Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

More gadget reviews

Vivo X200T delivers flagship cameras, Dimensity 9400+ power, strong battery life and premium design at ₹59,999. A balanced flagship that quietly makes sense.

Vivo X200T Review: Flagship Dimensity 9400+ performance & triple 50MP camera set up

Priced at ₹59,999, the Vivo X200T sits in an interesting spot, offering flagship performance and cameras while blurring the lines between the X200 FE, X200 Pro, and newer X300 models.

Vivo&rsquo;s X-series has traditionally followed a fairly clear hierarchy, which is why the Vivo X200T feels immediately intriguing. This is the first time Vivo has introduced a &ldquo;T&rdquo; model in its flagship X lineup, and its placement is anything but straightforward.&nbsp;
Starting at ₹59,999 the X200T sits much closer to the X200 FE than the X200 and X200 Pro, and&nbsp; yet its underlying hardware tells a different story altogether. On paper, the Dimensity 9400+ chipset positions the X200T above even Vivo&rsquo;s X200 and the X200 Pro, which were proper flagships. This already complicates things.&nbsp;
Add to that the presence of the newer X300 series, and the lineup starts to feel even more crowded. Where exactly does the X200T fit now? Is it a performance-first alternative, a stopgap flagship, or Vivo deliberately blurring its own boundaries? We try to find out.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Design</h2>
We start with the design, because that is where the Vivo X200T immediately establishes its identity.
From the back, the X200T looks unmistakably like a proper X200-series phone. The large, circular camera module placed right at the centre gives it a strong flagship vibe. I like how deliberate it looks, and more importantly, how practical it is. When I place the phone flat on a table, it stays stable, with none of the wobble you often get from off-centre camera layouts.
The camera module itself is cleanly executed. Like the X200 and X200 Pro, the flash sits outside the circular camera island instead of being tucked inside it. I prefer this approach. It keeps the module from looking cluttered and makes the design feel more premium.
There is an issue, though. Because of the hardware, the X200T feels slightly top heavy when I first picked it up. It is quite noticeable initially, but after a short while, it stops being distracting and never feels uncomfortable in daily use.
The X200T is a large phone, but it is not as heavy as I expected. At around 203 grams and 7.99mm in thickness, it feels manageable for its size and does not come across as bulky during long scrolling sessions or video playback. The weight feels reasonable, even if the balance could have been a touch better.
Button placement is straightforward and familiar. The USB-C port sits at the bottom alongside the speaker grille and SIM slot. There is no expandable storage, which is worth noting. The power button and volume rocker are positioned on the side, and both feel tactile and well-built, with a reassuring click.
Build quality is excellent overall. The back panel feels like glass and has a soft, sand-blasted, silly texture that does a good job of resisting fingerprints.&nbsp;
The flat aluminium alloy frame feels premium and solid in the hand, adding to the phone&rsquo;s sturdy feel. Up front, Vivo uses Schott Xensation glass, and with IP68 and IP69 ratings, I never felt the need to treat it like a baby.
The X200T comes in two colours, Stellar Black and Seaside Lilac. I have the Lilac version here, and it looks subtle yet distinctive under different lighting.&nbsp;
Overall, the X200T feels well-built, premium, and confidently designed.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Display</h2>
The Vivo X200T features a 6.67-inch LTPS AMOLED display, and it delivers a sharp and polished experience in everyday use. The panel is completely flat, which I genuinely appreciate. But what I was more surprised by, was just how slim the bezels are. Both of these, make interacting with the display feel more precise and gives the phone a cleaner look from the front.
The display runs at a 1.5K resolution with a 120Hz refresh rate, so naturally, text appears crisp, icons are clean, and scrolling feels consistently smooth.
Colour reproduction is excellent too. Colours look rich without being oversaturated, and contrast levels are strong. HDR10+ support adds to the experience when watching compatible content. HDR videos on YouTube look punchy, and Netflix shows and movies feel immersive, with deep blacks and good detail in darker scenes.&nbsp;
As for the brightness I found it to be good, but not class-leading. With a peak high brightness mode rating of 1600 nits, the screen remains usable outdoors, even in harsh sunlight. However, under direct sun, I did notice that it does not push quite as hard as some panels even from Vivo&rsquo;s own line up. It is not a deal-breaker, but it is noticeable.
One clear advantage is the fingerprint scanner. The X200T uses an ultrasonic sensor, and unlocking feels fast and reliable.&nbsp;
Audio performance is solid as well. The stereo speakers get loud, sound balanced, and offer better bass presence than I expected.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Cameras</h2>
Cameras are where the Vivo X200T really starts to shine, and this is one area where I spent a lot of time testing things properly. With Zeiss branding across the entire setup, expectations are naturally high, and for the most part, the X200T delivers results that feel confidently flagship-grade rather than merely impressive on paper.
The X200T comes with an all-50MP camera setup, and it shows Vivo was not cutting corners here. You get a 50MP main camera with OIS, a 50MP telephoto, and a 50MP ultrawide. All three cameras carry Zeiss&rsquo; T* coating, and that consistency across the stack makes a real difference in how dependable the results are, across all cameras.&nbsp;
Starting with the main camera, the output is flagship-grade. Photos are packed with detail, colours look natural, and skin tones are handled very well. There is a slight tendency to underexpose in some scenes, but highlights are controlled beautifully, which I prefer. Thanks to CIPA 4.5 professional image stabilisation, shots stay sharp even in tricky lighting or when shooting handheld. It is a reliable camera that I felt confident using in almost any situation.
The telephoto camera is another strong point. It delivers sharp, high-resolution images even at longer zoom levels, and detail holds up impressively well as you push the zoom further. This is one of those lenses that feels genuinely useful rather than just there to tick a box.
The ultrawide camera is also very solid. Having a 50MP sensor here means you do not see the usual drop in detail when switching lenses. Colours stay consistent with the main camera, and images remain usable even in lower light. In night shots, the X200T&rsquo;s ultrawide clearly holds on to more detail and texture than lower-resolution alternatives.
Portraits are handled well too. Edge detection is reliable, background separation looks clean, and the bokeh has a soft, natural character rather than an artificial blur.&nbsp;
Video performance is strong across the board. The X200T can shoot 4K at 60fps with solid stabilisation, and HDR video support adds extra dynamic range in challenging scenes.&nbsp;
For selfies, the X200T uses a 32MP front camera. Vivo could have used a 50MP camera here as well, but I wll give them this, I love the colour tuning here. Skin tones look natural, and the overall output feels pleasing rather than overly processed.
There is also a Classic Negative Film Style mode, that mimic several of Fujifilm&rsquo;s stock looks, like you would get in a Fujifilm mirrorless camera nowadays. It is easily one of my favourite creative options on the phone.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Performance</h2>
Performance on the Vivo X200T is exactly what you would expect from a phone sitting this high in the lineup.
The X200T is powered by a chipset that sits just a step below the Dimensity 9500, which already puts it in very strong territory. On paper, this actually positions the X200T above even the X200 and X200 Pro in terms of raw silicon hierarchy. Paired with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage, it is a clearly performance-focused setup.
In day-to-day use, the phone feels fast and responsive. App launches are quick, multitasking is smooth, and moving between heavier applications never feels sluggish. While the jump to UFS 4.1 storage does not dramatically change everyday interactions, I did notice slightly quicker load times when dealing with large files and heavier games. It is not night and day, but it is there if you pay attention.
Benchmarks make the gap far more obvious. Vivo claims an AnTuTu score north of 3 million, and while my unit topped out closer to 2.9 million, that is still an excellent result. Geekbench scores are strong as well. 3DMark results tell a similar story, confirming that there is plenty of graphical headroom here.
That performance translates well into gaming. I spent time playing BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile, and the phone handled both without breaking a sweat. The X200T supports higher frame rates, going up to 120fps where supported, and gameplay felt smooth and consistent throughout my sessions.&nbsp;
More importantly, sustained performance holds up well. Thanks to the new liquid cooling vapour chamber with its updated wick structure and nano-fluid design, thermals stayed under control. I noticed some warmth during longer gaming sessions, but never anything alarming.
One thing worth highlighting is how well the X200T works with Vivo&rsquo;s V2 imaging chip. Powered by the BlueChip technology stack and optimised across eight key domains, it fully unlocks advanced imaging features without impacting overall performance.
In regular use, the phone simply feels powerful without constantly reminding you of it, which is exactly how a flagship-class device should behave.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Software, UI and AI</h2>
The Vivo X200T runs Android 16 with OriginOS 6 straight out of the box, and that is a big deal if you care about longevity. Vivo is promising five years of Android updates and seven years of security patches, which already puts this phone in a very comfortable spot for long-term use. More importantly, Vivo is also talking about sustained smoothness over those five years, not just ticking update boxes, and that is something you actually feel in daily use.
I am not going to deep-dive into OriginOS itself since I have already spent a lot of time with it before, but OriginOS 6 feels noticeably more polished than earlier versions. The transparent, liquid-style UI gives the whole interface a modern, premium vibe. Yes, the inspiration from Apple is obvious, but in everyday use, it works. The interface feels clean, cohesive, and easy to live with.
What really stood out to me was how fluid everything feels. Animations are smooth, app launches are quick, and basic interactions like unlocking the phone or pulling down notifications feel seamless. Nothing stutters or feels half-baked. Lock screen customisation has also been expanded, letting you personalise things without turning the UI into a cluttered mess.
Origin Island is another feature I like. It is clearly inspired by the Dynamic Island, but Vivo has made it feel playful and genuinely useful. Live activities like navigation, music controls, and timers sit neatly at the top of the screen. That said, I do wish more third-party apps supported it right now, because the idea has a lot of potential.
Vivo has also put real effort into cross-device features. Office Kit adds tools like phone-to-PC mirroring, cross-device file sharing, remote PC control, and collaborative notes. If you work across multiple devices, these features actually make life easier rather than feeling like gimmicks.
AI is present throughout the system, but thankfully, it stays mostly practical. The AI photo suite includes tools like Weather Filters, Passerby Erase, Scene Transformation, and AI Landscape Master. You also get Google Gemini features like Circle to Search. These are tools I found myself using naturally, not just once for testing and then forgetting about.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Battery</h2>
Moving on to battery life, the Vivo X200T packs a 6,200mAh battery, which is slightly smaller than what I expected for a phone this size. Vivo could have pushed this further, but battery life has been solid for me. The X200T comfortably lasts a full day with regular usage, including gaming, navigation, and streaming, without any anxiety. In my initial testing, I did not notice any noticeable shortcomings.
Charging is also pretty much on point. You get 90W wired charging, plus, you also get 40W wireless charging on top of that, which adds real convenience to daily use.
<h2>Vivo X200T Review: Verdict</h2>
The Vivo X200T ends up being a phone that makes sense only once you stop trying to label it. It is not a cheaper X200 Pro, nor is it an overgrown X200 FE. Instead, it feels like a cut-down version of the X300. It feels like a blend of flagship design, serious camera hardware, and top-tier performance, stitched together with very few obvious compromises.&nbsp;
What impressed me most is how balanced the experience feels. The display is excellent, the cameras are genuinely dependable across all focal lengths, and performance never becomes a talking point because it simply works. Battery life holds up well, charging is fast and convenient, and the build quality inspires confidence without trying too hard.
Yes, the pricing places it in a slightly awkward position, and Vivo could have made its lineup clearer. But taken on its own terms, the X200T delivers a premium, polished experience that justifies its existence. If you want flagship performance and cameras without chasing labels, this phone quietly earns its place.

Realme Pad 3 5G review: A productivity-first Android tablet with a 7:5 display, excellent battery life, clean software, and solid performance for work and study.

Realme Pad 3 5G Review: A Productivity-Focused Android Tablet

The Realme Pad 3 5G surprises with a book-style 7:5 display, long battery life, clean Android 16 software, and reliable performance for productivity-focused users.

The Realme Pad 3 5G focuses on productivity with a unique 7:5 display, excellent battery life, clean Android 16 software, and reliable performance, making it a sensible mid-range Android tablet for work and study.

The tablet market in India has been largely polarized: you either buy an iPad for longevity, or a budget Android tablet for media consumption. But mid-range tablets that can handle work, study, and play without costing a kidney are finally starting to make sense, and the Realme Pad 3 5G fits right into that space.
After a bit of a hiatus following the Pad 2, Realme is back. I&rsquo;ve been testing the device extensively to see if it lives up to its "productivity" claims. Spoiler alert: It&rsquo;s surprisingly good at being a digital notebook, but it does have its quirks. Here is my detailed review.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Unboxing, Design &amp; Build</h2>
The unboxing experience here feels complete. You aren't just getting the slate; the box includes a proper 45W SuperVOOC charger, a sturdy 1-meter white USB-A to Type-C cablet, the usual paperwork and a SIM ejector tool.
As for the tablet itself, I&rsquo;ve been using the Space Grey unit (there&rsquo;s also a Champagne Gold version), and it definitely leans more towards "business professional" than "flashy tech toy". It&rsquo;s a clean, matte slab that feels reassuringly cold to the touch, thanks to the AL 5252 aluminum back. The finish is achieved through a mix of sandblasting and anodizing, which does a surprisingly good job of resisting the greasy smudges that usually plague dark-colored devices.
What really surprised me, though, was the weight distribution. On paper, it weighs about 578g , which sounds average for a tab, but because the chassis is so thin(just 6.6mm), the device feels dense and premium rather than heavy. It&rsquo;s reinforced with a polycarbonate and aluminum alloy middle frame, making the whole thing feel rigid. I tried twisting it gently (don't ask why), and there was zero flex or creaking.
Holding the tablet in landscape mode is clearly how <a title="Realme P4 Power 5G First Look: 10,001mAh battery, crammed into a slim design" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/mobiles/realme-p4-power-5g-first-look-10-000mah-battery-crammed-into-a-slim-design-1768974283807" target="_blank">Realme</a> intends you to use it as your hands naturally rest away from the quad speakers. Two are slotted on the left edge and two on the right, creating a loud, symmetrical soundstage. The power button sits on the top-left corner and doubles as a fingerprint scanner. It&rsquo;s quick, though my muscle memory took a day to get used to reaching for it there.
The top edge houses the volume rockers and the microphone array. This is also where you&rsquo;ll find the SIM tray. Just a heads-up for the power users: this is a single Nano-SIM slot, not a dual one. However, it does have a dedicated spot for a microSD card (up to 2TB), which is a massive bonus if you plan to carry around a library of 4K movies or massive design files. One omission that might bug the utility-focused crowd is the lack of an IR blaster; you can't use this tablet to control your AC or TV, which is a feature I&rsquo;ve come to miss on devices that skip it.
On the front, you&rsquo;re looking at an 11.6-inch screen wrapped in 6.88mm bezels. They are uniform on all sides and strike a nice balance thin enough to look modern, but thick enough to give your thumbs a place to rest without accidentally tapping the screen. The 8MP rear camera is tucked into a modest square bump that sits mostly flush, so if you&rsquo;re typing on a flat desk, the wobble is barely noticeable.
Overall, the design doesn't try to reinvent the wheel, and it doesn't need to. It&rsquo;s minimalist, practical, and feels built to survive a daily commute in a crowded backpack.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Display</h2>
I didn&rsquo;t expect the display to be the thing that stuck with me on the <a title="Realme Pad 2 Wi-Fi launch confirmed alongside P1, P1 Pro: Price, specs &amp; release date details here" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/realme-pad-2-wi-fi-launch-confirmed-alongside-p1-p1-pro-price-specs-release-date-details-here-1712841353596" target="_blank">Realme Pad</a> 3. Usually, tablet screens blur together after a point. This one didn&rsquo;t, and it took me a couple of days to figure out why.
On the surface, everything looks predictable enough. It&rsquo;s an 11.6-inch panel with a 2.8K resolution (2800 &times; 2000), and yes, it&rsquo;s sharp. Text looks clean, icons don&rsquo;t fray at the edges, and even when I pulled the tablet closer than I normally would, nothing broke visually. But after the initial &ldquo;okay, that looks nice&rdquo; moment passed, I realised that resolution wasn&rsquo;t what I kept noticing while using it.
It was the shape of the screen.
Realme has gone with a 7:5 aspect ratio, which they brand as &ldquo;Book View.&rdquo; Ignore the name for a second. What matters is that it&rsquo;s noticeably wider than the usual 16:10 layout most Android tablets stick to. And once you start using it for anything beyond video playback, the difference becomes hard to unsee.
I spend a lot of time reading scripts, scanning PDFs, and editing articles, and this is one of the rare tablets where those tasks didn&rsquo;t feel compromised. There&rsquo;s simply more room for text to breathe. I wasn&rsquo;t zooming in every few minutes or constantly adjusting margins just to stay comfortable.
That extra width also helps when you split the screen. I ran Google Docs on one side and a browser on the other for a few sessions, and neither app felt like it was being punished for multitasking. Instead of two tall, awkward columns, both windows felt usable. Not perfect, but usable and which is more than I can say for most tablets in this range.
The display refreshes at up to 120Hz and switches dynamically depending on what you&rsquo;re doing. In practice, it felt consistently smooth. Scrolling through menus, hopping between apps, or moving through a heavy YouTube feed never felt jerky or uneven. More importantly, I didn&rsquo;t notice the kind of random stutters that sometimes show up when affordable hardware tries to juggle a high refresh rate.
Now, this is still an LCD panel, and that comes with trade-offs. If you&rsquo;re used to AMOLED screens on your phone, you&rsquo;ll spot the difference almost immediately. Colours are lively enough, Realme claims 96% NTSC coverage, and reds and blues do stand out, but blacks never fully disappear. They sit somewhere between dark grey and &ldquo;almost black.&rdquo;
That limitation shows up most clearly while watching darker content. I watched a few episodes of The Witcher, and in low-light scenes, the contrast just wasn&rsquo;t strong enough to sell the mood. The black bars, which are thicker here because of the squarer screen, don&rsquo;t fade away into the bezel either. They glow faintly. The tablet supports Widevine L1, so you do get full HD playback on Netflix and Prime Video, but there&rsquo;s no HDR support. For casual viewing, it&rsquo;s fine. For anyone who really cares about image depth, it&rsquo;s not impressive.
Brightness is another area where the Pad 3 feels tuned more for indoor use. It sits around 500 nits normally and can stretch to about 550 nits when pushed. Inside a room, a classroom, or an office, it&rsquo;s completely fine. I didn&rsquo;t struggle there at all. Outside is a different story. I tried using it on a balcony, and once direct sunlight hit the screen, readability dropped quickly.&nbsp;
One thing I genuinely liked, though, was how easy it was on my eyes. I read a lot at night, and the combination of DC dimming and a hardware-level low blue light filter actually helped. I could sit with the tablet for a couple of hours before bed without that dry, tired feeling creeping in.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Camera</h2>
Before I even start this section, it is well known that nobody&rsquo;s buying a tablet for its photography chops. So, honestly nothing much to write here. The 8MP rear camera here is just fine for what it is. I found it useful enough for scanning documents or snapping a quick picture of a whiteboard in class. It focuses fast and the text comes out readable. That is really all you need it to do.
The front camera is where the real value is. Realme has placed the 8MP sensor on the longer edge of the display, which makes a big difference during video calls in landscape mode. So, during video calls, you look centered and more natural, instead of looking like you&rsquo;re staring sideways. I took a few Google Meet calls on this, and the video was sharp. The dual microphones also did a solid job of cutting out background noise. It is a practical setup that works for meetings, not social media.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Performance</h2>
The Realme Pad 3 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300-MAX. It is a 4nm chipset that attempts to balance raw power with battery life. My review unit arrived with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage.
I ran the standard benchmarks to get a baseline. On AnTuTu, the device hit around 970,000. In Geekbench 6, it scored around 992 in single-core and near 2,958 in multi-core. These are good figures for this segment. But synthetic tests only tell you so much.
In actual use, the tablet feels responsive. Apps launch fast and &nbsp;I could keep five or six apps active in the background without the system killing them aggressively.
Gaming was a genuine surprise. Both Call of Duty Mobile and BGMI ran smoothly and hit 90 FPS. I played for a solid two hours to test the thermals. The management here is excellent. The back of the tablet barely warmed up and the temperature mark never crossed 30 degrees. The cold weather might be a factor, but the device stayed incredibly cool.
For work, I tried editing clips in CapCut. Scrubbing through 1080p footage was smooth. But when I loaded a 4K timeline, I noticed lag during playback. It handles the basics well. Just don't expect it to replace a powerful workstation for creative tasks.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Software &amp; AI</h2>
Software is often where mid-range tablets stumble. This one is different. It runs realme UI 7.0 on top of Android 16 straight out of the box. The interface feels grown-up and fluid. It really uses that high refresh rate well. I was happy to see Realme show some restraint with pre-installed apps. There is almost no bloatware here. You get the essential Google and Realme tools. You won't have to spend several minutes cleaning up junk games.
Productivity is a big reason to buy a tablet today, and the Pad 3 delivers with genuinely useful AI features. &ldquo;AI for Pad&rdquo; includes AI Documents for quick PDF summaries, AI Recording Summary for meeting notes (it misses a few words sometimes, but gets the gist), and Circle to Search for instant lookups. If you use a Realme phone, Cross-Device Sync is seamless too, letting you copy on your phone and paste on the tablet instantly. Overall, the software feels smooth, well-optimised, and refreshingly free of bloatware.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Battery and Charging</h2>
This is the &ldquo;Titan&rdquo; in the room. The 12,200mAh battery is phenomenal. In my testing, the endurance was genuinely impressive. I fully charged the tablet five days ago and haven&rsquo;t needed to plug it in since (it&rsquo;s still at 21%). That includes a solid day and a half of heavy use, where I streamed a cricket match and watched loads of movies.
I even spent my entire weekend binging Quentin Tarantino&rsquo;s classic filmography. By the way, I absolutely love his work, and if you haven&rsquo;t watched his films, you definitely should. And yes, I still think Reservoir Dogs is better than Pulp Fiction. Yeah, I went there. Through all that media consumption, I never once felt the usual battery anxiety.
When you do finally need to plug in, the charging speed is decent. It supports 45W charging. I wouldn't exactly call it "fast" by smartphone standards because it takes close to two hours to go from zero to one hundred percent. However, considering you are filling up such a massive cell, that is pretty considerable.
&nbsp;Another feature I found useful is the reverse charging. It provides a 10W of reverse charging and you can actually use the tablet as a massive power bank to charge your phone or earbuds in a pinch, which adds a lot of practical value.
<h2>Realme Pad 3: Should You Buy It?</h2>
The Realme Pad 3 5G is not pretending to be an iPad killer. It is simply one of the most sensible Android tablets I have used this year. If your day revolves around reading PDFs, researching, or typing away at documents, this device is an easy recommendation. The 7:5 screen shape makes a massive difference for actual productivity, and the battery life is just ridiculous.
I spent my time with the 8GB + 256GB 5G version, which comes in at ₹31,999. If you do not need the cellular connectivity, the Wi-Fi model starts cheaper at ₹26,999. Sure, the LCD panel won't give you those perfect inky blacks for late-night movie marathons. But for students or professionals who need a reliable machine that does not cost a fortune, this is the one to buy.

