware on offer.
There is also a limited-period bundle that adds more value. OnePlus is including the Stylo Pro stylus, otherwise priced at ₹5,499, at no extra cost. If you plan to use the tablet for notes or sketching, that is a solid bonus.
On top of that, the folio case is available at ₹2,999 during the launch period. Overall, the pricing feels competitive, especially once you factor in the bundled extras.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 design: Familiar look, smarter tweaks</h2>
The OnePlus Pad 4 does not look very different from the Pad 3, but the changes here feel more considered than they initially appear.
It is slimmer at 5.94mm and weighs 672 grams, which, in daily use, makes it easier to carry around than you might expect from a tablet this size. I found it comfortable to move around with, whether I was using it at a desk or just holding it for longer sessions.
The metal unibody design stays clean and minimal. OnePlus has avoided adding unnecessary design elements, and I like how understated it feels. It looks premium without trying too hard to stand out.
That said, a few smaller changes do affect usability. The bezels are slightly thinner now, which improves the overall look, but also makes it a bit trickier to hold. I noticed that I had to be more mindful of my grip, especially when using it for extended periods.
There is also a practical shift with the pogo pins. They have been moved to the top edge, away from the camera module. It is a small change, but it alters how the keyboard connects and means older accessories are no longer compatible.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 display: Excellent, but playing it safe</h2>
The OnePlus Pad 4 sticks with a display setup that already worked well, and that decision defines the experience here.
You are looking at a 13.2-inch panel with a 3.4K resolution, backed by a 144Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision support, and 12-bit colour processing. The 7:5 aspect ratio also carries forward, and I still find it one of the most practical layouts for a tablet, especially when you are switching between work and entertainment.
In actual use, it does not disappoint. Text looks crisp, animations feel smooth, and the size makes it comfortable for both content consumption and productivity. I found the aspect ratio particularly useful while multitasking, since it gives apps more breathing room.
Brightness has been nudged up to 1000 nits in high brightness mode. It helps outdoors, but the difference is subtle unless you are under strong sunlight.
Where it falls a bit short is ambition. At this price, I expected a move to AMOLED. This panel is still solid, but deeper blacks, stronger contrast, and better HDR would have made the upgrade feel more meaningful.
It feels reliable, just not new.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 performance: Faster and more consistent in practice</h2>
The biggest change with the OnePlus Pad 4 sits under the hood. It runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and on paper, that is a sizeable upgrade. OnePlus is claiming around a 42% jump in benchmark performance, with AnTuTu scores going past 4.1 million, along with gains in both CPU and GPU efficiency.
In real-world use, though, this is not the kind of upgrade that hits you instantly. The previous model was already quick enough for most tablet use cases. Apps opened without delay, multitasking felt fluid, and even heavier workloads rarely pushed it to its limits.
Where things start to shift is over time. The Pad 4 feels more consistent. Thanks to an improved cooling system and a larger vapour chamber, it is better at maintaining performance during longer sessions. I noticed that it holds its pace when juggling multiple apps or using it continuously, and it does not build up noticeable heat.
Memory and storage have also been refined. You get 8GB or 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, paired with 256GB or 512GB of UFS 4.1 storage. The move to UFS 4.1 may seem minor, but it helps with quicker file transfers and smoother app loading over time.
Interestingly, the previous model went up to 16GB of RAM, but used UFS 4.0 storage. In practice, both feel fast, but the Pad 4 feels tuned for sustained performance rather than short bursts.
Connectivity stays mostly the same, with Wi-Fi 7 and USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C. The only real upgrade is Bluetooth 6.0 over Bluetooth 5.4. There is still no cellular option, though using it with a 5G hotspot worked reliably in my experience.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 audio: Reliable, immersive, and hard to fault</h2>
Audio remains a clear highlight on the OnePlus Pad 4, and OnePlus hasn&rsquo;t tried to fix what wasn&rsquo;t broken.
You still get an eight-speaker system, combining woofers and tweeters placed evenly on both sides. In use, the output feels rich and well-balanced, whether you are watching videos or just playing music in the background. It does not feel thin or uneven, which is often the case with tablets.
One thing that stood out to me is how well it adapts. The tablet adjusts its audio channels based on how you hold it, so the sound stays properly aligned even when you rotate it. It is a small touch, but it makes the experience feel more polished.
Volume is also more than enough to fill a room, and even at higher levels, the sound stays clean without turning harsh.
Overall, this is one area where OnePlus has simply maintained a strong baseline, and that works in its favour.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 cameras: Basic tools, nothing beyond that</h2>
Cameras on the OnePlus Pad 4 follow the usual tablet playbook.
You get a 13MP rear sensor and an 8MP front camera, and in my use, both handled everyday tasks without any fuss. They are dependable, but clearly not a focus area.
The rear camera works well enough for scanning documents or grabbing a quick shot when your phone is not nearby. The front camera is more relevant here, with support for 1080p video. I used it for calls and meetings, and it stayed consistent with no major issues.
Beyond that, there is not much to talk about. This is not a device meant for photography, and it does not try to be one.
Like most tablets, the cameras are simply there when you need them, and easy to forget about otherwise.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 software: Clearly built with productivity in mind</h2>
With the OnePlus Pad 4, the real change is not the hardware, it is the direction. OnePlus is clearly pushing this tablet toward getting actual work done.
It runs OxygenOS 16, and the experience leans heavily into multitasking. You can open multiple apps, resize windows more freely, and move between tasks in a way that feels closer to a lightweight desktop than a typical tablet. I found this especially noticeable during longer work sessions.
A big part of that comes from Open Canvas. It lets you place apps side by side and even extend them beyond the screen, so you can swipe between them instead of squeezing everything into one view. In practice, it feels more natural than standard split-screen and makes better use of the large display.
Multitasking overall is more flexible. You can have up to five apps open at once, depending on how you set things up, and switching between them stays smooth and predictable. It is not quite a full desktop replacement, but it gets closer than most Android tablets.
File handling has also improved. Drag-and-drop feels more reliable, and external storage support makes managing files less restrictive. It is still not perfect, but it is usable enough that I did not feel limited.
There is also tighter cross-device integration. You can use it as a second screen, and file transfers feel quicker and more seamless.
OnePlus has added AI tools like AI Writer and AI Summary, but in my use, they feel more like occasional helpers. The promise of three Android updates and four years of security patches does add some long-term confidence.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 battery: Slightly bigger, a bit more dependable</h2>
Battery is one area where the OnePlus Pad 4 makes a simpler improvement rather than a headline jump.
It now comes with a 13,380mAh battery, which is a step up from before. On paper, OnePlus talks about up to 20 hours of video playback along with longer standby times. In my usage, it comfortably handled a full day that included streaming, browsing, and some work without needing a top-up.
The upgrade is not dramatic, but it is easy to notice over time. Compared to the earlier model, this one feels a bit more relaxed with its battery behaviour. I found myself worrying less about plugging it in midway through the day.
Charging, however, stays unchanged. You still get 80W SUPERVOOC, and a full charge takes a little over 90 minutes. It is fast enough, just not faster than before.
Overall, this fits the tablet&rsquo;s theme, a small but useful step forward in everyday reliability.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 accessories: Promising direction, but not fully there yet</h2>
Right now, the accessory ecosystem around the OnePlus Pad 4 feels like it is still coming together.
The Stylo Pro is the most complete piece right now, and it is a clear step up. With 16,000 levels of pressure sensitivity, it feels more accurate and natural, especially for writing or sketching. I also like that OnePlus has added interchangeable tips this time. They slightly change the feel depending on how you use it, which is something regular stylus users will appreciate.
Beyond that, things are still taking shape. OnePlus has confirmed a new keyboard, but there is no clear timeline yet, so it is not something you can really factor into your buying decision at the moment.
There is also a new folio case, though I did not get to try it with my unit, so I cannot comment on how it holds up in real use.
Right now, the intent is clear, but the full ecosystem does not feel fully in place yet.
<h2>OnePlus Pad 4 verdict: A polished upgrade that&rsquo;s still evolving</h2>
The OnePlus Pad 4 is clearly a step ahead of the Pad 3, but it is not a dramatic shift.
Performance feels steadier over time, battery life stretches a bit further, and the overall experience comes across as more refined. At the same time, it does not fundamentally change how the tablet feels in everyday use. The display remains excellent but largely unchanged, and the design feels cleaner without being completely reworked. Much of what works here is built on an already solid foundation.
Where things feel slightly unfinished is with the accessories. OnePlus is clearly aiming for a more complete, laptop-style setup, but that vision is not fully realised yet. That puts the Pad 4 in an interesting spot as a strong, but somewhat transitional update.
If you are buying a tablet today, this is the more forward-looking option. It feels better aligned with where OnePlus is heading.
If you already own the Pad 3, though, the upgrade is not urgent.
What you get here is a more mature version of the same idea, one that prioritises consistency over quick impressions.

The Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro packs AMOLED, strong battery, and real performance. A premium thin-and-light that gets surprisingly close to MacBook Pro.

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: A True MacBook Rival?

<h3 data-start="596" data-end="747">Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro delivers AMOLED, strong performance, and long battery life in a premium thin-and-light that rivals the MacBook Pro experience.</h3>

The thin-and-light category is packed right now, and most machines here don&rsquo;t try very hard to stand out. They lean on the same core ideas: keep things slim, stay portable, offer just enough power for everyday work, and deliver battery life that gets you through the day. The Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro doesn&rsquo;t exactly break away from that template, but it does try to stretch it by addressing some of the typical compromises, especially around performance, that usually come with ultra-portable machines
That added ambition shows up clearly in the pricing. The 14-inch base model, equipped with 16GB RAM, 512GB storage, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 325 processor, starts at ₹1,69,990. That already pushes it into the premium bracket. The variant I tested, also a 14-inch model, goes further with an Intel Core Ultra 7 358H chip, 32GB RAM, and 1TB storage, priced at ₹2,14,990.
At this level, just delivering on design and performance is not enough. Buyers expect a more complete experience, especially when it comes to ecosystem features, something devices like the Apple MacBook Pro have consistently done well.&nbsp;
So the real question is simple: does this machine justify what it asks for?
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Design</h2>
The first thing that hits you with the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro is just how effortlessly portable it feels. The 14-inch variant I tested measures only 11.6mm in thickness and tips the scales at a little over 1.2kg. For a machine that is also chasing strong performance and solid battery life, that balance is genuinely impressive.&nbsp;
In everyday use, that slim profile translates into real convenience. Sliding it into a backpack never feels like a burden, and on days when I was hopping on the Metro, it barely registered as extra weight.
Samsung has gone with an aluminium build, and the moment you pick it up, the premium feel is obvious. It feels rigid and well put together. That said, I did notice a small ergonomic quirk. The wrist rest tapers into a slightly sharper edge than I would like, and during longer typing sessions, it occasionally presses into my wrists. It is not a major issue, but it is something I kept becoming aware of over time.
Port selection is fairly well thought out. On the left side, there are two USB-C Thunderbolt 4 ports, alongside a full-sized HDMI 2.1 port capable of outputting up to 8K at 60Hz or 5K at 120Hz, which is great for high-resolution external displays.&nbsp;
On the right, you get a 3.5mm combo audio jack and a USB 3.2 Type-A port. However, I do feel the absence of an SD card slot on this 14-inch model, especially given the Pro branding.
Turn the laptop over, and you will notice rubber feet that provide grip and a slight lift, bottom-firing speakers positioned along the edges, and an intake vent near the top. The exhaust is placed along the rear hinge, keeping heat away from the sides, which works well in practice.
The lid keeps things minimal and clean, and Samsung says it has refined the hinge mechanism. I did find the opening and closing action smoother overall, although it still snaps shut slightly towards the end. There is a bit of wobble, but even when typing quickly or using the touchscreen, the display remains stable.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Display</h2>
My test unit of the Galaxy Book6 Pro came with a 14-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a 3K resolution of 2880 x 1800, and it is one of those displays that immediately grabs your attention. It is also a touchscreen with support for up to 10 simultaneous inputs, and I found myself instinctively tapping, scrolling, and interacting with it far more than I initially expected.
What really stands out is how vibrant everything looks. Colours do not just appear accurate, they have a certain richness that makes content feel more engaging. The panel runs at 120Hz and can dynamically shift between 30Hz and 120Hz depending on usage. In practice, this means smoother animations and scrolling when needed, while quietly conserving battery when things are static.
Samsung has also included VESA DisplayHDR True Black 1000 certification, with peak brightness going up to 1000 nits in HDR and around 500 nits in SDR. Combined with the deep blacks AMOLED panels are known for, contrast levels here are excellent, and HDR content looks properly tuned.
The high resolution on a relatively compact 14-inch screen ensures everything appears sharp and detailed. It covers 100 per cent of the DCI-P3 colour gamut and exceeds 100 per cent of sRGB, so for workloads involving Photoshop or DaVinci Resolve, it holds up comfortably. Samsung&rsquo;s Vision Booster is also present, adjusting brightness, contrast, and colours based on ambient conditions. It works subtly in the background, but it does make a difference over time.
The 16:10 aspect ratio gives you more vertical space, which is especially useful for documents and spreadsheets. Bezels are slim, though not the thinnest, and the bottom chin is slightly thicker with a discreet Samsung logo.
This is still a glossy panel, but Gorilla Glass with DXC coating helps reduce reflections. It is not completely glare-free, but it remains usable in most lighting conditions.
All things considered, this is a display that feels premium and performs reliably, whether you are working or just watching content.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Speakers and Webcam </h2>
The Speakers and the webcam are not where the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro tries to steal the spotlight, and that becomes clear pretty quickly. The 14-inch model uses bottom-firing stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support. They deliver decent volume and a bit of richness, but they stop short of feeling exceptional.
That said, they are far from disappointing. For everyday scenarios like streaming shows, hopping on calls, or casual music playback, they hold up just fine. Most users will find them perfect for almost all of their day-to-day stuff.&nbsp;
The issue is more about expectations. When a laptop gets so many other things right, you start hoping for audio that stands out as well, and here it feels like Samsung has chosen to stay within safe limits.
The webcam is where the compromise is easier to spot. You are looking at a 2MP sensor that records in 1080p, which feels a bit basic for a premium device in 2026. I honestly was hoping to see an 1440p sensor. It works decently well for meetings and video calls, so functionality is not a concern. You also get access to Windows Studio Effects such as auto framing, eye contact, and background blur, which help clean things up and make calls feel more polished.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Keyboard and Touchpad</h2>
Samsung has largely carried forward the keyboard setup from its previous Galaxy Book lineups, and that is not a bad thing. On the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro, typing still feels comfortable and well thought out. The keycaps are generously sized, spacing is just right, and long writing sessions never feel cramped. There is also white backlighting that shines cleanly through the legends, so working in dim environments is handled without any fuss.
The keys themselves do not travel very deep and bottom out fairly quickly, which means you can type very fast on the keyboard. They feel tactile enough, although faster typing can make them a bit noisy. What stood out more to me was the stiffness. Even after writing somewhere between 20,000 and 30,000 words, I never completely warmed up to that firmness. Some people might actually like that slightly resistant feel, but for me, it remained a small irritation.
The touchpad, however, is where things come together beautifully. It is spacious, smooth to the touch, and consistently responsive. Navigation feels effortless, palm rejection works reliably, and the haptic feedback is evenly tuned across the surface.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Performance and Benchmarks</h2>
I went into testing the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro expecting typical thin-and-light behaviour, efficient, quick, but not exactly powerful. That assumption did not last long. This machine ended up delivering far more performance than I had anticipated.
Powering it is Intel&rsquo;s Panther Lake platform, and my unit came equipped with the Core Ultra X7 358H. It is a 16-core processor with a mix of 8 efficiency cores, 4 performance cores, and 4 low-power efficiency cores, capable of boosting up to 4.8GHz within a 25W to 80W power range. In real-world usage, the way it balances efficiency and performance stands out. It is not chasing outright dominance, but for most workloads, it never feels like it is holding you back.
Here is how it performed in CPU benchmarks like Cinebench and Geekbench.&nbsp;
In Cinebench R23, it scored 1954 in single-core and 13587 in multi-core. Cinebench 2026 returned 480 for single-core and 3488 for multi-core.&nbsp;
Geekbench results were 2779 in single-core and 16546 in multi-core. For graphics, the OpenCL test on Geekbench delivered a score of 55920.
Numbers aside, what matters is how it behaves in actual work. I pushed it through fairly demanding tasks. Photoshop handled large PSD files with multiple layers without slowing down. In Premiere Pro, a complex 1080p timeline with multiple effects played smoothly without any stutter.&nbsp;
Even in PugetBench, it held its ground with a score of 33604 in Premiere Pro and 8462 in Photoshop, which is impressive for a device in this class.
AI performance is another area where this laptop quietly flexes. With a dedicated NPU capable of up to 50 TOPS, a lot of AI-driven tasks can run directly on the device without needing an internet connection.&nbsp;
That said, if your workflow involves running large language models locally, stepping up to something like the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra with a dedicated GPU would make more sense. As for graphics, the integrated Intel Arc GPU performed better than expected.
Out of curiosity, I even tried gaming. This is not built as a gaming machine, but it can hold its own if you tweak settings.&nbsp;
In Black Myth: Wukong, running at 2880 x 1800 on low settings, I saw around 44FPS without frame generation. Dropping to 1080p and enabling frame generation pushed it to a much smoother 70 to 75FPS.
I also tested a few more titles at 1080p on low settings. Cyberpunk 2077 averaged 88FPS, Ghost of Tsushima came in at 103FPS, and Valorant on high settings ran at 210FPS. For a thin-and-light laptop, that is more than enough if you just want to unwind with some casual gaming.
Thermals are handled well, too. Even during longer benchmark runs and gaming sessions, the laptop stayed relatively cool. The upper section of the keyboard did get a bit warm, but nothing uncomfortable. Samsung&rsquo;s updated vapour chamber cooling and improved fan design clearly make a difference.
Fan noise is another pleasant surprise. Whether I was running benchmarks or gaming, the fans stayed extremely quiet. In fact, I had to bring the laptop close to my ear during testing just to confirm that they were spinning.
This is not a laptop you buy primarily for gaming, but that is not the point. For professionals, creators, or anyone constantly on the move, it delivers strong, reliable performance, with the added bonus that it can handle a bit of gaming when you need a break.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Software and Galaxy AI</h2>
Running on Windows 11, the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro delivers a familiar experience, but not without its usual Windows quirks. Updates can still feel intrusive, often popping up at inconvenient moments and pushing their way through, which is more down to Microsoft than anything Samsung is doing here. There is also a strong push towards Microsoft Copilot, and while some of its features are genuinely useful, others feel less essential in day-to-day use.
Where this machine starts to differentiate itself is through Samsung&rsquo;s ecosystem layer. If you are already using Galaxy devices, the experience changes quite noticeably. Pairing it with something like the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra unlocks features that feel seamless rather than forced. You can use your phone as a webcam, extend or mirror your display, and move files or clipboard content between devices almost instantly. That level of integration makes everyday workflows feel smoother.
If you are already on a Galaxy S series phone, or even using a Fold or Flip, these features feel polished and reliable.
On the AI front, alongside the standard Copilot tools, Samsung&rsquo;s Galaxy AI suite feels more practical in real use. Features like photo editing, writing assistance, and translation are here, but AI Search stood out the most. Being able to describe a file and have the system locate it quickly is genuinely useful.
There are also smaller conveniences baked in. You can ask Galaxy AI to adjust settings like display vibrancy, and it handles it without digging through menus.
None of these features is revolutionary on its own, but together, they make the overall experience feel more connected, responsive, and intuitive.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Battery life and Charging</h2>
Battery life ended up being one of the most impressive parts of the Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro, especially considering how slim and portable it is. Samsung has managed to fit in a 67.18Wh battery, and in real-world use, that capacity translates into consistently strong endurance.
In my usage, with the system set to best performance mode and brightness hovering between 50 and 55 per cent, the laptop regularly delivered around 14 to 15 hours of screen-on time. That figure does fall well short of the 30 hours Samsung advertises, but in practical terms, it still means most users can comfortably stretch this across two days without needing to reach for a charger.
What makes this more impressive is the category it sits in. Thin-and-light laptops with this level of performance usually struggle to go much beyond 4 to 5 hours. Here, thanks to the efficiency improvements brought in by Intel&rsquo;s Panther Lake chips, that limitation feels largely overcome.
Charging is handled through a 65W USB-C adapter, which is compact enough to carry around easily and can double up for charging other devices. Going from zero to full takes roughly between 1 hour 20 minutes and 1 hour 30 minutes. If you are in a hurry, plugging it in for about 30 minutes gets you close to 40 to 45 per cent, which is enough to keep you going for several more hours.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro Review: Verdict</h2>
The Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro is clearly stepping into territory dominated by the Apple MacBook Pro, and after using it for a while, it is evident that it is not out of place there. What impressed me most is how naturally it brings together performance, portability, and battery life without making it feel like a compromise-driven package.
It also holds its own when it comes to ecosystem and features. Samsung&rsquo;s integrations feel mature enough to go up against Apple&rsquo;s tightly knit ecosystem, and that shows in everyday use.&nbsp;
Plus, whether I was editing photos, scrubbing through video timelines, or juggling multiple apps at once, the experience remained smooth and consistent. The AMOLED display only elevates things further, making both work and entertainment feel equally engaging.
Battery performance is another strong point. It handled long workdays comfortably in my usage, and the fast charging meant I was rarely waiting around for it to top up.
This is not positioned as a gaming machine, and it does not need to be. For professionals, creators, and anyone looking for a premium, dependable laptop on the move, it makes a very strong case for itself, getting closer to the MacBook Pro experience than most Windows laptops manage.

Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch review covering display, brightness, gaming, audio, and smart features. Is this the best Mini LED TV under ₹75K?

Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65 Review: Best Value Mini LED TV?

From Mini LED contrast to Dolby Vision performance, here’s how the Xiaomi TV S 65-inch performs in real-world use, gaming, and everyday viewing.

<div class="" data-turn-id-container="ef56ac8d-66b1-4e9d-8eaa-d4d0e0684275" data-is-intersecting="true">&nbsp;</div>
<div class="" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:87dfaab3-4398-4258-be8a-666dbe3e1416-1" data-is-intersecting="true">
<section class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-WEB:87dfaab3-4398-4258-be8a-666dbe3e1416-1" data-testid="conversation-turn-4" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn="assistant">
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(--spacing)*4))] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(--spacing)*6))] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(--spacing)*16))] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col gap-4 grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal outline-none keyboard-focused:focus-ring [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" tabindex="0" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="ca8eaee7-e88a-44de-b28c-d13c039edb04" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-3" data-turn-start-message="true">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full wrap-break-word light markdown-new-styling">
Mini LED brilliance meets solid performance in the Xiaomi TV S 65-inch. With strong brightness, great contrast, and smooth smart features, it delivers a premium viewing experience at a competitive price, despite minor trade-offs.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</div>

There&rsquo;s a very specific moment when you upgrade to a bigger TV. You sit down thinking you&rsquo;ll just check something quickly, and suddenly two hours have passed. The frame feels wider, details start showing up in places you never noticed before, and content you&rsquo;ve already watched somehow feels new again.
That&rsquo;s pretty much what happened when I set up the Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch in my living room.
Part of what makes this TV interesting is where it sits in the market. Pricing starts at ₹51,999 for the 55-inch model, ₹71,999 for the 65-inch, and ₹99,999 for the 75-inch. At that price, you&rsquo;re usually looking at QLED options, not Mini LED with this kind of hardware.
So the real question is simple... Is it actually any good or just another spec-heavy TV that looks better on paper than in your room? That&rsquo;s what I wanted to find out.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: Design &amp; Connectivity</h2>
The design isn&rsquo;t trying to win awards, and I think that&rsquo;s intentional. The bezels are slim enough that they disappear once you start watching something, while the metal frame gives it just enough structure to feel solid without drawing attention to itself.
Yes, the back and stands are plastic, and you do notice that when you&rsquo;re setting it up. But once it&rsquo;s in place, it fades into the background completely, which is exactly what you want from something that&rsquo;s meant to be watched, not admired.
I also appreciated the flexibility with the stand. You can keep it centered if your TV unit is narrow or move the legs outward if you have more space. It&rsquo;s not something you think about every day, but when you&rsquo;re setting it up, it makes life easier.
You get three HDMI ports (including one with eARC), USB ports, Ethernet, optical audio out, Bluetooth 5.0, and dual-band Wi-Fi.
In practical terms, that means you can hook up a console, soundbar, and set-top box without juggling cables constantly.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: Display &amp; Picture Quality</h2>
On paper, you&rsquo;re getting a QD-Mini LED panel with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2160), and roughly 384&ndash;392 local dimming zones depending on the variant.
That&rsquo;s one of those specs that doesn&rsquo;t mean much until you actually see it working.
The difference shows up in contrast, especially in scenes where bright and dark elements exist together. I went back to watching The Batman, mostly because it&rsquo;s a nightmare for most TVs. Dark scenes, subtle lighting, a lot of shadow detail. On a typical LED panel, blacks tend to look washed out, like the TV can&rsquo;t fully commit to being dark.
Here, things felt more controlled. Shadows had depth, highlights stayed contained, and the overall image looked more intentional. It&rsquo;s not OLED-level black, but it gets close enough that you stop thinking about it after a while.
The next day, I switched to an IPL match, and the TV felt like it had completely changed its personality. Bright stadium lights, fast camera pans, and vivid greens all looked lively without feeling exaggerated. That balance is what stood out to me.
HDR content is where this panel really stretches.It supports Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and HLG, and with peak brightness going up to around 1200 nits, highlights feel punchy without becoming overwhelming.
At the same time, the 94% DCI-P3 color gamut helps keep colors rich without tipping into oversaturation, which is something you notice more over time than in the first five minutes.
The panel runs at a native 60Hz but uses DLG and MEMC to push things up to a perceived 120Hz when needed.
In real-world use, that translates to smoother motion during sports and gaming without things looking artificially processed.
I&rsquo;m not a heavy gamer, but I did plug in a console. The TV supports ALLM, so it automatically switches to low latency mode, and there&rsquo;s a Game Boost mode that helps with smoother visuals.
It&rsquo;s not a full high-end gaming display, but for casual use, it feels responsive enough.
There&rsquo;s also a light sensor built in, and paired with adaptive brightness and color temperature adjustments, the TV subtly changes how it looks based on your room lighting.
During the day, it boosts brightness to stay visible, and at night, it tones things down. It&rsquo;s not something you actively think about, but after a few days, you realise you haven&rsquo;t touched the settings at all.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: Audio Performance</h2>
You&rsquo;re getting a 34W quad-speaker setup with Dolby Audio, DTS:X, and DTS Virtual:X support.
For everyday use, it works well. Dialogue is clear, volume is more than enough, and the tuning is decent for casual watching.
But when you switch to movies or live sports, you start wanting more depth. It doesn&rsquo;t quite deliver that room-filling immersion, which makes a soundbar feel like a natural upgrade.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: Software &amp; Smart Features</h2>
The TV runs on Google TV with <a title="Xiaomi 17 Ultra Review: The Camera Phone to Beat in 2026" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/xiaomi-17-ultra-review-the-camera-phone-to-beat-in-2026-1773215036737" target="_blank">Xiaomi</a>&rsquo;s PatchWall layered on top, backed by a quad-core processor, 2GB RAM, and 32GB storage.
In day-to-day use, it feels smooth enough. Apps open quickly, navigation is straightforward, and everything from Netflix to YouTube works as expected.
PatchWall ended up being more useful than I expected, especially for cross-platform content discovery.
Casting is seamless too, with support for Chromecast, AirPlay, and Miracast, so switching between devices feels effortless.
The only limitation is the RAM. For normal use, it&rsquo;s fine, but if you&rsquo;re jumping between multiple apps frequently, you might notice the occasional slowdown.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: What I Didn&rsquo;t Like</h2>
There aren&rsquo;t any major flaws here, but there are a few compromises worth mentioning.
The plastic stand and back panel feel a bit basic during setup. The 2GB RAM can occasionally feel limiting if you&rsquo;re pushing the system harder than usual. And while the audio is good, it doesn&rsquo;t quite match the quality of the display.
None of these take away from the core experience, but they do define where the trade-offs are.
<h2>Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch Review: Verdict</h2>
The Xiaomi TV S Mini LED 65-inch isn&rsquo;t trying to reinvent the TV experience. It&rsquo;s simply trying to deliver a really good one at a price where you&rsquo;d usually expect more compromises.
And for the most part, it succeeds. You&rsquo;re getting Mini LED with precise dimming, strong brightness, <a title="Vu Premium 4K TV launched in India with Dolby Vision, HDR10" href="https://www.editorji.com/story/vu-premium-4k-tv-launched-in-india-with-dolby-vision-hdr10-1583999391016" target="_blank">Dolby Vision</a> support, solid connectivity, and a software experience that mostly stays out of your way.
Yes, there are trade-offs. But when you sit down and start watching, those details fade quickly. And that, more than anything, tells you this TV is doing something right.

Under Armour Velociti Distance review: a long-distance running shoe with firm cushioning, stable ride, and breathable upper built for Indian conditions. High-visibility colour enhances safety, making it ideal for night and low-light runs.

Under Armour Velociti Distance Review: Built for the Long Run

Under Armour Velociti Distance review: a long-distance running shoe with firm cushioning, stable ride, and breathable upper built for Indian conditions. High-visibility colour enhances safety, making it ideal for night and low-light runs.

There&rsquo;s a certain kind of running shoe that tries to impress you in the first five minutes. It&rsquo;s soft, bouncy, borderline theatrical. You step in and immediately feel like you&rsquo;ve unlocked some cheat code.
And then there&rsquo;s the other kind. The ones that don&rsquo;t bother with a first impression. They wait. They reveal themselves over kilometres, not steps.
The Velociti Distance from Under Armour sits firmly in that second camp.
I&rsquo;ve been using the UK 12 unit for a mix of runs around Delhi, and if there&rsquo;s one thing this shoe makes clear, it&rsquo;s that it wasn&rsquo;t designed for a highlight reel. It was built for repetition. For routine.
For the kind of running most people actually do in India, which is less about chasing records and more about surviving the weekly grind.
<h2>The Context: Why This Shoe Exists</h2>
Under Armour&rsquo;s Velociti lineup is their attempt at building a complete running ecosystem, not just a one-hit wonder. Instead of one &ldquo;do-it-all&rdquo; shoe, they&rsquo;ve split roles across five models, each tuned for a different kind of run.
The Distance sits right in the middle of that universe as the long-run specialist. And that positioning matters, because long runs in Delhi are not the same as long runs in Boston.
You&rsquo;re dodging broken pavements, navigating traffic, dealing with heat that feels like it&rsquo;s pressing down on your lungs, and often running at odd hours just to avoid all of that. A shoe here doesn&rsquo;t just need performance. It needs resilience.
<h2>First Impressions: Impossible to Ignore</h2>
Out of the box, the Velociti Distance doesn&rsquo;t try to seduce you. It&rsquo;s chunky, a bit loud depending on the colourway, and that thick HOVR+ foam midsole is impossible to ignore.
And then there&rsquo;s the colour. The hi-vis yellow accents, especially on the midsole, don&rsquo;t just stand out, they practically glow. It&rsquo;s the kind of shade that feels like it belongs on construction sites, high-speed race cars, or anything that absolutely cannot afford to go unnoticed.
In daylight, it&rsquo;s bold. In low light, it becomes functional. This is where the design stops being about aesthetics and starts being about utility.
Evening and early morning runs in India often come with poor visibility, patchy street lighting, and traffic that isn&rsquo;t exactly forgiving. That bright colourway adds an extra layer of visibility that you don&rsquo;t fully appreciate until you&rsquo;re out on the road after sunset.
Cars notice you sooner. Bikes give you a bit more space. Even other runners clock you from a distance.
It&rsquo;s not reflective in the technical sense, but the sheer brightness does a surprising amount of heavy lifting. It turns the shoe into a kind of moving highlighter on the road, which, in Indian running conditions, is more useful than it sounds.
<h2>The Fit and Upper: Built for Indian Conditions</h2>
Sliding my feet into the UK 12 told a slightly different story than the bold exterior suggests. The fit is surprisingly accommodating.
There&rsquo;s enough room in the forefoot to avoid that cramped feeling a lot of performance shoes tend to have, which is a relief if you&rsquo;re someone whose feet swell during longer runs.
The heel and ankle area feel structured, almost like the shoe is gently locking you in place and saying, &ldquo;I&rsquo;ve got you.&rdquo;
The upper deserves a mention here. The translucent mono mesh is not just a design flex. In Delhi&rsquo;s weather, where a morning run can still feel like you&rsquo;re jogging through warm air soup, breathability becomes non-negotiable.
This upper actually delivers. My feet stayed relatively cool even on longer runs, which is more than I can say for a lot of shoes in this category.
<h2>The Ride: A Study in Restraint</h2>
The first run in the Velociti Distance is slightly confusing. Not bad, just&hellip; underwhelming. You don&rsquo;t get that instant bounce or plushness that many modern foams are engineered to provide. Instead, the ride feels firm, controlled, and very grounded.
That&rsquo;s the HOVR+ foam doing its thing. Over a few runs, you start to understand what Under Armour is aiming for. This is not a shoe that wants to propel you forward aggressively. It&rsquo;s a shoe that wants to keep you stable, reduce impact, and let you tick off kilometres without drama.
There&rsquo;s a certain honesty to it. Even broader testing aligns with this impression. The cushioning leans more towards firm than soft, and while it provides solid support, it doesn&rsquo;t offer the kind of bounce or energy return that more aggressive trainers do . You feel planted rather than spring-loaded.
And in a weird way, that works. Because not every run needs to feel like a race.
<h2>Long Runs: Where It Finally Clicks</h2>
It took me about three runs to really understand this shoe. The turning point came during a longer session, somewhere around the 10 to 11 kilometre mark, where shoes usually start revealing their true personality.
That&rsquo;s when the Velociti Distance started making sense. The extra foam in the heel genuinely helps with impact. There&rsquo;s a noticeable reduction in that dull, creeping fatigue you feel in your knees and hips after sustained running.
It&rsquo;s not flashy, but it&rsquo;s effective. The kind of benefit you don&rsquo;t notice immediately, but definitely feel later in the day.
The stability also plays a big role here. Indian roads are unpredictable, and having a shoe that keeps your foot steady without overcorrecting is a huge advantage.
The frame and overall construction give you that sense of security, especially when your form starts to break down towards the end of a run. It&rsquo;s not exciting, but it&rsquo;s reassuring.
<h2>Daily Training: A Reliable Companion</h2>
Using this as a daily trainer highlights its strengths even more. This is a shoe that thrives on routine. Easy runs, recovery runs, steady-state efforts. It doesn&rsquo;t complain, doesn&rsquo;t demand attention, and doesn&rsquo;t try to do too much.
There&rsquo;s a certain predictability to it that becomes comforting over time.
In a market where a lot of shoes are trying to be everything at once, the Velociti Distance sticks to its role. It knows what it&rsquo;s built for, and it doesn&rsquo;t stray from that.
That said, if you try to push the pace, the limitations become clear. The lack of bounce and propulsion means you&rsquo;re doing most of the work yourself. It&rsquo;s not going to give you that extra kick when you want to pick up speed.
<h2>Verdict</h2>
At ₹16,999, the Under Armour's aren't cheap by any means. This price bracket is crowded with options that offer softer cushioning, lighter builds, and more energetic rides. Shoes that feel more versatile and, frankly, more fun. So the question becomes, why pick this?&nbsp;
The answer lies in what you value as a runner. If you&rsquo;re someone who prioritises comfort over long distances, stability over speed, and durability over flash, the Velociti Distance starts to make sense. It&rsquo;s built for consistency, not excitement.
And in India, where running conditions are far from ideal, that consistency can be more valuable than a few extra percentage points of energy return. After spending more time with the shoe, what stood out wasn&rsquo;t any one feature. It was the absence of problems.
No hotspots. No instability. No moments where the shoe felt like it was working against me. It&rsquo;s the kind of shoe you stop thinking about, which, in the world of running, is often the highest compliment.
The weight, which feels noticeable initially, fades into the background over longer runs. The firmness, which might feel slightly disappointing at first, starts to feel like a deliberate choice rather than a limitation.
It&rsquo;s not trying to impress you in the moment. It&rsquo;s trying to support you over time.

