Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The grocery firm responded to the tweet by regretting the delivery experience and asking Nitin to share order-related details.

Watch: man posts picture of live rat inside bread packet, grocery delivery company responds

Watch: man posts pictures of a live rat inside bread packet, grocery delivery company responds

The grocery firm responded to the tweet by regretting the delivery experience and asking Nitin to share order-related details.

A man took to Twitter and shared his ordeal by sharing a picture of a rat inside a packet of bread which he ordered from the grocery delivery platform Blinkit.
In the post, the man going by the name Nitin wrote that "he had the most unpleasant experience with Blinkit and even blamed it on the 10-minute delivery." Nitin added that he would rather wait for hours than receive such items.
The tweet soon went viral garnering various reactions from netizens.
The grocery firm also responded to the tweet by regretting the delivery experience and asking Nitin to share order-related details.

Cabin crew's refusal for food to a six-year-old girl because they had to serve the corporate clients first has sparked a discussion online on flight etiquette.
The complaint by the flyer, Dr. OBGYN (@drnngujarathi) said, "The great IndiGo6E experience: My six-year-old kid was hungry. Requested the cabin crew to give her any food available, and willing to pay for it. Even on repeated requests, they refused saying they will serve corporate clients first. My daughter kept crying during the whole flight but they (the cabin crew) didn’t serve (food to her)." 
Responding to the tweet, a representative of the airline commented, "Sir, we understand what you must have gone through. Hope she is fine now. We'll certainly look into it and will connect with you tomorrow during working hours at your registered number." 
The tweet immediately sparked a flurry of comments on Twitter. While some internet users believed that the IndiGo cabin crew should have given preference to the hungry child, others blamed the parent for not carrying food with them. 
"As a parent of a six-year-old, first of all it is your duty to carry food with you. So blame your carelessness first. Agreed, the airline could have acted promptly. So first say that 'I as the parent of a six-year-old kid's parent didn't bring food and was expecting the airlines to serve me first," wrote Twitter user Kamal Raj (@KamalRajbharat).
"This is very bad manners. The airline could have at least served complementary biscuits or snacks to the kid. Adults can understand the situation but children can't. Airlines should be children friendly," wrote user Kiran Patel (@kirnpatel). 

IndiGo cabin crew's refusal for food to a 6-yr-old leaves internet divided

A section of them blamed the parent for flying without carrying food with them while another said that the IndiGo cabin crew should have given preference to the hungry child&nbsp;

Cabin crew's refusal for food to a six-year-old girl because they had to serve the corporate clients first has sparked a discussion online on flight etiquette.
The complaint by the flyer, Dr. OBGYN (@drnngujarathi) said, "The great IndiGo6E experience: My six-year-old kid was hungry. Requested the cabin crew to give her any food available, and willing to pay for it. Even on repeated requests, they refused saying they will serve corporate clients first. My daughter kept crying during the whole flight but they (the cabin crew) didn&rsquo;t serve (food to her)."&nbsp;
Also read/watch| <a title="Biggest rail strike in over 30 years hits UK" href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/biggest-rail-strike-in-over-30-years-hits-uk-1655804790772">Biggest rail strike in over 30 years hits UK</a>
Responding to the tweet, a representative of the airline commented, "Sir, we understand what you must have gone through. Hope she is fine now. We'll certainly look into it and will connect with you tomorrow during working hours at your registered number."&nbsp;
The tweet immediately sparked a flurry of comments on Twitter. While some internet users believed that the IndiGo cabin crew should have given preference to the hungry child, others blamed the parent for not carrying food with them.&nbsp;
"As a parent of a six-year-old, first of all it is your duty to carry food with you. So blame your carelessness first. Agreed, the airline could have acted promptly. So first say that 'I as the parent of a six-year-old kid's parent didn't bring food and was expecting the airlines to serve me first," wrote Twitter user Kamal Raj (@KamalRajbharat).
"This is very bad manners. The airline could have at least served complementary biscuits or snacks to the kid. Adults can understand the situation but children can't. Airlines should be children friendly," wrote user Kiran Patel (@kirnpatel).&nbsp;

