Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The Supreme Court declined to stay the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, citing a presumption of constitutionality, but suspended provisions restricting waqf creation to practising Muslims of five years and government officers deciding property disputes.

Supreme Court refuses to stay entire waqf law, stalls certain provisions

The Supreme Court declined to stay the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, citing a presumption of constitutionality, but suspended provisions restricting waqf creation to practising Muslims of five years and government officers deciding property disputes.

The Supreme Court on Monday put on hold several key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, including the clause that only those practising Islam for the last five years can dedicate a property as Waqf, but refused to stay the entire law.
&ldquo;We have held that presumption is always in favour of constitutionality of a statute and intervention (can be done) only in the rarest of rare cases,&rdquo; a bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih said in its interim order on the intensely debated issue.
The apex court also pressed pause on the powers given to a collector to adjudicate the status of waqf properties and ruled on the contentious issue of non-Muslim participation in Waqf Boards, directing that the Central Waqf Council should not have more than four non-Muslim members out of 20, and State Waqf Boards not more than three of 11.
The CJI said the bench has considered the &ldquo;prima facie challenge&rdquo; to each section in the new law and found that &ldquo;no case was made out to stay entire provisions of the statute".
"However some sections need some protection,&rdquo; he said.
The bench made clear that its directions were prima facie and interim in nature and they would not prevent the petitioners or the government from advancing full arguments on the constitutional validity of the law at the stage of final hearing.
The detailed judgement is awaited.
CJI Gavai then referred to the provisions which have been interfered with or stayed by the interim order.
&ldquo;The requirement that a person has to be a practicing Muslim for the last five years before he can dedicate a property as waqf (Section 3(r)) has been stayed until the state governments rules are framed for examining whether a person is a practicing Muslim or not. Without any such rule/ mechanism, the provision will lead to an arbitrary exercise of power,&rdquo; the order said.
One of the most significant interventions came in relation to Section 3C, which had vested powers in designated government officers to determine the status of Waqf properties.
The bench stayed a proviso to Section 3C(2) of the law, which said a property would not be deemed Waqf until a government officer&rsquo;s report confirmed no encroachment.
It also stayed the operation of section 3C(3), which authorised the officer to declare a property as government land and alter revenue records.
The order stalled Section 3C(4), which required the state government to direct the Waqf Board to correct its records on the basis of the officer&rsquo;s findings.
&ldquo;Permitting the collector to determine the rights is against the separation of powers; the executive cannot be permitted to determine the rights of citizens,&rdquo; it said.
The bench clarified that until the title to a property is finally adjudicated under Section 83 by the Waqf Tribunal, and subject to appeal before the High Court, neither the possession of the Waqf nor its records would be disturbed. However, during the pendency of inquiry, no third-party rights could be created in such properties, it said.
On the non-Muslim participation in Waqf Boards, the bench declined to stay the provisions but imposed limitations.
While not striking down Section 23, which deals with the appointment of chief executive officers (CEOs), the bench said, &ldquo;As far as possible, efforts should be made to appoint the CEO, who is also the ex-officio secretary of the board, from the Muslim community.&rdquo; It, however, refused to interfere with the provision mandating registration of Waqfs, observing that it was not a new requirement and had existed under earlier legislations of 1995 and 2013.
According to the Act, Waqf refers to an endowment made by a Muslim for charitable or religious purposes, such as building mosques, schools, hospitals, or other public institutions. "Another defining feature of a Waqf is that it's inalienable- which means it cannot be sold, gifted, inherited or encumbered," it states.
On May 22, the Supreme Court reserved its orders on three key issues, including the power to denotify properties declared as "waqf by courts, waqf-by-user or waqf by deed", which cropped up during the hearing of pleas challenging the validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
Apart from the issue of denotification, petitioners raised questions over the composition of state waqf boards and the Central Waqf Council, where they contended that only Muslims should operate except ex-officio members. The third issue relates to a provision that says a waqf property will not be treated as a waqf when the collector conducts an inquiry to ascertain if the property is government land.
On April 25, the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs filed a preliminary 1,332-page affidavit defending the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 and opposed any "blanket stay" by the court on a "law having presumption of constitutionality passed by Parliament".
The Centre notified the Act on April 8 after it got President Droupadi Murmu's assent on April 5.
The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 on April 3 and April 4 respectively.

The UMEED portal revolutionizes Waqf property management through digitization and geo-tagging, aiming to support disadvantaged Muslims by ensuring transparency and accountability. Launched by Minister Rijiju, it underlines the government's commitment to minority rights.

UMEED Portal for Waqf Property Digitization

UMEED portal digitizes Waqf properties for improved management, benefiting economically disadvantaged Muslims. Launched by Minister Rijiju, it marks a significant step in transparency and accountability efforts, aligning with the government's commitment to minority community welfare.

UMEED portal digitizes Waqf properties, enhancing management. Aimed at benefiting disadvantaged Muslims, it serves as a centralized system for transparency and accountability.

The government has unveiled the UMEED portal, a transformative initiative aimed at digitizing and geo-tagging Waqf properties across the country. This landmark development was spearheaded by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who hailed it as a significant stride towards ensuring that Waqf assets are utilized effectively and equitably to benefit economically disadvantaged Muslims. UMEED, which stands for Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development, is more than just a modern technological platform. Serving as a centralized digital system, it allows for real-time uploading, verification, and monitoring of Waqf properties, ensuring transparency and accountability in their management. Minister Rijiju, alongside Union Minister of State for Minority Affairs George Kurian, inaugurated this central portal, emphasizing its role in enhancing the management and administration of Waqf properties in India. Rijiju noted that this initiative is a testament to the government's dedication to protecting minority communities' rights and ensuring that Waqf resources serve their intended purpose of supporting impoverished Muslims, particularly focusing on women and children. In a social media message following the launch, Rijiju described the UMEED portal as a "momentous occasion," emphasizing its importance not just as a technological advancement, but as a symbol of the government's pledge to improve the welfare of minority communities by securing and optimizing the use of their communal assets.

Centre defends Waqf Act in Supreme Court, stressing waqf's non-essentiality to Islam, addressing misuse of properties.

Centre Stands Firm on Waqf Act in Supreme Court

The Centre defends the Waqf Act in the Supreme Court, claiming waqf is not essential to Islam. Focus remains on curbing property misuse, with a legislative review ensuring the Act respects constitutional values.

Centre defends Waqf Act in SC; waqf deemed non-essential to Islam. Focus on curbing land misuse.