The Vivo T5 Pro packs a massive 9020mAh battery with solid performance and smooth UI. But does it compromise on camera and power? Full review inside.

Vivo T5 Pro Review: 9020mAh Battery Beast With Solid Performance

With a 9020mAh battery, smooth performance, and cool thermals, the Vivo T5 Pro is built for endurance—but comes with a few trade-offs.

The Vivo T5 Pro offers a massive 9020mAh battery with smooth performance and great thermals. However, it compromises on camera versatility and doesn&rsquo;t deliver top-tier power for its price.

I just finished a week-long stint using the Glacier Blue Vivo T5 Pro as my primary device. Right off the bat, this doesn&rsquo;t feel like just another boring seasonal refresh. It feels like Vivo is trying to see exactly how much juice they can shove into a phone without making it feel like a literal brick.
Most brands are currently playing it safe with 6,500mAh or 7,000mAh tanks. Vivo, however, decided to cross the 9,020mAh line. It isn&rsquo;t the largest though; the crown is still held by Realme P4 Power with a 10001mAh battery. But, it is a bold move that puts the T5 Pro in a very small category of hardware.&nbsp;
Throughout my testing, I kept looking for the catch. Usually, a battery this big means the phone is either too heavy to hold or the performance takes a hit to save power. For ₹29,999, the 8GB and 128GB model makes a strong argument on paper, but I wanted to see if the actual user experience holds up under heavy daily use.
<h2>Unboxing &amp; Design</h2>
Opening a Vivo box is a bit like a comfort ritual at this point. Unlike many brands that now ship empty-feeling boxes, Vivo still gives you the full kit. Inside the T5 Pro packaging, you actually find the essentials: a decent TPU case, the SIM tool, and the charging cable. The best part is the 90W Flash charge brick is still included, so you won't be scrolling through Amazon for a compatible adapter on day one.
While you can grab this in Sleek Black, the Glacier Blue unit I&rsquo;ve been using is the real standout. It has this icy, shifting look that honestly looks great when the light hits it. The back panel uses a new matte texture with a faint wave pattern that feels smooth but grippy. Even though the frame is plastic, it doesn't feel like a budget phone, and it is surprisingly good at keeping those nasty fingerprint smudges away.
The design itself is pretty minimal. The cameras live in a pill-shaped island with two big lenses stacked on top of each other. There is some nice metallic detailing around the housing that gives it a bit of a premium touch, very similar to what we saw on the <a title="Vivo V70 FE Review: Style Meets Serious Battery Power" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/vivo-v70-fe-review-style-meets-serious-battery-power-1775122467551" target="_blank">V70 FE.</a>
In terms of the physical layout, all the buttons sit on the right side, leaving the left edge completely flat. It has dual speakers and a USB-C port at the bottom, but keep in mind that the SIM tray doesn't have a spot for an SD card. I&rsquo;m a big fan of the move to a flat screen here. It feels much more secure in your hand during a long gaming session compared to those slippery curved displays. It is also tough, coming with IP68 and IP69 ratings to handle water and dust.
The weight is the biggest change. It went from 192g on the T4 Pro up to 213g. Honestly, I think that is a small price to pay for a 9,020mAh battery. Even with that massive cell, it is only 8.25mm thick. It is well-balanced, but you will definitely feel that extra weight if you're coming from a lighter device.
<h2>Display</h2>
A phone's display can really make or break the whole experience. Vivo clearly knew this when they picked the 6.83-inch 1.5K AMOLED panel for the T5 Pro. It looks great as soon as you wake it up. While it might not be the most premium glass on the market, it fits perfectly for a phone at this price point.
I&rsquo;ve said it before, but moving to a completely flat screen is such a massive relief. I&rsquo;m honestly over curved displays. They look fancy in renders but are a nightmare for accidental touches and finding screen protectors that actually stay on. This flat glass makes every tap feel more deliberate and simple.
The bezels are quite thin, so watching videos feels really immersive. The color tuning is solid too. It&rsquo;s vibrant and bright without looking like an over-saturated neon mess. Now, the box says 144Hz, but the reality is a bit different. Most apps and even the UI seem to stay at 120Hz. I didn't see it hit that 144Hz peak during my gaming tests either.
Brightness is where the T5 Pro really smokes the older <a title="Vivo T4 Pro Review: All-round performance with epic battery &amp; cameras" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/vivo-t4-pro-review-all-round-performance-with-epic-battery-cameras-1757937579734" target="_blank">T4 Pro</a>. It goes up to 2000 nits in high brightness mode. That 5000-nit local peak is mostly for the spec sheet, but the real-world impact is huge. I could read my messages in the middle of a sunny street without squinting or trying to cover the screen with my hand.
For security, the fingerprint sensor under the glass is snappy. It never gave me any trouble during my week with the phone.
If you're a big Netflix fan, there is one weird quirk. YouTube supports full HDR, but Netflix is capped at Full HD and lacks HDR certification. It&rsquo;s not the end of the world, but it&rsquo;s something to know if you stream a lot. For protection, Vivo used a toughened glass that isn't branded as Gorilla Glass, but it seems plenty tough. It survived a week in my pocket with keys and change without picking up any scuffs.
<h2>Performance</h2>
It&rsquo;s honestly confusing why Vivo chose the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 over the 7 Gen 4 we saw in the previous T4 model. If you just look at the spec sheet, it feels like a step back. But in the real world, the phone actually holds its own. My daily apps opened up fast and I didn't run into any annoying lag while jumping between tasks during a busy workday.
The benchmark numbers tell a similar story. I clocked an AnTuTu score of roughly 1.17 million, and my GeekBench 6 tests came in at 1,242 for single-core and 3,172 for multi-core. One thing that stood out was the 99.6 percent stability in the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme test. That is a great number, even if the best loop score of 1,136 was a little lower than I wanted to see for a device in this price bracket.
Gaming on the T5 Pro is actually a decent experience. I tested both BGMI and COD Mobile, and they both stayed locked at 90 FPS. It is a bit of a tease having a 144Hz screen when the games aren't hitting those speeds yet, so I&rsquo;m really hoping for a software update soon to unlock the full potential. The gameplay is buttery smooth at the start, but I did notice some stuttering and frame drops once I got past the 90-minute mark in a heavy session.
The best part, though, is how cool the phone stays. I&rsquo;ve used plenty of phones that turn into heaters after 20 minutes of play, but the T5 Pro stayed surprisingly chilled. I didn't even notice any real warmth until I was over two hours into a gaming marathon. It is easily one of the best devices I&rsquo;ve handled recently when it comes to managing heat under pressure.
<h2>Camera</h2>
The camera situation on the T5 Pro is a bit of a letdown if you look at the specs. Vivo basically took the triple-camera array from the T4 Pro and replaced it with a dual-lens system. You get a 50MP Sony IMX882 main sensor and a 2MP bokeh lens. This means the dedicated telephoto lens is officially dead. For selfies, you&rsquo;re looking at a 32MP shooter.
On the bright side, that main 50MP sensor actually does a decent job. Vivo is using their RAWHDR algorithm to fix things in the background, and it shows. Skin tones look very natural and highlights don't blow out, even if the processing leans a bit too much into warm, yellow tones. Portrait mode is okay, but you really feel the missing telephoto hardware the second you try to zoom in. The digital crop just looks soft and blurry compared to a real lens. For a phone at this price, that is a tough pill to swallow.
That said, portraits still look good because of how OriginOS tunes the images. The AI occasionally misses a few strands of hair, but the background blur feels deep and realistic. I also liked the selfie camera. It doesn't turn your face into a smooth piece of plastic like other brands do, so your actual skin texture stays intact for your social media posts.
Video performance is where you really hit a wall. You are capped at 4K at 30 FPS on the rear cameras. It is fine for basic clips, but the stabilization is a bit shaky. If you want "Ultra" stabilization, you have to drop the quality down to 1080p. It is a decent setup for an average user, but it lacks the professional flexibility we usually expect from Vivo.
<h2>Software, UI/UX, and AI</h2>
The T5 Pro boots up with OriginOS 6, sitting on top of the new Android 16. The first thing you notice is how quick the animations feel. It is genuinely fluid. Vivo has done a great job making the interface look and feel like a modern, high-end product.
But it&rsquo;s not all great news. The second you get to the home screen, you&rsquo;re hit with a wall of pre-installed bloatware. It&rsquo;s a real mood killer on a brand new phone. You can uninstall most of the junk, but having to spend twenty minutes cleaning up your fresh device is a letdown.
The AI features actually earn their keep here. Tools like AI Transcript and AI Creation aren&rsquo;t just gimmicks; they are massive time-savers for summarizing meetings or fixing up PDFs on the go. The AI photo tools are also surprisingly smart for quick edits.
I&rsquo;ve also found myself using Origin Island constantly. It lives at the top of the screen and acts like a smart hub for music or timers. The Drag and Go feature is a sleeper hit too, making it way easier to share files or do image searches without jumping through hoops.
One big win is the update promise. Vivo is offering three years of OS upgrades and five years of security patches. Knowing the phone won't be a paperweight in two years adds a lot of value.
<h2>Battery and Charging</h2>
The battery life on the T5 Pro is basically the phone's entire identity. It&rsquo;s got a massive 9,020mAh cell, which is a huge step up from the 6,500mAh unit in the last model. Most other brands are just starting to aim for 7,000mAh, so Vivo basically just skipped a few years to take the lead. In my testing, those big numbers actually translated to real performance.
I&rsquo;m usually pretty skeptical of official battery stats. What actually matters is how much juice you have left when you're heading home after a long day. This phone easily lasted me over two full days of normal use. To really push it, I streamed 4K YouTube for 12 hours straight, and the battery only dropped to 74%. Even after a busy weekend with gaming, benchmarks, and Netflix, I still had 23% left by Monday morning.
Filling up such a giant tank could have been slow, but the 90W charger in the box is a beast. It takes about 65 to 68 minutes to get from zero to 100%. A quick 35-minute charge gets you to 50%, which is honestly enough to last a whole day for most people. I also found the Bypass Charging really useful for keeping the phone cool while playing games, plus the reverse charging is a nice touch for topping up my earbuds.
<h2>Final Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
The Vivo T5 Pro is a classic case of give and take. It completely kills off that constant battery stress we all have, but it does it without actually feeling like a heavy brick in your pocket. If your day is mostly gaming or traveling for work, having a 9,020mAh tank under the hood is a massive win.
You just have to be fine with some obvious shortcuts. The camera setup feels like a downgrade from the older T4 Pro because they ditched the telephoto lens, and the chip is built for staying cool rather than breaking any speed records. If you&rsquo;re a photography nerd who needs serious zoom, this probably isn't for you. But if you want a sharp, good-looking phone that can easily go two or three days without seeing a charger, the T5 Pro is pretty much in a league of its own.

The OnePlus Nord 6 packs Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, 165Hz display, and a massive 9000mAh battery, making it a performance-focused all-rounder under ₹40,000

OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Performance Beast Under ₹40K

<h3 data-start="555" data-end="698">The OnePlus Nord 6 delivers flagship-like performance, 9000mAh battery, and smooth OxygenOS 16. A powerful pick under ₹40K.</h3>

The OnePlus Nord 6 sticks to what the Nord series has always done well, delivering more than what the price might suggest. Priced at ₹38,999 for the 8GB + 128GB variant, and dropping lower with bank offers, it enters a segment that is now packed with strong contenders.
From the outset, this feels like a phone built around performance. I am getting a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 processor, a 165Hz display, a massive 9000mAh battery, and OxygenOS 16 based on Android 16 right out of the box.
On paper, that is a seriously loaded setup. But in this price range, specs alone do not cut it anymore. What matters is how it all comes together in everyday use.
After using the Nord 6 for a while, I can see where it shines. Battery life is genuinely impressive, gaming feels smooth and consistent, and the software experience is among the cleanest you will find here. That said, there are a few compromises, and those do shape the overall experience.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Design</h2>
The OnePlus Nord 6 clearly takes inspiration from the OnePlus 15, but it does not feel like a copy. There is enough personality here to make it stand on its own.
The Quick Silver variant that I tested looks particularly striking. There is a holographic ribbon pattern running across the back, and it shifts subtly depending on how light hits it. It gives the phone a slightly futuristic edge, and I found myself noticing it more than I expected. The aluminium camera island also adds a nice contrast and makes the design feel a bit more premium.
That said, the finish is a magnet for fingerprints. Within minutes of using it, smudges start showing up, so going case-free is not the best idea here.
In terms of materials, OnePlus has gone with a plastic back, which does feel like a compromise at this price. The frame is also plastic, but it is well executed and genuinely feels like metal in hand. The phone feels dense and sturdy, almost brick-like, but not uncomfortable. At 8.5mm thick and 217 grams, it is on the heavier side, though I did not find it difficult to use. Smaller hands might disagree.
Durability is where this phone really stands out. You get IP66, IP68, IP69, and IP69K ratings, along with MIL-STD-810H certification, which is rare in this segment.
For display protection, OnePlus is using its own Crystal Guard Glass, which it claims matches Gorilla Glass Victus+. That is ambitious, and only time will tell how it holds up.
Ports and connectivity are fairly standard. There is the Plus Key, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, USB Type-C, an IR blaster, and NFC, though eSIM support is missing.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Display</h2>
The OnePlus Nord 6 gets a lot right with its display, and it shows the moment you start using it. I am looking at a 6.83-inch 1.5K AMOLED panel with full DCI-P3 coverage, and it delivers a genuinely pleasing viewing experience.
Colours come through vibrant without feeling overdone, contrast is well balanced, and I had no issues watching content across apps. OnePlus says this is a 10-bit panel, which means it can display over a billion colours. While there are panels out there pushing even higher numbers, this is still rare in this price segment and more than enough for a rich, immersive experience.
HDR is supported by the panel and Netflix gets HDR10+. Content does look sharp and dynamic. Brightness is another strong point.&nbsp;
Plus, with a claimed peak of 3600 nits, I found outdoor visibility to be reliable, even under harsh sunlight.
The refresh rate is where things get interesting. The panel can push up to 165Hz, and I could clearly notice the added smoothness in fast-paced games. Compared to a 120Hz display, the difference is easy to spot in those scenarios. For regular scrolling, though, it caps out at 120Hz.
Audio is handled by stereo speakers with a 300 per cent Super Audio mode. They get impressively loud and can easily fill a room, but at higher volumes, I did notice some loss in depth. For casual viewing, though, they get the job done well.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Performance</h2>
At its core, you are getting the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, paired with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. There is also a large vapour cooling chamber working in the background to keep thermals under control. In everyday usage, the experience is exactly what you would expect from this setup. Everything feels fast, fluid, and consistent, whether it is switching between apps, handling heavy multitasking, or just navigating through the UI.
The synthetic numbers line up with that experience as well. The Nord 6 manages an AnTuTu score of around 2.37 million, along with strong Geekbench results. 3DMark does show some variation, particularly when it comes to stability, but that does not really reflect how the phone behaves in real-world scenarios.
Gaming is where this phone really starts to separate itself. In BGMI, the Nord 6 can push up to 165FPS with AI-assisted frame interpolation, and this is not just a number on paper. In fast-paced matches, I could actually feel the smoother motion and improved responsiveness. It genuinely gives you an edge, especially in competitive play.
Even if you turn those AI features off completely, the phone still holds a steady 120FPS without struggling.
The 165Hz display ties into this perfectly. Compared to a standard 120Hz panel, the difference is noticeable in games like BGMI and Call of Duty: Mobile. Tracking feels smoother, inputs feel quicker, and overall gameplay feels more responsive.
If gaming is a priority, the Nord 6 is easily one of the stronger options in this segment.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Cameras</h2>
Cameras on the OnePlus Nord 6 feel like a bit of a balancing act. They are not the headline feature here, but they do a respectable job for what this phone is trying to be. It is important to remember that this is built as a performance-first device, not something chasing camera supremacy.
The main camera uses a 50MP Sony Lytia 600 sensor with OIS, and in most scenarios, it delivers reliable results. I found the colour tuning slightly on the warmer side, but it stays fairly natural and avoids the overly processed look that some phones tend to go for. What stood out more than I expected was zoom performance. Shots at 2x look clean, and even pushing up to 10x, I was able to get usable images, which is not something I usually expect in this segment.
The 8MP ultrawide is decent as well, and more importantly, it maintains good consistency with the main camera. That said, this is not the best camera system you can get at this price. HDR can occasionally look a bit off, and colour processing is not always consistent.
Low-light performance is where the limitations become clearer. It can manage in tricky lighting, but results are not always dependable, and noise creeps in fairly quickly.
Portraits, on the other hand, are handled well. Edge detection is clean, skin tones look natural, and results are consistently usable.&nbsp;
Video performance at 4K 60fps is another positive. Colours look pleasing, stabilisation works well, and footage comes out clean enough to use without much effort.
The 32MP front camera also performs well, delivering sharp images with good skin tone reproduction in decent lighting. Overall, the cameras are capable, but they are not the reason to buy this phone.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Software</h2>
The OnePlus Nord 6 comes with OxygenOS 16 based on Android 16 right out of the box, and OnePlus has backed it with a solid update promise. I am getting four major Android updates and six years of security patches, which is reassuring for long-term use.
In day-to-day usage, OxygenOS 16 feels refined and well thought out. There is a strong sense of polish across the UI, and the level of customisation on offer is something I genuinely appreciate. From themes to layout tweaks, there is enough flexibility here to make the phone feel personal without getting overwhelming. Compared to most rivals in this segment, I find the overall experience more cohesive and easier to live with.
There are a few visual elements that seem inspired by iOS 26, but OnePlus has done enough to ensure it does not feel like a copy.
On the AI side, OnePlus AI is integrated in a way that actually adds value. Most features feel useful rather than gimmicky, and Plus Mind, in particular, stands out. It feels purposeful and fits naturally into everyday usage.
Overall, OxygenOS 16 feels mature, stable, and easy to recommend.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Battery</h2>
Battery life on the OnePlus Nord 6 is easily one of its biggest highlights, and it completely changes how I think about charging.
Most phones in this price range get me through a full day, maybe stretching into a day and a half with careful use. With the Nord 6, I was consistently getting close to two full days on a single charge without having to think about plugging it in. That kind of endurance makes a real difference, especially if you are a heavy user.
Charging is handled by 80W wired, and going from zero to full takes roughly 70 minutes. It is not the fastest in this segment, but considering the size of the battery, I did not find it slow or inconvenient.
OnePlus has also added 27W reverse wired charging, effectively turning the phone into a power bank. I actually ended up using it that way a couple of times to top up my iPhone 16 Pro Max on longer days, and it worked exactly as expected.
The 9000mAh battery delivers exactly what it promises in real-world use. What stands out even more is that all of this comes packed into a relatively slim design, which makes it feel even more impressive.
<h2>OnePlus Nord 6 Review: Verdict</h2>
The OnePlus Nord 6 makes a strong case for itself in the sub-₹40,000 segment, especially if you value performance and endurance above everything else. In my time using it, the performance has been consistently fast, the battery life stands out in a big way, OxygenOS 16 feels polished, and the display delivers a solid viewing experience.
That said, it is not without trade-offs. The camera system is where the compromises are most noticeable. Low-light shots can be inconsistent, and in more challenging conditions, it struggles to match phones that are built with a stronger focus on imaging. Portraits and zoom are usable, but the ultrawide and night mode leave some room for improvement.
But that also comes down to positioning. This is not meant to be a camera-first phone. It is built around performance, and on that front, it delivers.
If you prioritise gaming, long battery life, and a smooth software experience, this is an easy recommendation.