GoPro Max 2 review: Here’s what it’s like using GoPro’s latest 360 camera.  I cover true 8K video, 10-bit colour, design, lens cover swaps, Quik reframing tools, file sizes, audio performance, stitching limits, and low-light performance.

GoPro Max 2 Review: GoPro’s Most Creative Camera Yet

In this review, I break down what it&rsquo;s like using the GoPro Max 2 as a first-time 360 user, covering true 8K video, 10-bit colour, design and lens covers, Quik reframing tools, file sizes, audio performance, stitching limits, and low-light results.

The Max 2 is GoPro&rsquo;s long-awaited follow-up to the original GoPro Max, and &ldquo;long-awaited&rdquo; is not a dramatic phrase here. It&rsquo;s been six years. Six years in camera tech is an eternity, and the jump from the original Max to the Max 2 is so huge that comparing the two almost feels pointless.&nbsp;
The Max 2 doesn&rsquo;t feel like an update. It feels like GoPro returning to a category it helped define, and doing it properly this time. What matters more is how the Max 2 fits into today&rsquo;s 360 market, where the obvious competition comes from Insta360&rsquo;s X5 and DJI&rsquo;s Osmo 360.&nbsp;
That&rsquo;s where the real comparison lives. And after spending time with the Max 2 as someone stepping into 360 capture for the first time, I can confidently say GoPro has built something that feels modern, thoughtful, and very &ldquo;GoPro&rdquo; in the ways that count.
It also has limitations that become impossible to ignore once you live with it long enough.
<h2>A familiar GoPro experience, built around a very different kind of footage</h2>
The Max 2 doesn&rsquo;t feel like GoPro trying to become a different brand. It feels like GoPro taking what it already does well and translating it into a 360 camera that can handle the same kind of real-world use people expect from the company.
The stabilisation is here. The special shooting modes GoPro fans care about are here too, including Hyperlapse and star trails. And the Max 2&rsquo;s mounting flexibility is a reminder that GoPro has always understood one thing better than most brands: action cameras don&rsquo;t live on shelves, they live on helmets, handlebars, chest mounts, tripods, and sometimes places that don&rsquo;t feel safe for electronics.
You get tripod mounting, magnetic mounting, and the classic three-finger GoPro mount that&rsquo;s practically iconic at this point.
GoPro launched the Max 2 globally last September, and if you&rsquo;ve been following the category, you&rsquo;ve probably already seen the specifications and early impressions everywhere.&nbsp;
So instead of treating this like a spec-sheet recap, I&rsquo;m writing this from the perspective that mattered to me: what it feels like to actually use the Max 2 when you&rsquo;re new to 360 cameras, and what you learn once the excitement wears off and the workflow becomes routine.
<h2>Setup is easy. The mindset shift takes longer.</h2>
The first few minutes with the Max 2 are almost too smooth. You insert a microSD card, drop in the battery, power it on, and follow the on-screen instructions to pair it with your phone. GoPro&rsquo;s Quik app is central to the experience from the start, and it stays central long after setup.
Quik isn&rsquo;t just for pairing. It becomes your main interface for previewing footage, accessing key features, and starting the editing process. That consistency helps because it reduces the friction of getting started, even if what you&rsquo;re recording is fundamentally different from what most people are used to.
And that&rsquo;s where the Max 2 gets interesting. Because it&rsquo;s not difficult in the way a confusing camera is difficult. It&rsquo;s difficult in the way learning a new creative tool is difficult. The camera records everything around you, but good results still depend on you knowing what you want the final output to feel like.
<h2>The design choice that changes how you mount it</h2>
The Max 2 has a squarish design, and it&rsquo;s immediately noticeable if you&rsquo;ve held the longer, stick-friendly shape of Insta360&rsquo;s X5. DJI&rsquo;s Osmo 360 also leans closer to the Max 2&rsquo;s design philosophy.
In day-to-day use, I found the Max 2&rsquo;s squarer shape more conducive to mounting on helmets, bike handlebars, and your chest. It sits in a way that feels stable and balanced. The longer form factor of the X5 makes more sense when you&rsquo;re using it on a stick, where the camera becomes this slim &ldquo;periscope&rdquo; for capturing yourself and the environment around you.
There are pluses and minuses to both designs, but I appreciated that the Max 2 feels built for practical mounting first, not just for looking sleek on a selfie stick.
<h2>Lens covers that don&rsquo;t require tools or patience</h2>
One of the smartest, most confidence-boosting decisions GoPro made with the Max 2 is how it handles lens protection.
Like other flagship 360 cameras, the Max 2 uses a twin-lens design and supports replaceable lens covers. The difference is that on the Max 2, replacing them is genuinely simple.&nbsp;
You twist the covers off with your fingers and swap them. No special tools, and no &ldquo;send it away to the manufacturer&rdquo; process, which is still something you have to deal with on DJI&rsquo;s Osmo 360.
That ease matters because 360 cameras are inherently more vulnerable than regular action cameras. Those lenses stick out. They&rsquo;re meant to see everything, which also means they&rsquo;re exposed to everything.
I found the lens covers durable too. I dropped the Max 2 from waist height onto a gravel driveway and the lens didn&rsquo;t even scratch. But the bigger point is peace of mind. If you&rsquo;re heading out, you can throw spare lens covers into your bag and stop worrying that one accident will end your shooting day.
<h2>&ldquo;True 8K&rdquo; is a headline, but the real story is what it enables</h2>
The Max 2 uses two 14mm lenses (35mm equivalent), and each lens records to a 1/2.3-inch sensor. Together, they produce what GoPro calls &ldquo;True 8K&rdquo; video, with 10-bit colour support.
GoPro has been unusually direct about how it believes this differs from what others are doing. The company points out that some pixels get lost when you&rsquo;re recording circular footage on a square sensor, and that some competing cameras get close to 8K and then use algorithms to boost the final output up to 8K.
GoPro argues that the Max 2 captures more usable pixels in the actual recording area, and it has an entire webpage explaining how that works.
In my testing, the difference isn&rsquo;t massive for everyday use. It exists, and professionals will care, especially if they&rsquo;re mixing footage with high-end cameras where every bit of detail matters.
But for most people, the Max 2&rsquo;s appeal isn&rsquo;t just about a resolution argument. It&rsquo;s about how the footage looks, how much room it gives you in editing, and how reliable it feels when you&rsquo;re shooting in good light.
<h2>Colour is where the Max 2 quietly wins hearts</h2>
Two things stood out to me almost immediately: 10-bit colour and GoPro&rsquo;s default colour rendering.
The 10-bit support matters because it helps prevent banding in skies, especially around sunsets where gradients can look ugly fast. And GoPro&rsquo;s default look leans darker, contrastier, and more realistic than what you typically see from other brands in this space.
Blue skies are where I noticed it most. The Max 2 gives a more natural tone, with a slight magenta touch that feels closer to what you actually saw in the moment. If you want something that looks louder and more attention-grabbing straight out of the camera, there are cameras that will do that too, but GoPro&rsquo;s look feels more grounded.
And if you want to colour grade later in DaVinci Resolve, 10-bit footage gives you much more flexibility. It&rsquo;s the difference between footage that holds up under edits, and footage that starts falling apart the moment you push it.
<h2>Daylight detail is strong, even when scenes get messy</h2>
In bright light, I found the Max 2 held detail well, especially in scenes with a lot of texture like foliage. It&rsquo;s the kind of footage that stays crisp enough to feel premium, but not overly sharpened to the point of looking artificial.
It also helps that the camera&rsquo;s contrast handling feels controlled. The footage has definition without feeling harsh, which is exactly what you want from a camera that&rsquo;s going to be used outdoors most of the time.
<h2>Single-lens mode is a practical option when you don&rsquo;t need everything</h2>
Like most 360 cameras, the Max 2 offers a single-lens mode. It&rsquo;s useful when you know the second lens isn&rsquo;t adding value, like when the camera is mounted to your chest and you&rsquo;re not planning to use the full spherical view.
In this mode, the Max 2 essentially becomes a 4K action camera, and the biggest advantage is that it saves you time later because you don&rsquo;t need to reframe the footage. The trade-off is that you&rsquo;re capped at 4K, but for quick shoots where speed matters, that&rsquo;s a fair compromise.
<h2>Audio is the one place the Max 2 feels undercooked</h2>
The Max 2 packs in six microphones and uses them intelligently in theory, dampening the side facing wind and prioritising the cleaner direction.
On paper, it sounds excellent. In real-world use, I found the audio consistently subpar. It sounded quiet and flat, and no matter what I did, I couldn&rsquo;t get it to feel as full or as punchy as I wanted.
If audio matters to you, I&rsquo;d plan to use an external mic. Honestly, that&rsquo;s good advice for most action cameras, but it feels especially important here.
<h2>Slow motion is still not a 360 camera&rsquo;s strongest talent</h2>
The Max 2&rsquo;s slow-motion tops out at 100 frames per second and is only available when shooting 4K. Once you reframe that footage, your maximum output resolution becomes 1080p.
It&rsquo;s usable, but it&rsquo;s not the reason you buy this camera. The reality is that 360 cameras, at least for now, still don&rsquo;t deliver the kind of slow-motion experience people expect from more traditional action cameras.
<h2>Editing is where the Max 2 becomes the product you actually paid for</h2>
If there&rsquo;s one thing the Max 2 taught me, it&rsquo;s that 360 capture shifts creative control into post-production.
Most people aren&rsquo;t buying these cameras to upload raw 360 footage for immersive goggles. They&rsquo;re buying them to create normal, cinematic videos for YouTube, Instagram, and everything else we actually watch. That means reframing is not optional. It&rsquo;s the whole point.
GoPro gives you two paths here: the revamped Quik mobile app and desktop software through GoPro Player for macOS and Windows.
Quik is clearly the star. The best feature in the mobile workflow is Object Tracking, which lets you select a subject in the 360 footage and have the software keep the shot locked on them, regardless of how the camera moved during recording.&nbsp;
In my use, it worked really well. It&rsquo;s not perfect, sometimes it frames the subject slightly differently than you&rsquo;d choose, but fixing those moments manually is easy.
The downside is that Object Tracking is mobile-only. The desktop software is capable and covers most of what you need, but missing automatic tracking slows things down. Hopefully GoPro brings it to desktop in a future update.
For more serious editors, GoPro now offers a DaVinci Resolve plugin alongside the long-existing Adobe Premiere plugin. The catch is that you have to transcode your clips into a Resolve-friendly format using GoPro Player first. Fortunately, there&rsquo;s a batch-processing option, and if you care about combining 10-bit footage into a larger workflow, it&rsquo;s worth the extra step.
One feature I genuinely loved is that you can plug the Max 2 directly into your phone to download clips. It&rsquo;s far faster than relying on Wi-Fi transfers, and it makes the workflow feel instantly less annoying.
<h2>The long-term realities: storage, stitching, and low light</h2>
Living with the Max 2 also means accepting the practical side of 8K 360 video.
File sizes are huge. Storage management becomes part of your life. Transfer times matter, especially if you&rsquo;re working on your phone and you&rsquo;re impatient, like most of us are.
The Quik app and GoPro Player are accessible and beginner-friendly, but they don&rsquo;t have the depth required for professional-grade editing. And if you want to bring footage into traditional non-linear editors, you still have to do reframing and adjustments inside GoPro&rsquo;s ecosystem first, which adds extra steps.
I also noticed stitching inconsistencies in certain scenarios, and GoPro doesn&rsquo;t offer manual stitching controls in its apps, which means you can&rsquo;t always fix what you can see.
Low-light performance is another limitation. Indoor and night footage isn&rsquo;t the Max 2&rsquo;s strong suit, and GoPro has clearly optimised for daylight shooting.
<h2>Verdict: powerful, creative, and not a shortcut</h2>
The GoPro Max 2 offers real creative advantages. It lets you capture scenes once and shape them later, enabling perspectives that aren&rsquo;t possible with more conventional cameras. But it also demands patience, planning, and a willingness to spend time in editing tools.
For newcomers, the Max 2 is approachable, but it isn&rsquo;t effortless. It rewards experimentation. It rewards learning point-of-view. And once you start getting it right, it&rsquo;s hard not to get addicted to the freedom it gives you.
If you don&rsquo;t currently own a 360 camera and you want one, the Max 2 is easy to recommend. The video quality is excellent, the colour rendering looks more realistic out of the box, the lens covers are genuinely easy to replace, and 10-bit colour gives you flexibility if you want to grade footage later.
The biggest caution is audio. If sound matters, plan for an external mic. And if you shoot mostly indoors or at night, you&rsquo;ll feel the limits sooner than you&rsquo;d like.
The GoPro Max 2 is priced at Rs 54,990 in India.

The Logitech MX Master 4 refines a familiar formula with better materials, new haptics, an Action Ring button, and long battery life, while still leaning heavily on software.

Logitech MX Master 4 review: Still the productivity king?

<h3>The Logitech MX Master 4 builds on a familiar design with revised materials, new haptic feedback, an Action Ring button, updated connectivity, and long battery life.</h3>

The MX Master 4 carries a reputation that very few computer accessories ever get to inherit. There is a reason creators like Marques Brownlee, Ali Abdaal, Casey Neistat, Austin Evans, and MrWhoseTheBoss have all, at different points in their careers, relied on the MX Master. That trust was built through long workdays, reliable tracking, and a level of customisation that adapts easily to different workflows.
I have wanted an MX Master on my desk for a long time, so when the opportunity to review the MX Master 4 came up, I took it without hesitation. This is not a gaming mouse, and it does not attempt to be one. My Logitech G304 still makes far more sense in that role. But for productivity, comfort, and extended all-day use, the MX Master 4, like the models before it, operates on a different level.
Rather than pushing for a dramatic redesign, Logitech has taken a measured path. The MX Master 4 looks familiar at first glance, but the changes start to matter once it becomes part of your daily routine.
With an official price of ₹15,000 and online pricing closer to ₹12,000, it sits firmly in premium territory. The question, then, is straightforward: after wanting one for so long, is this finally the MX Master I would buy myself?
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review: Design and ergonomics</h2>
Anyone coming from an older MX Master will feel right at home with the MX Master 4 almost instantly. The hand position, the overall posture, and the way the mouse fills your palm are all familiar. Logitech has not attempted to rework the fundamentals here, and visually it still sits very close to the MX Master 3S. That sense of continuity is deliberate. The real changes reveal themselves only after days of regular use, where the MX Master 4 starts to feel more polished and better thought through.
The mouse is offered in Graphite and Pale Grey, with a dedicated Mac variant available in White Silver. Colour options aside, the biggest improvement this generation comes down to materials. The rubberised finish on the MX Master 3S was one of its weakest points. It felt premium initially, but it did not age gracefully. Dust, skin oils, and everyday grime clung to it easily, and extended use often resulted in uneven wear and glossy patches that made the mouse feel prematurely worn.
That issue has been addressed decisively. The MX Master 4 switches to a higher-grade plastic across most of its surface. It still feels soft and pleasant in the hand, but without the tacky, dirt-loving behaviour of the earlier coating. Rubber has been restricted to the left and right wings, where grip is genuinely useful. In everyday use, this change makes the mouse feel cleaner, more durable, and far easier to maintain.
The left wing doubles as a thumb rest and now integrates the Actions Ring button. This is also where the haptic feedback is delivered. In use, the placement feels natural and intuitive. The button sits exactly where the thumb expects it to be, and I rarely needed to adjust my grip to reach it.
Logitech has also refined the main click area. The buttons are marginally larger, the loop around the scroll wheel has been removed, and the odd plastic extension on the right-click button from the MX Master 3S is no longer present. These are small tweaks individually, but together they give the mouse a cleaner and more cohesive look.
Click noise remains minimal. Like previous MX Master models, the MX Master 4 uses heavily dampened switches. There is very little audible feedback, and that is clearly intentional. Logitech has tuned this mouse for offices, shared workspaces, and long professional sessions where constant clicking can quickly become irritating. It may not satisfy those who enjoy pronounced tactile feedback, but it makes the mouse easy to live with for hours on end.
Scrolling continues to be a highlight. Both the MagSpeed main wheel and the thumb scroll wheel are aluminium, and both feel premium. The MagSpeed wheel remains exceptional. It offers precise, stepped scrolling when control matters, and seamlessly switches to free-spin mode at the press of a button. Even better, it adapts automatically to speed. Fast flicks glide freely, while slower movements return to controlled scrolling without any manual input.
The thumb wheel, while functional, still lags behind the MagSpeed wheel in feel. It is not as smooth, and the lack of a click limits its usefulness. Considering the mouse already offers eight programmable buttons, this feels like a missed opportunity to expand functionality further.
Below the thumb wheel sits the redesigned gesture button. Its new position makes it easier to press intentionally, and it feels more reliable during repeated use.
Despite not being marketed as a dedicated ergonomic mouse, the MX Master 4 is among the most comfortable work mice I have used. I have larger hands, and the shape fits exceptionally well. Long work sessions never caused fatigue or discomfort. It is still disappointing, though, that a left-handed version remains absent.
This is also not a mouse built for constant lifting or fast flicks, which makes gaming a poor fit. The grip does not encourage aggressive movements, and the Actions Ring button can be triggered unintentionally if you hold the mouse tightly. At 150 grams, it is also relatively heavy. By comparison, my Logitech G304 comes in at 99 grams with an AA battery.
That weight works against it in games, but becomes an asset in creative software. In tools like Photoshop and InDesign, the mouse feels planted and controlled, encouraging slower, more deliberate movements.
There is also a small nod to sustainability. The MX Master 4 is more serviceable, with exposed screws that should allow battery replacement in the future. While this has been possible in certain regions before, sourcing official replacement batteries in India remains difficult unless you are willing to venture into unreliable territory.
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review: Connectivity &amp; Tracking</h2>
In terms of connectivity, the MX Master 4 gives you two clear options. You can use Logitech&rsquo;s Bolt receiver, or go completely dongle-free with Bluetooth 5.1 Low Energy. I genuinely like having both, mainly because I switch between different work setups fairly often.
You can pair the mouse with up to three devices, and switching between them using the button on the bottom is quick and straightforward. Moving between my laptop and desktop felt fast and mostly seamless in day-to-day use.
Logitech says it has improved the internal antenna design and claims a wireless range of up to 10 metres. From my testing, that claim mostly holds up. As long as there were no major obstacles in the way, the connection stayed stable even when I moved a decent distance away from my desk.
For tracking, the MX Master 4 uses Logitech&rsquo;s Darkfield high-precision sensor, and it has been rock solid for me. I tested it on a polished wooden desk, a regular sheet of paper, and even on glass. Tracking stayed consistent across all of them, including glass, which is still something many mice struggle with.
The DPI range goes from 200 all the way up to 8,000, and you can adjust it in fine 50-DPI steps. That level of control is genuinely useful if you care about dialing in pointer speed exactly the way you like it.
The weak point here is the polling rate. Whether you use the Bolt receiver or Bluetooth, it is capped at 125Hz. That feels disappointing at this price, especially when even basic wireless mice bundled with budget keyboard combos run at the same rate.
Connectivity itself is simple enough, but the experience of the mouse is incomplete without the Logi Options+ software. Until I installed the software, even basic things like the back and forward buttons did not work. Once everything is set up, though, the mouse finally delivers what you are paying for.
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review:&nbsp;Software</h2>
Logi Options+ is, without question, the most polished customisation software I have used from any peripheral brand so far. Even large PC makers like Dell, HP, and Asus could learn a thing or two from it. The interface is clean, the setup process is easy to follow, and nothing feels confusing or unnecessarily buried. From a pure design and usability perspective, Logitech has done this part really well.
However, I have a few issues, with the first and foremost being, that you need Logi Options+ in the first place. Without the software installed, a large chunk of what you are paying ₹12,000 to ₹15,000 for simply does not function. Even basic buttons like back and forward are useless until the app is up and running.
Logitech positions the MX Master 4 as a productivity mouse for professional and corporate users. In that context, setup at work should be painless. In reality, it is anything but. On most office machines, installing third-party software like Logi Options+ is painfully convoluted thanks to enterprise level security.
Even with admin access on my work system, I had to get the IT team involved to adjust permissions before the software would behave properly. On top of that, the app asking for keystroke access immediately raised concerns. I had to explain why that permission was required, which is not a great conversation to have in a corporate environment.
A potential workaround would be setting the mouse up on another system and then using it at work. That is not an option here. The MX Master 4 has no onboard memory, so none of the customisations carry over. You have to use the Logi Options+ app, and have it run in the background.
On my personal MacBook, though, the entire setup took under three minutes and worked flawlessly.
Once everything is in place, the experience is excellent. You get to set workflow-specific shortcuts, and profiles, like I did for Photoshop and Lightroom, which made my life a lot easier.&nbsp;
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review:&nbsp;Haptics and the new Action Ring</h2>
The MX Master 4 introduces two features that actually move the series forward in a meaningful way: the new haptic feedback system and the dedicated Action Ring button. These are not minor tweaks or background additions. They directly change how the mouse feels and how quickly you can get work done.
Starting with haptics, the feedback is stronger than I expected from a mouse that still looks this understated. Logitech gives you four intensity levels to choose from: subtle, low, medium, and high. I left mine on low, and even that felt more than enough for everyday use. Anything higher quickly starts to feel excessive.
The idea behind the haptics is simple. The mouse gives you a small physical confirmation when an action is completed. It is not meant to grab your attention or pull focus, but to reinforce what you are already doing. Once you get used to it, it starts to feel surprisingly natural.
A good example is layer alignment in Adobe Photoshop. Normally, you rely entirely on visual cues to know when a layer snaps perfectly into place. With the MX Master 4, I also got a subtle haptic nudge the moment alignment was complete. It sounds trivial, but during detailed edits, that extra confirmation genuinely helped, especially when making very fine adjustments.
You get similar feedback when using the Action Ring, Smart Actions, and gesture shortcuts. The haptics also kick in when switching between desktops or workspaces, which makes those transitions feel intentional rather than something you triggered by accident.
The other big addition is the Action Ring itself. While Action Rings technically came to the MX Master 3S through a software update, the MX Master 4 is the first model to support them properly with a dedicated hardware button. That distinction matters in daily use.
Pressing the Action Ring button brings up a circular menu of actions that changes depending on the app you are using. These actions are essentially macros tied to shortcuts, but the way they are presented makes them quick and intuitive to access. Logitech claims this can save up to 33 percent of working time and reduce mouse movement by 67 percent. I did not measure those numbers, but while editing photos in Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop for this review, my workflow did feel noticeably faster and more fluid.
Inside Logi Options+, you can also create multiple profiles within the same app. For example, you can set up separate Photoshop profiles for photo retouching and for vector or path-based work, each with its own shortcuts. Similar setups work well in Lightroom, DaVinci Resolve, and most other creative applications.
Rounding things out are familiar features like Easy Switch for managing three connected devices through the software, continued Action Ring integration, and Logi Flow, which lets you drag files, images, and text between two computers simply by moving your cursor across screens.
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review:&nbsp;Battery</h2>
The MX Master 4 has a 650mAh battery, with Logitech claiming up to 70 days of use. I am inclined to believe that, because after a week of heavy use, my unit only dropped from 100 to 90 percent. Charging happens over USB-C, and a minute or two easily gets you through a full workday, without any range anxiety either.
<h2>Logitech MX Master 4 Review:&nbsp;Verdict</h2>
Spending time with the Logitech MX Master 4 as my work mouse made its priorities obvious. This is a mouse designed around long hours at a desk, not something meant to impress quickly. Comfort continues to be the core strength.
The material changes make a difference in daily use, the MagSpeed scroll wheel remains unmatched, and the mouse feels planted and predictable during fine, detail oriented work. The addition of haptic feedback and the hardware backed Action Ring button also deserves mention. What felt unnecessary at first gradually became helpful.
There are compromises that cannot be ignored. The weight alone makes gaming unrealistic, the 125Hz polling rate feels embarrassingly low for a mouse at this price, and the thumb scroll wheel still falls short of the main wheel in feel and precision. I kept wishing there was a way to make it handle gaming duties, but that option is not there.
Software remains another concern. Logi Options+ is polished, but the reliance on it is frustrating. Without the software running, several features stop working, which becomes a problem in restricted office environments.
So would I still buy it, especially now that the MX Master 3S sells for much less? Yes. The older model had durability issues over time, and the MX Master 4 earns its place on my desk today.

