Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Ban on public meetings, rallies on roads: SC to hear Andhra Pradesh's plea against HC order

A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha agreed to hear the Andhra Pradesh government&rsquo;s petition on Thursday after the standing counsel for the state sought an urgent hearing.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will hear on January 19 the plea of the Andhra Pradesh government challenging the high court's recent directive suspending the operation of a government order that prohibited public meetings and rallies on roads, including national highways.
A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha agreed to hear the Andhra Pradesh government&rsquo;s petition on Thursday after the standing counsel for the state sought an urgent hearing.
On January 12, the Andhra Pradesh High Court had suspended till January 23 the operation of the government order (GO) that barred public meetings and rallies on state roads and national highways.
"Court is prima facie of the opinion that the impugned GO No.1 is contrary to the procedure provided under Section 30 of the Police Act, 1861," it had held.
The high court had passed the interim order on a writ petition filed by CPI state secretary K Ramakrishna challenging the GO and posted the case for further hearing on January 20. It had sought the state government&rsquo;s response before that date.
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/with-akhilesh-kejriwal-mann-on-board-kcr-holds-key-meet-of-brs-in-telangana-1674053752422">With Akhilesh, Kejriwal, Mann on board, KCR holds key meet of BRS in Telangana</a>
The petitioner has contended before the high court that the GO was brought to "stifle" the opposition's voice against the government.
The Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy government had issued the order on January 2 midnight in the wake of a stampede at a rally organised by the main opposition Telugu Desam Party at Kandukuru on December 28 last year in which eight people were killed.
The prohibitory order (GO No. 1) was issued under the provisions of the Police Act, 1861 and the state police immediately started implementing it.

U'khand HC asks govt to ban construction work in Joshimath

U'khand HC asks govt to ban construction work in Joshimath | Land sinking

During the hearing, counsel on behalf of the state government and National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC) said that the government is very serious about this

A Uttarakhand High Court on Thursday asked the state government to strictly implement the ban on construction in Joshimath. Hearing a PIL on the crisis, a division bench of Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Alok Kumar Verma directed the government to form a committee of independent experts to look into the matter.
The court has directed the state government that the committee must include Disaster Management Authority CEO Piyush Rautela and MPS Bisht in it. The committee will present its report in a sealed envelope before the court within two months, the court has instructed.
During the hearing, counsel on behalf of the state government and National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC) said that the government is very serious about this matter.
"All construction work has been stopped in Joshimath and possible help is being given to the affected. The government is taking the help of Wadia Institute experts regarding landslides," the counsel added.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/local/ntpc-says-tunnel-one-km-away-from-town-1-1-km-below-ground-joshimath-land-sinking-1673599095738">NTPC says tunnel one km away from town, 1.1 km below ground | Joshimath land sinking</a>

New Zealand imposes lifetime ban on youth buying cigarettes

 

Lifetime ban on New Zealand youth from buying cigarettes. Here's why

The ban means that the minimum age for buying cigarettes will keep going up and up. In theory, somebody trying to buy a pack of cigarettes 50 years from now would need ID to show they were at least 63 years old




<header class="entry__header">
The ban means that the minimum age for buying cigarettes will keep going up and up. In theory, somebody trying to buy a pack of cigarettes 50 years from now would need ID to show they were at least 63 years old
</header>
<div class="mediaitem mediaitem--image">&nbsp;</div>

New Zealand on Tuesday passed into law a unique plan to phase out tobacco smoking by imposing a lifetime ban on young people buying cigarettes.
The law states that tobacco can't ever be sold to anybody born on or after Jan 1, 2009.
It means the minimum age for buying cigarettes will keep going up and up. In theory, somebody trying to buy a pack of cigarettes 50 years from now would need ID to show they were at least 63 years old.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/new-zealand-pm-ardern-caught-on-hot-mic-calling-opposition-leader-an-arrogant-prick-1670929008666">New Zealand PM Ardern caught on hot mic calling opposition leader an &lsquo;arrogant prick&rsquo;</a>
But health authorities hope smoking will fade away well before then. They have a stated goal of making New Zealand smoke-free by 2025.
The new law also reduces the number of retailers allowed to sell tobacco from about 6,000 to 600 and decreases the amount of nicotine allowed in tobacco that is smoked.
&ldquo;There is no good reason to allow a product to be sold that kills half the people that use it,&rdquo; Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall told lawmakers in Parliament. &ldquo;And I can tell you that we will end this in the future, as we pass this legislation.&rdquo; She said the health system would save billions of dollars from not needing to treat illnesses caused by smoking, such as cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and amputations. She said the bill would create generational change and leave a legacy of better health for youth.
Lawmakers voted along party lines in passing the legislation 76 to 43.
The libertarian ACT party, which opposed the bill, said many small corner stores, known in New Zealand as dairies, would go out of business because they would no longer be able to sell cigarettes.
&ldquo;We stand opposed to this bill because it's a bad bill and its bad policy, its that straightforward and simple,&rdquo; said Brooke van Velden, ACT's deputy leader. &ldquo;There won't be better outcomes for New Zealanders.&rdquo; She said the gradual ban amounted to "nanny-state prohibition" that would end up creating a large black market. She said prohibition never worked and always ended with unintended consequences.
The law does not affect vaping, which has already become more popular than smoking in New Zealand.
Statistics New Zealand reported last month that 8% of New Zealand adults smoked daily, down from 16% ten years ago. Meanwhile, 8.3% of adults vaped daily, up from less than 1% six years ago.
Smoking rates remain higher among Indigenous Maori, with about 20% reporting they smoked.
New Zealand already restricts cigarette sales to those aged 18 and over, requires tobacco packs to come with graphic health warnings and cigarettes to be sold in standardised packs.
New Zealand in recent years also imposed a series of hefty tax hikes on cigarettes.
The law change was welcomed by several health agencies. Health Coalition Aotearoa said the new law represented the culmination of decades of hard-fought advocacy by health and community organisations.