HyperX Pulsefire Saga review: A modular gaming mouse with customisable design, 26K sensor, and 8K polling rate. Is this wired mouse worth it in 2026?

HyperX Pulsefire Saga Review: Modular Gaming Mouse with 26K Sensor & 8K Polling

Discover the HyperX Pulsefire Saga, a modular gaming mouse that lets you customise shape, buttons, and feel. Powerful sensor, ultra-light design, and serious performance.

The HyperX Pulsefire Saga stands out with its modular design, letting users customise shape and feel. Combined with a 26K sensor and ultra-light build, it delivers top-tier performance with minor trade-offs.

We have all been there. You spend days hovering over the "Buy Now," hoping the hump height or the button placement on a new mouse actually fits your hand. Most of the time, you just end up adapting your grip to the hardware because the hardware definitely isn't changing for you. That is exactly why the HyperX Pulsefire Saga feels like such a curveball in today's market.
Priced at ₹5,193 and backed by a solid two-year warranty, this is less of a standard peripheral and more of a modular toolkit. It essentially invites you to pull the shell apart and rebuild the mouse to an ergonomic scheme until they actually fit your palm, almost as well as a glove.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Adjustable&rdquo; mice or mice that allow you to change out a few panels to get that perfect grip isn&rsquo;t exactly new, there have been a tonne of options, but usually, they cost a bomb. The HyperX Pulsefire Saga comes in at ₹5,193, but you can pick it up for as low as ₹3,990 online.
But in a world moving toward seamless wireless tech, is a "build-it-yourself" wired mouse still a smart bet?
<h2>HyperX Pulsefire Saga Design: More "Lego Set" than peripheral</h2>
Unboxing the Pulsefire Saga doesn't actually feel like opening a standard mouse. It feels more like you just bought a specialised kit. Usually, when you drop big money on a high-end gaming or productivity mouse, you only get a spare sticker or a manual. <a title="HyperX Cloud Jet Review: Is this the best budget wireless pick?" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/hyperx-cloud-jet-review-is-this-the-best-budget-wireless-pick-1770889510267" target="_blank">HyperX</a> went the opposite direction here by packing the box with genuinely useful hardware.&nbsp;
You get an alternate button cover set, a pair of swap-on side buttons, an extra top shell, and even replacement PTFE skates. They even included four pieces of grip tape for the flanks and main buttons. That is a massive win for anyone who deals with "gamer sweat" or just prefers a bit more friction under their fingertips.
At first glance, the Saga is surprisingly quiet. It is a sleek, matte-black unit that doesn't try too hard to look like a "gaming" device. Being a gaming mouse, it does come with some RGB that you can control through the app, but it is pretty minimal. It adds just enough of a highlight without becoming a desk distraction.&nbsp;
You have your two side buttons tucked into the left edge, and if you flip the thing over, you will find six skate pads and a dedicated DPI button.&nbsp;
Within five minutes of having it on my desk, I already had the "hood" off the mouse.
This modularity isn't just marketing fluff. For me, it was the absolute standout of the whole experience. The top shell and the button covers are anchored by magnets that feel remarkably sturdy. There was no wobbling or creaking once I snapped them into place.&nbsp;
I actually spent my first hour just fiddling with the various combinations of the shell and side buttons. There is something oddly satisfying about the process. Hearing that sharp click as a new piece seats itself is a nice throwback to the early days of modular tech, but it feels completely modern.
If you have ever found yourself wishing your mouse was just a hair wider or that your side buttons sat a little deeper in the frame, this is one of those devices I have used that actually lets you sit in the designer chair and fix it yourself.
<h2>HyperX Pulsefire Saga Review: Living with a "Tail"</h2>
As someone who has moved almost completely to wireless peripherals in my personal setup, I was a bit sceptical about going back to a wired setup. However, the HyperFlex 2 cable on the Saga is the closest thing to "invisible" I&rsquo;ve ever experienced.&nbsp;
At 1.8m in length, it&rsquo;s a paracord-style cable that is so light and floppy that it doesn't "push back" against your movements. During a frantic session of <a title="Apex Legends Mobile: PUBG को टक्कर देने आ गया ये गेम; जानिए कब होगा लॉन्च" href="https://www.editorji.com/hindi/tech-and-auto/apex-legends-mobile-coming-to-mobile-phones-launch-expected-in-may-1651565306576" target="_blank">Apex Legends</a>, I never once felt that annoying cable-drag that is usually quintessential to wired mice. I even used it for a complex video editing project, and the experience was seamlessly similar.&nbsp;
At 69 grams, the mouse hits a sweet spot. It doesn't feel like a hollow plastic toy, but it&rsquo;s light enough that my wrist didn't feel the usual fatigue after an eight-hour shift of writing and editing.
One of the best things about this mouse is the finish; its matte finish stays completely fingerprint-free across the entire body. However, I would strongly suggest pairing it with a high-quality mouse pad, as the skates underneath are absolute dust magnets.&nbsp;
<h2>HyperX Pulsefire Saga Performance: Beyond the numbers</h2>
Now, let&rsquo;s actually talk about those specs. On a typical marketing sheet, a 26K Sensor and an 8,000Hz polling rate just look like bigger numbers designed to sell a box. In practice, they translate into a buttery smoothness that you only really notice once you go back to a cheaper mouse.
When I was doing precision work, like masking an image in Photoshop or rotoscoping a complex subject in After Effects, the difference was immediate. The cursor feels less like a tool and more like an extension of your own arm. There is literally zero jitter here. You don't have to fight the sensor or drag your hand across the desk just to get a simple task done. It is incredibly responsive.
The HyperX Optical Switches under the main buttons provide a sharp, mechanical "snap" that stands out. You always know exactly when you have actuated a click. There is no guessing or mushy travel.
For me, the real "aha" moment came during a late-night session of Counter-Strike 2. At 8,000Hz, the tracking felt almost too fast at first, but then I realised it was not seeing that tiny bit of lag I had grown used to on other devices.&nbsp;
It is the kind of performance that spoils you. After a few days with the Saga, going back to a standard office mouse feels like trying to draw with a thick crayon when you&rsquo;ve become used to a fine-point pen.
<h2>HyperX Pulsefire Saga Review: The "Real World" friction</h2>
Of course, no piece of hardware is perfect. The Pulsefire Saga has its own specific quirks that you should know about before diving in. While the modular components are a stroke of genius, the side buttons feel like they came from a slightly different design philosophy.&nbsp;
They are made from a plastic that feels a bit thinner or "cheaper" than the premium material used for the main body. They perform their job without any missed inputs, but they just do not have that same high-end, solid click you get from the rest of the unit.
Then there is the scroll wheel. It is a bit on the smaller side and it has a surprising resistance to scrolling. If you are a power-scroller or the kind of user who flies through endless research PDFs, Excel sheets or deep Twitter threads, you might find this wheel a little too stiff for comfort.&nbsp;
It is clearly tuned for competitive gaming, where an accidental scroll could mean switching your weapon at the worst possible moment. For general office productivity, or for basic usage, however, it can feel like a bit of a workout for your index finger over an eight-hour shift.
I also spent some time digging into the HyperX NGENUITY software. While it is functional, the experience is definitely on the basic side. You can certainly hop in to tweak your RGB lighting modes or adjust your DPI stages, but do not expect anything extraordinary.
It lacks the deep customisation options that some of its high-priced rivals offer. It feels more like a "set it and forget it" tool rather than a comprehensive command centre. Besides, I really didn&rsquo;t like the fact that I had to install a 500MB app, just to tweak the RGB lights on my mouse.&nbsp;
None of these issues is a deal-breaker, though. They are simply the trade-offs you have to weigh against that incredible modular flexibility. In a world of over-engineered software and flashy marketing, the Saga feels like it is prioritising the physical build and raw sensor performance over the "extra" bells and whistles.
<h2>Verdict: Is it Worth the Desk Space?</h2>
The HyperX Pulsefire Saga is a rare breed of hardware that actually wants you to tinker with it. It doesn't try to be the one-size-fits-all solution that most brands force on you. Instead, it offers a level of personalisation that you would rarely find elsewhere. Certainly not at this price point.
Sure, the software is basic, and the scroll wheel is a bit of a thumb workout, but these feel like minor trade-offs for such a precise sensor and a cable that basically feels like air. If you are tired of adjusting your hand to fit a mouse and want a device that actually listens to you, the Saga is a fantastic investment. It&rsquo;s a performant, tactile, and genuinely fun tool that will give you a really hard time going back to your old mouse.

Samsung Galaxy A57 and A37 review covering design, performance, camera, battery, and software. Are they worth buying in 2026?

Samsung Galaxy A57 & A37 Review: Specs, Performance, Camera, Should You Buy?

A detailed look at the Galaxy A57 and A37, covering design, display, camera, performance, and battery. Do they still stand strong in a competitive market?

<div class="flex flex-col text-sm pb-25">
<section class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id="request-WEB:76782932-debc-498d-9c80-96468520571a-6" data-testid="conversation-turn-14" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn="assistant">
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(--spacing)*4))] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(--spacing)*6))] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(--spacing)*16))] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col gap-4 grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal outline-none keyboard-focused:focus-ring [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" tabindex="0" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="74ae0987-1a75-4c97-956d-41ba5bd51ceb" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-3" data-turn-start-message="true">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full wrap-break-word light markdown-new-styling">
Samsung Galaxy A57 and A37 offer polished design, strong displays, and reliable performance with long software support. Solid picks for everyday use, but rivals offer better specs for the price.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</div>

It takes a certain kind of nerve to release a phone that barely looks or acts any different from the last one. It is not that Samsung ran out of ideas. It feels more like they are convinced they have already hit the sweet spot and there is simply no reason to fix what isn't broken.
That is exactly the energy behind the new Galaxy A57 and A37. These handsets aren't here to blow anyone away with experimental tech or wild designs. They are basically built for people who value a sense of familiarity over anything else. While that reliability is a huge plus for the average buyer, those of us who live and breathe tech specs might find this "playing it safe" strategy a little bit boring.
If we look at the pricing in India, the Galaxy A57 5G lands at ₹56,999, while the A37 5G is sitting at ₹41,999. These tags put both phones in a very tight spot. The A57 is basically walking into a fistfight with performance heavyweights like the OnePlus 15R.
Meanwhile, the A37 has to prove its worth against the <a title="Google Pixel 10a Review: The Smartest &ldquo;Mid-Range&rdquo; Phone You Can Buy" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/google-pixel-10a-review-the-smartest-mid-range-phone-you-can-buy-1772874508674" target="_blank">Pixel 10a</a>, which is a massive hurdle when it comes to camera quality.&nbsp; Now, Samsung has to show that a polished, predictable user experience is actually worth more than the flashy features the competition is throwing around.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Design</h2>
Samsung isn't exactly reinventing the wheel with these two phones. But spend some actual time with them, and you start to see where the real effort went in.
The Galaxy A57 definitely feels more like a premium device. It has a much thinner metal frame at just 6.9mm thick and weighs only 179 grams. You notice that right away when you pick it up. It feels incredibly light and easy to handle, with a balance that makes it seem way more expensive than your typical mid-range phone. It does not quite reach "Ultra" flagship territory, but it certainly leans that way.
The biggest highlight for me is the durability. Samsung gave the A57 a full IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, a solid upgrade. What surprised me even more is that the more affordable A37 got the same treatment, moving up from IP67 to IP68. That level of protection across both models is a huge win for anyone who has ever worried about a spill or getting caught in the rain.
The A37, on the other hand, sticks to a more traditional approach. It keeps the plastic frame and feels a bit chunkier at 7.4mm thick and 196 grams. It does not feel cheap at all. Still, it comes across as more of a utility phone next to the A57's sleek design. You will notice that extra weight in your pocket, and the overall finish lacks the same polish.
Visually, both phones follow Samsung's current playbook. They sport a clean, minimal look with a glass-like back and a camera layout pulled straight from the Galaxy S series. It is a smart choice. The design makes them look high-end from afar, even if the materials feel more basic up close.
The one real downside is that glossy finish. It looks great for about five seconds. Then you start using it, and it turns into a total fingerprint magnet. If you skip the case, plan to wipe down the back every ten minutes or so.
For colors, the A57 comes in Navy, Icy Blue, and Lilac. The A37 offers Lavender, Charcoal, and Gray Green. I have been using the Navy A57 and the Lilac A37 side by side for a while now. For me, the Navy wins every time. It feels subtle and professional, and it hides smudges better than the lighter shades. The Lilac is fun if you want something that stands out, but it lacks that timeless quality.&nbsp;
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Display</h2>
Everyone knows Samsung nails displays, and these two prove it again. The A57 and A37 both run huge 6.7-inch Full HD+ AMOLED screens at 120Hz. It's the usual Samsung magic: vibrant colors, inky blacks, buttery-smooth scrolling through feeds or crisp video playback.
Sure, the A57 steps up to Super AMOLED Plus for better efficiency and calibration. But honestly, I could barely tell them apart in daily use. They both feel flagship-level. Whether I'm poking around menus or streaming shows, the visuals impress across the board.
Front protection is Gorilla Glass Victus+, which holds up nicely. Settings let you switch Adaptive or Standard refresh for battery tweaks. Peak brightness tops out near 1,900 nits; mine performed strong in sunlight and dazzled inside.
The A57 gets a small win with HDR10+ for more nuanced shadows and highlights in supported content. Fingerprint sensors are optical, in-display, quick, and spot-on. Only gripe: position it a hair higher for thumb comfort.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Camera</h2>
The camera department is where these two phones look the same on paper but start to tell a different story in your actual photo gallery. Both the Galaxy A57 and A37 are equipped with a 50MP primary sensor, a 5MP macro lens, and a 12MP selfie camera. The real fork in the road is the ultrawide lens. The A57 sticks with a 12MP ultrawide, while the A37 gets a lower resolution 8MP version.
When you actually start snapping photos, that gap becomes pretty obvious. The main sensors on both devices do a great job in broad daylight, giving you that classic Samsung look with vibrant colors and plenty of detail. However, I noticed the A57 is just a bit smarter with how it handles highlights and shadows, keeping the exposure a bit more balanced than its cheaper sibling.
The ultrawide on the A57 is surprisingly decent even when the lighting isn't perfect. It holds onto enough detail to be genuinely useful. On the A37, that 8MP sensor starts to struggle much sooner, especially when you move indoors or into the shade. The images come out looking a bit softer and less polished.
If you are into video, both phones can handle 4K at 30fps. The stabilization is good enough for a casual walk, though it won't replace a gimbal. Once the sun goes down, both phones take a hit. Low-light shots are fine for social media, but you will definitely notice some grain and a loss of sharpness if you start zooming in. Then there is the macro camera, which feels like it is mostly there just to fill space on the spec sheet since it doesn't really add much to the experience.
Samsung has also tucked more of its AI tricks into the Galaxy A57. The Best Face feature is great for group shots where someone always blinks, and the Auto Trim tool makes quick video edits a lot less of a headache. The Object Eraser has also been refined, so you can scrub out photobombers with much cleaner results. Plus, having the built-in voice transcription in the recorder app is a nice little productivity bonus that I found myself using more than I expected.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Performance</h2>
The Galaxy A57 is powered by the new Exynos 1680 chip, and while it starts with 8GB of RAM, you can actually spec it up to 12GB if you really want that extra headroom. It comes with 256GB of storage as standard. The A37, on the other hand, runs the <a title="Samsung Galaxy A55, Galaxy A35 launched in India: Check specs, features, and more" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/mobiles/samsung-galaxy-a55-galaxy-a35-launched-in-india-check-specs-features-and-more-1710156719444" target="_blank">Exynos 1480.</a> What&rsquo;s interesting here is that Samsung is actually giving you more choices with the cheaper model.
You can get a base 128GB version with 8GB of RAM, or go all the way up to a 12GB/256GB setup if you need it.
If you are just looking at the spec sheet, both of these processors show some decent growth. The Exynos 1480 in the A37 is a noticeable step up from what we saw last year, especially when it comes to the CPU and graphics. But the real shift is in the AI processing.&nbsp;
It&rsquo;s clearly designed to handle more of the background tasks and newer software features that Samsung is pushing. The A57&rsquo;s Exynos 1680 feels like a more careful upgrade. It isn't a massive leap in raw power, but it is built to run cool and keep things steady under pressure.
In my actual testing, the A57 just feels more "together." It handles heavy multitasking without breaking a sweat and stays remarkably consistent even when you are pushing it. A lot of that comes down to the larger vapor cooling chamber, which does a great job of keeping the heat in check. It isn't just about being a little faster. It&rsquo;s about the phone feeling stable even after you&rsquo;ve been using it for hours.
The A37 is perfectly fine for your typical daily routine, but you will definitely find its limits a lot faster than the A57. If you start jumping between heavy apps or settle in for a long gaming session, you might run into the occasional stutter or slowdown. It&rsquo;s a dependable phone for sure, it just lacks that extra bit of silkiness you get with its more expensive sibling.
Gaming is actually a decent experience on both. I spent some time with BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile, and both phones ran the games smoothly without getting uncomfortably hot to the touch. Even while I was charging the phones during a match, the temperatures stayed well within a reasonable range.
The audio quality really rounds out the whole package. You are getting hybrid stereo speakers on both models that get plenty loud and offer a surprising amount of depth. The sound stays clear even at higher volumes without that annoying distortion you often hear on mid-range phones, which makes a big difference when you are watching movies or gaming without headphones.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Software &amp; AI</h2>
Samsung keeps shining in the software department. These models ship with One UI 8.5 built on Android 16, backed by a solid six-year commitment to OS updates and security fixes. That kind of longevity really boosts their staying power over time.
This round puts extra emphasis on AI, particularly Samsung's push toward what they term agentic AI. Gemini now steps in to handle actions across different apps, letting you switch tasks smoothly without constant manual hopping.
On top of that, you find handy tweaks like an improved Bixby for casual chats and searches, plus Circle to Search for fast info grabs. AI even handles call and recording transcription. It does not match the depth of flagship offerings, yet it makes daily use feel sharper and more integrated.
<h2>Samsung Galaxy A57 &amp; A37: Battery</h2>
Each phone carries a 5,000mAh battery, and real daily performance lines up closely between them. Light to moderate habits see you through an entire day with room to spare. Push it harder, and you still make it to evening without plugging in.
Charging stays at 45W wired speeds for both. No bump for the A57 this time around, but the A37 catches up to match it perfectly. Samsung promises about 60 percent in half an hour, and tests confirm it delivers in practice.
Curiously, these mid-tier options outpace the pricier Galaxy S26 on charge times, which stands out as unusual.
All in all, it offers solid, no-fuss charging: speedy for quick boosts yet not revolutionary enough to wow.
<h2>Verdict: Safe Picks or Missing the Moment?</h2>
The Galaxy A57 and A37 do a lot of things right. You get clean software, a design that feels premium enough, and performance that holds up well for everyday use. For most people, that&rsquo;s honestly enough.
But this price segment is packed right now. There are phones that go harder on raw power, battery life, and even cameras. That makes things a bit tricky for Samsung here.
Where these phones start to make more sense is during sales. Samsung tends to drop prices quite a bit, and at those rates, they become much easier to recommend.
So it really depends on what you care about. If you want stability, long-term updates, and a no-nonsense experience, these are safe choices. If you are after the best specs for your money, you might want to look around a bit more.

Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro review covering sound quality, ANC, design, battery, and features. Are these the best premium earbuds under ₹25,000 in India?

Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: Flagship Sound, ANC & Premium Features

Flagship sound, elite ANC, and a refined design—Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro aim to dominate the premium earbuds space in 2026.

Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro offer premium sound, powerful ANC, and a refined design, making them one of the best flagship earbuds&mdash;especially for users in the Samsung ecosystem.

Samsung has certainly taken a winding path through the wireless audio world. We have witnessed everything from those strange bean shapes to several stemless iterations, but last year&rsquo;s Buds3 Pro truly flipped the script with that sharp Blade look.&nbsp;
This year, the Galaxy Buds4 Pro takes that foundation and polishes it into something much more sophisticated. I lived with the Black model for a full week, and it is obvious that Samsung was not just looking to ship a minor refresh.&nbsp;
They were clearly aiming for a genuine flagship feel. With a price tag of ₹22,999, these are sitting in the high-end bracket, promising top-tier construction and sound. I put them to the test during noisy morning commutes and quiet late-night sessions to see if they actually earn that premium investment.
<h2>Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: Design &amp; Comfort</h2>
Unboxing the Galaxy Buds4 Pro makes it clear that Samsung has evolved its design language well beyond the earlier models. They have traded the soft, pebble-like curves of the <a title="Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro Review: The Ultimate Earbud Upgrade?" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/samsung-galaxy-buds-3-pro-review-the-ultimate-earbud-upgrade-1725106261982" target="_blank">Buds3 Pro </a>for a more architectural and boxy look that feels fresh. The case has a satisfying weight and premium texture, although that translucent lid is a massive fingerprint magnet. If you like your gear to stay spotless, you will definitely be wiping it down every few minutes since it holds onto every smudge.
The bottom half of the case uses a consistent matte finish that actually provides some grip. While I am testing the professional Black version, you can also find these in White or an online-exclusive Pink Gold. I really appreciate that the USB-C port and pairing button are hidden on the top edge. It is a smart move that keeps the rest of the chassis looking clean and totally uncluttered.
The earbuds themselves show off a more mature take on the "Blade" aesthetic. The metallic accents along the stems make them look like high-end tech jewelry rather than just another plastic accessory. Even if critics say they are starting to resemble AirPods, the actual build quality and finish feel distinctly like a Samsung creation.
The real win, though, is the actual comfort. Samsung apparently used a giant database of ear scans to refine the shape, and you can really feel the difference. I wore these for a five-hour writing marathon and genuinely forgot I had them in. They sit deep enough to stay put during a workout but avoid that annoying high-pressure feeling that usually causes ears to itch after an hour.
Durability is another strong point thanks to the IP57 rating. This means the buds are fully equipped to handle a sweaty gym session or an unexpected downpour during your commute.
Finally, the stem controls have been completely revamped. The new pinch and swipe sensors are incredibly responsive. Squeezing the blade to manage calls or music feels very natural, and sliding a finger along that metallic trim to adjust volume is much more precise than the old, finicky touch pads.
<h2>Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: Audio Quality</h2>
If you&rsquo;re dropping a massive amount of money on a set of flagship earbuds, you really shouldn't have to settle for a compromise. Since I&rsquo;ve spent six years working as a musician, my ears are probably a bit of a curse because I&rsquo;ve become hyper-aware of every tiny detail.&nbsp;
I am constantly on the lookout for the subtle things that Bluetooth compression usually kills off, like the actual physical vibration of a bass string or those clever stereo pans in a guitar track that give a song its real texture.
<a title="Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Review: Pros, Cons &amp; Real-World Test" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/samsung-galaxy-s26-ultra-review-pros-cons-real-world-test-1773923373353" target="_blank">Samsung</a> actually pulled off a serious technical win here. They went with a dual-way speaker setup that uses a 5.5mm tweeter for the highs and a revamped 11mm woofer for the low end. But the real reason these sound so different is the Dual Amplifier system.&nbsp;
Most buds just use one amp to drive everything, which is why they can end up sounding muddy or cluttered. On the Buds4 Pro, the woofer and tweeter are powered separately. This lowers the interference and lets that bigger woofer really breathe. The result is a bass response that feels authoritative and punchy without ever becoming bloated or messy.
I pushed these with a pretty diverse mix of tracks to see exactly where they would stumble. Starting with the remastered version of "Imagine" by John Lennon, the soundstage felt surprisingly open. Each piano note had its own room to resonate instead of feeling like it was fighting for air.&nbsp;
Then I pivoted to Indian classics like Kishore Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar. The vocal reproduction was a major highlight for me because it captured the raw, emotional weight of their voices without that thin, "digital" harshness you get with cheaper hardware.
For a low-end stress test, I threw on Divine&rsquo;s "Azadi" and Eminem&rsquo;s "Rap God." A lot of brands try to trick you by cranking the bass until it covers up the vocals, but the Buds4 Pro kept things tight and well-separated. Even on those complex Coke Studio arrangements like "Bewajah," the stereo imaging stayed incredibly sharp.
If you happen to be using a Galaxy S23 or a newer device, you get the Samsung Seamless Codec for 24-bit UHQ audio. That basically means you&rsquo;re getting a studio-grade experience while you&rsquo;re out and about. If the stock tuning isn't for you, the Samsung Wearable app includes a 9-band EQ.&nbsp;
I personally found the "Dynamic" preset to be the most fun for my daily listening, but being able to dial in a custom profile is a massive plus for anyone who cares about their gear. It doesn't feel like you&rsquo;re listening to a heavily processed file. It just sounds like the music was meant to be heard this way.
<h2>Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: ANC and Call Quality</h2>
If your main priority is simply shutting out the noise of the world, the Galaxy Buds4 Pro have officially made a case for being the best in the business. I have put plenty of flagship earbuds through their paces, but the Adaptive ANC on this specific pair feels like it is on a totally different level. The very moment you switch it on, you get this immediate sense of isolation. It honestly feels like you have just stepped into a private, silent bubble.
What really stood out to me was how well these buds handle those tricky, erratic sounds that usually sneak through other hardware. Whether I was on my daily metro commute or just walking through a chaotic local market, those deep low-frequency hums and engine rumbles just seemed to vanish. This makes them a fantastic tool if you are trying to meditate or just need to stay in the zone while writing in a loud environment.
Samsung also added some of the smartest transparency features I have seen in a while. In the app, you can turn on things like Voice Detect and Siren Detect. I actually had a moment where I was waiting for a delivery rider with my ANC at full blast when an ambulance went past. The buds picked up the siren immediately and shifted into ambient mode so I wasn't caught off guard.
In the same way, if you start talking to someone, your music dips and the outside world filters in automatically. It saves you from having to fumble with your phone or the stems every time. You even have granular control over the ambient levels, so you can decide exactly how much of your surroundings you want to let in. I will say that keeping the ANC on for several hours did cause a tiny bit of ear strain for me, but let's be honest, that is generally the case with almost every high-end earbud out there.
Call quality is another area where these didn't break a sweat. Samsung is using a six-microphone system paired with a machine-learned Deep Neural Network to strip away background chaos. I tested this by calling a friend who usually complains about my audio whenever I am outside. Whether I was in a noisy office or a crowded street, he actually went out of his way to tell me how clear I sounded.&nbsp;
Even while gaming, I never faced any issues with the call quality. My teammates were able to hear me clearly, and we never had any miscommunication due to poor audio.
Plus, the Super Wideband support ensures your voice carries a lot more detail. It sounds much more natural than the robotic tone you usually get from cheaper buds.
<h2>Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: Connectivity and Controls</h2>
It honestly feels like Samsung designed the Galaxy Buds4 Pro specifically for those of us who obsess over future-proofing our gadgets. While most manufacturers are happy to stick a Bluetooth 5.4 chip in their flagship buds and call it a day, Samsung went ahead and included Bluetooth 6.1 support. During my week of testing, the connection remained rock solid.
I was able to walk into a different room or put a couple of solid walls between myself and my phone without experiencing any of those annoying stutters that usually ruin a good listening session.
If you are using an Android device, getting these set up is basically instant because of Google Fast Pair. However, I have to be clear that the experience definitely hits another gear if you are already living in the Samsung ecosystem. To truly unlock the potential of these buds, you really need to use the Samsung Wearable app to manage all the high-level settings.
I actually made it a point to pair these with a Realme phone just to see how they would behave for a standard Android user who isn't using a Galaxy device. Even without the exclusive One UI 8.5 integration, the app still offers a massive amount of flexibility.&nbsp;
Looking at the physical controls on the stems, they are generally quite snappy, though I will be honest and say I still prefer old-school tapping over the newer pinch gestures. I found that while sliding my finger for volume was smooth, I occasionally struggled to get the pinch pressure just right when I was trying to toggle through ANC modes in a hurry.
The level of depth inside the app is genuinely impressive. You can remap your gestures, mess with a 9-band EQ to find your ideal sound, or even enable those futuristic head gestures. Being able to just nod your head to take a call or shake it to reject one is a massive help when your hands are full.&nbsp;
You also get very reliable voice commands for things like volume or playback, and the in-ear detection is incredibly fast. It pauses your media the very second you pull a bud out, which is exactly the kind of high-end polish you want when you are paying for a flagship device.
<h2>Galaxy Buds4 Pro Review: Battery &amp; Charging</h2>
I would honestly describe the battery performance on the Galaxy Buds4 Pro as a reliable daily driver. It is not going to set any new world records, but for most people, it definitely gets the job done without any issues.&nbsp;
Samsung claims you get around 6 hours of life with the noise cancellation active, and about 7 hours if you decide to turn it off. In my own day-to-day testing, those numbers were pretty much spot on, so I didn&rsquo;t run into any strange surprises or disappointments during my usual routine.
By no means are these the longest-lasting earbuds you can buy today, but being realistic, they carry enough of a charge to survive a standard workday or a long cross-country flight. You really won't find yourself stressing about them dying right in the middle of a phone call or a project.&nbsp;
I actually didn't even bother timing a full charge from zero to a hundred percent because I just never felt the need for it. The fast charging is what really saves the day here anyway. If you just toss them back into the case for 10 or 15 minutes, you are basically set for a two or three hour commute back home.
When it is time to top up the case itself, you have some very solid options. It handles both USB-C wired charging and Qi wireless charging without any hitches.&nbsp;
I found the wireless route to be a perfect fit for my specific workflow. I would just leave the case sitting on my desk pad while I was busy typing away, and it would slowly fill back up in the background. It is just one of those straightforward features that fits right into your daily life without giving you a single headache.
<h2>Final Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
Spending ₹22,999 on the Galaxy Buds4 Pro is certainly a significant commitment, but Samsung has finally delivered a flagship that can actually compete with the heavy hitters from Sony and Apple. It feels like they have officially moved beyond their experimental phase to produce something that is genuinely premium.
You should definitely consider picking these up if you are already invested in the Samsung ecosystem and want that high-fidelity, studio-quality audio experience. They are also a great choice if you felt the earlier "blade" designs were a bit too loud and want something more elegant for long hours of wear. If your daily life involves a noisy commute, the adaptive noise cancellation is a total lifesaver.
On the other hand, you can probably give these a miss if you are an iPhone user, because you will end up missing out on the best proprietary features like the Seamless Codec. Additionally, if you are working with a strict budget, the standard Buds4 offer a lot of the same core technology for a much lower price. When you look at the big picture, these are easily the best-sounding earbuds that Samsung has ever brought to market.

Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Facebook and Instagram will no longer support NFT transactions.

Meta drops NFT support on Facebook and Instagram

Facebook and Instagram will no longer support NFT transactions.

Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has announced that it is winding down support for NFTs on its platforms.
A company executive said in a <a href="https://twitter.com/skasriel/status/1635386565487898624?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1635386565487898624%7Ctwgr%5E6b22a762caacaa553acd933eb588bca1b2b35e40%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techlusive.in%2Fapps%2Fmeta-is-giving-up-on-its-nft-dreams-on-facebook-instagram-1364161%2F" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tweet</a> that Meta would now focus on other ways to support creators, influencers, businesses and people.
Though no explanation was given for the decision, it follows the shut down of Meta's crypto-wallet Novi last year which was also expected to get NFT support eventually.

The Kenstar Tallde 105 BLDC Cooler combines powerful airflow, honeycomb cooling pads, and low power consumption into a surprisingly practical solution for Delhi summers. Here’s how it performed after real-world use.

Kenstar Tallde 105 BLDC Cooler Review: The Appliance That Made Delhi Summer Slightly Less Hostile

The Kenstar Tallde 105 BLDC Cooler delivers strong airflow, low power consumption, and practical everyday usability for Delhi summers. It won&rsquo;t replace an AC, but for large ventilated spaces, it&rsquo;s an efficient and surprisingly modern cooling alternative.