Is the CMF Headphone Pro worth ₹7,999? We tested its 100-hour battery, 40dB ANC, and unique Energy Slider in our detailed review. Read our final verdict.

CMF Headphone Pro Review: 100-Hour Battery and Bold Design – The New Budget King?

Nothing’s sub-brand CMF is shaking up the budget audio space. We spent a week with the CMF Headphone Pro to test its massive battery claims, unique design quirks, and audio performance. Does the bold style match the sound quality? Here is our honest review.

<div class="flex flex-col text-sm pb-25">
<article class="text-token-text-primary w-full focus:outline-none [--shadow-height:45px] has-data-writing-block:pointer-events-none has-data-writing-block:-mt-(--shadow-height) has-data-writing-block:pt-(--shadow-height) [&amp;:has([data-writing-block])&gt;*]:pointer-events-auto scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id="request-694a96e5-68bc-8323-b7d8-0f05a643b82d-32" data-testid="conversation-turn-72" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn="assistant">
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:--spacing(4)] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(6)] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(16)] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" tabindex="-1">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="cacebb39-68e0-4b2c-bc68-8708fe645e07" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-2">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[1px]">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full break-words light markdown-new-styling">
CMF Headphone Pro combines bold design, tactile controls, LDAC audio, and massive battery life. ANC isn&rsquo;t class-leading, but at ₹7,999, it&rsquo;s one of the most interesting and well-rounded budget headphones available.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="z-0 flex min-h-[46px] justify-start">&nbsp;</div>
<div class="mt-3 w-full empty:hidden">
<div class="text-center">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
<div class="pointer-events-none h-px w-px absolute bottom-0" aria-hidden="true" data-edge="true">&nbsp;</div>

The budget headphone segment has started to blur into one long, boring pattern. Walk into any store or scroll online and you&rsquo;ll see the same safe designs repeated over and over. Black plastic, familiar shapes, and a heavy focus on specs, often at the cost of how these headphones actually feel to live with day after day. That&rsquo;s the space CMF, Nothing&rsquo;s sub-brand, is clearly trying to shake up.
With the CMF Headphone Pro, the idea doesn&rsquo;t seem to be about racing to the lowest price. Instead, CMF is leaning hard into design and personality, trying to stand out in a category that rarely takes risks. The headphones first showed up in a few global markets in September 2025, and now they&rsquo;re finally making their way to India on January 20.
I&rsquo;ve been using the Light Green version, and at least on paper, it ticks a lot of boxes. There&rsquo;s a bold, industrial-inspired look, a colour that doesn&rsquo;t try to disappear, big battery claims, and features like LDAC that you don&rsquo;t usually see at this price. The real test, though, is everyday use. At ₹7,999, does all that style translate into something you&rsquo;ll actually enjoy using, or is the appeal mostly skin deep?
<h2>Design, Build &amp; Comfort</h2>
Let&rsquo;s call it like it is: most budget headphones look painfully safe. Black, beige, plastic, and forgettable. The <a title="CMF Phone (1): New affordable smartphone by Nothing likely under development" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/mobiles/cmf-phone-1-new-affordable-smartphone-by-nothing-likely-under-development-1715167142105" target="_blank">CMF</a> Headphone Pro clearly didn&rsquo;t get that memo. It does the exact opposite and makes sure you notice it. I&rsquo;ve been using the Light Green version daily, and I genuinely enjoy how bold it looks. The almost toy-like pop design feels playful and confident, not like it&rsquo;s trying to blend in with everything else on the shelf.
Yes, the body is mostly plastic, but it doesn&rsquo;t feel flimsy or hollow in the hand. The matte finish avoids that greasy shine cheap headphones often pick up, and the metal reinforcement inside the headband adds some real confidence when you adjust the size. CMF says these went through 66 different durability tests, including drops and twists, and based on daily use, I believe it. They feel sturdy enough to survive being tossed into a backpack. That said, the included drawstring pouch feels like an afterthought. A proper hard case would have made a lot more sense here.
The modular ear cushions are easily the most talked-about feature. Are they necessary? Not really. Are they fun? Absolutely. Swapping them out is strangely satisfying and lets you change the look whenever you want. Just be careful while putting them back on. If they&rsquo;re even slightly misaligned or flipped, the seal gets messed up. Also worth mentioning: the Light Green headphones and orange pads I tested attract dust like crazy. If you&rsquo;re not someone who constantly wipes your gear, they won&rsquo;t stay clean for long.
Comfort is mostly solid. At 283 grams, they don&rsquo;t feel heavy on the head, even during long sessions. The ear pads are big and cushy, and they form a good passive seal around the ears. However, the clamp is a bit tight. After about two hours of editing, I could feel the pressure, along with the usual heat build-up that comes with leatherette pads on closed-back headphones.
The controls are where CMF really leans into experimentation. The buttons themselves are on the smaller side, which took some getting used to. On the right cup, you&rsquo;ll find the USB-C port, a customizable Action Button, and a clicky roller for volume and playback or ANC, depending on how you set it up.
But the standout is on the left cup. Alongside the power button and the 3.5mm jack is the Energy Slider. It&rsquo;s smooth, has no clicks, and lets you adjust bass and treble on the fly. It feels more like a fidget than a control, and I caught myself sliding it around even when I didn&rsquo;t need to. It did take a few days to build muscle memory for the smaller buttons, though.
In the end, the CMF Headphone Pro clearly isn&rsquo;t trying to be subtle. It goes all-in on bold design and tactile controls. The tiny buttons and dust-prone pads aren&rsquo;t perfect, but the overall build and comfort punch above what you&rsquo;d expect at this price.
<h2>Audio Quality</h2>
Before getting into how these headphones sound, a bit of context matters. I don&rsquo;t treat music as background noise. For the past six years, I&rsquo;ve spent a lot of time actively listening, breaking tracks down layer by layer. I pay attention to small details most people gloss over; faint guitar lines tucked behind vocals, overlapping instrument layers, and those subtle melodic elements that give a song depth. So when I say the CMF Headphone Pro got serious listening time, it really did.
CMF is using 40mm custom drivers with nickel-plated diaphragms and a copper voice coil. That looks fine on a spec sheet, but numbers don&rsquo;t tell you much until you actually hit play. To get a real sense of what these could do, I jumped between very different genres, moving from the emotional softness of Ali Sethi&rsquo;s tracks to the hard-hitting, bass-driven delivery of Divine.
Straight out of the box, the tuning feels clearly aimed at everyday listeners. It&rsquo;s smooth, easygoing, and doesn&rsquo;t try to sound overly technical. That said, things noticeably improve if you&rsquo;re using an Android phone. Switching over to LDAC brings an immediate lift in clarity and separation, and it&rsquo;s not subtle.
To test dynamics and staging, I started with Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen, a track that exposes weak headphones very quickly. The CMF Headphone Pro managed the layered vocal sections better than expected. Individual harmonies remain audible, although during the most crowded moments, the instruments do push forward and slightly overshadow the vocals. It&rsquo;s the kind of compromise you only really notice if you&rsquo;re used to much more expensive gear.
For vocal-focused tracks, I played Gulon Main Rang and Qayede Se. The midrange is handled well. Ali Sethi&rsquo;s voice comes through warm and textured, without sounding artificially sharpened. As arrangements become busier, vocals do slip just a touch behind the mix. It never turns muddy, but they aren&rsquo;t always front and centre either.
Bass tuning is where these headphones become genuinely enjoyable. Using the Energy Slider with tracks like All Black, 3:59, and I&rsquo;m an Albatraoz shows that this control actually does something meaningful. At lower levels, bass stays clean and restrained. Push it higher, and you get a deep, physical thump. On 3:59, the sub-bass hits with authority without completely overpowering the vocals. Max it out, though, and it does get heavy; great for workouts, less ideal if you&rsquo;re listening critically.
I also spent time with binaural tracks during quieter moments to check clarity and background noise. The soundstage isn&rsquo;t massive, but it&rsquo;s wide enough to make spatial effects feel convincing. The Cinema and Concert modes add extra width that works well for movies, but for music, I preferred sticking to the standard stereo profile.
I ran the Personal Sound test in the Nothing X app as well. It takes a few minutes and is worth doing. For me, it slightly opened up the upper mids, making percussion hits feel sharper and more immediate.
Overall, the CMF Headphone Pro delivers a lively, engaging sound that feels well above what its price suggests. It captures small details: a vocalist's breath, the tail end of a drum hit better than expected. It&rsquo;s not trying to replace studio gear, but for everyday listening, it&rsquo;s genuinely satisfying.
<h2>ANC and Call Quality</h2>
This is one of those cases where the spec sheet sets expectations a little too high. CMF talks about 40dB hybrid adaptive <a title="Oppo Enco Buds3 Pro+ Review: ANC That Actually Works Under ₹2,500" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/oppo-enco-buds3-pro-review-anc-that-actually-works-under-2-500-1766497263765" target="_blank">ANC</a>, and in calm, everyday situations, it does what you&rsquo;d want it to do. Around the house or on quieter streets, the effect is obvious. The constant stuff in the background; fan noise, AC hum, distant traffic just drops away enough that you stop paying attention to it.
Once you step into properly noisy places, though, the picture changes. I used these during peak hours on the Delhi Metro and in a crowded local market, and that&rsquo;s where you start noticing the limits. The noise cancellation is still doing something, but it doesn&rsquo;t match the promise of the numbers. With ANC on and no music playing, plenty of sound still gets through. I&rsquo;d roughly put it at cutting about half the noise. Even with music playing at a comfortable volume, crowd chatter, announcements, and street sounds don&rsquo;t vanish. It takes the sharp edge off the chaos, but it doesn&rsquo;t create that bubble of silence you get from much more expensive headphones.
Call quality feels like a different story altogether. The Headphone Pro uses a three-mic setup with Clear Voice Technology, and in quieter environments, it works really well. Indoors, my voice sounded clean and natural, and calls stayed stable without any weird drops. For home or office use, it honestly performs better than you&rsquo;d expect at this price.
Outside is where things get messy. The microphones are very sensitive, and that sensitivity isn&rsquo;t always helpful. During calls in busy areas, my voice came through clearly, but so did everything else around me. Traffic, nearby conversations, and random street noise all made their way to the other end. The headphones struggle to separate your voice once the environment gets loud and unpredictable. The mics pick up a lot of detail, but in crowded markets or packed streets, switching to your phone&rsquo;s earpiece is still the safer bet.
Connectivity and Controls I didn&rsquo;t run into any connectivity issues during daily use, which is honestly the best compliment I can give here. The Headphone Pro uses Bluetooth 5.4 and supports AAC, SBC, and LDAC. That LDAC support still feels rare at this price, and if you&rsquo;re on Android, the difference is noticeable with higher-quality streams. Music sounds cleaner and less compressed than what you usually get from budget headphones. Pairing was completely hassle-free too. I switched them on, got a Google Fast Pair prompt, tapped once, and that was it.
The dual-device connection ended up being more useful than I expected. I kept the headphones connected to both my laptop and phone most of the time, and the switching just worked. I could be watching a video on my laptop, get a call on my phone, and the audio would jump over instantly. No menus, no reconnecting. That kind of reliability isn&rsquo;t guaranteed in this segment, so it stood out.
The physical controls deserve a mention. Between the rotary dial for volume and playback, the Energy Slider for bass tweaks, and the customizable Action Button, CMF has clearly tried to make things more interactive. I mapped the Action Button to the voice assistant using the Nothing X app. One press brought up Google Gemini, which made quick checks and reminders surprisingly convenient. It worked smoothly enough that I actually kept using it instead of defaulting to my phone.
Gaming performance was solid as well. With low-latency mode enabled, audio sync felt tight. While playing CODM, gunshots and effects lined up properly with what was happening on screen. I stopped actively listening for lag, which is usually a good sign. For casual gaming, the Headphone Pro does the job without any obvious issues.
<h2>Battery and Charging</h2>
This is the point where the CMF Headphone Pro clearly separates itself from most rivals. CMF talks about up to 100 hours of playback with ANC switched off and roughly 50 hours with noise cancellation enabled, and in real use, those figures don&rsquo;t feel like marketing exaggeration. Battery life quickly stopped being something I paid attention to, which says a lot.
Right out of the box, the headphones were sitting at around 60% charge. That single charge level lasted me close to three full days of fairly heavy usage, including long stretches of YouTube and OTT content. I first saw the low-battery alert at 10% midway through an episode, and even after that warning, I still had nearly two hours of listening time before it dropped to 5%. That level of endurance is hard to ignore.
Charging behaviour is equally sensible. CMF claims that a five-minute charge can give you around four hours of playback with ANC on, and from what I saw, that estimate holds up. A brief top-up during a short break was enough to get me through extended viewing without any breaks.
As for charging from empty to full, I honestly didn&rsquo;t track it closely because I almost never managed to drain the battery completely. According to CMF, a full charge takes about two hours using the USB-C port, which feels perfectly reasonable given how rarely you&rsquo;ll need to plug these in.
<h2>Price and Availability</h2>
The CMF Headphone Pro has officially arrived in India with an MRP of ₹7,999, though early buyers can grab it for ₹6,999 as part of a limited-time launch offer. Sales begin on January 20, with availability confirmed on Flipkart as well as select offline retail outlets.
When you factor in features like LDAC support, claimed 40dB active noise cancellation, and the class-leading battery life, the pricing comes across as extremely competitive for this segment.
<h2>Final Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
If long battery life and standout design matter more to you than total noise isolation, the CMF Headphone Pro is very easy to recommend. That near-100-hour stamina genuinely changes how often you think about charging, and the physical controls add a sense of playfulness you rarely see at this price.
Yes, the noise cancellation doesn&rsquo;t completely wipe out the chaos of the Delhi Metro, and the microphones can be a bit over-eager outdoors. Still, the lively sound tuning, LDAC support, and overall comfort balance those compromises well. At ₹6,999, it isn&rsquo;t perfect, but it&rsquo;s easily one of the most interesting headphones you can pick up right now.

Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G brings a 12.1-inch 120Hz display, Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 and a huge 12,000mAh battery. A practical Android tablet built for long use, but is it worth what Xiaomi is asking for it? Read our review to find out.

Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review: 12.1-inch display, Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 and a massive 12,000mAh battery

<h3>The Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G focuses on a large 120Hz display, reliable performance and a massive 12,000mAh battery, making it a practical Android tablet for long, everyday use.</h3>

I have spent plenty of time with the original Redmi Pad Pro, and it set a solid reference point for how a big, affordable Android tablet should feel. So when I started using the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G, I was genuinely curious whether Xiaomi would push for something new or stick to a formula that already worked. It quickly became clear that this tablet leans firmly towards refinement rather than reinvention.
The moment I picked it up, everything felt familiar. The design philosophy has not really changed, and that is not a negative. Instead of chasing flashy changes, Xiaomi seems to have focused on smoothing out the experience, fixing small annoyances, and polishing the parts that matter most in daily use.
On paper, a lot looks similar: a large display, strong battery life, and accessories that suggest light productivity. But after using it every day for work, streaming, and casual tasks, it is obvious that the Pad 2 Pro prioritises practicality, stability, and long-term comfort over trying to replace a laptop.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review: A big, smooth screen that plays it safe</h2>
I want to start with the display because, on a tablet, this is the one thing that really shapes how usable it feels every single day.
With the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G, the screen did not try to impress me in the first five minutes. Instead, it slowly won me over the longer I used it.
The tablet uses a 12.1-inch IPS LCD panel, and after days of working, binge-watching, and casual browsing, it felt like a sensible choice for this category. The 120Hz refresh rate makes a real difference in daily use. Scrolling feels smooth, app transitions look clean, and nothing ever feels jumpy or strained. I noticed this most during long reading sessions, where the higher refresh rate made the experience feel easier on my eyes rather than just visually flashy.
Dolby Vision support adds another layer to media consumption. Movies and shows look polished, with good contrast and controlled highlights, without pushing colours too hard. This is not a display that screams for attention, and I liked that. It stays comfortable over long sessions, which is exactly what I want from a tablet screen.
One design choice I appreciated more than expected was the bezel thickness. They are clearly visible, but in actual use, that works in the tablet&rsquo;s favour. I could hold the Pad 2 Pro securely without my palms constantly triggering the screen. Whether I was reading in portrait mode or watching videos in landscape, it felt easier to grip than tablets that chase ultra-thin bezels just for looks.
The 16:10 aspect ratio suits entertainment really well. Streaming content fills the screen nicely, with minimal black bars, and videos feel immersive. For productivity, especially when reviewing documents or reading long articles, I did sometimes wish for a bit more vertical space. That said, it never disrupted my workflow enough to be annoying, just something I noticed occasionally.
Sharpness was never a concern. The 2.5K resolution looks crisp at this size, with clear text and well-defined UI elements. Colours are handled in a balanced way too. With support for around a billion colours, photos and videos look lively but not exaggerated. Compared to the older Redmi Pad Pro&rsquo;s 12-bit panel, this is technically a downgrade, but in real-world use, I could not tell the difference unless I actively tried to.
Brightness peaks at around 600 nits. Indoors, I had zero complaints. Outdoors, direct sunlight does affect visibility, but the screen remains usable.
The quad-speaker setup with Dolby Atmos complements the display well. Audio is clear and reasonably loud, and the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack just adds to the tablet&rsquo;s overall practicality.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review: Familiar looks, solid feel, and a focus on practicality</h2>
The Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G plays things very safe when it comes to design, and you notice that straight away. Visually, it feels almost like a continuation of the earlier Pad Pro, and as someone who has used that tablet quite a bit, the familiarity stood out straight away.&nbsp;
The wide, rectangular shape and overall proportions feel unchanged, and if you have seen the previous model, this one will look instantly recognisable.
I found the design a bit too safe. The aluminium back, paired with the plastic strip that houses the camera, gives it a clean but conservative look. On my grey unit especially, the tablet looks understated to the point of being almost dull.&nbsp;
Apart from a subtle triangular texture on the plastic section, there is very little visual drama. It does not try to stand out on a desk, and that felt like a very deliberate choice.
That said, the finish started to grow on me the more I used it. The matte coating on the back turned out to be genuinely practical. It does not attract fingerprints easily, and even after days of use, it continued to look fairly clean.&nbsp;
I also appreciated the symmetry on the rear. There are two circular rings, even though only one holds the camera. The second ring is for the LED flash, and while it is a small detail, it keeps the back from looking lopsided.
In terms of build quality, I had no complaints. The aluminium back and frame feel solid and reassuring, with no flex or creaks when handling the tablet. It feels tougher than many tablets in this price range.&nbsp;
Gorilla Glass 3 protects the front, and the IP54 rating gave me a bit more confidence using it around the house, in the kitchen, or while throwing it into my backpack.
The port and button layout felt sensible in daily use. I liked having USB-C, a proper 3.5mm headphone jack, a SIM tray for 5G, and a microSD card slot for storage expansion. At around 600 grams for the 5G variant, it is easy enough to carry around, but the large 12.1-inch size did make long handheld sessions tiring for me, especially when using it one-handed.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review:&nbsp;Accessories that add to the experience</h2>
Xiaomi offers a dedicated keyboard case and Smart Pen as optional add-ons for the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G, and I spent some time using both to see how much they actually add to the experience.&nbsp;
The second-generation keyboard is made specifically for this tablet and doubles up as a protective case. In day-to-day use, I found it comfortable enough for emails, document edits, and quick notes. The keys have decent travel, and even during longer typing sessions, the layout never felt cramped or awkward.
That said, there are some clear limitations. The keyboard skips backlighting and does not include a trackpad, which immediately puts a ceiling on how far you can push it for serious work. It also connects over Bluetooth instead of using POGO pins, so it needs to be charged separately. In practice, this means one more device to keep an eye on, which slightly takes away from the plug-and-play convenience you expect from tablet accessories.
The Smart Pen follows a similar pattern. It needs its own charging and does not magnetically attach to the tablet, so there is no easy way to snap it on when you are done using it. However, once I actually started writing with it, those concerns faded a bit.&nbsp;
The pen feels responsive, palm rejection works well, and handwriting recognition is reliable. Pressure sensitivity makes it good for note-taking and light sketches, and the pen holder built into the keyboard case helped me keep it from getting lost.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review: Reliable performance that stayed consistent</h2>
Performance was never a concern for me while using the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G. It runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, an upper mid-range chip that feels well matched to a large Android tablet. In daily use, things stayed smooth and predictable. Apps opened quickly, animations felt fluid, and moving between multiple apps never felt messy. I often had several apps running side by side, and the tablet handled that without slowing down.
My unit came with LPDDR4X RAM and UFS 2.2 storage. While those specs may not look impressive on paper, they did not hold the experience back in real-world use. Multitasking felt reliable, and I did not run into frequent app reloads during normal usage. I also appreciated that Redmi continues to offer expandable storage on both the Wi-Fi and 5G variants, which is useful if you plan to store a lot of media or large files locally.
Benchmark numbers line up with that experience. The tablet crossed around 1.1 million points on AnTuTu and delivered solid Geekbench scores. 3DMark stability results were also respectable, suggesting it can sustain performance over longer sessions without major drops.
Gaming performance was reassuring as well. I played BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile, and both ran smoothly with stable frame rates.&nbsp;
Overall, the Pad 2 Pro feels tuned for steady, long-term use rather than chasing peak benchmark numbers, which suits a tablet focused on media, gaming, and everyday productivity.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review:&nbsp;Stable software with strong multitasking support</h2>
Using the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G, the software experience felt thoughtfully tuned for a large display, which is not something every Android tablet gets right. The tablet runs HyperOS 2 based on Android 15, and while the overall design language will feel familiar if you have used Xiaomi devices before, it adapts reasonably well to the tablet form factor. UI elements scale properly, layouts make good use of the extra space, and nothing felt awkwardly stretched or oversized. That said, some parts of the interface are starting to feel a little dated in terms of visual style.
Day-to-day use, however, was smooth. Animations and transitions are handled well, thanks to Xiaomi&rsquo;s HyperCore system running behind the scenes. The interface prioritises stability over flashiness, which worked in its favour during longer sessions. There are a few preloaded apps, but most of them feel tablet-relevant rather than unnecessary clutter, and none of them actively got in my way.
Where HyperOS 2 really impressed me was multitasking. Being able to run up to four apps at the same time turned out to be genuinely useful. I could mix split-screen views with floating windows, and the tablet handled it without feeling cramped or unstable. For my usual routine of watching videos, browsing the web, replying to messages, and taking notes simultaneously, this flexibility made the tablet feel far more capable.
On the AI side, Google Gemini is integrated into HyperOS 2, and in my use, it worked smoothly and reliably for everyday tasks.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review: A very basic camera setup</h2>
The cameras on the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G are very much an afterthought, and that was obvious in my use. On the back, you get an 8MP camera with a flash, but image quality is strictly basic. I found it useful for scanning documents or QR codes, and not much beyond that. Photos lack detail and consistency, so it is not something I would rely on for actual photography.
The 8MP front camera is more practical. It handled Zoom meetings and WhatsApp calls just fine in good lighting, delivering clear and usable results. Video recording is capped at 1080p at 30fps on both cameras. Realistically, I only see myself using video mode in an emergency, not by choice.
<h2>Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G Review:&nbsp;Long-lasting battery that made charging a non-issue</h2>
Battery life has easily been one of my favourite parts of using the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G. It comes with a huge 12,000mAh battery, and in real-world use, that size genuinely shows.&nbsp;
With my usual mix of streaming, browsing, light work, and occasional gaming, I was comfortably getting close to four days on a single charge. That kind of endurance really changes how relaxed you feel about using a tablet, especially if it is your main device for media or travel.
Charging is capped at 33W, and Xiaomi includes the charger in the box, which I appreciated. It is not the fastest out there, but it gets the job done without fuss.&nbsp;
The tablet also supports 27W reverse wired charging, which I found surprisingly useful for topping up my earbuds or giving my phone a quick boost when needed.
<h2>Verdict: Is the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G worth buying?</h2>
Starting at ₹24,999 for the Wi-Fi version and ₹27,999 for the Wi-Fi + 5G model, the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G makes its priorities clear. Xiaomi has focused on nailing the fundamentals instead of chasing premium touches.&nbsp;
Battery life is a clear strength, multitasking feels genuinely usable, and expandable storage across all variants adds to its day-to-day practicality. If you want a tablet that can comfortably last days without living near a charger, this one delivers.
The optional keyboard and Smart Pen also help push it beyond basic media use. They are not perfect, but they make typing, note-taking, and light work far more manageable. A magnetically charging pen and a backlit keyboard with a trackpad would have elevated the experience further.
There are trade-offs. The design is functional rather than inspiring, the display is good but not class-leading, and the AI features feel fairly basic. HyperOS 2 runs smoothly, but it already looks a bit dated.
Still, for the asking price, the Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G is a dependable, no-frills Android tablet that prioritises battery life, stability, and everyday usability.

Redmi Note 15 5G focuses on feel over flash with a slim, lightweight design, a bright curved AMOLED display, dependable performance, for Rs 22.999. 

Redmi Note 15 5G Review: Slim Design, Bright AMOLED Display, and Reliable Everyday Performance

The Redmi Note 15 5G shifts focus from raw specs to everyday comfort. With a slim build, curved AMOLED display, steady performance, and a capable 108MP camera, it delivers a balanced mid-range experience for ₹22,999.

<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto pb-10 [--thread-content-margin:--spacing(4)] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(6)] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:--spacing(16)] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" tabindex="-1">
<div class="flex max-w-full flex-col grow">
<div class="min-h-8 text-message relative flex w-full flex-col items-end gap-2 text-start break-words whitespace-normal [.text-message+&amp;]:mt-1" dir="auto" data-message-author-role="assistant" data-message-id="7756ccf7-e14a-45f0-b453-b8d7f794ac8b" data-message-model-slug="gpt-5-2">
<div class="flex w-full flex-col gap-1 empty:hidden first:pt-[1px]">
<div class="markdown prose dark:prose-invert w-full break-words light markdown-new-styling">
The Redmi Note 15 5G shifts focus on a slim, lightweight design, a bright curved AMOLED display, reliable performance, and a capable 108MP camera.&nbsp;
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

The Redmi Note series has always had a distinct purpose. It was supposed to give people a taste of something premium, without asking them to pay the premium tax.&nbsp; Previous Redmi Note phones delivered this through aggressive specs. The Redmi Note 15 5G, though is clearly chasing a different idea of value: how the phone feels, and how it looks. That approach makes sense in 2026. From the moment I picked it up, it didn&rsquo;t feel like a typical Redmi Note phone. It feels lighter, it feels different, and that is where the real conversation starts.
<h2>Design</h2>
One of the first thins that you&rsquo;ll notice is that the phone is unexpectedly slim and feels incredibly lightweight. At just 7.35 mm thick and 178 grams, it is noticeably lighter than most phones in this segment. This is one of those devices that you forget you have been holding. This is both, a compliment as well as a a mild criticism, depending on your preference.&nbsp; If you like phones that feel dense and reassuring, this might feel a little too light. Personally, I noticed it most when switching over from a heavier phone, which is my primary device.&nbsp; That said, it is undeniably comfortable. Weight distribution is excellent, and the curved edges make it easy to hold for long periods. Whether you are doom-scrolling, reading, or watching videos, it never feels awkward or tiring.
Design-wise, Redmi has not gone completely wild, but it has not played it completely safe either. The matte black finish looks clean and understated, though it is definitely a fingerprint magnet. Keeping it spotless is a losing battle.&nbsp;
The silver accents around the camera module add a bit of flair, and while both the back and frame are plastic, the finish does not scream &ldquo;budget.&rdquo; It feels intentional rather than cheap. Button placement is sensible and familiar. The volume rocker and power button sit on the left and are easy to reach. There is an IR blaster at the top, which is a small but appreciated addition.&nbsp; At the bottom, you will find the USB-C port, speaker grille, and the dual SIM tray. There is no headphone jack, which feels like a design-driven sacrifice rather than cost-cutting, but nonetheless, is it a bit disappointing if you rely on wired audio. For protection not only do you get an IP66 rating, you also get reinforced internals. Now, Xiaomi hasn&rsquo;t explicitly claimed what front glass they are using for the Note 15. However, the device has been tested against MIL-STD-810H, so we&rsquo;re guessing it uses some sort of Corning Gorilla Glass.
<h2>Display</h2>
Speaking of displays, the Redmi Note 15 5G does not try to impress with outrageous claims or or headline-grabbing battery numbers. Instead, it leans heavily on the quality of this display, and this is where the phone really justifies its price. The 6.77-inch curved AMOLED 120Hz panel immediately changes how the phone is perceived. It looks premium in a way that flat panels at this price often do not. The curve is subtle and well executed, and I did not face any issues with accidental touch.&nbsp; Colours are also vibrant thanks to the 12-bit panel, because of which you get a a100 per cent coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space. While text looks sharp and clean thanks to the FHD+ resolution.
Watching content on this display is genuinely enjoyable. Netflix, YouTube, or endless reels all look great.
Brightness is another strong point. Redmi claims that the display has a peak brightness of 3200nits, and we have good reason to believe them, as the outdoor visibility is genuinely excellent. Even under harsh sunlight, the screen remains readable.&nbsp; You also get 3840Hz PWM dimming which helps keep things comfortable during night usage. Add TUV Triple Certified Eye Protection 2.0 and you have a display that&rsquo;s actually less stressful to your eyes
Unlocking the phone is handled by an in-display optical fingerprint scanner. It is fast, reliable, and has not failed me so far, and has been very consistent. Coming to the audio setup, we get a set of stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos and MiSound dual tuning. The speakers get pretty loud, and can easily fill a room. However, because of the slim design and thing built, the speakers lack bass or any meaningful character. Still, considering what the phone costs, I am not really complaining.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
<h2>Performance &amp; Software Experience&nbsp;</h2>
The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is a mid-range chip, so, its better if we get into this with our expectations in check.&nbsp;
Day-to-day usage is smooth. Apps open quickly, scrolling feels fluid, and multitasking does not feel stressful. It is not the kind of phone that makes you think about performance at all, which is actually a good thing.
You get decent gaming performance, but clearly that was not the focus here.&nbsp; BGMI runs at 60fps but it is quite stable. Still, If you are a competitive gamer, chasing higher frame rates, this is not the phone for you. For casual gaming sessions, though, it works just fine. Benchmarks were a bit odd. AnTuTu completed its run but did not display a final score for reasons unknown, no matter to what network we were connected to. Geekbench worked as expected and gave a clearer idea of where the chip stands. During testing, the phone warmed up slightly, but it never became uncomfortable.
On the software side, the phone ships with Android 15 and HyperOS 2. Ideally, Android 16 would have been nicer to see out of the box, but Redmi&rsquo;s promise of four years of Android updates and six years of security patches is reassuring. AI features, mainly powered by Gemini are pretty useful in small, practical ways. There is some preinstalled bloatware, but most of it can be removed without much effort.&nbsp;
You also get a tonne of Xiaomi&rsquo;s interconnectivity features, and from my limited testing, they work really well. We also get Xiaomi Share, which works similarly to Quick Share, making transferring files and photos between devices simple and reliable.
<h2>Battery&nbsp;</h2>
Battery life reflects a clear design decision by Redmi. AT a time when almost every new phone gets a 6000mAh battery or more in phones under ₹20,000 Redmi is using a 5520mAh silicon-carbon battery. It definitely falls short of current standards, especially when other mid-range phones are pushing massive capacities here.&nbsp; But then, that is the trade-off for the slim and lightweight design. In everyday use, the phone easily lasts a full day, and you can push it to go a day and a half. Heavy camera usage does drain it faster. I noticed around a four percent drop in about half an hour, though that could also have been influenced by cold environmental conditions. Charging is reliable and quick. The 45W fast charger takes the phone from roughly 15 percent to nearly full in about an hour. You also get 18W wired reverse charging, which is a nice bonus to have.&nbsp;
<h2>Cameras&nbsp;</h2>
The Note 15 comes with a 108MP main camera with OIS, and an 8MP ultrawide, even though the camera module would suggest that its packing some serious hardware.&nbsp; Nonetheless, The &ldquo;Master Pixel&rdquo; main camera well in daylight. Photos are sharp, colourful, and pleasing to look at. Detail retention is good, and shots between 1x and 2x remain consistent. Dynamic range could be better, and occasionally the areas around the subject do not look quite right, but overall, the main camera delivers dependable results. Portraits are a strong point, especially for human subjects. Edge detection is clean, and the bokeh effect looks natural.&nbsp;
Selfies from the 20MP front camera, however, are underwhelming. Skin tones often look washed out, and texture processing can feel artificial at times. Video performance tops out at 4K 30fps and is average at best. There is noticeable grain, and stabilisation does not fully live up to quality OIS standards. Video quality, in particular, feels like an area where Redmi still has room to improve.
<h2>Verdict&nbsp;</h2>
Redmi understands what the boundaries are for the Note 15 5G and does try to pretend being something its not. It&rsquo;s not going after its competition based solely on specs. Priced at under ₹20,000, it focuses on the things that matter in everyday use: a slim and comfortable design, an excellent display, stable performance, and a capable main camera. At an expected price of around ₹20,000, it is not an the default recommendation, especially with strong alternatives like the Nothing Phone 3a and the Motorola Edge Fusion 60 offering better solutions. However, if design, display quality, and day-to-day comfort, if the user experience matters more to you than raw specs, the Redmi Note 15 5G makes a solid case for itself.

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini packs a 6.32-inch AMOLED display, 200MP main camera with 3.5x telephoto, Dimensity 8450 chip, 6,200mAh battery, and ColorOS 16. Here's our in-depth review of it

Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Oppo’s take on a compact flagship is solid

<h3>The Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini is Oppo&rsquo;s first compact phone, focusing on strong fundamentals like build quality, versatile cameras, smooth performance, and reliable battery life without obvious compromises.</h3>