The center on Wednesday defended the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 in the Supreme Court and said though waqf was an Islamic concept, it was not an essential part of Islam.
Arguing before Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, "Waqf is an Islamic concept. But it is not an essential part of Islam.. Waqf is nothing but just charity in Islam." "Charity is recognised in every religion, and it cannot be regarded as an essential tenet of any religion," he said. Earlier in the day, Mehta asserted nobody could claim right over public land by using waqf by user principle which was a statutory right and the law could take it away.
"Waqf by user" refers to a concept where a property is recognised as waqf based on its long-term use for religious or charitable purposes, even without formal documentation.
Responding to the challenge against the validity of the 2025 law, Mehta argued the amended law dealt with the secular aspects of waqf and activities that were non-essential to Islam.
Mehta said the "waqf by user" concept did not permit &ldquo;wholesale takeover of waqf properties&rdquo; by the state as alleged.
&ldquo;Waqf by user is not a fundamental right, it is a creature of statute, and what the legislature creates, it can also take away,&rdquo; he said.
Any stay of the provision on abolition of unregistered "waqf by user" properties would defeat the purpose of the law which has been enacted to remedy the mischief like usurpation of government land, Mehta added.
&ldquo;The Centre is the custodian of properties on behalf of 14 crore citizens,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;and nobody has the right over government land.&rdquo; Mehta said, &ldquo;There is a Supreme Court judgment which says the government can save the property if it belongs to the government and has been declared as waqf.&rdquo; Contesting the argument of government officers arbitrarily claiming land as government property from now on and override waqf status, he called it &ldquo;misleading and false.&rdquo; On the point of an officer above the rank of a district collector deciding the dispute on the claim over an alleged waqf property, he said officer wouldn't finally determine the property's ownership.
Mehta said the eviction or takeover of property could only occur after due process through the Waqf Tribunal proceedings (under Section 83) and subsequent appeals.
The possession would continue with the waqf until the issue was fully adjudicated, he said.
The SG cited the extensive deliberations of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, which held 96 sittings, received 97 lakh representations, and incorporated feedback from 25 Waqf Boards and several state governments.
He said the bill was not rushed or passed mechanically but involved thorough clause-by-clause scrutiny.
&ldquo;There has been an unprecedented level of consultation. It's not the case that this was done behind closed doors. Many of the suggestions made by stakeholders were either incorporated or reasonably rejected,&rdquo; Mehta added.
The law officer also drew bench's attention to the "historic misuse" of waqf by user to claim ownership of public or private lands without documentation.
&ldquo;This menace has existed since 1923. The first legislation dealing with waqf property was introduced then to curb this very issue,&rdquo; he said.
On the question whether the law infringed upon Articles 25 and 26 (freedom of religion and management of religious affairs) of the Constitution, he said though waqf was an Islamic concept, it did not constitute an essential religious practice.
Unlike Hindu, Jain religious trusts which deal with religious aspects, temples, priests and their management, waqf may include schools, colleges, etc., Mehta said.
Doctrine of essential religious practices, he added, as articulated by Dr B R Ambedkar must be satisfied before any constitutional protection under Article 25 can be claimed.
&ldquo;Unless it is shown that waqf is an essential part of Islam, the rest of the arguments cannot succeed,&rdquo; Mehta said.
The Centre opposed the claim that the law enabled mass takeover of waqf properties.
&ldquo;There is no wholesale capturing. The designated officer cannot take possession. At best, the revenue entry changes, which itself is subject to challenge and appeal. Title disputes will continue to be resolved in courts,&rdquo; he said.
Referring to case laws, he said the government could protect public lands even if erroneously entered as waqf, and that mere entry in the waqf register did not confer ownership.
Mehta said no affected parties moved the court and &ldquo;it is nobody's case that Parliament does not have the competence to pass this legislation".
He said the amended law did not allow waqf by user prospectively.
On the issue over non-Muslims being appointed in the Central Waqf Council and the state waqf boards, he said in the CWC a maximum of four non-Muslims of the total 22 members were allowed.
In state boards, of the total 11 members, a maximum of three non-Muslim members -- except if the ex-officio members was non Muslim then two non-Muslims&mdash;could be appointed.
&ldquo;Non-Muslims can also be aggrieved or affected or beneficiary and this is the reason that non-Muslims have been included,&rdquo; he said.
The hearing would continue on Thursday.

The RJD embraces the Supreme Court's decision to stay the Waqf Act's provisions, continuing its fight to protect minority rights and constitutional integrity.

SC Halts Waqf Act; RJD Pledges Legal Battle

RJD lauds the Supreme Court's pause on the Waqf Act provisions, reinforcing its commitment to defending minority rights and constitutional values amid legislative challenges.

The RJD embraces the Supreme Court's decision to stay the Waqf Act's provisions

The RJD celebrates the Supreme Court's temporary suspension of controversial Waqf Act provisions, pledging continued legal action to protect constitutional and minority rights.

The main opposition party in Bihar, Rashtriya Janata Dal, on Friday, welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to put on hold key provisions of the Waqf Act till the next hearing, and said the "legal battle against the legislation will continue".
Talking to reporters here on Friday, RJD's Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha said, "The Waqf Act attacks the rights of minorities." It attacks the very soul of the Constitution. It is unconstitutional. The RJD will not allow this to happen, he said.
"Our legal battle against the new legislation will continue. We welcome the SC's decision of putting on hold key provisions of the Waqf Act till the next hearing," Jha said.
The SC on Thursday granted the Centre a week's time to file a response to the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
The three-judge bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan noted assurance of the Centre that till the next date of hearing (May 5), waqf, including 'waqf by user', which is declared by notification or registered, will neither be denotified nor its character changed.
The SC gave its observation while hearing a batch of petitions, including AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi's plea and RJD's Manoj Jha, against the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 recently passed by Parliament.
"We thank the SC for putting on hold key provisions of the Waqf Act. Right from the beginning our leaders, Lalu Prasad Ji and Tejaswhi Yadav Ji, are clear that the RJD will not allow anyone to divide the society on the name of caste, creed and religion. This is not the fight to protect the soul of the constitution only, this is the fight to protect minorities in the country," said Jha.
There are several amendments in the Act, which go against the Constitution, he claimed.
"In the coming hearings, we hope that the points raised by us will be considered by the court," the RJD MP said.
"We hope for more relief," he said.
When asked about the meeting of leaders of 'Mahagathbandhan' held in Patna on Thursday and also on the prevailing confusion over the CM face in the assembly polls due in the state later this year, Jha said, "There is an appropriate time for everything. I must say one thing as you people know the sun rises in the east. It is a universal truth." "Similarly, this issue is also very clear. Now, I don't have to say much about this," Jha said.

NHRC investigates violence in Murshidabad amid Waqf Act protests, displacing residents to Malda. The NHRC team aims to report on human rights abuses within three weeks.

NHRC Investigates Murshidabad Violence

Amid Waqf Act protest violence in Murshidabad, NHRC examines human rights concerns. The investigation focuses on affected individuals taking refuge in Malda, with a report due soon.

NHRC investigates violence in Murshidabad amid Waqf Act protests, displacing residents to Malda

NHRC investigates Murshidabad violence due to Waqf Act protests. Team visits Malda camps sheltering displaced residents. Report due in three weeks amid three reported deaths.

A team of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on Friday arrived in West Bengal's Malda district to meet people who have taken shelter in refugee camps after fleeing violence-hit areas of Murshidabad district.
The NHRC took suo motu cognisance of the recent violence in Murshidabad that broke out during protests over the Waqf (Amendment) Act.
The Commission on Tuesday said it has decided to send a team to conduct an on-the-spot inquiry into the incidents, considering the seriousness of the situation.
The NHRC action comes following the receipt of a formal complaint about the violence and the alleged human rights violations in the affected areas.
According to officials, three people were killed during the violent clashes that erupted in the Muslim-majority areas of Shamsherganj, Suti, Dhulian, and Jangipur in Murshidabad district. Many residents, fearing for their lives, fled their homes and took shelter in camps set up in neighbouring Malda district.
The violence occurred amid widespread protests against the central government&rsquo;s recent amendments to the Waqf Act.
The NHRC has directed that a detailed inquiry report be submitted within three weeks.

The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to file its response within a week on challenges to the Waqf Amendment Act 2025, while ensuring no waqf properties are denotified and no new appointments are made to the Waqf Council until the next hearing.

Waqf Act case: SC directs Centre to file response within a week

The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to file its response within a week on challenges to the Waqf Amendment Act 2025, while ensuring no waqf properties are denotified and no new appointments are made to the Waqf Council until the next hearing.