Sunrisers&nbsp;Hyderabad suffered a big defeat to Rajasthan&nbsp;Royals in their first match in IPL&nbsp;2022. The match saw a controversial dismissal of Hyderabad's skipper Kane Williamson. The franchise&nbsp;has lodged a complaint against the third umpire to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) over this controversial dismissal.
Also read:&nbsp;IPL 2022: Simon Katich departure was a warning sign for Sunrisers Hyderabad, says Shane Watson
As quoted by Cricbuzz, an SRH&nbsp;official confirmed the same. SRH&nbsp;were chasing a mammoth target of 211 against&nbsp;RR, Williamson was batting but dismissed on&nbsp;Prasidh Krishna's delivery after being caught in the slips by Devdutt Padikkal. The on-field umpires couldn't give their verdict and it was referred to&nbsp;the third umpire. The replay suggested that the ball&nbsp;might have bounced before the caught but the decision went in the favour of the fielding side and Kane was given out.
IPL&nbsp;2022 Live Updates
Get all the Updates of IPL&nbsp;2022 here!

IPL 2022: Sunrisers raise complaint over third umpire's decision

Why are Sunrisers unhappy? What made them complain against third umpire in IPL?


Sunrisers&nbsp;Hyderabad suffered a big defeat to Rajasthan&nbsp;Royals in their first match in IPL&nbsp;2022. The match saw a controversial dismissal of Hyderabad's skipper Kane Williamson. The franchise&nbsp;has lodged a complaint against the third umpire to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) over this controversial dismissal.
As quoted by Cricbuzz, an SRH&nbsp;official confirmed the same. SRH&nbsp;were chasing a mammoth target of 211 against&nbsp;RR, Williamson was batting but dismissed on&nbsp;Prasidh Krishna's delivery after being caught in the slips by Devdutt Padikkal. The on-field umpires couldn't give their verdict and it was referred to&nbsp;the third umpire. The replay suggested that the ball&nbsp;might have bounced before the caught but the decision went in the favour of the fielding side and Kane was given out.

Sunrisers&nbsp;Hyderabad has lodged an official complaint against third umpire to BCCI&nbsp;over Kane's dismissal vs Rajasthan&nbsp;Royals. Kane was given caught out but the replay suggested that the ball might have bounced before caught.

Sunrisers&nbsp;Hyderabad suffered a big defeat to Rajasthan&nbsp;Royals in their first match in IPL&nbsp;2022. The match saw a controversial dismissal of Hyderabad's skipper Kane Williamson. The franchise&nbsp;has lodged a complaint against the third umpire to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) over this controversial dismissal.
Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news/ipl/ipl-2022-simon-katich-departure-was-a-warning-sign-for-sunrisers-hyderabad-says-shane-watson-1648827154881" target="_blank">IPL 2022: Simon Katich departure was a warning sign for Sunrisers Hyderabad, says Shane Watson</a>
As quoted by Cricbuzz, an SRH&nbsp;official confirmed the same. SRH&nbsp;were chasing a mammoth target of 211 against&nbsp;RR, Williamson was batting but dismissed on&nbsp;Prasidh Krishna's delivery after being caught in the slips by Devdutt Padikkal. The on-field umpires couldn't give their verdict and it was referred to&nbsp;the third umpire. The replay suggested that the ball&nbsp;might have bounced before the caught but the decision went in the favour of the fielding side and Kane was given out.
<a href="https://www.editorji.com/sportsblog/ipl/ipl-2022-live-score-gt-vs-dc-gujarat-titans-vs-delhi-capitals-live-toss-playing-xi-and-match-updates-60" target="_blank">IPL&nbsp;2022 Live Updates</a>
Get all the <a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news" target="_blank">Updates of </a><a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news" target="_blank">IPL&nbsp;2022</a> here!

complaint

Categories