The Reno 15 Pro Mini is Oppo&rsquo;s first compact phone, and the interesting part is that unlike many other manufacturers who had a crack at the compact form factor, it does not feel like a compromise. This is not a &ldquo;small phone with cut corners&rdquo; situation.&nbsp;
You get a solid, premium build, a display that is easy on the eyes, cameras that are genuinely versatile, and software that feels polished and reliable.&nbsp;
Performance is smooth in, battery life is surprisingly strong for the size, and the camera&hellip; well, its a Reno, so they speak for themselves.
No element here has been added for sake of it. Instead, the Reno 15 Pro Mini focuses on doing the basics really well, and that approach works in its favour.
Starting at Rs 59,999 before launch offers, it positions itself as a serious compact option for people who want a smaller phone without feeling like they are settling for less. Having tested the device thoroughly for two weeks, I can confidently say, that if you are looking for a compact phone, you need to take the Reno 15 Pro Mini seriously.&nbsp;
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Design and build</h2>
Let&rsquo;s start with the design, because the Reno 15 Pro Mini actually surprised me here.
At first glance, it looks familiar enough. You get flat glass on the front and back, a flat, space-grade aluminium frame, and materials that feel premium the second you pick it up. But what really stood out in daily use was how solid the phone felt.&nbsp;
Nothing flexes, nothing creaks, and it never feels like corners were cut to make it smaller. It feels like a phone that was designed this way from the start, not one that was simply shrunk down.
The back is where Oppo clearly decided to have a bit of fun. The glossy rear glass uses HoloFusion Technology to create this ribbon-like pattern running across the rear.&nbsp;
As the phone catches the light, the design subtly shifts and sparkles. It is not loud or flashy, and that is what I liked about it. It adds personality without trying too hard or turning into a gimmick.
I am a bit torn about the finish, though. The glass is completely smooth, with no texture at all. It looks great, but I did miss having a little more grip during everyday use.&nbsp;
I never felt like the phone was going to slip out of my hand, but during longer scrolling sessions, I was definitely more aware of how slick the surface was than I would have preferred.
The camera module uses Oppo&rsquo;s Dynamic Stellar Ring design, and yes, it instantly reminded me of older iPhone Pro models. It is not the most original look, but it works well here. The module does not feel oversized or top-heavy, and it never made the phone awkward to hold or use.
Ergonomics is one of the Reno 15 Pro Mini&rsquo;s biggest strengths. At 187 grams and just 7.99mm thick, it sits comfortably in the hand and feels nicely balanced. The slimmer body makes a real difference in day-to-day use, especially when using the phone one-handed. For a compact phone, it never felt cramped or fiddly.
In terms of durability, Oppo has gone all-in. It gets IP66, IP68, and IP69 ratings, Add in features like Sponge Bionic Cushioning, cold-sculpted glass, Splash Touch, and Glove Touch, and it genuinely feels built for real life. Plus, the Gorilla Glass 7i on the front &nbsp;only adds to that confidence.
As for colour options, we have the Cocoa Brown, which looks properly premium in person, as well as the Glacier White if you want a bit more flair.&nbsp;
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Display and audio</h2>
The Reno 15 Pro Mini features a 6.32-inch LTPS AMOLED display with a 1.5K resolution and a pixel density of 460 PPI. In everyday use, the panel looks sharp and clean, with crisp text and well-defined icons. I never felt the resolution was a limitation, even when reading smaller text or browsing dense pages.
Colour reproduction is one of the display&rsquo;s stronger points. On YouTube and Netflix, colours looked natural and well balanced, especially skin tones, which often get exaggerated on some panels.
Blacks are deep, highlights are controlled, and the overall image feels accurate rather than flashy. For longer viewing sessions, this kind of tuning works in the display&rsquo;s favour and keeps things easy on the eyes.
One of the first things that you notice are the bezels, which are extremely thin, and that adds a lot to the front-on look of the phone, and makes the Reno 15 Pro Mini look more premium and even more compact than it already is.
Outdoor visibility is strong. In my usage, brightness peaked at around 1,800 nits, which made a noticeable difference under harsh sunlight. Checking notifications or watching short clips outside was rarely a problem. HDR content also holds up well, with enough punch to stand out without looking overprocessed.
The in-display fingerprint scanner is optical, and it has been fast and reliable throughout my time with the phone. Unlocks are quick, with no random misses.
Audio rounds things off nicely. The stereo speakers get loud, offer decent separation, and work well for casual video watching and gaming. At higher volumes, the sound can get slightly tinny, but for a compact phone, the overall experience is better than expected.
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Cameras</h2>
Cameras are where the Reno 15 Pro Mini really starts to pull ahead, and this is the section where things became clear to me pretty quickly.
The hardware itself is ambitious for a compact phone. You get a 200MP main camera, paired with a 50MP ultrawide and a 50MP 3.5x telephoto. That already gives the Reno a lot more flexibility than most small phones, and more importantly, it actually shows up in daily use.
In daylight, the main camera delivers consistently detailed shots without pushing the processing too far. Colours look balanced, highlights are handled well, and the images generally feel controlled rather than overcooked. Low light is handled just as confidently.
I saw fewer blown highlights and more stable exposure, especially in tricky mixed lighting. Oppo&rsquo;s new PureTone Technology clearly helps here. It has been tuned with Indian lighting conditions and skin tones in mind, and in my use, that comes through in more natural-looking photos, particularly when people are in the frame.
Versatility is where the Reno really shines. The ultrawide is genuinely useful, and the 3.5x telephoto gives you meaningful reach without a big drop in quality. Portraits benefit a lot from this setup too. Subject separation looks cleaner, and having more focal length options makes framing feel more deliberate.
Video is another strong area. The Reno 15 Pro Mini supports 4K 60fps HDR recording across all cameras, which means I could switch between lenses while filming without worrying about inconsistent output. Stabilisation is solid on both the front and rear cameras, and footage stays smooth even when shooting handheld.
It also gets features like Dual-View Video. This lets you record using both the front and rear cameras at the same time, so you can capture what&rsquo;s happening while also recording your own reactions. I ended up enjoying this more than I expected, especially for quick clips where switching cameras would normally break the flow.
The 50MP front camera does a good job with skin tones as well, though it is not perfect. Overall, this is a camera system that feels complete, versatile, and easily one of the Reno 15 Pro Mini&rsquo;s strongest features.
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Performance and gaming</h2>
My review unit of the Reno 15 Pro Mini comes with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, 256GB of UFS 3.1 storage, and it is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8450. On paper, this is a capable but not headline-grabbing setup, and once I started running benchmarks, the results reflected that.
In synthetic tests, AnTuTu topped out at around 2.1 million, with Geekbench and 3DMark painting a similar picture. These are solid scores, but they are clearly not meant to impress on charts. What mattered more to me was how the phone behaved once I stopped staring at numbers and started using it.
In everyday use, the Reno 15 Pro Mini feels fast and responsive. App launches are quick, multitasking is smooth, and I did not run into stutters during normal usage. The Dimensity 8450 is built on a 4nm process and uses an all-big-core architecture with eight Cortex-A725 cores clocked up to 3.25GHz, which helps keep things feeling snappy while also reducing power consumption.
Gaming is where Oppo&rsquo;s optimisation really makes a difference. The AI HyperBoost 2.0 engine plays a big role here, combining AI Adaptive Temperature Control and AI Adaptive Frame Booster. The system dynamically manages heat buildup and uses GPU computing to generate intermediate frames, effectively boosting frame rates without pushing power consumption too hard. In BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile, I was consistently able to play at 120fps, with smooth and responsive gameplay throughout most sessions.
Even after pushing the phone hard with extended gaming, the Reno 15 Pro Mini never showed any signs of major heating. It stayed comfortable to hold, which is not something I can say about every compact phone I have used.
Connectivity has also been reliable in my experience. AI LinkBoost 3.0 helps in crowded Wi-Fi environments and areas with weaker cellular signals, while the customised X1 network chip, developed with MediaTek, improves overall Wi-Fi performance.
In real-world use, the Reno 15 Pro Mini feels stable, well-optimised, and dependable, which ultimately matters far more than raw benchmark numbers.
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Software experience</h2>
The Reno 15 Pro Mini runs ColorOS 16, and honestly, this is one of the best versions of Oppo&rsquo;s software I have used. In terms of look and feel, it sits very close to OxygenOS 16, which is still one of my favourite takes on Android. The design is clean, the interface stays out of your way, and everything feels built around speed and smoothness rather than visual clutter.
More than how it looks, ColorOS 16 feels noticeably smoother. Animations flow naturally, transitions feel connected, and nothing feels abrupt or jittery. A lot of that comes down to the Trinity Engine and the new Luminous Rendering Engine doing their thing in the background. Even when I was switching between apps quickly or multitasking heavily, the system stayed fluid and responsive without random slowdowns.
Personalisation is handled well and never feels overdone. The Flux Home Screen lets you resize folders and icons more freely, which is genuinely useful once you get used to it. Aqua Dynamics surfaces live information in a way that feels helpful instead of distracting. Lock screen customisation is deep but tasteful, with support for motion photos, video wallpapers, and subtle depth effects without turning the interface into visual chaos.
AI is a big focus this year, and Oppo&rsquo;s own tools are surprisingly practical. Features like call summaries, transcription, translation, and VoiceScribe are baked into the system and work quietly in the background. These feel like tools you actually use day to day, not features you test once and forget about.
Google Gemini integration is also handled really well. Gemini works smoothly across system apps, search, and everyday tasks, and features like Circle to Search feel natural to use. Nothing feels bolted on, which is exactly how AI should be on a phone.
Then there is Mind Space, and nothing else here comes close to it. It genuinely feels like a second brain. Being able to quickly capture information, have it organised automatically, and then pull it up later using natural language is something I ended up relying on more than I expected.
AI tools for photos and videos round things off nicely. Features like AI Portrait Glow help clean up tricky shots, while Popout makes it easy to turn stills and motion photos into something more dynamic.
Oppo is also promising five major ColorOS updates and six years of security patches. That long-term support adds real credibility. As a whole, ColorOS 16 feels mature, confident, and genuinely a joy to live with.
<h2>Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Review: Battery life and charging</h2>
The Reno 15 Pro Mini comes with a 6,200mAh battery, which is impressive for a phone this size. It also uses a silicon carbide cell, and while I do think Oppo could have pushed this combination a bit further, the real-world results are still solid.
In my usage, I was consistently getting around seven to eight hours of screen-on time. On lighter days, the phone comfortably stretched to two days, and even with heavier use, I was rarely worried about battery anxiety.
Charging is straightforward. The phone supports 80W fast charging and ships with the charger in the box. It does take a little while longer to top up compared to smaller batteries, but it still goes from zero to full in under an hour. In daily use, quick top-ups were more than enough to get me through the day without any stress.
<h2>Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
After using the Reno 15 Pro Mini for a while, it is clear what Oppo was aiming for here. Priced at Rs 59,999 before disounts, this is a compact phone that tries to feel complete, not clever. And for the most part, it succeeds.
The design feels solid and durable, the display is sharp without being tiring, and the camera setup is a genuine standout for a phone this size. Having a proper telephoto lens changes how usable the camera system feels, and video performance is strong across the board. Performance is not chart-topping, but in real-world use, it is smooth, stable, and easy to rely on. Battery life is better than expected, and fast charging keeps things convenient.
It is not perfect. The smooth glass back could use more grip, and users obsessed with benchmark numbers might want more raw power. But if you want a compact phone that feels well balanced, practical, and genuinely easy to live with every day, the Reno 15 Pro Mini gets most things right.
It also holds its own against compact favourites like the OnePlus 13s and Vivo X200 FE, which says a lot for a first attempt.

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G packs an 8000mAh battery in a slim 7.42mm body. Bold design, curved AMOLED and solid endurance at ₹27,999.

Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Review: 8000mAh battery beast

<h3>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G packs an 8000mAh battery into a slim 7.42mm body, offering standout endurance, a curved 144Hz AMOLED display and stable mid-range performance at ₹27,999.</h3>

Tecno isn&rsquo;t hiding what the Pova Curve 2 5G is about. This is a phone built around one clear headline: an 8,000mAh battery inside a slim 7.42mm body. In a mid-range market where big batteries usually translate into bulky designs, Tecno is betting that this combination alone is enough to grab attention.&nbsp;
Pair that with a curved AMOLED display and an unapologetically bold design, and the Pova Curve 2 positions itself as a device that wants to stand out visually and practically.
That positioning carries into the pricing. The Pova Curve 2 5G is available in two variants: 8GB RAM with 128GB storage at ₹27,999, and 8GB RAM with 256GB storage at ₹29,999. Tecno is also offering cashback benefits of up to ₹3,000 through select banks and NBFC partners, which brings the effective price closer to more aggressively priced rivals.&nbsp;
At these numbers, Tecno isn&rsquo;t chasing value-for-money headlines alone. Instead, it&rsquo;s asking buyers to pay for endurance, design, and day-to-day usability.
The bigger question, then, is whether the Pova Curve 2 delivers beyond its standout battery and design. To answer that, it&rsquo;s worth looking closely at how it holds up in real-world use across display quality, performance, cameras, software experience, and charging.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Design &amp; Build</h2>
Tecno clearly wasn&rsquo;t interested in playing it safe with the Pova Curve 2, and that&rsquo;s evident the moment you flip the phone over.&nbsp;
The back is dominated by a triangular camera module with dual cutouts, a layout that feels deliberately unconventional in a market obsessed with circular islands and iPhone-adjacent rectangles. It&rsquo;s a look you don&rsquo;t encounter often, and that alone gives the phone a distinct visual identity.&nbsp;
Adding to this is a secondary triangular accent near the bottom-right corner, which leans hard into a sci-fi, almost spaceship-like aesthetic. A continuous strip running across the back ties these elements together, making the design feel intentional rather than ornamental.
Design, of course, is deeply personal. But after two decades of watching smartphone aesthetics oscillate between bold experimentation and conservative minimalism, this feels like a refreshing deviation from the norm.
At a time when most brands are content with muted finishes and familiar silhouettes, the Pova Curve 2 dares to be loud. That also means it won&rsquo;t appeal to everyone. If your taste runs toward clean lines and understated elegance, this phone may feel a bit too expressive. For everyone else, it&rsquo;s a guaranteed head-turner.
Despite the visual drama, the phone itself is impressively slim at just over 7.4mm. In the hand, it feels lighter and thinner than you&rsquo;d expect, and that slimness is immediately noticeable during everyday use. There are compromises, though.&nbsp;
Both the frame and the rear panel are plastic, which slightly undercuts the premium aspirations of the design. Tecno does try to offset this with small touches, like the textured orange power button. It&rsquo;s easy to find by feel and adds a bit of character without being gimmicky.
Overall, the Pova Curve 2 feels like a device designed to stand out in a sea of sameness. It may not win over minimalists, but for users who want their phone to look different and aren&rsquo;t afraid of a bit of sci-fi flair, this is a design that confidently charts its own course.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Display</h2>
Tecno&rsquo;s approach with the Pova Curve 2 display is clearly about creating impact first and refining the experience around it. Front and centre is a large 6.78-inch AMOLED panel that stretches edge to edge with a subtle curve along the sides.&nbsp;
The curvature is restrained rather than dramatic, which helps avoid accidental touches and keeps the phone practical for daily use. Resolution sits at Full HD+, sharp enough for everything from social feeds to long video sessions.
Where the panel tries to flex its muscles is in smoothness. The screen is rated for a 144Hz refresh rate, but in real-world usage, it behaves more intelligently than aggressively. Most interactions feel fluid without the phone constantly locking itself to the highest refresh setting. Only select games are able to tap into the full 144Hz capability, which is in line with how most high-refresh displays are handled today.
Brightness is another headline feature, with Tecno claiming a peak output of 4,500 nits. Indoors and in shaded environments, the display looks vibrant and punchy, with colours that don&rsquo;t appear oversaturated. Outdoors, the screen generally holds up well, though in very bright sunlight, you may still find yourself squinting or angling the phone slightly to read finer text.
One area Tecno seems keen to emphasise is eye comfort. The Pova Curve 2 uses high-frequency PWM dimming, which essentially means the display manages brightness changes at a speed fast enough to reduce perceived flicker.
During late-night use, the screen felt easy on the eyes, with no immediate discomfort during extended scrolling or video playback. However, this is the kind of feature that reveals its true value only after weeks, not days, of use.
Sound output is handled by speakers tuned with Dolby Atmos support. Volume levels are more than adequate for casual viewing, and dialogue in shows and videos comes through clearly. The stereo effect is present, but the bottom speaker does most of the heavy lifting, so how you hold the phone can affect the listening experience.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Performance</h2>
At the core of the POVA Curve 2 is MediaTek&rsquo;s Dimensity 7100, a 6nm chipset that prioritises efficiency and consistency over raw firepower. It&rsquo;s paired with generous memory and storage configurations, including 8GB of physical RAM with additional virtual expansion, and UFS 2.2 storage in both 128GB and 256GB variants.&nbsp;
On paper, this places the phone squarely in familiar mid-range territory, especially when you consider that some battery-centric rivals, like Realme&rsquo;s Power series with the Dimensity 7300 and Dimensity 7400, do offer a noticeable step up in outright performance.
In everyday use, though, the Curve 2 holds its own. App launches are quick, multitasking feels fluid, and the phone doesn&rsquo;t show signs of hesitation during routine workloads. More importantly, the performance feels predictable rather than spiky, which matters far more than peak scores.
Gaming performance reflects the same philosophy. Titles like BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile run comfortably at 60fps for extended sessions, with no obvious stutters or aggressive throttling.&nbsp;
The phone doesn&rsquo;t chase ultra-high frame rates or maxed-out graphics, but it delivers stable gameplay without turning warm or dropping frames unexpectedly. For casual and mid-level gamers, it&rsquo;s more than adequate.
Where Tecno genuinely tries to carve out a point of difference is in connectivity. The POVA Curve 2 adopts a triple-chipset setup, pairing the Dimensity 7100 with two dedicated signal-processing chips.
In theory, this approach shifts network-related tasks off the main processor and onto specialised hardware, which should help maintain more consistent call and data performance in challenging conditions like crowded areas or weak-signal zones.
In real-world use with a Jio 5G SIM, the impact felt more subtle than transformative. I didn&rsquo;t notice a dramatic improvement compared with other phones in this segment, but just as importantly, I also didn&rsquo;t run into connectivity problems.&nbsp;
Calls remained stable, data throughput stayed consistent, and 5G signals held up where expected. It&rsquo;s the kind of feature that quietly underpins a reliable experience rather than one that jumps out as a game changer.
There&rsquo;s also an added emphasis on off-grid communication. The phone supports direct device-to-device connectivity over distances of up to two kilometres, without needing mobile data, Wi-Fi, or even a SIM. It&rsquo;s a niche feature, but one that could prove genuinely useful in emergencies or outdoor scenarios where networks are unreliable.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Software</h2>
Software on the Pova Curve 2 feels more deliberate than flashy. HiOS 16, based on Android 16, doesn&rsquo;t try to overwhelm you with features, but it does show that Tecno is paying closer attention to how the phone actually gets used. The interface leans into softer visuals and layered effects, which makes it feel lighter and less cluttered than older versions of HiOS.
One feature that quietly improves daily use is Tecno&rsquo;s Dynamic Port. Instead of being a visual gimmick, it surfaces useful information like OTPs at the top of the screen, letting you glance and move on without breaking your flow. It&rsquo;s the kind of addition that fades into the background once you get used to it, which is usually a good sign.
Ella, Tecno&rsquo;s in-house AI assistant, replaces Google&rsquo;s offering by default. It handles basic tasks well enough, and the company&rsquo;s focus on local data handling may appeal to some users. That said, the option to switch to another assistant remains, which is the right approach.
There&rsquo;s some preloaded software, and a bit of early notification noise, but nothing that can&rsquo;t be cleaned up quickly. More than anything, HiOS 16 here feels calmer and more considered. It doesn&rsquo;t redefine the Android experience, but it no longer feels like an afterthought either.
The phone ships with HiOS 16 based on Android 16 out of the box and is guaranteed two major Android version updates, along with three years of security patches. That puts it in line with what most mid-range phones in this price bracket offer, without overselling longevity.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Cameras</h2>
Camera hardware on the Pova Curve 2 5G is fairly straightforward, and Tecno isn&rsquo;t pretending otherwise. The phone relies on a 50MP main rear sensor, paired with a secondary 2MP unit that plays more of a supporting role than a meaningful creative one.
Video recording goes up to 2K at 30fps from the rear camera, which is still not a given in this price segment and is a practical win for users who shoot a lot of clips for social media.
In good daylight, the main camera delivers serviceable results. Photos have enough detail and contrast for everyday use, but the processing can be inconsistent. Colours tend to lean on the punchy side, and fine textures occasionally break down into visible grain, even when lighting is favourable. It&rsquo;s not a deal-breaker, but it does remind you that this isn&rsquo;t a camera-first device.
Low-light performance is where the limitations become more apparent. Noise creeps in quickly, and the camera struggles to preserve detail without aggressive smoothing. Night shots are usable for casual sharing, but expectations need to be kept in check. This is a camera that prioritises speed and convenience over accuracy.
The 13MP front camera mirrors the rear setup in philosophy. It supports 2K video recording, which is great to have for video calls and vlogging, but still images can be hit or miss. Skin tones sometimes look a little over-processed, and dynamic range is limited, especially under harsh lighting.
Overall, the Pova Curve 2&rsquo;s cameras are adequate rather than impressive. They get the job done for social media, video calls, and quick captures, but they don&rsquo;t stand out in a crowded mid-range market. Tecno&rsquo;s strengths with this phone lie elsewhere, and the camera setup feels like a functional addition rather than a headline feature. &nbsp;
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Battery &amp; Charging</h2>
Big batteries in slim phones are no longer rare. We&rsquo;ve already seen several devices with 7,000mAh to 7,500mAh cells manage respectable thickness without feeling cumbersome in daily use. Tecno isn&rsquo;t breaking new ground by pairing a large battery with a slim profile.
Where the POVA Curve 2 stands apart is in how far it stretches that formula. Stepping up to an 8,000mAh battery usually introduces compromises, but here the phone remains just 7.42mm thick. In the hand, it doesn&rsquo;t feel like a typical &ldquo;power bank phone,&rdquo; and the weight distribution stays comfortable even during long sessions.
That extra capacity delivers tangible gains in endurance. For most users, the phone can comfortably last close to two full days on a single charge. With heavier usage, including gaming, streaming, and constant connectivity, it still gets through a long day with enough reserve to avoid charging anxiety. Lighter usage patterns can push it well beyond the 48-hour mark.
Charging such a large battery is handled sensibly rather than aggressively. The POVA Curve 2 supports 45W fast charging, and Tecno includes the charger in the box. A full charge takes roughly an hour and forty minutes, which is reasonable given the battery size. More importantly, short charging sessions are genuinely useful, adding several hours of use in a brief plug-in.
The result is a phone that doesn&rsquo;t chase extremes in one direction. The POVA Curve 2 doesn&rsquo;t just offer a big battery for the sake of numbers; it integrates it into a slim, usable design, delivering endurance that feels practical rather than excessive.
<h2>Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Review: Verdict</h2>
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G is a phone that knows exactly what it wants to be. Its biggest win is battery life, delivering long, stress-free usage without turning the phone into a heavy or uncomfortable slab. The slim design and curved display help it feel more premium than most battery-focused phones, and everyday performance remains stable and predictable.
That focus does come with compromises. Camera performance is serviceable but unremarkable, the chipset prioritises efficiency over raw speed, and the software experience, while improved, still requires some cleanup out of the box. None of these are deal-breakers, but they do define the kind of user this phone is meant for.
If you want a phone that looks different, lasts significantly longer than most, and handles daily tasks without fuss, the Pova Curve 2 makes a compelling case at its effective pricing. It doesn&rsquo;t try to be the best at everything, but it executes its core strengths well, and in a crowded mid-range segment, that clarity works in its favour.

Gadget Review

Vivo V70 Elite packs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, 50MP 3X telephoto, 6500mAh battery & 90W charging. A polished premium mid-ranger worth ₹52,000?