The Supreme Court on Thursday took note of the Centre&rsquo;s request for a week's time to submit its preliminary response in the case concerning the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
Representing the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta assured the bench that a reply, along with necessary documents, would be filed within seven days.
The court recorded the Centre&rsquo;s assurance that no appointments would be made to the Waqf Board or the Central Waqf Council until the matter is further heard. It also acknowledged Mehta&rsquo;s submission that properties registered or declared under the Waqf category, including &ldquo;waqf by deed&rdquo; and &ldquo;waqf by user,&rdquo; would not be de-notified in the meantime.
Mehta emphasized the legislative nature of the Waqf Act, stating: "The Waqf Act is a considered piece of legislation." He added that the Centre had received numerous representations regarding land classifications as Waqf. Arguing against a blanket stay on the Act, Mehta warned: "Staying the entire Act would be a severe step," and requested time to respond fully.
While noting previous positive observations about parts of the legislation, the court clarified it was not inclined to stay the Act in its entirety. It stressed the importance of maintaining the status quo during the judicial review. "We do not want the current status to be altered while the matter is under consideration," the bench reiterated.
On Wednesday, after a lengthy two-hour hearing, the court hinted at possibly suspending certain key provisions. These included the participation of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards, the role of Collectors in property disputes, and provisions for de-notifying court-declared Waqf properties. Before issuing any interim order, the court decided to hear all parties defending the Act.
The case is being heard by a three-judge bench consisting of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, and Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan. During arguments, the bench observed: "We will say that whichever properties have been declared by the court to be Waqf or held to be Waqf will not be de-notified as Waqfs or be treated as non-Waqf properties, whether they are by Waqf-by-user or waqf-by-declaration or otherwise... declared by courts or otherwise also."
The Chief Justice further elaborated: "Second, Collector can continue with proceedings, but the proviso will not be given effect to. If he wants, he can move an application before this court, and we can modify it. Third, as far as the constitution of the Board and Council is concerned, ex officio members can be appointed, regardless of their faith, but the other members should be Muslims."
Commenting on the amended law's provision for de-notifying longstanding Waqf properties, the CJI stated: "Government cannot rewrite history." On including non-Muslims in Waqf institutions, Justice Viswanathan remarked: "Whenever it comes to Hindu endowments, it would be Hindus who would be governing."
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing one of the petitioners, voiced concern over the authority given to Collectors: "This is per se unconstitutional. This also says that property will not be a Waqf till the officer decides so." Referring to changes in council composition, he added: "Only Muslims had been part of the Waqf council and Boards, but now, after the amendment, even Hindus can be a part of it." Sibal strongly argued: "It is a parliamentary usurpation of the faith of 200 million persons."
Towards the end of the hearing, the bench also addressed reports of violence in West Bengal's Murshidabad district, allegedly linked to the new law. "The one thing is very disturbing&mdash;the violence that is taking place. The issue is before the court and we will decide," the bench stated.
Multiple petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Critics argue the legislation discriminates against Muslims and infringes upon their fundamental rights. The bill received presidential assent on April 5 after intense parliamentary debate.
Opposition to the law has come from several political figures and groups, including AIMIM&rsquo;s Asaduddin Owaisi, Congress MPs Mohammad Jawed and Imran Pratapgarhi, AAP&rsquo;s Amanatullah Khan, and members from parties like DMK, CPI, SP, RJD, and others. Religious and civil bodies such as the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, AIMPLB, and various Sunni groups have also filed challenges.
On the other hand, BJP-ruled states and other groups&mdash;including Adivasi and Hindu organizations&mdash;have filed impleadment applications defending the law. Two PILs have also been submitted, questioning parts of the 1995 and 2025 Acts and urging for equal protections for other communities.

The Supreme Court challenges the Centre's justification for appointing non-Muslims to waqf boards, stressing the secular nature of the judiciary.

Supreme Court questions Centre over non-Muslims in waqf boards

The Supreme Court challenges the Centre's justification for appointing non-Muslims to waqf boards, stressing the secular nature of the judiciary.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday took strong note of an analogy drawn by the Centre in support of the inclusion of non-Muslims in waqf boards and the argument that by that logic, a bench of Hindu judges should not be hearing pleas related to waqf.
The bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Sanjay Kumar and K V Viswanathan was questioning the provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 that allow for the nomination of non-Muslim members to the Central Waqf Council and state waqf boards.
"Are you suggesting that minorities, including Muslims, should also be included in boards managing Hindu religious institutions? Please state that openly," the CJI said.
Representing the Centre in the matter, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the provisions, emphasising that the inclusion of non-Muslim members is limited and does not affect the predominantly Muslim composition of these bodies.
The law officer also said objections to non-Muslim participation could logically extend to judicial impartiality and by that logic, the bench itself would be disqualified from hearing the matter.
If the objection to the presence of non-Muslims in the statutory boards is accepted, then the present bench would also not be able to hear the matter, Mehta said, adding, "Then your Lordships cannot hear this matter if we go by that logic."
The CJI shot back, saying "No, sorry Mr Mehta, we are not talking just about adjudication. When we sit here, we lose our religion. We are absolutely secular. For us, one side or the other is the same."

Students from Aliah University protested in Kolkata against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, seeking its repeal. BJP plans a campaign to highlight the law's benefits, as J.P. Nadda defends its impact on Muslim welfare.

Kolkata Protest Against Waqf (Amendment) Act

Aliah University students in Kolkata protested the Waqf (Amendment) Act, calling for its repeal. BJP responds with a public awareness campaign, emphasizing the law's benefits for Muslim welfare, led by J.P. Nadda.

Students from Aliah University protested in Kolkata against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, seeking its repeal

Aliah University students in Kolkata protested against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, urging its repeal. The BJP plans a campaign to highlight the act's benefits. J.P. Nadda claims the law aids poor Muslims and reorganizes Waqf property control.

Students of Aliah University in Kolkata on Friday took out a rally protesting the Waqf (Amendment) Act and demanding that the legislation be withdrawn.
The participants in the rally also blocked the seven-point crossing in the Park Circus area here for some time after they went past the barricades put up by the police.
The Aliah University students, who marched from their campus nearby, raised slogans demanding that the law be withdrawn.
"The BJP is talking of 'sabka sath, sabka vikas', but one community is being discriminated against," one of the students participating in the rally alleged.
The BJP has said that it will launch a fortnight-long public awareness campaign, aimed especially at Muslims, from April 20 to publicise the benefits of the Waqf (Amendment) Act and counter the opposition's criticism of it.
BJP office-bearers from across the country attended a workshop in New Delhi on Thursday where party president J P Nadda accused the opposition parties of misleading Muslims about the provisions of the amended law as part of its vote-bank politics.
Nadda said the new law, which came into effect on April 8, would help utilise Waqf properties for the welfare of poor Muslims and women, adding it would free these assets from the control of a small but influential section of people and open them for the minority community's overall benefit.

Pravat Tripathy accuses BJD of inconsistent Waqf Bill stance, sparking discord. Naveen Patnaik rebuffs claims, citing Tripathy's expulsion. Party's mixed Bill stance causes unrest.

BJD's Internal Discord Over Waqf Bill

Former MLA Tripathy accuses BJD of Waqf Bill inconsistency, causing party discord. Patnaik denies claims, citing Tripathy's expulsion. Mixed Bill stance sparks unrest in Odisha.

Rift in BJD intensifies over Waqf bill voting stance

Former MLA Pravat Tripathy accuses BJD president Naveen Patnaik of inconsistency over the Waqf Bill, sparking internal discord. Patnaik rebuffs claims, citing Tripathy's expulsion. Party's mixed stance on the Bill leads to unrest.

