Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The Supreme Court's designation of West Bengal school recruitment as 'tainted' leaves 26,000 jobs in limbo, urging reform and accountability.

West Bengal School Recruitment Controversy

West Bengal's school recruitment process labeled 'tainted' by Supreme Court, casting 26,000 jobs into uncertainty, driving demands for reform.

SC verdict: Lawyer questions flawed process

Supreme Court's 'tainted' label of West Bengal's school recruitment process leaves 26,000 jobs uncertain, demanding reform.

Senior advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya on Thursday said that when the whole process of recruitment of teaching and non-teaching staff in West Bengal government-sponsored and aided schools has been termed "tainted" by the Supreme Court, it cannot be determined who was eligible and who was not.
Bhattacharya represented several candidates, who claimed to have been deprived of a fair selection process, before the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court in their challenge against the appointments of nearly 26,000 teaching and non-teaching staff.
The CPI(M)'s Rajya Sabha MP maintained that when the whole process is declared "tainted", it cannot be determined who was eligible and who was not.
"One must also think of the interest of those lakhs of candidates who had been deprived of a fair selection process for the jobs," Bhattacharya said.
Expressing dismay at the loss of jobs of 25,753 teaching and non-teaching staff, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that this happened because the state government did not assist the apex court by presenting the case properly.
"The state government did not assist the Supreme Court by presenting documents before it properly," he said, claiming that the government did not work in the interest of these people who lost their jobs.
He alleged that the state was keen to "save those who were behind such recruitments."

India hit back at a group of Islamic nations after it criticised the court judgment against Kashmiri terrorist Yasin Malik. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, or OIC, called the conviction and life imprisonment of Malik "illegal", and the charges "concocted".
This, despite the fact that Malik pleaded guilty to the charges during the trial in an NIA court. The Indian government called the OIC's Human Rights Commission's comments "unacceptable".
The Indian foreign ministry said, "India finds unacceptable the comments made by OIC-IPHRC today criticising India for the judgement in the case of Yasin Malik. Through these comments, OIC-IPHRC has implicitly expressed support for the terrorist activities of Yasin Malik, which were documented and presented in the Court. The world seeks zero tolerance of terrorism and we urge OIC not to justify it any manner."
On May 25, Yasin Malik was sentenced to life in prison in a terror funding case.The National Investigation Agency, which probed the case, had sought the death sentence.

Terrorist Yasin Malik pleads guilty but Islamic nations criticise Indian courts. Watch Modi govt's response | OIC

Terrorist Yasin Malik pleads guilty but Islamic nations criticise Indian court. Watch Modi govt's response


Yasin Malik conviction: the Indian government called the OIC's Human Rights Commission's comments "unacceptable".

India hit back at a group of Islamic nations after it criticised the court judgment against Kashmiri terrorist Yasin Malik. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, or OIC, called the conviction and life imprisonment of Malik "illegal", and the charges "concocted".
This, despite the fact that Malik pleaded guilty to the charges during the trial in an NIA court. The Indian government called the OIC's Human Rights Commission's comments "unacceptable".
The Indian foreign ministry said, "India finds unacceptable the comments made by OIC-IPHRC today criticising India for the judgement in the case of Yasin Malik. Through these comments, OIC-IPHRC has implicitly expressed support for the terrorist activities of Yasin Malik, which were documented and presented in the Court. The world seeks zero tolerance of terrorism and we urge OIC not to justify it any manner."
Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/on-india-trip-bangladesh-minister-says-this-about-china-amid-criticism-of-beijing-over-sri-lanka-crisis-1653738514864" target="_blank">On India trip, Bangladesh minister says this about China, amid criticism of Beijing over Sri Lanka crisis</a>
On May 25, Yasin Malik was sentenced to life in prison in a terror funding case. The National Investigation Agency, which probed the case, had sought the death sentence.

A Pathankot court will today deliver verdict in the rape and murder of a minor girl in Kathua of Jammu and Kashmir last year. 8-yr-old girl from the nomad community was abducted, drugged and raped for several before being killed. The case had triggered widespread especially after some BJP leaders held rallies in support of the rape accused. The Supreme Court had shifted the trial to Pathankot over fears that free and fair trial may not be possible in Jammu. 5 people, including a juvenile and 2 SPOs, are accused in the case. 2 cops are also accused of destroying the evidence in the case

verdict

Categories