For the last few years, my relationship with Delhi summers has been almost entirely dependent on air conditioners. Once temperatures cross 40 degrees, survival in this city starts feeling less like &ldquo;summer&rdquo; and more like an endurance event sponsored by the sun itself.
The walls stay warm deep into the night, ceiling fans begin circulating air that feels suspiciously oven-adjacent, and stepping outside in the afternoon feels like somebody left the Earth too close to a tandoor.
The problem is that once you get used to air conditioning, it quietly becomes a financial hostage situation.
Last summer, my electricity bill climbed high enough that I started doing mental math every single time I reached for the AC remote. I&rsquo;d switch it off for an hour, immediately regret my decision, switch it back on, and then spend the rest of the evening pretending not to think about the meter spinning downstairs.
So this year, I wanted to try something different. Not because I expected a cooler to outperform an air conditioner, but because I was curious whether coolers had finally evolved beyond the loud plastic boxes I remembered from childhood summers.
That&rsquo;s how the Kenstar Tallde 105 BLDC Cooler entered my house. Priced at ₹21,290, it sits in an interesting spot where it&rsquo;s clearly more premium than the average neighborhood cooler, but still dramatically cheaper to buy and run than installing another air conditioner.
And after spending over a week with it during some particularly unpleasant Delhi heat, I&rsquo;ve come away thinking this cooler understands Indian summers better than many air conditioners do.
<h2>The Height Looks Excessive Until You Actually Use It</h2>
The first thing anybody notices about the Tallde is its size. This is not a subtle appliance. Standing at nearly 4.7 feet tall, it immediately dominates whichever corner of the room you place it in. When I first wheeled it into my living room, it honestly looked more like a portable appliance from a sci-fi movie than a traditional desert cooler.
At first, I assumed the height was mostly a design gimmick. A way to make the product look more premium or visually distinct from standard coolers. But after a few days of using it, I realized the vertical design solves one of the oldest problems with desert coolers.
Most coolers blow air far too low. You place them in a room, turn them on, and the airflow ends up cooling your coffee table more effectively than your body. The Kenstar&rsquo;s elevated fan changes that completely. Whether I was sitting at my desk editing videos or lying down on the couch in the evening, the airflow actually reached me properly instead of disappearing into furniture.
That difference sounds minor on paper, but in daily use it changes how effective the cooler feels. Rather than creating a vague sense of coolness somewhere in the room, the Tallde constantly reminds you that it&rsquo;s working.
The design itself is fairly clean as well. The white body with black accents keeps it from looking too industrial, and while nobody is going to mistake this for minimalist Scandinavian furniture, it doesn&rsquo;t visually ruin the room either. That matters more than people think because coolers tend to become semi-permanent summer residents in Indian homes.
Even though the cooler is tall, the footprint is surprisingly manageable. It fits neatly into corners without swallowing huge amounts of floor space, which became especially important in my apartment where every square foot already has a job.
<h2>The BLDC Motor Is Why This Cooler Exists</h2>
The biggest selling point of the Tallde isn&rsquo;t actually the airflow or the water tank. It&rsquo;s the BLDC motor.
Normally, motor specifications are the sort of thing people ignore entirely while buying appliances. Most of us just want to know whether the thing cools properly and whether it&rsquo;ll survive more than two summers. But after using this cooler, I genuinely think the BLDC setup is what makes the entire experience practical.
Traditional desert coolers in this category usually consume somewhere around 200 to 250 watts of electricity. The Tallde is rated at 145 watts, which might not sound revolutionary until you remember how long coolers tend to run during Indian summers.
This isn&rsquo;t an appliance you switch on for twenty minutes. During peak Delhi heat, coolers become all-day companions. They run through afternoons, evenings, and often entire nights. Over time, that lower power consumption starts making a noticeable difference.
I found myself using it far more freely than I use my AC because there wasn&rsquo;t that constant low-level guilt sitting in the back of my mind. With air conditioners, every extra hour quietly feels expensive. With the Tallde, I could leave it running through long stretches of the day without mentally calculating my next electricity bill.
The lower power draw also creates another huge advantage for Indian households: inverter support.
Delhi power cuts during summer feel almost inevitable at this point, especially during storms or peak evening loads. During one outage, the cooler continued running comfortably on my home inverter while the AC sat uselessly on the wall pretending to be modern art.
That single moment made the BLDC motor feel genuinely valuable rather than just marketing terminology.
<h2>I Used It Wrong on Day One</h2>
My first experience with the cooler was terrible. That&rsquo;s entirely my fault.
I placed it inside a closed bedroom, shut all the windows, turned on cooling mode, and expected it to behave like an air conditioner. Instead, within an hour, the room started feeling humid and slightly sticky. The airflow was strong, but the environment itself became uncomfortable.
Then I remembered how evaporative cooling actually works.
Desert coolers need ventilation. They aren&rsquo;t designed for sealed rooms. Once I opened windows and allowed proper cross ventilation, the entire experience changed almost immediately.
Suddenly the airflow felt fresher. The room stopped feeling damp. The cooler started behaving the way it was supposed to.
This is probably the most important thing to understand before buying any desert cooler, including this one. If you expect AC-style cooling inside a tightly sealed room, you&rsquo;ll probably end up disappointed. But if you use it in a properly ventilated environment, especially in dry North Indian heat, the Tallde becomes extremely effective.
I eventually shifted it closer to my dining area where airflow across the house was better, and that&rsquo;s where the cooler really started shining.
<h2>The Airflow Is Aggressively Good</h2>
Kenstar claims an air throw of up to 50 feet, and while I didn&rsquo;t walk around my house with scientific measuring equipment trying to verify marketing numbers, the airflow is undeniably strong.
Even at medium settings, the cooler pushes air across large rooms comfortably. At higher speeds, it starts feeling like somebody opened a wind tunnel inside your house.
The motorized swing helps distribute air evenly rather than concentrating it in one direction, and the large fan combined with the cooler&rsquo;s height creates airflow that actually travels through the room instead of collapsing a few feet away.
What surprised me most was how quickly the airflow changes the perception of heat. The room temperature itself may not plummet dramatically the way it would with an AC, but your body starts feeling cooler almost instantly because of the sheer amount of moving air.
A huge part of why the Tallde manages to feel effective in Delhi&rsquo;s dry heat comes down to the three-side honeycomb cooling pads. Compared to the thinner grass-style cooling material you&rsquo;d find in older coolers, these pads retain water far more consistently, which helps maintain stable airflow even after hours of continuous use.
During the hottest part of the afternoon, I noticed the cooler didn&rsquo;t suddenly start throwing warm air the way cheaper coolers often do once the water circulation settles. The airflow stayed surprisingly consistent, especially when the cooler had proper ventilation around it.
The honeycomb design also feels sturdier overall, with none of the sagging or uneven wet patches I&rsquo;ve seen in older desert coolers over time. It gives the entire cooling system a more dependable feel, particularly during long summer days where the cooler ends up running almost continuously.
There&rsquo;s also an ice chamber at the top, which I immediately tested because adding ice to coolers is practically embedded in Indian DNA at this point.
And yes, it works. The airflow becomes noticeably cooler for a while, especially if the water inside the tank was already heating up after hours of operation. It&rsquo;s not a dramatic transformation, but it does give the cooler an extra edge during especially brutal afternoons.
<h2>Living With It Every Day</h2>
One of the most underrated aspects of this cooler is the 105-liter water tank.
Smaller coolers constantly demand attention. You fill them, forget about them for a few hours, and suddenly they&rsquo;re empty again. The Tallde feels far less needy. A full tank comfortably lasted me through overnight use and large portions of the next day.
That convenience matters more than spec sheets make it seem.
During Delhi summers, the last thing anybody wants is to keep refilling water tanks multiple times a day while sweating through their T-shirt. The large capacity makes the cooler feel reliable in a very practical sense. You switch it on and largely stop thinking about it.
There&rsquo;s also a water level indicator on the front, which saves you from awkwardly checking the tank manually every few hours.
The wheels at the bottom deserve credit too. Once filled, the cooler becomes extremely heavy, but the castors are smooth enough that moving it around flat surfaces doesn&rsquo;t feel like a gym workout. I could shift it between rooms without much trouble, though uneven thresholds still require a bit of caution.
The controls on the top panel are also surprisingly modern for a desert cooler. The Tallde uses a touch-based control panel that feels clean and intuitive in daily use. Everything from fan speed and cooling mode to swing controls and timer settings is accessible directly from the top, and the buttons respond reliably without needing multiple taps.
I especially liked that the panel remains easy to use even in dim lighting at night, where some appliances suddenly turn into a guessing game of random button pressing. The touch controls also give the cooler a more contemporary feel overall, like something designed for modern apartments rather than an appliance that simply exists to fight heat.
You also get seven fan speeds, which initially sounded excessive until I actually started using them. Lower settings work well during evenings when you just want softer airflow in the background, while the higher levels are genuinely powerful enough to cool larger spaces quickly.
The remote also ended up being far more useful than I expected. On most coolers, remotes feel like an afterthought with mushy buttons and questionable responsiveness, but the Tallde&rsquo;s remote worked reliably from across the room during my testing. That became especially useful at night because once the cooler starts pulling down the heat in the room, the last thing you want to do is get up repeatedly to tweak fan speeds or swing settings.
I often found myself lowering the fan speed gradually through the evening without leaving the couch, which sounds lazy until you experience Delhi heat after a long day outside.
<h2>It&rsquo;s Loud. But Also&hellip; Every Cooler Is Loud.</h2>
There&rsquo;s really no avoiding this conversation. At higher fan speeds, the Tallde is noisy.
Not unbearably noisy, but definitely noticeable. If you&rsquo;re watching television, taking calls, or trying to work in complete silence, you&rsquo;ll probably reduce the speed slightly.
That said, the sound becomes much easier to tolerate once you understand what the cooler is actually doing. Moving this much air naturally creates noise. And compared to older desert coolers I&rsquo;ve used, the Tallde still sounds more controlled and less mechanically chaotic.
Lower and medium settings are far more comfortable for continuous use, especially at night.
Personally, after a couple of days, the sound simply merged into the normal audio landscape of Delhi living. Between traffic outside, ceiling fans, pressure cookers, barking dogs, and distant wedding processions that somehow operate year-round, the cooler didn&rsquo;t feel unusually intrusive.
<h2>Maintenance Is Part of the Deal</h2>
Unlike air conditioners, desert coolers expect some participation from the user.
You&rsquo;ll eventually need to clean the tank, especially if you&rsquo;re using hard water. The honeycomb pads will collect mineral deposits over time, and regular maintenance is necessary to keep airflow and cooling performance consistent. In Delhi, where hard water is practically a personality trait, mineral buildup feels less like a possibility and more like an inevitability after prolonged use.
Thankfully, the Tallde includes a dust filter net that helps prevent larger particles from getting trapped inside the honeycomb pads. In a city like Delhi where dust behaves almost like weather, that feature becomes surprisingly useful because it helps keep the pads cleaner for longer periods.
One thing new buyers should know is that the cooler does produce a noticeable smell during the first couple of days of operation. It&rsquo;s the typical new-cooling-pad smell that most coolers have. Thankfully, it fades away fairly quickly.
<h2>Verdict: Should You Buy it?</h2>
The Kenstar Tallde 105 BLDC Cooler doesn&rsquo;t replace an air conditioner. And honestly, I think judging it through that lens completely misses the point.
What it does instead is offer something far more practical for Indian summers: meaningful cooling with dramatically lower power consumption.
For large ventilated rooms, living spaces, balconies, terraces, and semi-open environments, it works extremely well. The elevated airflow genuinely improves comfort, the giant water tank reduces daily hassle, and the BLDC motor makes long-term usage far easier on electricity bills.
Most importantly, it feels designed around real Indian usage conditions rather than laboratory scenarios. It handles long operating hours well, works during power cuts through an inverter, and delivers airflow strong enough to survive Delhi afternoons without immediately forcing you back to the AC remote.
After spending time with it, I realized something surprising. I didn&rsquo;t actually need air conditioning all the time. Sometimes what I really wanted was strong, continuous, properly directed airflow that could make unbearable heat feel manageable again.
And that&rsquo;s exactly what the Tallde delivers.

The Vivo X300 Ultra delivers mirrorless-style cameras, flagship power, strong battery life and premium design. See if it is worth ₹1,59,999.

Vivo X300 Ultra Review: A True Camera Flagship

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a full-blown camera-first flagship with superb imaging, strong performance, excellent battery life and a steep ₹1,59,999 price.

For a little over two weeks, the Vivo X300 Ultra became my primary phone, and honestly, it did not take long for me to figure out what Vivo was aiming for here. The first time I started shooting photos and videos with it, one thing became immediately obvious: this is a phone built almost entirely around the camera experience.
Over the past few years, Vivo has slowly turned itself into one of the biggest players in smartphone photography. While other brands chased flashy AI tricks and raw performance numbers, Vivo consistently focused on imaging, and the results have shown. Its X-series phones regularly delivered some of the best camera systems on any smartphone. The frustrating part, at least for Indian buyers, was that the Ultra models never officially made it here. We usually got the standard and Pro variants, while the real camera monsters stayed limited to China.
That finally changes with the X300 Ultra. Vivo has now brought its top-tier flagship to India alongside the X300 FE, entering a space already packed with serious competition like the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, with the Oppo Find X9 Ultra expected soon. In 2026, though, calling a phone &ldquo;Ultra&rdquo; is no longer enough. Every brand is chasing the same dream of building the ultimate flagship.
Which also makes Vivo&rsquo;s pricing strategy pretty bold. At ₹1,59,999, the X300 Ultra costs even more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Galaxy S26 Ultra, two phones most buyers instantly associate with the premium segment.
So what exactly makes the X300 Ultra stand out?
For me, the answer comes down almost entirely to the cameras.
Of course, the phone delivers everything else you would expect from a modern flagship too. But unlike most rivals that try balancing everything equally, the X300 Ultra feels like a device designed around photography first, with the rest of the hardware supporting that vision. The bigger question is whether Vivo&rsquo;s camera-first approach is enough to justify that massive asking price.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Cameras</h2>
Talking about the Vivo X300 Ultra almost automatically means starting with the cameras first. Everything else about this phone feels like it exists to support Vivo&rsquo;s imaging ambitions, and after using it extensively, this easily feels like one of the most serious camera systems on any smartphone right now.
The hardware itself is loaded. Vivo is using a 200MP Sony LYT-901 main sensor with gimbal stabilisation, alongside a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HPB periscope telephoto camera with an 85mm focal length, 3.7x optical zoom, OIS, and an f/2.7 aperture. The ultrawide camera uses a 50MP Sony LYT-818 sensor with a 14mm focal length, dual-pixel autofocus, OIS, and a 116-degree field of view. Up front, there is a 50MP selfie camera with autofocus.
What immediately changes the feel of the main camera is Vivo&rsquo;s decision to use a tighter 35mm focal length instead of the typical 24mm look most smartphones rely on. Photos end up looking far more natural and cinematic, especially for portraits, food shots, and street photography.
On paper, Vivo has slightly narrowed the aperture to f/1.9 this year, and pixel sizes are also smaller. But in actual usage, the large 1/1.12-inch sensor still delivers excellent detail, strong dynamic range, and surprisingly reliable motion handling.
Vivo&rsquo;s colour science continues to be one of the best in the business. Images look cinematic without becoming overly sharpened or aggressively HDR-heavy. Colours are slightly richer than reality, especially greens and reds, but the processing usually makes photos look more vibrant rather than fake.
The standout camera here is easily the 85mm telephoto sensor. Zoom shots remain impressively detailed even at longer ranges, while the gimbal stabilisation genuinely helps reduce shaky results. I also ended up using the telephoto camera heavily for macro photography. Instead of relying on the dedicated Super Macro mode, the 7.4x telephoto zoom produced cleaner close-up shots with better subject separation and more comfortable framing distances.
Portrait mode is excellent too, and this is one of the few phones where the Zeiss branding actually feels meaningful. Edge detection is clean, skin tones mostly stay natural, and the background blur looks softer and more camera-like than what most phones manage.
The ultrawide camera is surprisingly strong as well. Vivo is using a massive sensor here, and unlike most ultrawide cameras that feel noticeably weaker than the primary sensor, this one stays consistently sharp with strong low-light performance and well-controlled distortion.
What impressed me most overall was the consistency between all three rear cameras. Switching between the main, telephoto, and ultrawide rarely feels jarring because colours and exposure remain cohesive across lenses. The only time I noticed slight differences was in lower light, where the ultrawide and telephoto cameras became slightly more prone to motion blur with fast-moving subjects.
Video has clearly become a huge focus this year too. The X300 Ultra supports 4K 120fps Dolby Vision recording across all rear cameras, while the selfie camera supports 4K 60fps Dolby Vision recording. You also get 10-bit LOG recording, LUT support, and extensive manual controls in Pro Video mode. Most casual users may never touch these features, but their presence makes it clear Vivo is targeting serious creators alongside regular users.
The 50MP selfie camera is excellent too. Selfies come out detailed, autofocus works reliably, and skin tones mostly stay natural. Vivo still adds a slightly warm tone to faces sometimes, but overall, the results look clean and pleasing.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Design</h2>
The first thing that stood out to me about the Vivo X300 Ultra was just how massive and substantial it feels in the hand. This is unapologetically a big flagship, and that gigantic camera module on the back makes the phone feel slightly top-heavy during one-handed use.
Thankfully, Vivo has still paid attention to ergonomics. The aluminium frame uses softly curved edges, which makes the phone more comfortable to hold compared to some aggressively flat-sided rivals. The matte finish on the frame also helps with grip while keeping fingerprint smudges under control.
The rear design looks premium without feeling overly flashy. Vivo has used a clean two-tone glass finish, and in this Victory Green colourway, the upper section leans heavily into the camera-inspired aesthetic while the lower half stays far more minimal. It gives the phone a distinct identity without looking excessive.
The camera module itself is enormous, but because it sits centrally, the phone surprisingly does not wobble much when placed on a table. My only minor complaint is that the module sits low enough for my index finger to occasionally brush against the housing and sometimes even the lenses while adjusting my grip.
You also get an IP69 rating, so the X300 Ultra can comfortably handle water immersion as well as high-pressure water exposure.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Display</h2>
The Vivo X300 Ultra features a massive 6.82-inch LTPO AMOLED display that can show over 1 billion colours, and gets a 144Hz refresh rate. We also get Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and 2160Hz PWM dimming.
In daily use, this is easily one of the best smartphone displays I have used in a long time. The panel looks incredibly sharp, colours appear vibrant without feeling artificially boosted, and the slim bezels make the entire front feel almost edge-to-edge. Watching HDR content, gaming, and even regular scrolling simply feels fantastic on this screen.
The adaptive LTPO refresh rate can intelligently scale between 1Hz and 144Hz depending on the task, helping the phone stay smooth while also managing battery life efficiently. Animations feel fluid throughout the interface, and high-refresh-rate gaming feels especially responsive.
Brightness is another area where the X300 Ultra performs exceptionally well. With 1,800 nits of high brightness mode output and a claimed peak brightness of 4500 nits, outdoor visibility remains excellent even under harsh sunlight.
One thing worth noting is that the phone does not run at full QHD+ resolution by default. Vivo dynamically adjusts resolution depending on usage to balance performance and battery life. Honestly though, the default setting already looks more than sharp enough in everyday use.
The ultrasonic fingerprint scanner also deserves credit. It is quick, reliable, and positioned comfortably for natural unlocking.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Performance</h2>
The Vivo X300 Ultra is powered by Qualcomm&rsquo;s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which is currently the chipset powering most serious Android flagships. Vivo has also paired it with its custom VS1+ imaging chip, giving the phone an absurd amount of processing power for both photography and everyday performance.
The variant I tested came with 16GB LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 storage, and the overall experience feels incredibly fast. App launches are instant, multitasking feels effortless, and large file transfers happen ridiculously quickly.
The benchmark numbers reflect that too. The phone scored over 3.8 million on AnTuTu, while Geekbench 6 delivered 3595 in single-core and 10,302 in multi-core tests. More importantly, those numbers translate into genuinely smooth real-world performance. The phone never really feels like it is struggling, regardless of what you throw at it.
Gaming performance is excellent as well. BGMI and COD: Mobile both support 120fps gameplay, while Genshin Impact runs at up to 60fps. Thermals are handled fairly well too. During the demanding 3DMark Wild Life Extreme stress test, temperatures rose from roughly 36&deg;C to 51&deg;C, which is not unusual for a benchmark this heavy.
In regular usage, the phone stays mostly under control. It does get noticeably warm during long outdoor camera sessions, especially while recording high-resolution video, but Vivo&rsquo;s large vapour chamber cooling system helps bring temperatures down reasonably quickly afterwards.
The stereo speakers are excellent too. They get impressively loud, stay clear at high volumes, and offer strong stereo separation while gaming or watching videos.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Battery Life: Big battery, fast charging</h2>
The X300 Ultra packs a huge 6600mAh battery, and thankfully, Vivo hasn&rsquo;t built a camera monster that constantly lives next to a charger. Battery life here is genuinely dependable.
On lighter days with mostly messaging, browsing, music streaming, and some casual photography, the phone can comfortably spill into a second day. But even during heavier usage involving gaming, long camera sessions, and navigation, I never really found myself stressing about battery life before the end of the day.
That said, this is still a phone designed for power users, and once you start pushing all the high-end hardware simultaneously, the battery does begin to move. Shooting a lot of 4K video, especially at higher frame rates, using the camera outdoors at max brightness, or gaming for long stretches, definitely drains it faster.&nbsp;
What I like is that the battery performance feels predictable. Some flagship phones randomly nosedive once the camera gets involved, but the X300 Ultra remains fairly consistent even during intensive use.&nbsp;
Charging is predictably fast too. The phone supports 100W wired charging and 40W wireless charging, and with Vivo&rsquo;s bundled adapter, the speeds are seriously quick for a battery this large. Around 20 minutes gets you close to 50%, while half an hour takes it comfortably past 70%. For a 6600mAh battery, that&rsquo;s honestly kind of ridiculous.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Software</h2>
The Vivo X300 Ultra runs OriginOS 6 based on Android 16, and honestly, Vivo&rsquo;s software experience has improved massively over the past few years. At this point, it is genuinely difficult to complain about how polished the overall experience feels.
What I like most about OriginOS is that it manages to feel playful and feature-rich without becoming overwhelming. There are customisation options almost everywhere, including lock screen layouts, icon styles, animations, wallpapers, and multitasking tools, but the interface still feels organised instead of turning into visual chaos.
Vivo has also added several genuinely useful AI and smart features. The live screen translation works surprisingly well, the recorder app&rsquo;s transcription tool is extremely handy during meetings or interviews, and the AI summary feature saves time when dealing with long notes. Even Origin Island, which initially sounds gimmicky, becomes genuinely useful once you start dragging screenshots, files, and content between apps regularly.
The experience is not completely perfect, though. There are still a few pre-installed apps that most users will probably uninstall immediately, along with the occasional App Store notification that feels unnecessary on a flagship phone at this price.
On the bright side, Vivo is promising 5 years of Android updates alongside 7 years of security patches, which is exactly the kind of long-term support expected from a premium flagship in 2026.
<h2>Vivo X300 Ultra Review: Verdict</h2>
The Vivo X300 Ultra does not feel like another flagship chasing attention with flashy AI features and oversized spec sheets. This is a phone that has been very clearly built around the camera experience first. The consistency between sensors, the cinematic colour science, the incredible telephoto system, and the sheer flexibility for both photography and video make this one of the most capable camera phones available right now.
What impressed me even more is that the rest of the phone still holds up extremely well. The display is excellent, performance is ridiculously fast, battery life remains dependable, and OriginOS feels far more refined than older Vivo software ever did.
Of course, the X300 Ultra is not flawless. That enormous camera module makes the phone feel heavy during daily use, and the occasional pre-installed app still feels unnecessary at this price point. The phone also gets noticeably warm during long outdoor camera sessions, especially while recording high-resolution video.
Then there is the pricing. At ₹1,59,999, Vivo is entering territory dominated by phones like the iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, which is never an easy comparison.
But if smartphone photography and videography matter more to you than almost anything else, the X300 Ultra absolutely belongs in that conversation. In many ways, this might be Vivo&rsquo;s strongest camera flagship yet.

The OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite packs a massive 7,000mAh battery, 144Hz display, Dimensity 7400 chip, and clean OxygenOS experience under ₹25,000.

OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite Review: Best Budget Battery Phone Under ₹25,000?

With a huge 7,000mAh battery, smooth 144Hz display, clean OxygenOS, and strong everyday performance, the OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite feels like one of the smartest budget phones of 2026.

The OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite delivers a massive 7,000mAh battery, smooth 144Hz display, solid gaming performance, and clean OxygenOS, making it one of the smartest budget phones under ₹25,000.

Finding a solid phone under ₹25,000 in 2026 is becoming a bit of a nightmare. With the constant price hikes in the smartphone industry, things have become a little messy. And of the options that are actually available at that price point, there honestly isn&rsquo;t much to write about.&nbsp;
The OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite, though, seems to challenge that belief.&nbsp;
Starting at ₹20,999 for the 6GB + 128GB model, OnePlus basically decided to go all-in on two things with this one: a crazy battery life and a build that can actually take a beating.
With OnePlus throwing in a massive 7,000mAh battery in there, it feels like they chose to focus on what people actually care about. It is fast, lasts surprisingly long, and doesn't feel like a compromised budget device at all, at least as far as the in-hand feel is concerned.
This is probably the most practical budget phone I have tested in a while. Here is why the Lite might actually be the smarter pick this year.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite: Unboxing and Design</h2>
OnePlus is staying the course with the Nord unboxing. You still get the full setup here. The signature blue and black box still holds everything you actually need &mdash; a 45W power brick, that iconic red cable, and a protective case right in the box.&nbsp;
There is even a screen protector pre-applied. It is just a basic plastic film, so you will likely want to swap it for tempered glass at some point, but it is nice to have that protection from day one.
The case they included is just a standard, clear one. It is a little basic, but it works fine until you decide to buy something more personalised. The phone itself looks and feels much more premium than you would expect for the price. It is built out of high-quality plastic, but the matte finish is excellent.&nbsp;
It does a great job of hiding oily smudges and fingerprints, so the phone stays looking fresh even after a long day of use. Despite the plastic build, it feels dense and well-assembled. It definitely doesn't feel like a cheap toy.
If you look at the back, the pill-shaped camera layout definitely has some <a title="Realme P4x Review: Budget performer with a beast of a battery" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/realme-p4x-review-budget-performer-with-a-beast-of-a-battery-1765358964468" target="_blank">Realme P4x </a>vibes. OnePlus kept the controls simple by putting all the buttons on the right side. The power button also acts as your fingerprint sensor, and it reacts quickly when you tap it.&nbsp;
With a massive 7,000mAh battery tucked inside, the device is slightly on the thicker side, but just 8.5mm. It weighs 208g, so it has a solid, reassuring heft without being a literal brick in your pocket.
In terms of durability, the Nord CE6 Lite offers an IP64 rating, which is pretty solid for keeping out dust and surviving accidental splashes. But the MIL-STD-810H certification is the bigger deal. That military-grade drop protection means this phone is built to handle the kind of drops and tumbles that happen in the real world. For a budget-friendly device, it is a surprisingly tough piece of hardware.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite Review: Display</h2>
OnePlus has made a bold move by bringing a 144Hz refresh rate to the <a title="Nord CE6 Review: Big Batteries, Smarter AI, and Better Display" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/nord-ce6-review-big-batteries-smarter-ai-and-better-display-1778158589065" target="_blank">Nord CE6 </a>Lite. It is a segment-leading feature that makes every scroll and animation feel incredibly fluid. While navigating the UI, the scrolling feels remarkably smooth, though the actual viewing experience reflects its budget-friendly positioning.
The Nord CE6 Lite uses a 6.72-inch LCD panel. Yes, the Lite series no longer features an AMOLED in this budget. As I said, welcome to the AI era.&nbsp;
The bezels here are a constant reminder that this is a budget phone, especially when you look at that noticeable chin at the bottom of the screen. While the display is quite punchy for an LCD, it lacks the deep blacks found on more expensive AMOLED screens. You get HDR support for YouTube playback, but Netflix is limited to standard dynamic range.&nbsp;
But, in terms of content consumption, the display does a pretty decent job. During my time with the phone, I never faced any issues, whether I was watching a movie or scrolling through random social feeds. It&rsquo;s not the kind of experience that you would probably get on an AMOLED, but it&rsquo;s decent enough for the price tag.
As for brightness, its peak brightness hits 1000 nits in HBM, which is bright enough for most daily use cases but struggles a bit more than premium panels when used in direct, harsh sunlight.
Durability and usability are big focus areas here as well. The screen features a specialised touch technology that maintains 97% touch accuracy even with wet hands. This ensures you can still reply to texts or navigate the phone with sweaty fingers without the sensor going haywire.&nbsp;
For a phone in this price bracket, having that level of reliability in difficult conditions is a significant addition that most people will actually appreciate during daily use.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite Review: Performance</h2>
The processor of the Nord CE6 Lite actually turned out to be the biggest surprise of this entire review. We get the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, and for storage, you get up to 256GB of UFS 3.1 storage, whereas RAM tops out at 8GB. OnePlus hasn&rsquo;t exactly shared what kind of RAM we have in this. Still, we get to see a massive jump in power, especially compared to other current phones at this price.&nbsp;
I ran the usual benchmarks and saw an AnTuTu score of 999,565, while Geekbench 6 pulled in 1077 for single-core and 2978 for multi-core. Seeing that kind of speed at this price is pretty rare.&nbsp;
It makes the UI feel much smoother than I expected for a budget device, so daily tasks feel pretty much effortless.
Gaming was another area where it punched above its weight, hitting a solid 90 FPS in BGMI and COD Mobile. It isn't perfect, though.&nbsp;
I did catch a few small stutters during those long marathon sessions. It also gets a bit warm after a while; after two hours of playing, I could definitely feel the heat against my palms. It clearly doesn't have the high-end cooling tech you get on the more expensive models.
Still, you have to remember this chip isn't built for pro-level gaming. Even with a bit of heat under heavy load, it offers a very snappy experience for most people. If you just want a fast phone for multitasking and casual gaming that won't break the bank, this is a huge step up.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite Review: Camera</h2>
The camera setup on the Nord CE6 Lite is a bit of a mixed bag. OnePlus decided to stick with the same basic configuration we have seen before, featuring a main 50MP sensor and a 2MP depth lens. I was really hoping they would finally add an ultrawide this year for some much-needed versatility, but instead, we are still stuck with a pretty limited dual-camera layout.
That said, the primary camera actually does a solid job of keeping colours looking natural. It doesn't over-saturate things like a lot of other budget phones tend to do. If you&rsquo;re just posting to social media, your portraits will look decent enough, even if they aren't going to win any awards.&nbsp;
A surprising highlight here is that the Lite actually supports 4K video on the rear camera. You don't always see a lot of phones at this price point doing that, so it is a nice feature for anyone who records a lot of clips.
Flip the phone over and you are dealing with an 8MP selfie shooter. While it's a step down from the 16MP on the previous OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite, it works fine for quick snaps or video calls, but the lack of a high-res sensor is pretty obvious if you try to crop in.&nbsp;
Most of the heavy lifting is handled by the software processing.&nbsp;
Still, the main 50MP sensor is reliable enough to make this a decent daily driver for the average person. It is a very basic, no-frills camera package that just focuses on getting the essentials right.
Nord CE6 Lite Review: Software, UI/UX &amp; AI Features The Nord CE6 Lite is hitting the market with OxygenOS 16 right out of the box, running on top of Android 16. It is that classic OnePlus experience: incredibly fast, smooth, and thankfully stripped of the bloatware that usually clutters up budget phones.&nbsp;
The interface feels high-end, making app switching feel almost instant during daily use. It is great to see this level of polish on a device that doesn't cost a fortune.
The AI features here are surprisingly practical. The AI Creative Tools do some heavy lifting; AI Eraser is perfect for getting rid of photobombers in your snaps, while AI Detail Boost can actually save those low-res shots that would normally be useless.
Google Gemini is also baked into the system as a daily assistant, and I found Circle to Search to be one of the most useful additions for quickly figuring out what is in my social media feeds.&nbsp;
Beyond those, the phone is packed with several other AI tools that feel genuinely useful for anyone living in today&rsquo;s digital world. It is clear that OnePlus is finally taking AI seriously, even for their budget devices, and not just for their more expensive, premium offerings. They are making it a standard part of the OnePlus experience, even for their more affordable models.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite Review: Battery and Charging</h2>
The battery on the Nord CE6 Lite is easily the biggest reason to buy it. That 7,000mAh battery is massive for the price, and it&rsquo;s also a huge jump from the 5,500mAh cell in the previous generation. I put it through my usual daily routine, and it easily lasted almost two full days before I had to even think about a charger.&nbsp;
The 10W reverse charging is also a clever touch. I actually used it to jumpstart my dead earbuds while I was on the move, so for basic power ups you can easily count the Nord CE6 Lite on as your charging buddy.
It uses a 45W SUPERVOOC charger when you finally run out of juice. It would have been nice if OnePlus stuck to the 80W chargers that previous Nord and Nord Lite devices came with.
Still, the phone charges pretty quick. It takes about an hour and a half to hit a full charge, which is fine since it beats out most other phones in this bracket anyway. Just ten minutes on the plug gave me enough power to get through a workday.
You also get Bypass Charging with it. It is great for gaming because the phone pulls power from the wall instead of the battery while you play. This keeps the heat down and stops the battery from wearing out too fast. If you hate constantly worrying about your battery percentage, this thing is the new benchmark for budget phones.
<h2>Nord CE6 Lite Review: Verdict</h2>
The Nord CE6 Lite is probably the most balanced budget phone I&rsquo;ve handled this year, one that costs roughly ₹20,000. It doesn't bother with flashy features that don't work. Instead, OnePlus has covered most of the practical essentials that you&rsquo;d probably demand on a budget device.
Sure, there are certain trade-offs; losing the AMOLED screen is a bummer if you&rsquo;re a big movie buff. But for most of regular users, that 7,000mAh battery is a fair trade. You&rsquo;re getting a clean, fast UI without any of the junk apps that usually ruin budget phones.&nbsp;
At ₹20,999, it&rsquo;s just a solid, dependable tool that isn't going to die on you by lunchtime. If you just want a phone that stays alive and doesn't lag, this is easily the smartest pick in its price range.

OnePlus Nord CE6 delivers an 8000mAh battery, rugged IP69 durability, smooth 144Hz AMOLED display, strong gaming performance, and practical AI features.

OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: 8000mAh Battery, 144Hz AMOLED & AI Features

Massive battery, rugged build, smooth 144Hz display, and practical AI make the Nord CE6 stand out.

OnePlus Nord CE6 combines a massive 8000mAh battery, rugged durability, smooth 144Hz AMOLED display, strong gaming performance, and practical AI features into a reliable mid-range package.