The alleged rift in the opposition BJD over its flip-flop stand on the Waqf Bill voting further widened on Thursday with former party MLA Pravat Tripathy accusing party president Naveen Patnaik of attempting to divert attention from the main issue and lying about his expulsion from the regional outfit.
Addressing a press conference, Tripathy alleged that Patnaik in his statement to the media on Wednesday did not speak on the Waqf Bill voting issue which has created ripples across the party and the state over BJD&rsquo;s change of stand at the last moment.
"He (Patnaik) lied on my suspension. The party revoked action against me in 2017. I did not urge the party to revoke my suspension, but he (Patnaik) revoked it keeping in view my requirements. Therefore, I extensively campaigned for BJD during the 2019 and 2024 elections," Tripathy claimed.
While giving a clean chit to his close aide VK Pandian, the BJD president has said Tripathy was expelled from the party some years ago.
"I want to state clearly that ex-MLA Pravat Tripathy was expelled from the Biju Janata Dal some years ago because he was indicted in a chit-fund case and spent some years in jail. I want to clarify again that he doesn&rsquo;t belong to the party," Patnaik had said on Wednesday.
Countering Patnaik&rsquo;s statement, the former MLA asserted, "I was a member of BJD till Wednesday evening. During the 2019 elections, the BJD president and then chief minister was present at the meeting which I had addressed. I also attended party programmes in Cuttack district after the COVID pandemic," he said and displayed documents and photographs to justify his claim.
Tripathy added, "The then No. 2 in the BJD (referring to Pandian) had hailed my contribution to the party. If this person has withdrawn from active politics and not involved in any party activities for the past 10 months, then why is the needle of suspicion over the split voting pointing towards him," he asked.
Tripathy, who did not contest the polls in 2019 and 2024 and his son Devi Ranjan Tripathy replaced him as the BJD MLA from Banki assembly segment, came to the limelight when he joined the bandwagon in the Waqf voting issue where BJD MPs voted both for and against the Bill.
Like some other leaders, Tripathy too had indicated that Pandian was the person who diluted the BJD stand at the last moment of the voting.
He held the former bureaucrat responsible for the BJD&rsquo;s defeat in the 2024 election.
Tripathy continues to have influence in Banki assembly segment in Cuttack district as he won the seat four times in 1995, 2000, 2009 and 2014.
His son Devi Ranjan Tripathy retained the seat in 2019 and 2024.
BJD was yet to react to Tripathy&rsquo;s allegations.
Though the regional party initially decided to oppose the Bill, it changed its stand and told party MPs to vote according to their conscience.
This led to at least one BJD MP (Sasmit Patra) voting in support of the Bill while another abstained (Debasish Samantray). Five other MPs have not revealed to whom they voted. The BJD has seven MPs in the Rajya Sabha.
With the majority of the party leaders realising that the BJD&rsquo;s secular stand on the Waqf Bill was questioned due to confusion in voting, many indirectly blamed Patnaik&rsquo;s close aide Pandian, who quit active politics 10 months ago after BJD&rsquo;s defeat in both Assembly and Lok Sabha elections.
Though BJD&rsquo;s Rajya Sabha floor leader Sasmit Patra issued a social media post informing all party MPs that they can vote as per conscience, many leaders suspected that he (Patra) might have made such a change at the last moment at the instruction of Pandian.
MP Debasish Samantaray, who abstained from voting on the Bill, has also expressed his displeasure over the last-minute change in the party&rsquo;s stand, indicating at Pandian.
However, Patnaik on Wednesday made it clear that Pandian should not be held responsible or blamed for the activities of BJD, as the bureaucrat-turned-politician had already been away from active politics for over 10 months.
Meanwhile, Patra has reached New Delhi after his foreign tour but was yet to clarify his stand on the Waqf Bill voting issue.

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was disrupted by protests demanding discussion on the Waqf (Amendment) Act. The Speaker's order fueled tensions, leading to multiple adjournments and revealing potential fractures.

Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was adjourned for the day on Tuesday following a ruckus

J&K assembly session disrupted over Waqf (Amendment) Act debate

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly adjourned amidst uproar over the Waqf (Amendment) Act, showing rare unity among opposing parties demanding its discussion, but the Speaker deemed it sub judice, escalating tensions and adjournments.

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was adjourned for the day on Tuesday following a ruckus by the National Conference (NC), Congress, PDP and other members over the Speaker disallowing adjournment of business to discuss the Waqf (Amendment) Act.
The treasury benches, including ministers, joined the PDP demanding a discussion on the Act. After their demand was rejected by the Speaker, the treasury benches did not allow the House to function for the second consecutive day.
As the House assembled for the day, NC members led by Salman Sagar, Tanvir Sadiq and Peoples Conference member Sajad Gani Lone raised the issue of adjourning the Budget Session to discuss the Act in the House.
As Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather asked them to allow the Question Hour to begin, members of the NC, Congress, People's Democratic Party (PDP) and Independents trooped into the well of the House, raising slogans and demanding the withdrawal of the "black law".
Amid the noisy scenes, PDP member Waheed-ur-Rehman Parra stormed into the well of the House, demanding the immediate passage of the resolution moved by his party.
As Parra, carrying a copy of the resolution in his hand, pressed for its passage, NC leader Abdul Majid Larmi accused him of being an agent, sparking a heated verbal exchange between NC members and other opposition legislators, including Sheikh Khursheed.
When Parra attempted to enter the well of the House, the Speaker directed the marshals to evict him. Sajad Gani Lone of the People's Conference attempted to prevent him from getting evicted.
"I was demanding the passage of the resolution in the House over the Bill. It is unfortunate on the part of the Speaker to remove me from the House. This is a Muslim-majority region. We have over 60 Muslim legislators in the House, but we cannot discuss and pass the resolution," Parra told reporters outside the House.
Nine members of the NC, Congress and Independent MLAs had submitted notices to the Speaker to adjourn business for discussing the issue on Monday. The House was adjourned for the day after two adjournments due to the pandemonium.
The situation escalated into further chaos, with NC MLAs and Sajad Lone engaging in a fierce verbal duel. "We want the resolution to be passed. This is a Muslim-majority state," Lone said.
He accused the NC of theatrics and added, "It is ironic that NC legislators are protesting against an NC Speaker just to fool the people." He further said they should bring a no-confidence motion to remove the Speaker.
Amid noisy scenes, NC members Nazir Gurezi, Salman Sagar and Tanvir Sadiq urged the Speaker to consider the sentiments of the members as they pertained to a religious matter and allow the discussion.
"We want to discuss the issue. It is our religious matter. This is a Muslim-majority state. Please allow the discussion," Gurezi said.
The Speaker said the motion was disallowed as the matter was sub judice. "You cannot undo what Parliament has done. No discussion can be held on this. I have not allowed any discussion," the Speaker said.
As pandemonium broke out in the House, the Speaker initially adjourned the proceedings for 30 minutes.
When the House reassembled after the adjournment, the treasury benches and the PDP members continued to demand a discussion on the issue.
The Jammu and Kashmir government said it has concerns over the Waqf (Amendment) Act and urged Speaker Rather to hold a discussion on it in the House.
"This government is chosen by the people. Members have been elected by the people. If it is the concern of the members, it is the concern of the government too. We cannot say it is not the concern of the government," Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary told the House amid the uproar.
Referring to Section 58, sub-rule 9, the Speaker said, "The motion shall not relate to a matter which is not primarily the concern of the government. If it is not the concern of this government, the motion cannot be taken up." This triggered massive protests from members, who thumped desks and raised slogans.
Responding to him, Minister for Agriculture Javed Dar and Minister Sakina Itoo said it is the concern of the government.
Nazir Gurezi of the NC said the Supreme Court has not admitted the matter as no notices have been issued. "Keeping this in view, a discussion can be held," he said.
However, BJP member Sham Lal Sharma and Peoples Conference member Sajad Lone told the protesting treasury benches to bring a no-confidence motion to remove the Speaker.
As the ruckus continued, the Speaker adjourned the House till 1 pm.
After House proceedings resumed, NC member Mubarak Gul stood up from his bench and urged the Speaker to allow a discussion on this important issue, saying that it involved religious sentiments.
"We seek debate. Let every member across the House speak on it. It is a sensitive issue. It is a religious issue. Some have protested in several places across the country. These are concerns for all of us," Gul said in the house.
Seeking a debate on the matter, he said it would be good to allow members to speak on it.
However, BJP member Sham Lal Sharma opposed the discussion and also the adjournment of the House, stating that the Speaker had given his ruling and rejected the adjournment motion according to the rule book.
"The government has also joined them, which wasn't the case in the past. The House is not being allowed to function by the treasury benches," he said.
Sharma said if members and the government do not have faith in the Speaker, they should bring a no-confidence motion to remove him. "Let a new Speaker decide over it," he said.
The treasury benches continued their protests, saying they wanted an adjournment and a discussion on the Act.
The BJP raised slogans like "Gundagardi nahi chalegi", "No scope for discussion" and "Dramabazi band karo", which were countered by the NC members for a few minutes.
The Speaker said his ruling was final and would not be changed. He then adjourned the House for the day.