Vivo V70 Elite Review: A premium mid-ranger with a flagship set of cameras

<h3>The Vivo V70 Elite delivers a balanced premium mid-range experience with strong cameras, refined software, and dependable performance. At ₹52,000, it focuses on consistency over spec-sheet theatrics.</h3>

The Vivo V70 Elite steps into one of the most competitive price brackets right now. With a starting price of ₹52,000, it sits in that tricky space where a phone is expected to deliver a near-flagship experience without actually being one. On paper, it ticks plenty of premium boxes. There&rsquo;s the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 running the show, a sharp 1.5K AMOLED panel with slim bezels, a 50MP 3X telephoto camera with OIS, a massive 6,500mAh battery, and Vivo&rsquo;s refined OriginOS 6 tying it all together.
That sounds impressive, but this is also a segment where rivals are not holding back. Oppo, iQOO, OnePlus and Realme are all chasing bigger numbers, faster charging, stronger chipsets and flashier camera setups.
So the question isn&rsquo;t about whether the V70 Elite performs well, because it does. The real discussion is whether it offers enough of an edge to feel worth ₹52,000 in a market where simply being good just does not cut it anymore.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s design: Comfort meets confidence</h2>
The first thing that struck me was how naturally the V70 Elite settles into the hand. A 6.59-inch display usually means some finger gymnastics, but here it just feels balanced. It is large, yes, but not awkward. The glass and metal build sits comfortably in the palm, and I found myself using it one-handed more often than I expected, without constantly readjusting my grip. That everyday ease genuinely matters.
A lot of that comfort comes from the finish. The back has this velvety texture that feels soft yet grippy, almost cushioned without being rubbery. It adds a sense of security when you are holding it casually. The frame helps too. At 7.59mm, it is slim enough to look sleek without chasing extreme thinness. Weighing 197 grams, the phone feels evenly balanced, so it never tips forward or strains the wrist. The Passion Red unit we tested looks bold and premium, though the Authentic Black and Sand Beige variants may differ slightly in weight and dimensions.
The build quality backs up the feel. You get a glass rear panel paired with an aerospace-grade aluminium frame, and together they give the device a solid, refined character. The camera island switches things up with a squarish layout instead of the circular module seen on some other Vivo devices. The 50MP main and 50MP telephoto lenses each sit within their own subtle accent ring, while the 8MP ultrawide, Aura Light, and a small Zeiss logo complete the setup.
Durability is not just cosmetic here. The V70 Elite carries IP68 and IP69 ratings for dust and water resistance, along with an SGS five-star drop resistance certification. It feels sturdy enough for daily life, though it remains a glass build, so basic care still makes sense.
Ports and buttons are laid out sensibly. The dual Nano SIM slot, speaker grille and USB 2.0 Type C port sit at the bottom. Volume controls and the power key are on the right, and there is even an IR blaster placed on top.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s display and audio: Premium vibes all around</h2>
Displays in this segment have improved massively, so the V70 Elite had to come prepared. It features a 6.59 inch 1.5K AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, and the first thing you notice is how seamless the front looks. The bezels are extremely slim, which makes the screen feel expansive and gives the phone a polished, near-flagship appearance.
The specifications back that up. You get HDR10 and HDR10+ support, peak local brightness rated at 5000 nits, and full DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage. On paper, that already sounds serious, and in daily use, it absolutely holds up. HDR content on YouTube and Netflix looks punchy, with strong contrast and controlled highlights. Bright scenes retain detail instead of blowing out, and darker scenes maintain depth without crushing shadows. Colours are vibrant but not exaggerated, striking a good balance between lively and accurate.
The panel is capable of displaying over a billion colours, which strongly suggests a 10-bit display, even though that has not been officially confirmed. Regardless, gradients appear smooth and natural. Games like Honkai Star Rail look rich and immersive, with depth in textures and colour transitions that you do not always see at this price point. The 120Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling fluid and animations clean, adding to the overall premium feel.
Outdoor visibility is reassuringly strong. While we do not have an exact high-brightness mode figure, the display remains readable under harsh sunlight. Text stays sharp, and colours do not wash out easily, making everyday use outdoors comfortable.
The ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor is another highlight. It is fast, accurate, and works reliably even when your fingers are slightly sweaty or oily, which is a practical advantage over optical sensors.
Audio performance is solid as well. The stereo speakers get loud enough for casual streaming and gaming, with a decent sense of separation and a noticeable hint of bass. At maximum volume, there can be slight distortion, but for the most part, they stay clear, punchy, and enjoyable for everyday use.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s performance: Real-world speed over raw hype</h2>
At the heart of the V70 Elite sits the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. It might technically belong to last year&rsquo;s silicon cycle, but this is still a 4nm, flagship-grade processor that has plenty of muscle left. Paired with up to 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB of UFS 4.1 storage, the hardware setup is undeniably serious and built for heavy use.
In everyday performance, the phone feels quick and confident. Apps pop open without delay, multitasking stays smooth even with multiple background processes, and the UI maintains a consistent fluidity. There is a sense of responsiveness that makes the device feel premium rather than mid-range. Whether it is rapid app switching, scrolling through social feeds, or juggling work apps, it handles it without stutter.
That said, Vivo&rsquo;s V series has never chased record-breaking benchmark numbers purely for headlines. The focus has always been stable, sustained output, and that philosophy is clear here. Instead of short bursts of peak performance followed by throttling, the V70 Elite prioritises consistency.
The benchmark numbers reflect that balance. It scores around 1.85 million on AnTuTu, which is comfortably high. On Geekbench, it posts 1933 in single-core and 4908 in multi-core tests. In 3DMark&rsquo;s Wildlife stress test, it maintains 79 per cent stability, suggesting it can sustain performance reasonably well under prolonged load.
In real gaming scenarios, it delivers dependable results. BGMI runs at an average of 88 to 89 FPS over a 20-minute session with no major frame drops. Given the chipset, 120FPS support would have been ideal, but even so, gameplay feels stable. Thermals stay controlled, and heavier tasks like exporting videos in VN are handled smoothly without excessive heating.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s software: Polished, playful and future-ready</h2>
If you have followed Vivo&rsquo;s recent phones, the software experience here will feel familiar in a good way. The V70 Elite ships with OriginOS 6 based on Android 16, and it is easily among the cleanest Android skins available right now. This does not feel anything like the older Vivo software many people still remember. The interface has been completely refined and feels far more cohesive.
Vivo has embraced a transparent, liquid-inspired design language that looks glossy and modern without going overboard. There is a hint of Apple-like finesse in the smoothness and layering, but it still feels distinctly Vivo. Lock screen customisation is more flexible than before, with additional layout options and styling tools that are easier to set up. Animations across the system are fluid, and even the dynamic island-style pop-up feels thoughtfully integrated rather than gimmicky. Updated icons and cleaner transitions give the UI a mature, premium character.
What stood out most during my usage was the consistency. Apps open quickly, the ultrasonic fingerprint unlock is instant, and scrolling through notifications or social feeds feels seamless. The redesigned control centre is sharper and better organised, making quick toggles more accessible. Origin Island adds a bit of interactive flair, while phone-to-PC mirroring and cross-device connectivity proved genuinely useful during daily work.
AI features are deeply integrated, many powered by Google Gemini. Tools like AI Creation, AI Search and Circle to Search are built in. The AI Photography Suite adds creative flexibility, letting you adjust moods or themes after capturing a shot. You can give images a winter aesthetic or experiment with beach-style edits, and even try India-specific options like AI Holi Portrait.
Not every feature is essential, but they are enjoyable to explore. Vivo is also promising four major Android updates and six years of security patches, which adds meaningful long-term assurance.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s cameras: Practical setup, powerful results</h2>
On paper, the V70 Elite does not try to overwhelm you with wild numbers, but it quietly checks all the right boxes. You get a 50MP main camera with OIS, a 50MP 3X optical telephoto with OIS, and an 8MP ultrawide at the back. Up front, there is a 50MP selfie shooter, and yes, it comes with autofocus. It feels less like a spec flex and more like a setup designed for real-world use.
In daylight, the main 50MP sensor produces crisp, lively images without going overboard on saturation. Colours are slightly restrained, which actually helps scenes look more natural. Highlights stay under control, skies do not blow out easily, and dynamic range is handled well. There is plenty of detail for social posts, and even light cropping holds up nicely.
Low light performance is solid, too. The main camera manages exposure well, keeping images sharp and avoiding strange colour shifts. It may not dominate extreme comparisons, but the output is bright, clean and dependable for this price range.
The 50MP 3X telephoto is where things get interesting. In daylight, zoom shots look sharp and detailed, with colours staying consistent. Even stretching to 5X or 10X delivers surprisingly usable results. At night, it still performs confidently, retaining good detail with only minor warmth creeping into certain scenes. If you enjoy shooting from a distance, this lens genuinely expands your creative options.
The 8MP ultrawide is the only area where you notice a slight step down. In good light, it handles landscapes and group shots well, keeping colours fairly aligned with the main camera. In low light, finer details soften a bit, but the images remain shareable.
The 50MP front camera performs reliably, delivering sharp, well-exposed selfies. Autofocus makes a real difference when you are moving. Portrait mode produces clean edge detection with pleasing background blur. Video recording goes up to 4K at 60FPS, offering stable, sharp footage that works well for vlogging and everyday content creation.
<h2>Vivo V70 Elite&rsquo;s battery and charging: Big cell, quick top-ups</h2>
The V70 Elite comes with a 6500mAh battery and 90W fast charging. For this price, that is solid, although I cannot help but feel Vivo could have gone even bigger. With rivals like Oppo, iQOO, OnePlus and even Realme pushing 7000mAh and even 7500mAh batteries, Vivo definitely had room to be more ambitious.
Still, real-world endurance is dependable. On heavy days filled with gaming, navigation over mobile data, and long video sessions, the phone easily lasted a full day. On lighter usage, it stretched close to a day and a half before I needed the charger.
The 90W charging is properly fast, taking about 55 minutes to go from nearly empty to full. Wireless charging would have sweetened the deal, but bypass charging does add practical value.
<h2>Verdict: A polished premium all-rounder</h2>
After spending proper time with the V70 Elite, it is clear that Vivo has crafted a well-balanced device. The design feels refined and comfortable in hand, the display is genuinely impressive for this segment, and the camera setup delivers meaningful versatility.&nbsp;
The 50MP 3X telephoto stands out as a practical addition rather than a numbers game. Performance is smooth and dependable, focusing on stability over flashy benchmark figures.&nbsp;
Battery life easily handles demanding days, and the 90W charging keeps downtime to a minimum. OriginOS 6 further elevates the experience with its polished look and genuinely useful features.
Pricing, though, could have been better. At ₹52,000, expectations are high, and a slightly lower entry point would have made it even more appealing. Features like wireless charging could also have added extra value, especially with the top variant crossing ₹60,000.
That said, if you want a premium mid-ranger that delivers consistency across design, display, cameras and software, the V70 Elite proves itself as a confident and capable choice.

HyperX Cloud Jet review: We test its comfort, sound quality, battery life, mic performance, and dual wireless features to see if this affordable gaming headset is worth buying in India.

HyperX Cloud Jet Review: Comfort, Gaming Performance & Battery Life Tested

Thinking of buying the HyperX Cloud Jet? Read our in-depth review covering comfort, sound, battery, mic, and dual wireless performance to find out if it fits your gaming and daily needs.

HyperX Cloud Jet Review: Is This the Best Budget Wireless Gaming Headset?

The HyperX Cloud Jet offers strong comfort, reliable gaming audio, and dual wireless support for PC and mobile. While great for competitive play, its flat music tuning, rigid design, slow charging, and average battery limit its appeal as an all-round headset.

Trying to find a wireless headset that doesn&rsquo;t look like a glowing sci-fi toy is a real chore. Most cheap options out there honestly feel like plastic junk that will break in a week. That is why the HyperX Cloud Jet is interesting. It launched in India for about ₹5,400, promising HyperX&rsquo;s famous comfort and solid sound without the usual high price tag.
It has a clean matte finish and lets you jump between your PC and phone, so it clearly wants to be the only headset you use. I spent a full week testing it out with a bunch of games and different music genres. I wanted to see if it actually holds up or if HyperX just cut too many corners to make it this affordable.
<h2>Design &amp; Build: Is it actually comfortable?</h2>
Unboxing this HyperX headset is super basic. No extra junk or fancy filler in the box, which I actually like. You just get the headset, the 2.4GHz dongle, a charging cable, and the usual manual.
When I first pulled it out, the weight caught me off guard. At 298g, it has this weirdly dense feel in your hand. Most budget headsets feel like hollow plastic toys that might snap if you look at them wrong. These feel solid and well put together. The cool part? That weight just disappears once you put them on. HyperX nailed the frame balance.
Thanks to the suspension strap, the weight spreads out so well. I never got that annoying digging sensation on top of my head. I've worn these for hours during long gaming sessions. Honestly, I didn't feel that typical urge to rip them off for a break. It's one of those rare pieces of gear that feels way lighter on your head than when you're just holding it.
I'm using the Blue version. It's a breath of fresh air. I'm so tired of <a title="CMF Headphone Pro review: Big style, bigger battery, bold sound all for ₹7,999" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/cmf-headphone-pro-review-big-style-bigger-battery-bold-sound-all-for-7-999-1768394697254" target="_blank">gaming headsets</a> that look like neon spaceships. This one skips the flashy RGB for a clean, matte finish. It looks professional on a desk. The branding is small and subtle. It doesn't scream for attention while you're trying to focus.
The ear pads use thick, padded mesh. If you get sweaty ears after an hour of playing, you'll love how much air these let in. But let's be real about the fabric. It's a bit more scratchy and textured than the smooth leatherette on pricier headphones. It felt a little irritating to me at first. You get used to it after a bit. Still, it's a different vibe if you're accustomed to that soft, buttery feel of high-end pads.
Every control is clustered on the left earcup. It's the main hub for power, the charging port, the volume dial, and the button to switch between dongle and Bluetooth. The mic is right there too. Swivel-to-mute design, which is my favourite. It's fast and intuitive. The arm is flexible but stays where you put it. No fighting with it mid-match.
The biggest headache? How rigid the frame is. The earcups have very little tilt and swivel. You can't really hang them around your neck comfortably on a break. If you try, the edges poke your chin. I eventually gave up and started leaving them on my desk every time I stood up. The headband isn't adjustable the traditional way either. The suspension strap works for most people. But if you have a larger head, the fixed frame might feel cramped. It's sturdy and quiet, but that lack of flexibility is the trade-off.
<h2>Sound performance and gaming audio</h2>
Under the hood, the HyperX Cloud Jet is rocking 40mm dynamic drivers, but let's be honest for a second, the tuning here is built strictly for the gaming crowd. If you are a music lover coming into this expecting a rich, hi-fi experience for your high-res audio files, you will likely walk away feeling underwhelmed.
I am quite picky when it comes to my music library, so I put these through the wringer with a massive variety of tracks. I listened to everything from Jazz and classic Rock to some really complex Indian Classical pieces and the latest Bollywood hits. To my ears, the soundstage just lacks the personality I want to hear at this price point. The audio profile feels a bit flat when you are actually trying to sit back and listen, missing that crisp high-end sparkle or the deep, rattling bass that makes a movie or song feel cinematic. It is perfectly fine for falling down a YouTube rabbit hole or listening to your favorite podcasts, but it won't impress anyone who prioritizes audio fidelity.
The experience definitely improves the moment you load up a game. I spent the bulk of my testing time on mobile titles like BGMI and COD Mobile, and the performance there was solid and predictable. Footsteps came through sharp and clear, making it easy enough to figure out exactly where an enemy was hiding. That is basically the main goal for competitive play. Over on my PC, I tried a few rounds of Apex Legends and found the spatial awareness was actually pretty impressive. It is clear that the "Signature HyperX Sound" is tweaked to boost the mids and highs. This makes the sound of a reload or a distant gunshot pop out more than usual. It isn't going to change your life, but it is very reliable gear for a daily gamer.
I also made a point to check the latency, especially for those who might try to use these for creative work or music production. Trying to use Bluetooth with a DAW is almost always a disaster, and this was no different. The lag over Bluetooth was so significant that trying to monitor audio in real time was basically impossible.
Switching over to the 2.4GHz dongle on my PC fixed the lag issues almost entirely. It brought the delay down to a point where it was barely noticeable for casual use. Even so, I wouldn't suggest picking these up if you are looking for serious studio tools. As for the audio codecs, the brand doesn't explicitly list them in the marketing, so I won't speculate too much. However, at the very least, you have support for the standard SBC and AAC formats.
<h2>Mic performance and call quality</h2>
The microphone on the Cloud Jet is a bit of a hit-or-miss situation for me. While hanging out on Discord, my teammates said I came through loud and clear without any real issues. I&rsquo;m a huge fan of the swivel-to-mute feature because it is just way faster than hunting for a tiny button during a frantic match. However, do not expect the noise filtering to pull off any miracles. It handles steady background hums okay, but it won&rsquo;t hide the loud clacking of a mechanical keyboard or people talking nearby. It is fine for casual squad comms, but it won't give you a silent bubble in a loud room.
For standard voice or video calls, the experience is basically the same. Most people won't wear a bulky headset while walking down the street, but I tested them in a crowded area just to see. Surprisingly, nobody complained about the ambient noise. It wasn't crystal clear, but it also didn't let the environment drown me out entirely. For basic calls, it works well enough. If you are gaming on your phone and an important call hits, you can take it without sounding like you are standing in a wind tunnel.
<h2>Connectivity and on-board controls</h2>
The way this headset handles connections is honestly its strongest selling point. It features a dual wireless setup that lets you switch between the lag-free 2.4GHz dongle and Bluetooth 5.3 with zero hassle. When you are sitting at your desk playing on a PC or console, the dongle is the way to go because the latency is basically invisible. That is a must-have for anyone playing fast-paced shooters where every millisecond counts. I personally treated the Bluetooth more like a convenient backup. It is great for answering a quick phone call or doing some light gaming on your mobile without needing to grab a different pair of headphones.
Regarding the actual controls, the layout is extremely straightforward. As I pointed out in the design part, everything is gathered on the left earcup. To recap, you get a volume wheel, the power button, and a dedicated switch to jump between the two wireless modes. It is a very clean, simple setup that does not force you to go digging through a user manual. You will likely have the muscle memory figured out within the first hour of using them.
If I am being picky, the total absence of a companion app is a bit of a bummer. You aren't going to find any deep EQ settings or custom sound profiles here. If you want to tweak the audio, you will have to rely on your device settings or whatever software you happen to be running at the time. While that is pretty common for more affordable wireless gear, having even a basic software suite would have made the entire experience feel a lot more polished.
<h2>Battery and charging</h2>
HyperX claims you can get about <a title="Oppo Enco Buds3 Pro+ Review: ANC That Actually Works Under ₹2,500" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/oppo-enco-buds3-pro-review-anc-that-actually-works-under-2-500-1766497263765" target="_blank">25 hours on Bluetooth</a> or 20 hours using the dongle, provided you stay around 50% volume. In my actual testing, that low-battery warning usually starts chirping at me around the 19-hour mark. While 20 hours is enough to get through a few heavy gaming sessions, it feels a bit behind the curve when you consider that many competitors in this same price bracket are now pushing 40 or even 50 hours of life.
The biggest frustration is definitely the charging speed. It takes nearly four and a half hours to get back to a full charge, which is honestly a slog. If you forget to juice them up overnight, you will be tethered to a cable for basically the entire morning. It works if you are strict with your routine, but that slow charging feels very behind the times.
<h2>Price and where to buy</h2>
The box for the HyperX Cloud Jet shows a price of ₹6,976, but you really shouldn't pay that much. That is just the official MRP. You can almost always find it for much less at local stores or online. If you are trying to save some serious cash, I suggest keeping an eye on Amazon. It frequently goes on sale there, and I&rsquo;ve seen it drop as low as ₹4,999. It is definitely worth waiting for one of those price cuts before you pull the trigger.
<h2>Final verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
Ultimately, the HyperX Cloud Jet is a specialized piece of gear rather than a crowd-pleaser. If your main goal is climbing the ranks in BGMI or Apex Legends, the solid spatial tracking and long-term comfort make it a dependable choice. Having that dual wireless connectivity is a massive plus too, since you can jump from PC gaming to a mobile call without any annoying setup changes.
Still, it falls short of being a true versatile daily driver. If you want a pair of headphones that actually brings some life and personality to your music collection, the flat tuning here will probably disappoint you. Combine that with the stiff, non-rotating design and the incredibly slow charging times, and it becomes much harder to recommend for people who need one headset to do everything. You should grab these if you only care about competitive gaming audio and a lightweight feel. For anything else, there are better options out there.

Lava Blaze Duo 3 review: Dual screens, 6.67” AMOLED display, smooth performance, clean Android 15, and long-lasting battery at ₹16,999.

Lava Blaze Duo 3 Review: Dual Screens, AMOLED Display & Smooth Performance at ₹16,999

Experience the Lava Blaze Duo 3 with dual displays, vibrant 6.67” AMOLED screen, clean Android 15, and reliable performance at ₹16,999.