Finally, the OnePlus Nord CE6 is out from behind the curtain, and this time, OnePlus is doing something different. Instead of the usual minor spec bumps, the Nord CE6 feels like a tool built for the actual world. It starts at ₹29,999 for the 8GB/128GB model, and honestly, it is a huge pivot away from those fragile mid-rangers that always feel like a compromise. It feels like a direct answer for anyone who wants a reliable, high-end experience without draining their bank account.
By doubling down on a massive battery and a build that can actually take a beating, this phone is moving into much more specialized territory. I have spent the last week pushing this thing to its absolute limit to see if these rugged upgrades are actually worth the cash or if the trade-offs are just too much to live with every day. It is a bold move for a brand that usually focuses on speed alone.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Unboxing &amp; Design</h2>
OnePlus is staying consistent with the unboxing of the Nord CE6, and honestly, that is great news for buyers. While most brands are busy stripping chargers and cases out of the box to save money, OnePlus still includes the full kit. You get that signature blue and black box, and inside, everything you actually need is right there.&nbsp;
There is a solid protective case, the famous red cable, and an 80W SUPERVOOC adapter. It is such a relief to not have to buy a brick separately. They even put a screen protector on for you, though it is just a basic plastic film that you will probably want to swap for tempered glass eventually.
The whole package feels way more complete than what you get from most competitors. Instead of those cheap, clear cases that turn yellow and look gross after a few weeks, you get an opaque one that actually feels premium. It makes the hardware feel substantial the moment you pull it out.
When you actually get the <a title="OnePlus Nord 6 Review: The new endurance king that almost has it all" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/oneplus-nord-6-review-the-new-endurance-king-that-almost-has-it-all-1775570208573" target="_blank">Nord</a> CE6 in your hand, it looks and feels like it belongs in a higher price bracket. The back has this smooth matte texture that is fantastic at hiding oily smudges and fingerprints. Even though the frame and back are plastic, the finish is so good it looks exactly like glass. The build is tight and doesn't have that hollow, cheap sound when you tap on it.
The design has definitely shifted toward a more "pro" aesthetic. The camera island is now a square, which looks a lot like the OnePlus 15 flagship. It gives the phone a more serious vibe than the older, more playful Nord designs. They kept things simple with all the buttons on the right side, and they have a nice, clicky response. Plus, the fingerprint sensor is under the glass, which keeps the front looking modern and clean. Interestingly, there is no Plus Key to be found here.
Even with a massive battery inside, the phone stays fairly thin at 8.55mm. It isn't a featherweight, but it doesn't feel bulky either. At 215g, it has a reassuring heft that makes it feel like it can actually survive a drop. The biggest highlight is the ruggedness. With IP66, IP68, and even IP69K ratings, this thing is a tank. It can handle high-pressure water jets and has military-grade toughness, so it is clearly built to take a beating.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Display</h2>
OnePlus really went all out on the screen here. Honestly, seeing a 144Hz refresh rate on a Nord is a huge win. It is a big deal for a mid-range phone because it makes every single swipe feel incredibly smooth. You really notice that extra speed when you are flicking through a long Instagram feed or jumping between apps. It just gives the whole interface a much more expensive, snappy feel that you don't always get at this price.
The actual panel is a 6.78-inch 1.5K AMOLED, and it looks fantastic. One thing I caught immediately was how much thinner the bezels are this time around. They look way more symmetrical than last year, which really helps you get lost in a video. The colors are punchy but they don't look fake, and since it supports HDR on Netflix, it is a great little device for catching up on shows.
I also took it out into the bright Delhi sun and it held up surprisingly well. You get 1800 nits of peak HBM brightness, so I wasn't constantly hunting for a shadow just to read a WhatsApp message. It stays perfectly readable even under direct light. Plus, the in-display fingerprint sensor is a nice touch. It reacts fast and feels a lot more modern than those side-mounted scanners we usually see in this segment.
Then there is the toughness. They used Crystal Guard Glass to keep it safe from scratches, but the Aqua Touch 2.0 is what actually saved me. It basically means you can still use the screen if your hands are sweaty or if it starts drizzling. The display doesn't freak out or register random ghost touches when it gets wet. When you mix that kind of ruggedness with the 144Hz speed, this screen is very hard to beat.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Performance</h2>
I&rsquo;ll be totally honest, the performance here really caught me off guard. OnePlus made a pretty weird choice by going with a dual-chip setup, pairing the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 with something they call a Touch Reflex Chip. I know some spec-heads are going to complain about them ditching the old Dimensity 8350, but in my hands, this thing felt incredibly quick. I spent the week jumping between heavy apps and multitasking, and it was just liquid smooth. Everything opens the second you hit the icon, which is that snappy feel people want from this brand.
I ran some benchmarks to see how it handles actual pressure. It hit over 1.1 million on AnTuTu and the Geekbench 6 scores were just as solid. But stats aside, the phone simply doesn't stutter when you are pushing it. When I loaded up BGMI and COD Mobile, it stayed locked at a steady 90 FPS. It felt so stable that I&rsquo;m betting we will see 120 FPS support via an update soon. That dedicated touch chip actually seems to help keep the lag down during competitive play.
The cooling was the biggest surprise for me. Even after an hour of grinding, the device only got a little bit warm. I didn't see any of that annoying thermal throttling where the frame rate suddenly tanks to save the hardware. Whether you are editing a quick video or in a long gaming marathon, the Nord CE6 just keeps up. It is a reliable, fast experience that finally makes a mid-range chip feel like a flagship.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Camera</h2>
The camera situation on the Nord CE6 is honestly a bit of a mystery. I was pretty floored when I realized OnePlus swapped out the ultrawide lens for a 2MP depth sensor. It feels like a big step backward in terms of what you can actually do with the camera, even though that main 50MP sensor is actually quite impressive. It is hard to justify trading a functional lens for a placeholder, but I suppose these are the kind of compromises we have to expect as phone prices keep climbing.
That main camera does a great job, to be fair. My shots around town had plenty of crisp detail, and the dual-axis OIS is a huge help if your hands aren't perfectly steady. But when you switch to video, the limitation comes back because you are capped at 4K at 30fps. Losing the 60fps option that older Nords had feels like a weird move for 2026. I ended up just using 1080p at 60fps most of the time to avoid that jittery look.
At least the color science is on point.<a title="OnePlus Pad 4 Review: This Might Be the Android Tablet to Beat" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/oneplus-pad-4-review-this-might-be-the-android-tablet-to-beat-1777537959030" target="_blank"> OnePlus</a> kept the saturation in check, so your photos look realistic instead of looking like a neon cartoon. The portraits are okay for social media, but that 2MP sensor isn't doing much work. The real highlight is the 32MP selfie camera. Having autofocus on the front is a total game changer at this price. It keeps your face sharp in every shot and even records in 4K. It is a fantastic front setup, but I still really wish I had that ultrawide for landscapes.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Software, UI/UX &amp; AI Features</h2>
The software on the Nord CE6 is exactly what I was looking for. It runs OxygenOS 16 on Android 16, and the whole thing is just fast and remarkably clean. You don't get that bloated, heavy feel that usually kills mid-range phones.&nbsp;
Instead, the UI feels high-end and jumping between big apps is basically instant. But the real headline is the long-term support. OnePlus is promising six years of longevity. Knowing a phone at this price will stay smooth and secure until 2032 is a massive win for anyone who hates upgrading every two years.
The AI stuff here actually feels useful for once. Having Google Gemini as a built-in assistant really changes your daily workflow. And Circle to Search is one of those features I ended up using way more than I expected just to identify stuff in my feed without closing apps.&nbsp;
On the photo side, the AI Eraser and Detail Boost tools are genuinely handy for fixing up a ruined shot or sharpening something that looked a bit soft. It is clear that OnePlus is making AI a core part of the system rather than just a gimmick. It feels like a natural part of the phone.
<h2>OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Battery and Charging</h2>
OnePlus has really moved the goalposts this year with the battery performance on the Nord CE6. I have been using it as my main device for a week now, and that 8000mAh cell is just incredible. In my actual daily use, I was consistently getting through two full days without needing a plug. It is a weird but great feeling to stop worrying about your charger until the second night rolls around.
The 27W reverse charging is another feature that actually turned out to be useful. I ended up using the phone like a portable power bank to juice up my earbuds while I was out and about. It is one of those things you might ignore at first but really appreciate when you are in a pinch. When the phone finally does hit zero, the 80W SUPERVOOC brick gets that massive tank back to full in about an hour.
Gamers are also going to love the Bypass Charging mode. It lets the phone draw power straight from the wall instead of the battery while you play, which keeps the heat down and saves the battery health in the long run. If you are someone who deals with constant low battery anxiety, the Nord CE6 has basically set a new benchmark. It is a total powerhouse that makes you wonder why every other mid-range phone isn't built this way.
<h2>Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
Choosing a phone is getting harder as prices keep climbing. We aren&rsquo;t seeing the same crazy value that older Nords used to offer, but the Nord CE6 still feels like it has that original DNA, even if it costs a bit more now.
It is a rugged tool for anyone who is sick of fragile glass and hunting for a plug by lunchtime. If your job keeps you outside or you just play games for hours, that 8000mAh battery and the tough build are genuine lifesavers. They make the price feel justified.
Yes, losing the ultrawide lens hurts, but the rest of the cameras are fine for daily shots. What you are really buying is a phone that survives a monsoon and lasts two days. If you want something fast and indestructible, this is a great deal. Photographers will hate the lack of lenses, but for anyone else, it is the ultimate "no-anxiety" phone.

The Vivo X300 FE combines ZEISS cameras, flagship-grade performance, slim design, and massive battery life in a surprisingly balanced package.

Vivo X300 FE Review: Small Phone, Big Flagship Energy

<h3 data-start="589" data-end="740">The Vivo X300 FE feels like the sweet spot of Vivo&rsquo;s X-series, balancing cameras, battery life, and usability surprisingly well.</h3>
&nbsp;

Over the past few years, Vivo has been on a serious roll with its X-series phones. Devices like the Vivo X300 and X300 Pro came across as polished, dependable flagships when I tested them, combining strong cameras, solid day-to-day performance, and battery life that comfortably survived heavy usage. That formula has clearly carried over to the Vivo X300 FE as well. On paper, it promises the same premium X-series experience, but in a package that is supposed to feel slightly more accessible.
The problem is, the pricing places the X300 FE in a slightly confusing position. Starting at ₹70,000 for the base 12GB+256GB unit, the X300 FE lands dangerously close to the standard X300, while also competing against the newer X200T, which is still very fresh in the market.
After using the X300 FE for around 10 days, I think I finally understand exactly where this phone fits into Vivo&rsquo;s lineup.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE: Pricing and availability</h2>
The Vivo X300 FE is priced at ₹79,999 for the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage variant. If you need more storage, the 12GB RAM and 512GB version sits higher in the lineup at ₹89,999.
Vivo is also selling the telephoto extender kit separately for ₹15,999, while the additional accessory bundle costs another ₹3,999. If you pick up the complete photography setup along with the 12GB + 256GB variant, the total comes to ₹95,997 after a ₹4,000 discount on the bundle.
The Vivo X300 FE will officially go on sale starting 14th May 2026.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Design and build quality</h2>
Vivo has played it fairly safe with the design language of its recent X-series phones, especially around the cameras. That changes with the X300 FE. The moment I picked it up, the biggest difference was impossible to miss. Instead of the oversized circular camera setup seen on the X300 Pro and Ultra, Vivo has switched to a much slimmer pill-shaped module that stretches horizontally across the back. It looks cleaner, more modern, and honestly, far less aggressive. The ZEISS branding, flash, and triple-camera setup are tucked neatly into the module without making the rear panel feel cluttered.
More importantly, the slimmer camera housing changes how the phone feels during actual use. The X300 FE does not have that heavy-top sensation some flagship camera phones suffer from. Compared to the regular X300, the balance feels better distributed, which made the phone noticeably more comfortable during long usage sessions.
Despite the redesign, Vivo has not cut corners elsewhere. The X300 FE still feels every bit like a premium flagship. The aluminium frame keeps the chassis rigid, while the matte glass finish on the rear adds grip and resists smudges surprisingly well. At 191 grams and just under 8mm thick, the phone manages to feel sleek without becoming fragile or overly thin.
I also liked the size. The 6.31-inch display sits in a sweet spot where the phone feels manageable without looking small. Reaching across the screen never felt awkward, and one-handed use was far easier than on most modern flagships.
The Lilac Purple finish on my unit gives the phone a younger, more playful vibe, though Vivo also offers subtler Urban Olive and Noir Black variants. Around the front, the slim bezels and flat panel help keep the design sharp and symmetrical. Vivo has also packed in almost every modern connectivity feature you would expect, including Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0, NFC, eSIM support, an IR blaster, and USB Type-C.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Display and audio</h2>
The display on the Vivo X300 FE ended up surprising me more than I expected. On paper, the specs already look solid, but once I started using the phone daily, it became clear that Vivo has tuned this panel really well. The device comes with a 6.31-inch AMOLED display featuring a 120Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 2640x1216 or about 1.5K. At 460PPI, it's noticeably sharp. Text looks cleaner, fine details stand out more, and high-resolution videos simply feel more refined.
What I appreciated most, though, was the colour reproduction. Vivo&rsquo;s ZEISS Master Color Display tuning avoids the usual trap of making everything look unnaturally vibrant. Instead, colours appear more controlled and realistic. Skin tones look accurate, HDR videos feel balanced, and photos do not get that exaggerated contrast-heavy treatment many AMOLED panels tend to push.
The panel also supports the P3 wide colour gamut along with HDR10+ playback on streaming platforms like Netflix, so movies and shows look punchy without feeling overprocessed. Vivo has also included 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, which genuinely helps during late-night usage. I noticed far less eye fatigue during long scrolling sessions in dim environments.
Brightness has been excellent too. In regular outdoor conditions, the panel comfortably pushes close to 1800 nits in high brightness mode, which kept visibility perfectly manageable even under aggressive sunlight. HDR highlights can climb all the way up to 5000 nits, allowing bright scenes and reflections in supported content to pop without affecting the darker areas of the image.
The LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate depending on what you are doing, which helps balance smoothness and battery efficiency nicely. Vivo has also equipped the phone with an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanner, and throughout my usage, it remained consistently fast and accurate.
As for audio, the stereo speakers are clean and sufficiently loud for videos, gaming, and casual content consumption. They do not have the deep, room-filling sound signature of the X300 Pro, but for a phone this size, the speaker setup still performs well.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Cameras</h2>
Cameras have consistently been one of Vivo&rsquo;s biggest strengths, especially across the X-series lineup, and the X300 FE definitely feels like it belongs in that family. After using the phone extensively, I came away feeling that Vivo has focused less on flashy tricks and more on building a camera system that feels dependable across different situations.
The hardware itself is interesting. The phone packs a 50MP Sony IMX921 primary sensor, paired with a 50MP Sony IMX882 telephoto camera and an 8MP ultrawide shooter. At first glance, the ultrawide sensor does feel slightly underwhelming on paper, especially when the rest of the setup looks considerably more premium. But once I started using the cameras properly, the overall tuning and consistency mattered far more than the raw numbers.
The main camera is easily the backbone of the experience. Vivo&rsquo;s ZEISS partnership continues to pay off here because the image processing feels restrained in a good way. Instead of pushing unrealistic saturation or over-sharpening everything, the X300 FE focuses on cleaner, more natural-looking results. In daylight, the phone is incredibly reliable. Photos consistently came out detailed, exposure handling was balanced, and highlights were controlled nicely without crushing darker areas of the frame. It is the kind of camera setup where you can quickly pull out the phone, tap the shutter, and trust that the shot will look good.
The telephoto camera ended up being my favourite part of the entire setup. The 50MP IMX882 sensor paired with OIS gives the X300 FE far more flexibility than most phones in this category. Vivo&rsquo;s AI True Clarity Engine also plays a role here, helping preserve details when zooming into distant subjects. Whether I was shooting buildings, street scenes, or random details far away, the phone retained a surprising amount of clarity without making images look artificially processed.
I also tried Vivo&rsquo;s Telephoto Extender Gen 2 kit, and honestly, it is more useful than I expected it to be. The attachment extends the focal length to roughly 200mm, allowing you to capture distant subjects with noticeably better reach. More importantly, it does not simply magnify the image digitally. Details in structures, signs, and textures remain much cleaner and more readable compared to standard zoom crops. The overall image quality still holds together surprisingly well at longer distances, which makes the setup genuinely fun to experiment with.
The ultrawide camera is clearly the weakest sensor in the system, but it is not unusable by any means. The 8MP sensor cannot match the sharpness or dynamic range of the main and telephoto cameras, though for casual landscape shots, group photos, or social media uploads, it still performs adequately.
Low-light photography is another area where the X300 FE performs confidently. The primary sensor manages highlights well while still retaining shadow details, which helps photos look cleaner and more natural at night. Noise control is decent too, and Vivo avoids going overboard with aggressive night processing.
Portraits are especially strong here. Vivo includes ZEISS multifocal portrait options ranging from 23mm all the way to 100mm, and that flexibility genuinely changes how you can frame your shots. Some focal lengths work better for environmental portraits, while others create tighter, more dramatic compositions. It makes the camera system feel more versatile rather than locked into one particular look.
Video capabilities are equally comprehensive. The X300 FE supports 4K recording at 60fps, along with 4K at 120fps and even 8K at 30fps for users who want extra flexibility while shooting. Stabilisation is solid, and the phone feels perfectly capable for casual content creation or vlogging.
On the front, Vivo has added a 50MP selfie camera with autofocus support, which is always a major plus. Selfies look sharp, skin tones remain natural, and autofocus helps keep things consistently crisp during both photos and video calls.
After spending time with the X300 FE, I think Vivo has delivered a camera system that feels balanced and mature. The ultrawide camera may not be class-leading, but the combination of a strong main sensor, an excellent telephoto camera, reliable image processing, and ZEISS-backed tuning makes this one of the more enjoyable compact flagship cameras I have used recently.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Performance</h2>
Performance was one of the areas I was most interested in testing on the Vivo X300 FE, mainly because compact phones sometimes struggle to sustain flagship-level power over longer sessions. Thankfully, that is not really the case here. The phone runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset, and throughout my time using it, the experience felt consistently fast and polished.
Vivo has paired the chip with LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and UFS 4.1 storage, and the difference is immediately noticeable in daily usage. Apps launch almost instantly, multitasking feels seamless, and heavier tasks like editing photos or transferring large video files happen without any frustrating delays. Even after loading the phone up with multiple apps running in the background, I rarely noticed slowdowns or stutters.
Benchmark performance is solid too. I recorded AnTuTu scores hovering around the 2.7 million mark, which comfortably places the X300 FE in flagship territory. While some larger phones may score slightly higher, the important part is that the real-world performance genuinely matches the numbers.
Gaming performance ended up being particularly impressive. I spent long sessions playing BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile at 120FPS, and frame rates stayed remarkably stable throughout. Vivo&rsquo;s vapour chamber cooling system deserves credit here because the phone manages heat surprisingly well for its size. Even during longer gaming runs, temperatures remained controlled, and I never noticed major thermal throttling affecting gameplay.
Overall, the X300 FE feels every bit like a proper flagship performer. It delivers speed, stability, and sustained performance without sacrificing comfort or portability.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Software and AI</h2>
The Vivo X300 FE runs OriginOS 6 based on Android 16, and after using it daily, I found the software experience surprisingly polished. Vivo has clearly focused on making the interface feel fluid without stuffing it with unnecessary clutter. Animations are smooth, app transitions feel consistent, and the overall UI responds quickly no matter what I was doing.
One thing I genuinely liked was the amount of customisation available. OriginOS gives you plenty of ways to make the phone feel personal without turning the settings menu into a maze. I spent quite a bit of time changing lock screen layouts, experimenting with Text Vibe styles, and setting up widgets in a way that actually suited my workflow. Dynamic wallpapers and smaller visual tweaks also help the interface feel more alive over time.
AI features are deeply integrated, especially around the camera experience. Tools like AI Erase, AI Reflection Erase, and AI Photo Enhance turned out to be far more practical than I initially expected. I regularly used them to clean up distracting objects, improve lighting, or sharpen details in photos without needing a separate editing app. Features like AI Magic Move and AI Image Expander also make edits feel quick and approachable rather than overly technical.
Vivo&rsquo;s AI True Clarity Engine quietly works in the background too, improving textures, colours, and fine details across different scenes.
Outside photography, features like Origin Island, Drag &amp; Go, and Shake &amp; Share make multitasking and file sharing feel smooth and intuitive. Vivo is also promising 5 years of Android updates and 7 years of security patches, which adds a reassuring layer of long-term value.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Battery and charging</h2>
Battery life has easily been one of the strongest parts of my experience with the Vivo X300 FE. Despite the relatively compact form factor, Vivo has managed to fit in a huge 6500mAh battery, and the endurance you get from it is genuinely excellent. Even on heavier days involving camera use, navigation, social media, and a lot of YouTube streaming, the phone comfortably lasted me an entire day without triggering battery anxiety.
On more demanding usage days, I was consistently getting over 7 hours of screen-on time, which is impressive for a flagship device in this size category.
Charging speeds are solid too. The 90W FlashCharge support gets the battery topped up quickly, making short charging sessions genuinely useful. Vivo has also included 40W wireless charging, which adds a nice layer of convenience for everyday use.
<h2>Vivo X300 FE Review: Verdict</h2>
The more time I spent with the Vivo X300 FE, the more this phone started making sense to me. It is not trying to be the most extreme device in the X-series lineup. Instead, it focuses on delivering a flagship experience that feels easier to live with every single day.
For me, the biggest strength here is the balance Vivo has managed to achieve. The phone feels slimmer and more comfortable to carry around than the X300, yet somehow feels more premium in the hand than the X200T. That sweet spot between portability and flagship feel is something Vivo has nailed surprisingly well.
The rest of the experience follows the same philosophy. The display looks crisp and natural, performance stays consistently fast no matter what I threw at it, and the cameras, especially the primary and telephoto sensors, remain dependable across different situations. Add to that the excellent battery life, and the X300 FE becomes a very easy phone to rely on daily.
My only hesitation comes down to pricing. Since it lands so close to the X300, the decision becomes harder if value is the priority.
Even so, if you are specifically looking for a compact flagship that still feels unmistakably like an X-series phone, the X300 FE holds its ground very well.

Highlights

Latest news

Meta drops NFT support on Facebook and Instagram

Up Next

More videos

Categories