Manipur MLA Sheikh Noorul Hassan aims to challenge the Waqf Amendment Act 2025, citing Muslim rights concerns. The BJP condemns an arson attack on Md Asker Ali's home, linked to support for the Act. Ali apologizes for prior backing.

Manipur MLA Challenges Waqf Act; BJP Condemns Arson

In Manipur, MLA Sheikh Noorul Hassan plans to challenge the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 in the Supreme Court, asserting rights violations. Following an arson attack on Md Asker Ali's residence, BJP decries the violence as Ali retracts his support for the Act.

Manipur MLA challenges Waqf amendment, BJP condemns Arson attack

Manipur MLA Sheikh Noorul Hassan plans to challenge the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 for its perceived violation of Muslim rights. After an arson attack on Md Asker Ali's home, the BJP condemned the violence, while Ali apologized for initially supporting the Act.

Manipur legislator Sheikh Noorul Hassan on Monday said he will challenge the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, in the Supreme Court.
In a video message, Hassan, a National People&rsquo;s Party MLA, said, "The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 violates the rights of Muslims. I personally condemn and reject this Act. I will challenge it in the Supreme Court." In a separate development, the Manipur BJP strongly condemned the torching of the house of its Minority Morcha president Md Asker Ali by a mob.
In a statement, the BJP condemned the incident and assured that "such unfortunate incidents shall not happen in the future." Ali's house at Lilong in Thoubal district was set on fire on Sunday for allegedly supporting the Act.
Following the incident, Ali posted a video on social media, apologising for his earlier statement.

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq criticizes Jammu and Kashmir Assembly Speaker for dismissing a Waqf motion, highlighting successful legislation in Tamil Nadu on similar matters.

J&K Speaker Faces Criticism Over Waqf Motion Dismissal

Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq on Monday criticised the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly speaker for rejecting the adjournment motion on the Waqf issue.

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq criticizes J&K speaker for dismissing Waqf motion

Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq on Monday criticised the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly speaker for rejecting the adjournment motion on the Waqf issue.

Hurriyat Conference chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq on Monday criticised the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly speaker for rejecting the adjournment motion on the Waqf issue.
"It is ridiculous and condemnable that Tamil Nadu which only has 6% Muslim population, passes a strong anti-Wakf resolution in its assembly, while the Muslim majority J&amp;K assembly speaker is struggling and refusing, by hiding behind technicalities, to discuss this deeply concerting issue for the Muslims of the state," he said on X.
Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather rejected the adjournment motion, saying the mater was in court.
The Mirwaiz said a huge mandate was given to National Conference in the assembly elections for safeguarding the interests of the people.
"The speaker would know that the strong peoples mandate given to his party was precisely for the reason that the party had promised to safeguard the interests of the people being trampled upon since August 2019 and take a stand for them in critical matters. Why is he capitulating so meekly?" he asked.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was passed by Parliament last week. The Act aims to streamline the management of Waqf properties (assets permanently donated by Muslims for religious or charitable purposes) with provisions to safeguard heritage sites, and promote social welfare.
It also seeks to improve governance by enhancing transparency in property management, streamlining coordination between Waqf boards and local authorities and protecting stakeholders' rights.&nbsp;

Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami hailed the Waqf Amendment Bill as a crucial step for transparency and justice, ensuring fair resolution of land disputes. PM Modi called it a watershed moment for socio-economic justice.

Waqf Amendment Bill a major step for transparency and justice: Uttarakhand CM Dhami

Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami hailed the Waqf Amendment Bill as a crucial step for transparency and justice, ensuring fair resolution of land disputes. PM Modi called it a watershed moment for socio-economic justice.

Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami on Friday hailed the passage of the Waqf Amendment Bill, calling it a crucial step towards ensuring transparency, justice, and the protection of constitutional rights for all citizens.&nbsp;
He emphasized that the central government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is committed to strengthening good governance and judicial reforms.
Taking to social media platform X, Dhami wrote, "The Waqf Amendment Bill has been passed in both Houses..! This bill is a significant step towards transparency, justice, and the protection of the constitutional rights of all citizens. The central government, under the leadership of the honorable Prime Minister Shri @narendramodiji, is continuously striving to strengthen good governance and judicial reforms. The objective of this bill is to establish complete transparency, legal clarity, and judicial balance in the management of Waqf properties."
&nbsp;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
वक्फ़ संशोधन विधेयक दोनों सदनों में हुआ पारित..! यह विधेयक पारदर्शिता, न्याय और सभी नागरिकों के संवैधानिक अधिकारों की रक्षा की दिशा में एक महत्वपूर्ण कदम है। केंद्र सरकार आदरणीय प्रधानमंत्री श्री <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@narendramodi</a> जी के नेतृत्व में सुशासन और न्यायिक सुधारों को सशक्त बनाने के लिए&hellip;
&mdash; Pushkar Singh Dhami (@pushkardhami) <a href="https://twitter.com/pushkardhami/status/1907994124965310911?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2025</a></blockquote>
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Dhami further clarified that the bill was not targeted at any specific community. Instead, he stated that its implementation would put an end to false and illegal claims while ensuring a fair resolution of disputes concerning land and property. "This bill is not against any particular community but has been brought to safeguard the rights of all citizens. Its implementation will put a stop to false and illegal claims, enabling fair resolution of disputes related to land and property. At the same time, it will ensure that Waqf properties are not misused and are utilized for the broader interest of society," his post further read.
Earlier, Prime Minister Narendra Modi also lauded the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025, describing it as a "watershed moment" that would benefit marginalized communities who have long been denied both voice and opportunity.
&nbsp;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill by both Houses of Parliament marks a watershed moment in our collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth. This will particularly help those who have long remained on&hellip;
&mdash; Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1907982401021816915?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2025</a></blockquote>
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
"The passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill by both Houses of Parliament marks a watershed moment in our collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth. This will particularly help those who have long remained on the margins, thus being denied both voice and opportunity," PM Modi wrote on X.
The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 was passed by Parliament in the early hours of Friday after an intense and lengthy debate. Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar announced the results, stating, "Ayes 128 and Noes 95, Absent zero. The Bill is passed." The House sat beyond midnight to ensure the legislation was approved.

Security has been heightened in Delhi's sensitive areas, including Jamia Nagar and Jamia Millia Islamia, following the passage of the Waqf Amendment Bill in Parliament. Police and paramilitary forces have been deployed to maintain law and order.

Security heightened in Jamia Millia Islamia after Waqf Bill passage in Parliament

Security has been heightened in Delhi's sensitive areas, including Jamia Nagar and Jamia Millia Islamia, following the passage of the Waqf Amendment Bill in Parliament. Police and paramilitary forces have been deployed to maintain law and order.

Security has been heightened in sensitive areas of southeast Delhi, including Jamia Nagar and prominent educational institutions like Jamia Millia Islamia, following the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Parliament.&nbsp;
Authorities are taking precautionary measures to ensure that law and order is maintained and to prevent any potential disruption by anti-social elements, a senior official said on Friday.
The Delhi Police, in coordination with paramilitary forces, has ramped up security arrangements in multiple areas deemed vulnerable, particularly in localities with a history of protests.
"To maintain law and order at multiple sensitive locations, we have intensified night patrolling, and additional deployment will be arranged as needed," a senior police officer stated.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which has been a subject of intense debate, was passed in Parliament in the early hours of Friday. The legislation secured approval in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha amid strong discussions between the government and the opposition.
The amendment is aimed at streamlining the administration of waqf properties and addressing concerns related to their management and disputes.
In light of the bill&rsquo;s passage, authorities are taking preemptive steps to avoid any untoward incidents. Police forces remain on high alert, especially in areas where previous demonstrations over similar issues have taken place.