Lava Blaze Duo 3 packs a 6.67&rdquo; FHD+ AMOLED, 1.6&rdquo; secondary screen, MediaTek Dimensity 7060, LPDDR5 RAM, and clean Android 15. Dual displays, vibrant visuals, smooth daily performance, and a sleek, standout design at ₹16,999.&nbsp;

The Lava Blaze Duo was a pretty solid phone, especially for its price. It stood out mainly because of its dual-display design, 6.67-inch curved screen, and an incredibly reliable battery life. So it&rsquo;s successor, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 had a lot to live up to. And it does. The design has changed, but still, we don&rsquo;t see a lot of radical changes here. Even the pricing is more or less the same. The Lava Blaze Duo 3 is easily available at a price of Rs 16,999 for the 6GB + 128GB variant. Now, I have been daily-driving the Blaze Duo 3 for a couple of weeks, and I have to say, what Lava&rsquo;s offering here for the price, is genuinely impressive. Here are my thoughts.&nbsp;
<h2>Design&nbsp;&nbsp;</h2>
From the moment I picked up the phone, it didn&rsquo;t quite feel like the Lava Blaze Duo I used last year. That&rsquo;s when it hit me: the design has changed noticeably this time. The finish, especially on the white colour variant that I&rsquo;m using, has this shiny, star-dust look to it. Lava calls this colour, the Imperial Gold. It&rsquo;s easy on the eyes and looks pleasant, though it may not appeal to everyone. Lava is also offering the phone in a Moonlight Black option.&nbsp; At the back, there&rsquo;s a massive rectangular camera module placed at the top, housing a a main 50MP camera sensor and a QVGA camera, which is pretty pointless. We also have a vertically stacked LED flash. In the other half of the camera module, we get a smaller, 1.6-inch AMOLED display, a feature that really sets the Duo Blaze 3 apart from all other phones in this price bracket. More on this, later.
 The entire camera module sticks out slightly, and on top of that, the two cameras have their own deco rings. All of this is quite subtle, but, you do get a very slight wobble when you place the device screen-side up on a table.&nbsp;
 The back panel is plastic but comes with a glass-like finish that gives it a slightly premium look. The shiny frame follows a flat design, which improves grip and makes the phone comfortable to hold. At 7.55 mm, it&rsquo;s a pretty slim phone, although not the slimmest in its segment. That said, it is pretty light, weighing just 163 grams, which makes it pretty easy to carry. The weight, along with the slim built, ensures that this slips in and out of pockets without any trouble.&nbsp; You get the he power button and volume rocker sit on the right side, positioned very ergnomically, if you have smaller hands. At the bottom, you&rsquo;ll find one of the stereo speakers, a dual nano SIM slot, and at the top, you&rsquo;ll see even a built-in IR blaster, which is a nice extra feature to have. &nbsp;Durability-wise, we do get an IP64 rating for dust and water resistance. However, there is there is no word on what sort of glass has been used for the main display.
<h2>Display&nbsp;</h2>
Speaking of displays, we are getting a 6.67-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. In real usage, the refresh rate mostly switches between 60Hz and 90Hz, but navigation remains smooth overall. The display curves very slightly at the edges, which helps in gripping the phone. What I was surprised by is that it is a 10-bit panel, which produces over 1 billion colours. We rarely get to see this at this price point. And yes, it is has Widevice L1 support. So on OTT platforms, colours pop out and everything looks sharp and vibrant.&nbsp; Brightness wise, we are limited to about 800-nit HBM, but I didn&rsquo;t come across a lot of issues, even when I was outdoors.&nbsp;
 Now, the smaller display. The AMOLED secondary display, first introduced on the Lava Blaze Duo 2, makes a return here, but its slightly bigger this time as it goes from 1.58-inch to 1.6-inch. It&rsquo;s actually pretty cool. It supports basic functions like checking the time, viewing notifications, and clicking pictures, mainly selfies.&nbsp;
I found myself using this screen mostly for notifications, especially during meetings, or when I didn&rsquo;t feel like unlocking the phone just to check a message. You can also control music playback from here, and surprisingly, even step tracking shows up on the outer display, which feels like a nice little bonus. Coming to the audio, the stereo speakers are just about average, not too loud, not too flat but paired with the main display, they do the job well enough for casual media consumption.&nbsp;
<h2>Battery&nbsp;</h2>
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 packs a 5,000mAh battery and supports 33W wired charging. While that&rsquo;s decent, it does feel slightly underwhelming when other phones in this price range are offering much higher battery capacity. &nbsp;
That said, battery life turned out to be better than I expected. With moderate usage which included clicking a lot of pictures, watching a couple of videos, and taking calls the phone easily lasted close to a day and a half before needing a recharge.&nbsp; Charging is fairly quick as well. The phone goes from zero to full in about an hour, which is convenient and removes the anxiety of having to top up right before stepping out.&nbsp;
<h2>Camera&nbsp;</h2>
The phone comes with a 50MP primary camera featuring a Sony IMX752 sensor, along with an 8MP front camera. You also get a QVGA camera on the back, which is pretty pointless. Compared to the 64MP camera on the Blaze Duo 2, the 50MP sensor looks like a downgrade, on paper at least. However, you are getting a much better sensor and better tuning which makes up for it. In daylight, photos turn out bright, sharp, and fairly detailed. That said, colours are slightly boosted and don&rsquo;t always look true to life. There&rsquo;s also a noticeable green tint in some shots, which can be distracting at times. The 2x digital zoom works reasonably well, with decent detail and colour consistency. Once you push it to 3x, sharpness drops, but the images are still usable for casual shots.&nbsp;
Selfies are detailed, though again, skin tones appear a bit saturated. You also get modes like Dual View Video which lets you capture videos from both front and rear cameras at the same time.&nbsp;
<h2>Performance&nbsp;</h2>
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, a mid-range chipset designed for basic usage. Benchmark results reflect that clearly;483,000 on AnTuTu and 1,062 (single-core) and 2,510 (multi-core) on Geekbench. Performance is pretty decent and average. Apps open quickly, multitasking isn&rsquo;t very smooth, but is not exactly an issue, and routine tasks like browsing, clicking photos, or using ChatGPT run smoothly. The phone is available with 6GB or 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM, paired with 128GB of UFS 3.1 storage. You also get expandable storage up to 1TB via a microSD card slot, which is good to see.&nbsp;
<h2>Software&nbsp;</h2>
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 runs Android 15 out of the box and offers a clean, straightforward UI. There&rsquo;s barely no bloatware, and that&rsquo;s easily one of the phone&rsquo;s strongest points.&nbsp; Now, Lava has promised that the device will see an Android 16 update, and at least two years of software support. Beyond Android 16, there is no word. This is a bit odd, especially when you consider that brands like Samsung are offering up to six years of updates, and even Poco promises at least four years for devices at this price point,.&nbsp;
<h2>Verdict&nbsp;</h2>
At ₹16,999, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 carves out a clear identity in a crowded segment. You get LPDDR5 RAM paired with UFS 3.1 storage, which is still not a given at this price, along with a sleek design and a genuinely vibrant AMOLED display. The secondary screen remains its standout feature and adds real everyday convenience, whether it is for quick notifications, music controls, or selfies.
What also works in the phone&rsquo;s favour is the clean, near-stock software experience. It feels refreshingly clutter-free, runs smoothly in daily use, and is backed by performance that holds up well for everyday tasks. The camera system, while not class-leading, is reliable enough for casual photography and social media use. Where the Blaze Duo 3 really earns its appeal is in the overall experience it delivers. It may not chase headline numbers everywhere, but it focuses on usability, thoughtful design, and a fuss-free UI. Add to that the made-in-India branding, and the phone makes a strong case for buyers who value a clean Android experience, a good display, and something that stands out visually.

Oakley Meta HSTN shows how smart glasses can fit daily life with solid audio, a practical camera, and hands-free AI, even if battery life still needs planning.

Oakley Meta HSTN review: Smart glasses that finally fit daily life

<h3>The Oakley Meta HSTN brings AI, audio, and a hands-free camera in a sporty frame. Here&rsquo;s how Meta&rsquo;s smartest glasses yet perform in real life.</h3>

Smart glasses have promised the future for a long time, but they have rarely earned a permanent spot in daily life. Meta&rsquo;s latest push into eyewear, supported by its long-term partnership with EssilorLuxottica, makes it clear this is no longer a side project.
With the Oakley Meta HSTN arriving in India at ₹41,800, the discussion changes. This is less about whether smart glasses actually work and more about whether they fit into everyday tech habits, especially in a market that cares deeply about both price and how things look.
By blending Meta&rsquo;s AI features with Oakley&rsquo;s performance-driven design, the HSTN suggests a future where smart glasses are worn all day, not just pulled out to show off.
<h2>Oakley Meta HSTN Smart Glasses: Are they comfy? </h2>
The Oakley Meta HSTN comes in multiple frame and lens options, which makes sense because these aren&rsquo;t glasses you wear once in a while. They&rsquo;re designed to stay on your face for most of the day.
You get PRIZM Polar lenses for outdoor use, transition lenses for mixed lighting, and clear lenses if you want the most low-key look possible. I used the version with transition lenses, and they&rsquo;re easily the most practical. Indoors, they behave like regular glasses. Step outside and they darken just enough to stay comfortable. Not full sunglasses-dark, but enough that you&rsquo;re not squinting your way through the day.
For the most part, people assumed these were normal glasses. That illusion only broke when they noticed the camera lens or saw the LED blink while recording.
Fit is where Oakley&rsquo;s sports DNA really shows. The glasses sit snug and don&rsquo;t wobble. I used them on the treadmill and during workouts with plenty of movement, including burpees, which I regret doing but respect for testing purposes. The glasses stayed firmly in place the entire time, which is exactly what you want from something aimed at active users.
Long-term comfort is a bit more mixed. The straight, narrow temple arms help with stability, but after a few hours they&rsquo;re not as forgiving as the curved arms on the Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Some rubber padding at the tips would have made a noticeable difference.
The glasses themselves are IPX4 rated, so sweat, light rain, and the occasional splash aren&rsquo;t an issue. You can work out, run outdoors, or get caught in a drizzle without stressing. The charging case, however, doesn&rsquo;t offer any water protection. For a product clearly aimed at sports and fitness users, that feels like a missed opportunity.
<h2>Oakley Meta HSTN: Sound, Calls, and the Camera You Actually Use</h2>
Audio turned out to be one of the quiet highlights of the Oakley Meta HSTN. It&rsquo;s not flashy, but it&rsquo;s genuinely useful. The open-ear speakers let you listen to music or podcasts without cutting you off from the world around you.
This makes a big difference during everyday use. Walking on busy roads, commuting, or working out, you can still hear traffic, conversations, or someone trying to get your attention. Your music stays in the background instead of taking over. Once you get used to it, regular earbuds start to feel a bit antisocial.
Calls are handled well too. The five-mic setup, spread across the arms and near the nose pad, does a solid job of isolating your voice. Even while moving or dealing with wind, calls stayed clear. No awkward &ldquo;can you hear me now?&rdquo; moments, which is more than I can say for some wearables.
The camera is where these glasses start to feel genuinely different from most gadgets. It shines in situations where using your phone feels like extra effort. Crowded streets, quick errands, or moments where your hands are already full. You see something, tap the glasses, and you&rsquo;re done.
The jump to 3K video sounds bigger than it looks. The footage itself doesn&rsquo;t suddenly become dramatic or cinematic. What you do notice is better stabilisation. Videos stay steady even when you&rsquo;re walking or moving around, which makes them far more watchable later.
This is not an action camera replacement, and it doesn&rsquo;t try to be. The quality works well for quick clips, short videos, and casual sharing. Taking photos or recording video is simple. Press the button or use voice commands. A white LED lights up to show recording is active. It won&rsquo;t silence every privacy concern, but it&rsquo;s a visible reminder that the camera is on.
Over time, I found myself using the camera for very ordinary things. A quick clip in the kitchen. Snapping a photo while shopping with both hands full. Capturing something mid-walk that I&rsquo;d usually forget about five minutes later. The glasses remove just enough friction to make those moments feel worth recording.
That&rsquo;s where the Oakley Meta HSTN makes the most sense. It&rsquo;s not chasing cinematic shots or trying to replace your phone. It&rsquo;s about making it easier to capture everyday moments without breaking your flow. And once that habit sets in, it&rsquo;s surprisingly hard to unlearn.
<h2>Oakley Meta HSTN: Talking to Your Glasses (And When It Actually Helps)</h2>
Meta AI works best when you don&rsquo;t treat it like a serious tool. The moment you stop trying to &ldquo;test&rdquo; it and start using it casually, it clicks. You say &ldquo;Hey Meta&rdquo; and ask simple things. Weather before stepping out. A nearby caf&eacute;. Something random because you&rsquo;re killing time on a walk. Most of the time, it does what you expect.
Things get more interesting once you involve the camera. Standing outside a metro station, I asked what I was looking at. The first answer was broad and slightly lazy. I followed up with another question, and it got sharper. That&rsquo;s how Meta AI tends to behave. It often needs a second push, but once it understands what you want, it becomes genuinely useful.
I tried this again while walking through a park, asking about trees and plants around me. As far as I could tell, it got most of them right. It even went on to explain basic plant care, which I didn&rsquo;t ask for but didn&rsquo;t hate either. It&rsquo;s not something I would ever bother typing into Google, but saying it out loud felt oddly natural.
That said, the AI still has its limits. Ask too many questions back-to-back and it can lose track of the conversation. One minute it&rsquo;s doing a decent job as a tour guide, the next it forgets what you were talking about entirely. Rephrasing usually helps. The best way to think about it is not as an expert, but as a smart friend who occasionally zones out.
At home, I asked Meta what I was looking at while the TV was on. It correctly identified that I was watching a video game trailer on YouTube, but guessed the wrong game. Close enough to be impressive, wrong enough to remind me not to trust it blindly. That balance comes up often.
All of this is handled through the Meta AI app, which works on both Android and iPhone. If you&rsquo;ve used Ray-Ban Meta glasses before, the layout will feel familiar. You can manage photos and videos, adjust settings, and connect services like Spotify, Apple Music, Strava, Garmin, and Audible. You can also add multiple glasses to the same app, which is handy if you&rsquo;re already in deep.
There&rsquo;s support for Be My Eyes as well, which allows people with low vision to connect with volunteers for help with everyday tasks. It&rsquo;s not something you&rsquo;ll use daily, but it&rsquo;s one of the more thoughtful features here.
The app itself is mostly easy to use, though not without flaws. Some settings are buried deeper than they should be, and the gallery could have been easier to reach. I also ran into a crash or two while poking around the AI settings. Nothing serious, just reminders that this whole experience is still being refined.
<h2>Oakley Meta HSTN: How Long They Actually Last</h2>
Battery life on the Oakley Meta HSTN is decent, but you do need to plan around it. If you use the glasses the way they&rsquo;re meant to be used&mdash;taking photos, recording videos, listening to music, and chatting with Meta AI&mdash;you&rsquo;re not getting through a full day on a single charge. By the time evening rolls around, the charging case becomes part of the routine.
The good news is that this is still an improvement over the first-generation Ray-Ban Meta glasses. Meta claims up to 8 hours of use on the glasses themselves and up to 48 hours with the charging case. In real-world use, I saw closer to 6 hours on a single charge and roughly 40 hours when using the case. It&rsquo;s not the big leap Meta advertises, but it&rsquo;s a clear step forward compared to the Ray-Bans, which topped out at around 36 hours with their case.
Fast charging helps smooth things out. Pop the glasses into the case for about 20 minutes and you get roughly half the battery back. It&rsquo;s the kind of feature you don&rsquo;t think about until the day you forget to charge them, and suddenly it feels essential.
The one setting worth being careful with is 3K video. While it sounds like a major upgrade, it doesn&rsquo;t noticeably improve how your videos look. What it does do is drain the battery faster. Unless you really need it, sticking to 1080p makes more sense. You&rsquo;ll get similar-looking footage and noticeably better battery life.
<h2>Oakley Meta HSTN: The India Verdict</h2>
The Oakley Meta HSTN doesn&rsquo;t suddenly turn smart glasses into an essential purchase, but it gets closer than Meta ever has before. With a starting price of ₹41,800, this is clearly not aimed at everyone, especially in a market like India where price matters just as much as features. You do need to be aware of battery limits, and Meta AI still has its off days. This is very much a product that&rsquo;s growing into itself.
That said, when everything clicks, the experience is genuinely satisfying. The audio feels natural and useful, the camera turns out to be far more practical than expected, and the hands-free nature of it all slowly changes how often you bother pulling out your phone. Add Oakley&rsquo;s snug fit and performance-first design, and these glasses start feeling like something you can actually live with, not just test and put away.
The Oakley Meta HSTN isn&rsquo;t trying to replace your phone, smartwatch, or action camera. It&rsquo;s meant to sit quietly alongside them and take care of small, everyday moments with less effort. If you&rsquo;re curious about where smart glasses are headed and don&rsquo;t mind paying early-adopter prices, this is the strongest case Meta has made so far. If not, it still offers a clear and convincing preview of what this category could become in the next few years.

Read our in-depth Redmi Note 15 Pro+ review. We test the 6500mAh silicon-carbon battery, 100W HyperCharge, and 200MP camera in real-world Indian conditions.

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Review: A 6500mAh Titan Built Like a Tank

Xiaomi just changed the mid-range game. Our week-long test of the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ reveals if that massive 6500mAh battery and IP69K rating are actually worth your money.

The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ is a 6500mAh beast that ends battery anxiety for good. With its rugged vegan leather build, stunning 3200-nit screen, and 100W charging, it&rsquo;s a premium powerhouse built for the real world. A true mid-range titan.

