UK introduces new definition of extremism

The UK government on Thursday unveiled a new definition of extremism, as church leaders warned it risked disproportionately affecting Muslim communities.

The new definition comes after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warned earlier this month of a "shocking increase in extremist disruption and criminality" that risked the country tipping into "mob rule".

Sunak's comments, made in a Downing Street address to the nation, came after regular pro-Palestinian protests in London.

The marches protesting Israel's military response to the October 7 attacks by Hamas on southern Israel have seen dozens arrested for anti-Semitic chanting and banners, promoting a proscribed organisation and assaulting emergency workers.

Currently, extremism is defined as "the vocal or active opposition to our fundamental values" such as "mutual respect and tolerance".

According to the new definition, extremism is the "promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance".

Groups or individuals will be regarded as extremist if they use that ideology to "negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others or undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights" it said.

They will also be deemed extremist if they "intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve" the other two objectives.

The government said in a statement that the new definition was "narrower and more precise" than the earlier 2011 definition.

It said it provided a "high bar that only captures the most concerning of activities. It is not about silencing those with private and peaceful beliefs," it said.

Senior minister Michael Gove, who oversaw the new definition, said it would ensure that government did not "inadvertently provide a platform to those setting out to subvert democracy and deny other people's fundamental rights".

He said Britain was stronger as a result of its diversity "but our democracy and our values of inclusivity and tolerance are under challenge from extremists.

"In order to protect our democratic values, it is important both to reinforce what we have in common and to be clear and precise in identifying the dangers posed by extremism," he added.