The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 was passed in Parliament after a heated 13-hour debate, with the opposition calling it anti-Muslim and unconstitutional, while the government defended it as a move for transparency and minority welfare.

Parliament passes Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after Rajya Sabha nod

The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 was passed in Parliament after a heated 13-hour debate, with the opposition calling it anti-Muslim and unconstitutional, while the government defended it as a move for transparency and minority welfare.

Parliament early Friday approved the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after the Rajya Sabha gave its nod to the contentious legislation following an over 13-hour debate.
The discussion witnessed staunch objections from opposition parties, which termed the Bill "anti-Muslim" and "unconstitutional" with the government responding that the "historic reform" would benefit the minority community.
The Bill was passed in the Rajya Sabha with 128 members voting in favour and 95 opposing it. It was passed in the Lok Sabha early Thursday, with 288 members supporting it and 232 against it.
Parliament also approved the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2025, with the Rajya Sabha approving it. The Lok Sabha has already given its nod to the Bill.
Participating in the discussion, Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accused the Congress and other opposition parties of scaring the Muslim community with the Bill and asserted that the central government worked for all with the motto of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas'.
Rijiju said the Waqf Board is a statutory body and, as such, like all government bodies, it should be secular. He said the inclusion of a few non-Muslims on the Waqf Board would not alter the decisions of the body and instead would add value.
The minister also claimed that the Bill brought by the government has incorporated several suggestions made by the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) as well as the stakeholders.
The Opposition INDIA bloc parties opposed the Bill, alleging that it was "unconstitutional" and aimed at targeting Muslims. They claimed that the aim of the legislation was to take over the properties of Muslims and hand them to corporations.
Leaders of several opposition parties, including the Congress, the TMC, the DMK, the AAP, the Shiv Sena (UBT), the Samajwadi Party, the RJD, and Left parties, alleged that the Bill was brought by the government with mala fide intentions. Some of them also demanded the withdrawal of the Bill.
Intervening in the discussion, Leader of the House and BJP leader J P Nadda said the Bill is not against Muslims and claimed that it is aimed at helping the poor and protecting the rights of Muslim women.
Nadda accused the Congress of making Muslim women second-grade citizens during its rule at the Centre.
"You made the Indian Muslim ladies second-grade citizens," Nadda said, referring to the Congress party and added, "It was only India where Muslim women were not brought into the mainstream." While triple talaq was banned in Muslim countries such as Egypt, Sudan, Bangladesh, and Syria several years ago, the Congress-led UPA government did nothing for Muslim women while it was in power for a decade.
"We believe in real service, not lip service...I stand in support of the (Waqf) Bill as its sole purpose is to bring reforms in managing the Waqf properties," Nadda said.
Rijiju said the Waqf Board is a statutory body and all government bodies should be secular. Explaining the inclusion of non-Muslims on the Board, he said the number of non-Muslims has been restricted to only four out of 22.
He also accused the Congress and other opposition parties of "pushing Muslims out of the mainstream." For 60 years, he alleged, the Congress and others ruled the country but did not do much for the welfare of Muslims, who continue to remain poor.
Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said the government is trying to sow the seeds of conflict by suppressing Muslims through the Bill and appealed to the ruling party not to disturb peace and harmony in the country.
Kharge, also the Congress president, said the legislation is "unconstitutional" and not good for Indian Muslims. He urged the government to withdraw the Bill which has a lot of "mistakes" and not make it a prestige issue.
He also accused the NDA government of trying to create trouble for Muslims, claiming that the Bill seeks to destroy the community by usurping their properties.
Earlier, initiating the debate, Congress MP Syed Naseer Hussain termed the proposed legislation "unconstitutional" and alleged that it targets the Muslim community.
He also accused the BJP of using the proposed legislation to trigger communal tension and polarisation in the society to strengthen its vote bank.
He alleged that the Bill seeks to treat Muslims as "second-class" citizens in the country. Hussain also noted that the BJP-led government was trying to bulldoze the legislation in the Upper House.
Manoj Jha of the RJD said the "content and intent" of the Bill puts a question mark on the government's motives. He also said the government should send the Bill to the select committee of Parliament once again.
Jha alleged the Bill was akin to "dog whistle politics" to keep Muslims away from the mainstream.
Samajwadi Party MP Ram Gopal Yadav emphasised all religions must be treated with respect and the government must prevent India from "shifting towards a totalitarian state." He said India has a huge population of minorities, especially Muslims and if a large section of people feel that injustice has been meted out to them, any efforts to appease them will not work.
John Brittas of the CPI(M) said the Bill was an attack on the Constitution.
"It attacks the basic tenets of India's Constitution, its secularism, democracy, and equality. There is a cardinal violation happening. They have already discriminated against people by segregating them. They are now segregating God from God. Hindu God from Allah," he said.
Y V Subba Reddy of the YSRCP too opposed the Bill, saying it was "unconstitutional".
Congress member Abhishek Singhvi said the Bill has omitted the concept of 'Waqf by user', at least prospectively, by disallowing Waqfs to be created based on uninterrupted usage over a significant period.
"This is a deliberate attempt by the government to further its own agenda by minimising protection conferred upon Waqf properties with the right hand and significantly increase its own control and power to permanently claim these properties with its left hand," Singhvi alleged.
Independent MP Kapil Sibal said non-Muslims could earlier form the Waqf Board too, but this Bill does not allow that anymore. He said there should be reform in the Hindu religion and questioned why only one community was being targeted.
"Bring a law to ensure that women have rights in bequeathing property," he said, urging the government to make a commitment in the House that it would bring a law to maintain the rights of daughters.
While BJD's Muzibulla Khan said Muslims were concerned over the inclusion of non-Muslims on the Waqf Board, party leader Sasmit Patra said the BJD had not issued any whip to its MPs and they were free to vote of their own will.
DMK leader Tiruchi Siva said his party opposes the Bill as it is legally flawed.
"I stand on behalf of my party to oppose this Bill... We reject the Bill in its entirety because it is legally flawed, constitutionally indefensible and morally reprehensible," he stated.
"Why is a certain community being targeted is our question?" Siva asked.
The intention of the government is mala fide and deplorable, and the DMK is certain that the Supreme Court will strike the Bill down, Siva said.
AAP member Sanjay Singh said the Bill is against the tenets of the Indian Constitution, and alleged that the government wants to control Muslim religious bodies through the legislation.
Singh noted that after Muslims, the government will target other religious bodies of the Sikhs, Christians, and Jains and hand them over to their "friends".
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut spoke against the Bill and questioned the government's intent.
"Why is the government so worried about poor Muslims?" Raut said, accusing the NDA of diverting attention from US President Donald Trump's announcement of reciprocal tariffs on India.&nbsp;

Prime Minister Narendra Modi hails the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill as a major step toward transparency, socio-economic justice, and inclusive growth, despite strong opposition in Parliament.