For the longest time, the whole point of the Redmi Note series was just to hit that sweet spot where price meets performance. But honestly, with this new Redmi Note 15 Pro+, it feels like Xiaomi is tired of just playing it safe in the middle ground. They are clearly trying to push this phone into a much more premium category. On the spec sheet, you&rsquo;ve got some pretty wild numbers like a 6500mAh battery and a 200MP camera, plus some really gutsy calls, especially with how they&rsquo;ve totally rethought the camera setup this time around.
I&rsquo;ve been carrying the Coffee Mocha version of this phone as my main device for the last week to see if these changes actually matter when you&rsquo;re out in the real world. I wanted to know if these upgrades are genuine or if it is just more marketing fluff designed to look good on a box. After living with it for seven days, here is my honest breakdown of how it actually stacks up.
<h2>Unboxing &amp; Design</h2>
When most smartphone brands decided to ditch everything but the phone and a cable to save on costs, <a title="Redmi Note 15 5G Review: Slim, comfortable, and playing a different game" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/redmi-note-15-5g-review-slim-comfortable-and-playing-a-different-game-1767941831177" target="_blank">Xiaomi</a> went the other way by keeping the box packed with everything you actually need. It feels like a genuine "full kit" right out of the gates. You get a protective case that actually feels sturdy, which is a nice change from those flimsy clear ones that usually turn yellow within a month. It is refreshing to see a brand not nickel and diming their customers for the basics.
The real highlight here is that massive 100W HyperCharge brick sitting in the box. Honestly, this is a genius move on their part. It puts them miles ahead of competitors who brag about fast charging speeds but then expect you to pay extra for the actual charger. Moving from the 90W brick on the older <a title="Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Review (Champagne Gold Edition): A good mid-ranger with a touch of class" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/redmi-note-14-pro-5g-review-champagne-gold-edition-a-good-mid-ranger-with-a-touch-of-class-1751890714900" target="_blank">Redmi Note 14 Pro+</a> might seem like a small tweak on paper, but in daily use, it is a very solid step forward for convenience.
Holding the phone for the first time is a bit of a surprise, especially in this Coffee Mocha finish. It has this "Rugged Sophistication" vibe that you just do not expect for this kind of money. The back uses a rich vegan leather that feels expensive and soft to the touch. The best part is that it gives you a really secure grip and stays completely clean from those annoying oily fingerprints. I spent a week testing this out, and the back held up perfectly against scratches from my keys or coins in my pocket.
What really impressed me was how slim the phone feels, even though there is a huge 6500mAh battery tucked inside. This Coffee Mocha leather version is about 8.47mm thick, while the plastic back versions are even thinner at 8.19mm. The weight is balanced so well that it never feels like one of those bulky, top-heavy battery phones. Even at 208g, it sits comfortably in your hand. The other colours might be a tiny bit lighter, but honestly, you will not even notice a difference when you are actually using it.
<h2>Display</h2>
Honestly, I wasn't expecting the screen on the <a title="Redmi Note 15 Pro+ First Look: Bigger battery, brighter screen, sharper focus" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/mobiles/redmi-note-15-pro-first-look-bigger-battery-brighter-screen-sharper-focus-1769756688081" target="_blank">Redmi Note 15 Pro+</a> to stick with me like it did. Usually, you see these massive spec sheets and think, "Yeah, looks good on paper," but then the actual experience feels totally flat. After a week of having this as my daily driver, though, I&rsquo;ve completely flipped my stance. The display ended up being one of my favourite parts of the whole package, mostly because it doesn't feel like it&rsquo;s trying to show off with fake colours or weird visual tricks. It just works.
It is a 6.83-inch 1.5K AMOLED panel, and it's just&hellip; clean. Everything looks sharp and vibrant without feeling artificial. After a day or two, I actually forgot I was using a "mid-range" phone. You only really feel the quality difference when you pick up a different device and realise how washed out other screens look compared to this one.
Xiaomi calls this an "All-Around Liquid Display," which is just marketing speak for the glass curving a bit on all four sides. I&rsquo;ll be the first to say I was worried about this. I&rsquo;ve had some pretty annoying experiences with curved glass before, think accidental palm touches and those weird reflections that make it impossible to see the edges. But after living with it, those fears kind of vanished. Whether I was firing off WhatsApp replies or just doom-scrolling late at night, I didn't hit a single ghost touch. It actually felt stable and reliable.
Using it day-to-day feels incredibly smooth, thanks to that 120Hz refresh rate. Everything from the animations to the scrolling feels natural, not forced. The 1.5K resolution is the sweet spot too; it&rsquo;s crisp enough to look high-end but doesn't absolutely murder the battery. I spent a lot of time on YouTube and Netflix, and with Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support, the contrast and colours are honestly, excellent for a phone at this price.
One small win was the fingerprint sensor. Usually, in this bracket, they&rsquo;re a total toss-up. But this one? It worked on the first tap almost every single time. It&rsquo;s one of those things you stop thinking about after a few days, which is exactly how good tech should be.
Brightness is another area where it genuinely shines. It peaks at 3200 nits, which sounds like a lot because it is. I was riding out to Greater Noida in the middle of a super bright afternoon with Google Maps open, and even with the sun beating down, I could see every turn perfectly. No squinting or trying to shade the screen with my hand. And for the night owls, that 3840Hz PWM dimming is a lifesaver. My eyes didn't feel like they were burning even after a long session of reading in the dark before bed.
The screen is wrapped in Gorilla Glass Victus 2, which gives you a bit of a safety net. I&rsquo;m not exactly gentle with my phones; it goes in and out of my pocket with keys and stuff, but so far, not a single scratch. As for the sound, the speakers get surprisingly loud. Xiaomi lets you boost the volume up to 400 per cent using their software. To be fair, you lose the bass, and it gets a bit tinny at that level, but if you&rsquo;re just trying to hear a voice note or a reel in a noisy room, it gets the job done.
<h2>Camera</h2>
Xiaomi really rolled the dice on the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ cameras by cutting the rear setup down to just two sensors. It is a pretty bold departure from the triple camera array we saw last year, and I will be honest, I am not entirely sold on the change. While that 200MP main shooter is an absolute monster in terms of raw power, it is really tough to overlook the fact that the telephoto lens has been axed. The Note 14 Pro+ had a versatile system that just worked, so losing that dedicated zoom feels like taking a step backwards. Once you try to zoom in now, the image quality basically drops off a cliff, leaving you with blocky pixels and none of that sharp optical detail you would expect from a pro plus model.
On the bright side, the 200MP primary camera is a total champ when you have decent lighting. What I appreciate most is that the shots actually look like real life. You aren't being hit with that aggressive, fake-looking AI processing or neon colours that look like they were cooked in a lab. The photos stay grounded and realistic, which makes them much nicer to look back at in your gallery. Portrait shots are also quite solid. The way it separates the person from the background is usually spot on. Even if the software gets a little carried away with smoothing out skin textures every now and then, the final image still feels balanced and authentic enough to post on social media without a second thought.
The 8MP ultra-wide lens is really just a role player in this setup. It handles the job for wide landscapes or squeezing friends into a group photo, but we have to be realistic here; it is not trying to match the main sensor for clarity. It feels more like a backup tool than a flagship feature. For the selfie lovers, the 32MP front camera actually does a surprisingly good job. It keeps things sharp and handles video calls really well without any weird flickering or blurring around the edges.
When it comes to video, the rear camera can hit 4K at 30fps, while the front is stuck at 1080p at 60fps. I was actually caught off guard by how steady the footage was from the main back camera during my week of testing. It might not be as smooth as a high-end flagship, but for a mid-range device, it is more than respectable. At the end of the day, the camera situation feels a bit uneven. That main 200MP sensor is truly impressive, but if you are the type of person who is constantly zooming into subjects, you are definitely going to feel the loss of that telephoto lens.
<h2>Performance</h2>
To be completely fair, I already had a pretty good idea of what the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 was going to offer before I even unboxed the Redmi Note 15 Pro+. It is built on a 4nm process, which sounds great, but let&rsquo;s be real for a second. This isn't the kind of chipset that exists just to brag about massive numbers on a spec sheet. If you are the type of person who stays up late obsessing over benchmark charts to see who is on top, this phone probably wasn't made with you in mind.
However, when it came to my actual day-to-day usage, it really did hold its own. Honestly, it performed a lot better than I originally expected. My daily routine is usually a bit of a disaster, bouncing between dozens of open apps, firing off emails, messing with documents, and watching a ton of video. I even tried a bit of light video work just to see if it would choke. Through all that mess, the phone stayed impressively smooth. I didn't run into those annoying random freezes or the tiny stutters that usually start to get under your skin after a few days of heavy use.
I did end up running those standard benchmark tests anyway, mostly because I wanted to see where it landed. On AnTuTu, my unit hit a score of nearly 8.1 lakh. Geekbench showed 1238 for single-core and 3218 for multi-core. I also threw it at 3DMark Wild Life, where it stayed in that 4100 to 4200 range with frame rates around 25 FPS. I actually thought about skipping that one, but I figured I might as well see the whole picture. These are solid, middle-of-the-road results. They aren't going to set the world on fire, but they are exactly what you should expect from this kind of hardware.
Gaming was the part that actually caught me off guard. I spent a good amount of time playing BGMI and Call of Duty Mobile, and I have to say, both games felt really stable. Yeah, the frame rate is capped below 90 FPS, but the experience stayed consistent. I didn't see those sudden frame drops or weird slowdowns that usually ruin a match, even during the longer gaming sessions.
Some people might complain about the UFS 2.2 storage being used here. On paper, it is definitely slower than the newer standards we see in flagship phones. But in real-world usage? I honestly barely noticed it. Unless you are constantly moving massive files around every single hour, it really isn't going to change your life much.
What actually impressed me the most was the heat management. Most phones in this price bracket start getting uncomfortably hot once you start gaming for a bit. That just didn't happen here. After a full hour of heavy gaming, the temperature was sitting around 37 degrees. Even when I pushed it toward two hours, it stayed near 39 and never even touched 40. Finding that kind of thermal control at this price point is actually pretty rare.
<h2>Software, UI/UX &amp; AI Features</h2>
On the software front, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ ships with HyperOS 2 built on top of Android 15. In my daily testing, the whole experience felt very zippy and responsive. The interface is fluid, apps open up without any delay, and the animations have a nice snappiness to them. If you have used a Redmi device in the last few years, you will feel right at home with the layout and navigation.
However, I really need to call out Xiaomi for the amount of bloatware pre-installed on this device. It is honestly everywhere. I really don't understand why anyone would need half a dozen random puzzle games pre-loaded on a brand new handset. It just clutters up the home screen and takes away that "new phone" feeling. While you can go in and manually delete most of this junk, I ended up spending my first ten minutes with the phone just cleaning up the app drawer, which is never a great way to start.
On the plus side, the way they have integrated AI tools for productivity is actually quite impressive. The HyperAI suite includes features like AI Writing, Speech Recognition, and a built-in Interpreter. I found these surprisingly helpful for knocking out emails and drafting articles when I was in a rush. Having Google Gemini and Circle to Search right there also makes finding information feel completely effortless.
As for longevity, the update promise is pretty respectable. You get four years of major OS updates and six years of security patches. Even though it didn't launch with Android 16, it is still a solid choice if you plan on keeping your phone for a long time rather than upgrading every single year.
<h2>Battery and Charging</h2>
To be totally honest, the battery life on the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ is just flat out nuts. It is running on a 6500mAh silicon-carbon battery and supports 100W fast charging. While those specs look fancy on a website, it is the actual day-to-day endurance that really caught me off guard.
I basically got to a point where I just stopped thinking about where my charger was. Xiaomi says you can get a full top up in under 40 minutes, and in my testing, that was pretty much spot on. Even if you only have about ten minutes to spare for a quick plug-in, you get enough power to stop worrying for the next several hours.
The real highlight, though, is how it handles a massive workload. On my most chaotic days, when I was gaming for hours and binge-watching high-res videos, I would still finish the day with about 37 per cent left in the tank. If you are not a hardcore power user and just stick to the basics like making phone calls or scrolling through Instagram, you could easily go over two and a half days without even looking for a wall socket. They even added 22.5W reverse charging, which is a genuine lifesaver if your earbuds die or a friend&rsquo;s phone is about to give up on them.&nbsp;
<h2>Final Verdict: Should You Buy It?</h2>
The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ really hits the mark in just about every way that actually matters. There is no doubt that this device represents a significant step up across almost every single category. That massive 6500mAh battery combined with the 100W charging speed means the phone just keeps going and going, while the display remains incredibly smooth and exceptionally bright. Having that 3200 nits of peak brightness is a huge plus. The vegan leather finish on the back adds a high end feel and does a great job of staying free from messy fingerprints, while the 200MP primary sensor captures photos that actually look realistic. For those of us who create content, the AI features baked into HyperOS are genuinely helpful, and the overall performance handles the daily grind without any noticeable issues.
Of course, the pre-installed junk apps are a bit of a headache, and I know that photography fans will definitely feel the sting of not having a dedicated telephoto lens. Also, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 is not exactly going to be breaking any speed records. However, when you look at the price and consider the IP69K durability, the long-term update promise of four years of OS and six years of security patches, and that impressively slim 8.47mm body, it really is a fantastic deal. It is a perfect choice for heavy users who care more about battery life and a top-tier screen than flashy gimmicks.

Realme P4 Power 5G review based on real-world testing, covering battery life, charging, display, performance, cameras, software, and long-term usability.

Realme P4 Power 5G Review: 29 Hours Later, It Still Wouldn’t Die

We tested the Realme P4 Power 5G with its massive 10,001mAh battery to see if it truly delivers unmatched endurance in daily use.

Realme P4 Power 5G is built around a massive 10,001mAh battery, delivering extreme endurance, a smooth 144Hz display, and dependable performance for users who value long battery life over everything else.

We all expected that by 2026, the fear of a dead phone would be a distant memory, but most of us are still hunting for charging ports by mid-day. The Realme P4 Power 5G feels like it was designed out of pure spite for that struggle. It aims to be the final solution for anyone tired of living on a low-battery warning.
While other manufacturers are playing it safe by inching toward 7,000mAh, Realme has gone nuclear with a 10,001mAh Titan Battery. It is a massive jump that honestly makes every other flagship look outdated. I have been using the TransSilver edition as my daily driver to see if this is just a spec-sheet flex or a real game-changer. A huge battery means nothing if the phone is a brick or lags under pressure.
Launching today, January 29, the P4 Power 5G starts at ₹25,999 for the 8GB+128GB base model. I tested the 12GB+256GB version, priced at ₹30,999, to see if it can actually survive the ultimate endurance test.
<h2>Unboxing &amp; Design: The "Power of Paradox"</h2>
The unboxing experience feels refreshingly grounded to me. In the box, I get the phone, a standard clear TPU case that protects the back without hiding the TransSilver finish, which is also available in TransOrange and TransBlue, and a full 80W SuperVOOC charger. It is a relief to see a brand still including both the charging brick and a solid cable, as it means I can get the advertised charging speeds from day one without buying anything extra.
Once I remove the plastic, it is immediately clear that <a title="Realme 16 Pro+ Review: Real-World Performance, Big Battery, Serious Cameras" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/realme-16-pro-review-real-world-performance-big-battery-serious-cameras-1767698966416" target="_blank">Realme</a> was not aiming for subtlety. The TransSilver unit I have been using is built around a bold, two-part design that demands attention. The top section is dominated by the TransView window, a transparent panel that reveals circuit-inspired patterns and exposed screw details. It has a gritty, mechanical character that feels intentional and loud. This design clearly leans into a tech-forward, expressive identity, favouring personality over the safe, minimal glass slabs that dominate the market.
The lower half of the phone takes a more practical direction. It transitions into a matte finish exactly where my palm naturally grips the device. I see this as a smart functional choice because the added texture provides better grip and a sense of security that glossy phones often lack. The contrast between the transparent top and the matte bottom gives the phone a distinct identity without making the design feel cluttered.
The camera island follows the same confident design language. It is a raised rectangular block with two large circular rings stacked vertically, along with a slim strip housing the third sensor and the flash. You do notice the bump when the phone is placed flat on a desk, but the layout feels deliberate rather than something added as an afterthought.
What impressed me most is the engineering behind the size. Packing in a massive 10,001mAh battery usually results in a phone that feels like a brick, yet Realme has managed to keep the thickness to just 9.08mm. In my view, this is the biggest highlight of the phone itself. It feels dense and substantial, but the quad-curved display and the way the back panel tapers into the frame help it sit comfortably in my hand.
At 219 grams, I do notice the weight when coming from a smaller phone, but it is lighter than several flagship devices with much smaller batteries. More importantly, the weight distribution feels well balanced. It never feels top-heavy while I am typing or scrolling, which helped avoid the hand fatigue I expected. It is a large phone, but one that remains practical for daily use.
<h2>Battery and Charging: Entering the 10,000mAh era</h2>
Since the <a title="Realme P4 Power 5G First Look: 10,001mAh battery, crammed into a slim design" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/mobiles/realme-p4-power-5g-first-look-10-000mah-battery-crammed-into-a-slim-design-1768974283807" target="_blank">Realme P4 Power 5G</a> is essentially a gigantic battery pack with a phone attached, the battery performance deserves real attention. While most brands spent 2025 cautiously nudging capacities to 6,000 or 7,000mAh, Realme threw caution to the wind. After using the phone for a few days, my idea of what &ldquo;good&rdquo; battery life actually means shifted completely. The 10,001mAh Titan Battery is not just a spec-sheet flex. It genuinely changes how you treat the device day to day.
To see if those numbers actually held up, I decided to be a bit unreasonable. I charged the phone to 100% and let 4K YouTube videos loop continuously. No power-saving modes, no lowered brightness, just raw, constant playback. Most phones would struggle to make it through a workday like this, but the P4 Power took three full hours just to drop its first 10%.
After 12 hours of straight playback, the battery was still sitting at a healthy 57%. By the 24-hour mark, I was genuinely tired of checking the percentage, yet it was still holding on at 22%. It finally dipped to 20% after 24 hours and 29 minutes of nonstop 4K streaming.
I expected that final 20% to drain quickly, but that did not happen. The phone did not shut down until the 29-hour and 31-minute mark, meaning the last stretch alone delivered nearly five additional hours of runtime. Realme claims around 32.5 hours of YouTube playback, and since I was not using any power-saving features, those lab numbers actually seem fairly conservative. For most users, this is easily a two-day phone, and stretching it to three days is very realistic if you are not glued to the screen.
A big reason this works is the battery technology itself. Realme is using a silicon-carbon anode battery, which allows far higher energy density without turning the phone into something that feels like a brick. There is also a &ldquo;Titan Long-Life Algorithm&rdquo; baked into the software, which Realme claims can keep the battery healthy for up to eight years. That is a bold promise, but charging the phone far less often does make the maths for longer battery life add up.
Despite the massive capacity, charging is surprisingly quick. The 80W UltraDart charging took the phone from zero to 100% in about one hour and 11 minutes. A 36-minute top-up gets it to 50%, which, on this phone, is enough to last an entire day.
I also ended up using the 27W reverse charging more than expected. With such a large battery, the P4 Power effectively doubles as a high-speed power bank. I plugged in my Realme 14 Pro+ and saw it jump from 31% to 41% in roughly 33 minutes. Combined with bypass charging, the entire power setup feels thoughtfully engineered rather than just oversized.
<h2>Display: 144Hz HyperGlow 4D Curve+</h2>
The best thing I can say about the display on the Realme P4 Power 5G is that I stopped noticing it after the first hour. That is usually a good sign. When a screen disappears into the background, it means it is doing its job well. On paper, this is a 1.5K 144Hz HyperGlow 4D Curve+ panel, and in everyday use, it makes the phone feel far more premium than the price would suggest. The quad-curved edges allow the glass to flow neatly into the frame, which visually trims down the phone and makes it feel less bulky than it actually is.
The 144Hz refresh rate is exactly as smooth as I expected. Scrolling through social feeds, switching apps, or moving through settings feels quick and fluid. While the full 144Hz mode is limited to supported apps and games, general motion handling remains consistently smooth. It is not an LTPO panel, but during my time with it, the LTPS technology felt efficient enough without any obvious drawbacks.
Brightness is where this display really stands out for me. Realme claims a peak brightness of 6,500 nits, which is clearly a lab figure, but the real-world performance still impressed me. Even under harsh midday sunlight in New Delhi, I had no trouble reading messages or checking maps. I never felt the need to search for shade just to see the screen clearly.
The colour tuning is also well judged. It looks punchy without slipping into that artificial, over-saturated look that many mid-range phones suffer from. Skin tones look natural, and with HDR10+ support, Netflix content feels dynamic, with good contrast and highlights that pop. I also appreciated the eye-care mode, which stays comfortable without turning everything yellow. Overall, this is a well-balanced panel that remains easy on the eyes, which matters when the battery encourages very long screen-on time.
<h2>Performance: Sustained power</h2>
The <a title="Realme P4 Pro Review: Best phone under ₹25,000?" href="https://www.editorji.com/tech-news/gadget-review/realme-p4-pro-review-best-phone-under-25-000-1756028306605" target="_blank">Realme P4</a> Power 5G is not trying to win benchmark trophies with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, and that feels deliberate. Built on a 4nm process, the chip is clearly tuned for consistency and reliability rather than headline-grabbing numbers. On paper, it is not a flagship processor, but that spec sheet does not fully reflect how the phone behaves in daily use.
In my day-to-day usage, performance felt surprisingly snappy. I usually keep far too many apps running in the background, but the phone handled that without slowing down. Opening apps like Instagram or Chrome was quick, and I did not run into the random stutters that often show up on mid-range phones. This is the kind of performance sweet spot most people actually want, where everything works smoothly without drawing attention to the hardware.
Out of curiosity, I ran a few benchmarks to see if the numbers matched my experience. On AnTuTu, the phone scored just over 8.7 lakh. Geekbench 6 returned a single-core score of 1060 and a multi-core score of 2942. These are not eye-catching figures, but they are solid for the price and line up with the stable behaviour I saw in real-world use.
Gaming was where I had some concerns, especially with such a large battery and whether Realme would need to throttle performance. The company claims a stable 90 FPS in BGMI, and in my testing, that claim held up. Gameplay felt fluid, with no sudden frame drops during intense moments. While the phone does allow higher frame rates in some cases, sticking to 90 FPS delivered the most consistent experience.
Thermals are something to keep in mind. In my tests, the phone started at around 24 degrees and climbed to 34 degrees within the first twenty minutes of gaming. After an hour, it hovered near 40 degrees, and by the two-hour mark, it reached roughly 44 degrees. At that point, the warmth becomes noticeable in your hands. Interestingly, I did not see this behaviour during my 24-hour YouTube playback test. The heat only showed up when the GPU was being pushed hard.
Overall, if you can tolerate some warmth during long gaming sessions, the P4 Power delivers stable, dependable performance that feels stronger than its price suggests. It comes across as a reliable workhorse rather than just another budget phone.
<h2>Software, UI &amp; UX, and AI</h2>
The Realme P4 Power 5G runs Realme UI 7.0 on top of Android 16, and from the first boot, the software feels fairly mature. The interface is smooth, and the animations feel quick without trying too hard to be flashy. Realme highlights its new Flux Engine for smoother transitions and improved background app handling, and in my daily use, it actually makes a difference. The phone stays responsive even when I am bouncing between multiple apps.
That said, this is still very much a Realme phone, which means there is a noticeable amount of pre-installed bloatware waiting for you out of the box. It is not the cleanest Android experience you can get. The upside is that most of these apps can be uninstalled. After spending a bit of time cleaning things up, the software feels far more manageable and less cluttered.
The UI becomes more interesting once you start using the AI features. I usually approach these with low expectations, but some of them are genuinely useful. AI Captions, for example, worked well for me while watching videos in noisy environments, and the accuracy for English content was better than expected.
There are also creative tools like AI Instant Clip and AI Perfect Shot, clearly aimed at people who post regularly on Instagram or Reels. They make it easy to fix framing or add lighting effects like AI LightMe without needing a separate editing app. Importantly, these features run smoothly on the hardware, which is not always the case on mid-range phones.
In terms of longevity, Realme promises three major Android updates and four years of security patches. For a phone in this price segment, that feels fair. Overall, the software is not perfect, mainly because of the bloatware, but it is stable, feature-rich, and well optimised.
<h2>Camera</h2>
The Realme P4 Power 5G uses a 50MP Sony IMX882 main camera paired with an 8MP ultra-wide, a setup we have seen plenty of times before. In daylight, the main camera does a decent job. Photos are sharp enough for most people, but it is clear that the software is doing a lot of the heavy lifting. Colours are noticeably boosted, especially greens and blues, giving shots an instant Instagram-ready look. It works well for social media, but calling the output natural would be a stretch.
Dynamic range is where the limits show up. Bright skies are handled reasonably well, but in high-contrast scenes, shadows tend to lose detail and turn into dark patches. The phone gets the shot, but it does not always balance the scene cleanly.
Portraits are surprisingly decent for the price. Edge detection usually holds up, though it still struggles with messy hair. The background blur feels a bit too aggressive for my taste, but it looks fine on a phone screen. My main issue is skin tones. Realme has moved away from the heavy plastic smoothing of older models, but there is still a visible AI-processed layer that makes faces look slightly artificial. It is not a dealbreaker, but it is noticeable.
The 8MP ultra-wide is fine for quick landscape shots, though the drop in sharpness compared to the main camera is obvious. On the positive side, colour consistency between the two lenses is good, so the gallery looks cohesive.
Selfies are good enough for video calls, even if they share that same processed look. Video recording tops out at 4K 30fps and looks sharp, but stabilisation shows its mid-range limits. It is fine when standing still, but walking footage has visible shake. Overall, this is a social-media-first camera setup that prioritises convenience over precision.
<h2>Verdict: Should you buy it?</h2>
If you are tired of carrying a power bank everywhere, the Realme P4 Power 5G makes a very strong case for itself. It feels tailor-made for students, frequent travellers, or anyone who spends hours streaming videos and just wants a phone that can last through a long weekend. That massive 10,001mAh battery, paired with a 144Hz display, turns it into a genuinely solid device for media consumption.
That said, it is not trying to please everyone. If mobile photography is a priority or if you cannot tolerate a phone that warms up during long gaming sessions, this is probably not the right pick. The cameras are clearly tuned for quick social media shots, and sustained GPU-heavy gaming does bring noticeable heat.
Ultimately, this phone knows exactly what it is meant to be. If you want a reliable workhorse that simply refuses to run out of juice, it is hard to beat right now. It prioritises real-world endurance over chasing benchmark glory.

Gadget Review

Tecno Pova Curve 2 5G Review: The case for bigger batteries in slim phones

Vivo V70 Elite Review: A familiar yet refined smartphone

HyperX Cloud Jet Review: Is this the best budget wireless pick?

Lava Blaze Duo 3 review: Two displays for the price of one, but does it make sense?

Oakley Meta HSTN Smart Glasses Review: The Most Livable Smart Glasses Yet?

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Review: A serious upgrade that plays it safe

Realme P4 Power 5G Review:29 Hours later, it still wouldn’t die

More gadget reviews

Vivo X200T Review: A new kind of flagship in Vivo’s lineup

Realme Pad 3 5G review: A productivity tablet that finally makes sense

GoPro Max 2 Review: GoPro’s Most Creative Camera Yet

Logitech MX Master 4 Review: A masterclass on improving perfection

CMF Headphone Pro review: Big style, bigger battery, bold sound all for ₹7,999

Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G review: A big Android tablet with strong fundamentals, and a few surprises

Redmi Note 15 5G Review: Slim, comfortable, and playing a different game

Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini: A 200MP compact phone that's full of surprises

Categories