Parliament's nod to Waqf Bill 'watershed moment': PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi hails the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill as a major step toward transparency, socio-economic justice, and inclusive growth, despite strong opposition in Parliament.
&nbsp;

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday hailed the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Parliament as a "watershed moment" in the country's collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth.
He said this will particularly help those who have long remained on the margins, thus being denied both voice and opportunity.
&nbsp;
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill by both Houses of Parliament marks a watershed moment in our collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth. This will particularly help those who have long remained on&hellip;
&mdash; Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1907982401021816915?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2025</a></blockquote>
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
In posts on X, he said the Waqf system for decades was synonymous with lack of transparency and accountability, especially harming the interests of Muslim women, poor Muslims and Pasmanda Muslims.
He said, "The passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill by both Houses of Parliament marks a watershed moment in our collective quest for socio-economic justice, transparency and inclusive growth."
He added that the legislations passed by Parliament will boost transparency and also safeguard people&rsquo;s rights.
PM Modi said India will now enter an era where the framework will be more modern and sensitive to social justice.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
We will now enter an era where the framework will be more modern and sensitive to social justice. On a larger note, we remain committed to prioritising the dignity of every citizen. This is also how we build a stronger, more inclusive and more compassionate India.
&mdash; Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1907982414842048895?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2025</a></blockquote>
&nbsp;
He said, "On a larger note, we remain committed to prioritising the dignity of every citizen. This is also how we build a stronger, more inclusive and more compassionate India."
&nbsp;
The prime minister thanked all the members of Parliament who participated in the parliamentary and committee discussions, voiced their perspectives and contributed to the strengthening of these legislations. He offered special thanks to the countless people who sent their valuable inputs to the Parliamentary committee.
He said, "Yet again, the importance of extensive debate and dialogue has been reaffirmed."
The Rajya Sabha passed the Bill last night, a day after the Lok Sabha had given the contentious draft law, opposed strongly by a united opposition, its approval.

AAP MP Hayer opposes the Waqf Bill citing it as a government intrusion on minority religious properties threatening constitutional rights.

AAP MP Opposes the Controversial Waqf Bill

In a passionate parliamentary address, AAP MP Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer opposed the Waqf Bill, highlighting its threat to minority religious property rights and constitutional freedoms under Articles 14 and 26, amidst BJP's tactics and unfulfilled Sachar Committee commitments.

Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer challenges controversial Waqf Bill in Parliament

AAP MP Hayer criticized the Waqf Bill as a threat to minority property rights, citing constitutional concerns.

Aam Aadmi Party Lok Sabha member from Sangrur Gurmeet Singh Meet Hayer today strongly opposed the Waqf Bill in Parliament. With his strong and logical arguments, he termed it as the bill that paves the way for the BJP government to loot and interfere in Affairs of minority religions.
This bill has been brought to grab Waqf properties, said Meet Hayer.
He also said that with this bill, the gateway has been opened to loot minority religions. Today, there is an attack on Waqf, in future, there may be tinkering with matters of other minority religions like Sikhs, Buddhists etc. With this bill, Article 14 has been directly violated.
According to the law, how will we find out whether a person is worshipping in his private life?
Meet Hayer said that the BJP's politics of dividing the country is clearly visible in this bill. He said that the attitude of the central government towards Muslims has been visible in the last 11 years from actions and rhetorical speeches.
The Home Minister calls the government serious towards Muslims, but not a single BJP Lok Sabha member is a Muslim and neither is there a Muslim MLA in Uttar Pradesh from BJP.
The MP said that the government has talked about implementing the recommendations of the Sachar Committee, but the Sachar Committee report also says that 70 percent of the Waqf Board properties in the country have been occupied and 355 are in the possession of the government. What has the government done about this?
He said that many historical buildings, mosques, and educational institutions in the country are hundreds of years old, from where will they get the necessary papers?
Meet Hayer, giving an example of Malerkotla&rsquo;s, which is part of his parliamentary constituency, mutual brotherhood and unity of all religions from the time of Nawab Sher Mohammad Khan's slogan of &ldquo;Haa the Naara&rdquo; also cautioned the central government against creating divisions on the basis of religion.
He said that he would do his best to fulfil the promise made to the residents of Malerkotla and oppose this bill.
The AAP Lok Sabha member said that the Constitution of the country has been attacked by this bill. Under Article 26, they can form and run their own organization and today this very right has been attacked

The Lok Sabha clears Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 amid heated debates, with the NDA backing it for minority welfare and opposition labeling it as divisive. Key changes involve Waqf tribunal improvements and transparency enhancements.

Lok Sabha passes Waqf Bill after hours long debate

The Lok Sabha passes the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, with NDA emphasizing minority benefits and opposition voicing concerns of divisive politics. Changes to Waqf tribunals and calls for better transparency highlight this legislation.

Lok Sabha passes Waqf (Amendment) Bill after hours long debate

Lok Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after a 12-hour debate. The NDA supports it for minority benefits, while opposition calls it divisive. It includes Waqf tribunal changes and aims for increased inclusivity and transparency.

The Lok Sabha early Thursday passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after over a 12-hour debate, which saw the ruling NDA strongly defending the legislation as beneficial for minorities, while the opposition described it as "anti-Muslim".
The Bill was passed after all amendments moved by the opposition members were rejected by voice votes.
It was passed after a division of votes -- 288 in favour and 232 against. In his reply to the debate, Union Minorities Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said there is no place in the world safer than India for minorities and they are safe because the majority is entirely secular.
He said even a minuscule minority community like the Parsis are safe in India and all minorities here live with pride. "Some members have said that minorities are not safe in India. This statement is completely false.
There is no place safer than India for minorities. I am also a minority and we all are living here without any fear and with pride," he said after the debate on the Bill. The minister said whenever a minority community faces persecution, it always comes to India to take refuge and cited the examples of the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan community, minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. "Minorities of Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan came to India after facing religious persecution in their respective countries. How can you say that minorities are not safe in India. Very, very wrong to say this.
"The coming generation will never forgive you. Minorities in India are safe because the majorities of the country are fully secular. This is not the case in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. But still, you abuse us," he said. Rijiju said, through the Bill, the NDA government is going to unify all minorities in the country.
He also highlighted the "wholehearted" support of the Christian community for the Bill. He said a large number of disputes are pending with the Waqf tribunals and through the legislation, the government wants to expedite these cases.
"We want to expedite the resolution of the disputes in the tribunals. Justice delayed is justice denied. Widows, divorcees, and orphans will be given justice through the Bill," he said.
Earlier, making an intervention in the debate, Union Home Minister Amit Shah asserted that a vote bank was being created by intimidating minorities and confusion being spread in the country in the name of the Waqf bill.
"The Narendra Modi government runs on a very clear principle that we will not bring any law for vote bank because law is for justice and welfare of people," he said, adding, "Everyone has the right to follow their religion, but conversion cannot be done for greed, temptation and fear."
He stressed that it has become a fashion to create fear among the people of the minority community. "It is the resolve of the Modi government that no citizen of this country, irrespective of his religion, will be harmed," Shah said.
He said the non-Muslims in Waqf council and boards are meant purely to ensure the administration of properties in accordance with stated aims. Shah said if there had not been an amendment in the Wakf Act in 2013, there would have been no need to bring this legislation.
"Elections were due in 2014 and in 2013, the extreme Wakf law was made overnight for the purpose of appeasement. As a result, 123 properties in Delhi's Lutyen's Zone were handed over to the Wakf just 25 days before the elections," he said.
He said a vote bank was being consolidated by intimidating minorities and confusion being spread to strike fear among minorities. Earlier, there was no provision to include any non-Muslim among those who run religious institutions and the NDA government is not going to do it either, he said.
Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said the INDIA bloc will oppose the proposed changes to the Waqf law and called the Bill an attack on the basic structure of the Constitution. He accused the government of misleading Parliament, referencing past discussions on the matter.
"This Bill is an attack on the basic structure of our Constitution, an attack on our federal structure, and has four primary objectives: to dilute the Constitution, to defame minority communities, to divide Indian society, and to disenfranchise minorities," he alleged. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav claimed that the Bill was a BJP ploy for polarisation following its reverses in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.
He claimed the Bill would send a wrong message to the world and dent the country's secular image. The Bill will prove to be a "Waterloo" for the BJP as some of its allies might be claiming to support the legislation but inside they are not happy about it, he said. Participating in the debate, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi staged a symbolic protest by tearing up a copy of the Bill.
Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, in a post on X, called the Waqf Bill a weapon, aimed at marginalising Muslims and usurping their personal laws and property rights. "This attack on the Constitution by the RSS, BJP and their allies is aimed at Muslims today but sets a precedent to target other communities in the future," he said.
According to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, Waqf tribunals will be strengthened, a structured selection process will be maintained, and a tenure will be fixed to ensure efficient dispute resolution.
As per the Bill, while Waqf institutions' mandatory contribution to Waqf boards is reduced from 7 per cent to 5 per cent, Waqf institutions earning over Rs 1 lakh will undergo audits by state-sponsored auditors. A centralised portal will automate Waqf property management, improving efficiency and transparency. The Bill proposes that practising Muslims (for at least five years) can dedicate their property to the Waqf, restoring pre-2013 rules. It stipulates that women must receive their inheritance before the Waqf declaration, with special provisions for widows, divorced women and orphans.
The Bill proposes that an officer above the rank of collector investigate government properties claimed as Waqf. It also proposes that non-Muslim members be included in the central and state Waqf boards for inclusivity.

Prime Minister Modi introduces Waqf Amendment Bill in Parliament, focusing on transparent and efficient property management with tech enhancements.

PM Modi Drives Waqf Bill for Efficient Management

Prime Minister Modi elevates property management standards by proposing the Waqf Amendment Bill in Parliament, incorporating technology for enhanced transparency and efficiency.

PM Modi has taken a 'bold step', said Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma

PM Modi advances Waqf Amendment Bill, aiming for transparent, efficient Waqf property management through tech-driven reforms.

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Wednesday said Prime Minister Narendra Modi has taken a "bold step" by introducing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Parliament.
Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju tabled the Bill in the Lok Sabha earlier in the day. It seeks to improve the administration of Waqf properties, introduce technology-driven management, address complexities and ensure transparency.
"The Waqf Bill was presented in Parliament today. This law was very necessary for India. PM Narendra Modi has taken a bold step after 75 years. I congratulate and express my thanks to him," Sarma told reporters in Jorhat. He expressed optimism that the law will be passed by both Houses of Parliament.
Tabling the Bill, which was examined and redrafted by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), Rijiju said the legislation has nothing to do with religion, but deals only with properties.
The minister also said the Waqf Bill will be renamed as Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency and Development (UMEED) Bill.
According to the Bill, the Waqf tribunals will be strengthened, a structured selection process will be maintained, and a tenure will be fixed to ensure efficient dispute resolution.
It also proposes that non-Muslim members will be included in the central and state Waqf boards for inclusivity.
A centralised portal will automate Waqf property management, improving efficiency and transparency, according to the legislation.

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Lok Sabha, aiming to enhance transparency, include non-Muslim members in Waqf boards, and redefine property management rules.

Contentious Waqf (Amendment) Bill tabled in Lok Sabha

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Lok Sabha, aiming to enhance transparency, include non-Muslim members in Waqf boards, and redefine property management rules.

Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday tabled the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha, which seeks to improve the functioning of Waqf properties, address complexities, ensure transparency and introduce technology-driven management.
Tabling the Bill, which was examined and redrafted by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), Rijiju said the legislation has nothing to do with religion, but deals only with properties.
"The government is not going to interfere in any religious institution. The changes made in the Waqf law by the UPA government gave it overriding effect over other statutes, hence the new amendments were required," Rijiju said amid noisy opposition protest, adding, "You (opposition) tried to mislead the people on issues which are not part of the Waqf Bill."
Rijiju also claimed the consultation process of the JPC was the largest ever exercise carried out by a parliamentary panel in India's democratic history.
The minister said more than 97.27 lakh petitions and memorandums were received by the JPC through physical and online formats and the JPC had gone through each of them before finalising its report.
As many as 284 delegations submitted their views on the Bill besides the Waqf boards of 25 states and Union Territories, he said.
Legal luminaries, charitable organisations, academicians and religious leaders, among others, also submitted their opinions, Rijiju added.
"Waqf is controlling the third largest pool of properties in the country after railways and defence. The railways and defence properties belong to the nation, but Waqf properties are private in nature. It is unfair to compare them with the land banks of railways and armed forces," he said.
The minister further alleged that ordinary Muslims were misled for vote-bank politics for 70 years as no benefits were received by them from such a large pool of land bank.
"Why the Waqf properties are not used for the benefit and welfare of the ordinary, poor and downtrodden Muslims? These properties will have to be used for the welfare of the common Muslims," Rijiju said.
As of 2004, a total of 4.9 lakh properties were held by the Waqf and their income was just Rs 163 crore, he said.
After the 2013 amendment, the minister said, the income has gone up by just Rs 3 crore to Rs 166 crore.
"We can't accept such meagre income from such a huge bank of properties. The income should have been at least Rs 12,000 crore. Waqf property has to be used for poor Muslims, and the Waqf Bill is needed to achieve this purpose," he said.
Stating that the law will be prospective, not restrospective, and will not snatch away anyone's property, Rijiju said that when the Citizenship (Amendment) Act was enacted in 2019, the opposition claimed the rights of the Muslims will be taken away, and their citizenship rights will be snatched.
"Tell me now, citizenship rights of how many Muslims were taken away ever since the CAA came into force? Not even one. You should apologise for misleading the people on the CAA. The country will remember for ages who is supporting and who is opposing the Waqf Bill," he said.
The minister also said the Waqf Bill will be renamed as Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency and Development (UMEED) Bill.
As of now, the number of total Waqf properties is around 8.72 lakh and had they been managed efficiently, fortunes of not only the Muslims, but the whole country would have changed, Rijiju said.
"You will see the transformational impact just within a year. A new dawn will come. That is why the common Muslims are whole-heartedly supporting the Bill," he said.
Referring to the power to be vested in the state governments, Rijiju said the Waqf boards will be appointed by the states.
"The state governments will have full authority as land is a state subject. The boards will be fully under the state governments, and the Central government will have no control over them," the minister said.
He also said a special provision has been incorporated in the Bill that no properties in the tribal areas could be declared as Waqf property.
The minister went on to describe as "most draconian" Section 40 of the original Act, which empowers the Waqf Board to investigate and decide whether a property is a Waqf property.
Rijiju said there were many instances of the "misuse" of the earlier law, citing the examples of a gurdwara in Haryana which was declared as Waqf, and properties of 600 families in Kerala which were also declared the same.
"That is why many organisations, including Christian groups, have sought the act's immediate implementation," he said.
The Limitation Act, 1963, will now apply to Waqf property claims, reducing prolonged litigation, he said.
Rijiju also introduced another Bill -- The Mussalman Waqf (Repeal) Bill, 2024 -- for consideration and passage in the House.
According to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, Waqf tribunals will be strengthened, a structured selection process will be maintained, and a tenure will be fixed to ensure efficient dispute resolution.
As per the Bill, while Waqf institutions' mandatory contribution to Waqf Boards reduced from 7 per cent to 5 per cent, Waqf institutions earning over Rs 1 lakh will undergo audits by state-sponsored auditors.
A centralised portal will automate Waqf property management, improving efficiency and transparency.
The Bill also proposes that practising Muslims (for at least five years) can dedicate their property to Waqf, restoring pre-2013 rules.
Also, women must receive their inheritance before Waqf declaration, with special provisions for widows, divorced women and orphans.
The Bill also proposes that an officer above the rank of collector will investigate government properties claimed as Waqf.
In case of disputes, the senior government official will have the final say on whether a property belongs to Waqf or the government.
This replaces the existing system where such decisions are made by Waqf tribunals.
The Bill also proposes that non-Muslim members will be included in the central and state Waqf boards for inclusivity.
Earlier, Speaker Om Birla rejected the opposition's objections that the government had no power to insert new provisions in the amended Bill.
Intervening in opposition's objections, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the Bill was tabled after a long process of consultations carried out by the JPC.
Shah said the Bill was first introduced in August 2024 after which, as sought by the House, it was referred to the JPC, which held long consultations on it.
The JPC report was approved by the Union Cabinet before the Bill was tabled in the House.
"This is a democratic committee. This committee did not act like the Congress-constituted committee. It followed proper procedure and consultations," Shah said.

waqf bill

Categories