'Unacceptable risk': US regulator bans Huawei, ZTE from selling their products 

Huawei declined comment Friday. Along with Huawei and ZTE, the order affects products made by companies such as Hikvision and Dahua, makers of widely used video surveillance cameras.

The US is banning the sale of communications equipment made by Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE and restricting the use of some China-made video surveillance systems, citing an &ldquo;unacceptable risk&rdquo; to national security.
The five-member Federal Communications Commission said Friday it has voted unanimously to adopt new rules that will block the importation or sale of certain technology products that pose security risks to US critical infrastructure. It's the latest in a years-long escalation of US restrictions of Chinese technology that began with President Donald Trump and has continued under President Joe Biden's administration.
&ldquo;The FCC is committed to protecting our national security by ensuring that untrustworthy communications equipment is not authorized for use within our borders, and we are continuing that work here,&rdquo; said FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat, in a prepared statement.
Huawei declined comment Friday. Along with Huawei and ZTE, the order affects products made by companies such as Hikvision and Dahua, makers of widely used video surveillance cameras.
Also Watch| <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/uk-court-to-hear-case-to-ban-xinjiang-cotton-as-protest-against-uyghur-forced-labour-by-china-govt-1666706153717">UK court to hear case to ban Xinjiang cotton as protest against 'Uyghur forced labour' by China govt</a>
The FCC's order applies to future authorizations of equipment, though the agency leaves open the possibility it could revoke previous authorizations.
&ldquo;Our unanimous decision represents the first time in FCC history that we have voted to prohibit the authorization of new equipment based on national security concerns,&rdquo; tweeted Brendan Carr, a Republican FCC commissioner.
Carr added that as &ldquo;a result of our order, no new Huawei or ZTE equipment can be approved. And no new Dahua, Hikvision, or Hytera gear can be approved unless they assure the FCC that their gear won't be used for public safety, security of government facilities, &amp; other national security purposes.&rdquo;&nbsp;

Karnataka Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Wednesday welcomed the Union government's decision to ban the Popular Front of India (PFI) for its alleged terror activities, and said the move sends a message to all "anti-national groups" that they will not survive in this country.
He said all that is necessary would be done to stop PFI's activities in the state.
"For a long time, it has been a demand by the people of this country, by all political parties including the opposition CPI, CPI(M) and the Congress. PFI is the avatar (incarnation) of SIMI (banned Students' Islamic Movement of India), and KFD (Karnataka Forum for Dignity). They were involved in anti-national activities and violence," Bommai said.
Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, he said they had their command outside the country and some of their important office-bearers had even gone across the border for the training.
The PFI was involved in all sorts of anti-social activities and time had come to ban this organisation, Bommai added.
"With a lot of background work, information, and cases, the Government of India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah has taken the right decision. This is the message for all anti-national groups that they will not survive in this country. I also urge people not to associate with such organisations," he added.
To a question that PFI was strong in coastal Karnataka and the task before the state government to remove them, the Chief Minister said, "Whatever necessary, will be done." In a notification issued late Tuesday night, the Union Home Ministry banned the PFI saying the central government is of the opinion that the Islamist outfit and its affiliates have been involved in subversive activities, thereby disturbing public order and undermining constitutional set up of the country and encouraging and enforcing a terror-based regressive regime.
It continues "propagating anti-national sentiments and radicalising a particular section of society" with the intention to create disaffection against the country, it said.
Welcoming the Centre's decision to ban PFI, Home Minister Araga Jnanendra said it is a right move for the country's unity and integrity, and to maintain peace and order.

K'taka CM Basavaraj Bommai welcomes ban on PFI, says it is an embodiment of SIMMI & KFD

Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, he said they had their command outside the country and some of their important office-bearers had even gone across the border for the training.

Karnataka Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Wednesday welcomed the Union government's decision to ban the Popular Front of India (PFI) for its alleged terror activities, and said the move sends a message to all "anti-national groups" that they will not survive in this country.
He said all that is necessary would be done to stop PFI's activities in the state.
"For a long time, it has been a demand by the people of this country, by all political parties including the opposition CPI, CPI(M) and the Congress. PFI is the avatar (incarnation) of SIMI (banned Students' Islamic Movement of India), and KFD (Karnataka Forum for Dignity). They were involved in anti-national activities and violence," Bommai said.
Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, he said they had their command outside the country and some of their important office-bearers had even gone across the border for the training.
The PFI was involved in all sorts of anti-social activities and time had come to ban this organisation, Bommai added.
"With a lot of background work, information, and cases, the Government of India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah has taken the right decision. This is the message for all anti-national groups that they will not survive in this country. I also urge people not to associate with such organisations," he added.
Also Watch| <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/centre-bans-popular-front-of-india-and-its-affiliates-for-five-years-with-immediate-effect-1664332321542">Centre bans Popular Front of India and its affiliates for five years with immediate effect</a>
To a question that PFI was strong in coastal Karnataka and the task before the state government to remove them, the Chief Minister said, "Whatever necessary, will be done." In a notification issued late Tuesday night, the Union Home Ministry banned the PFI saying the central government is of the opinion that the Islamist outfit and its affiliates have been involved in subversive activities, thereby disturbing public order and undermining constitutional set up of the country and encouraging and enforcing a terror-based regressive regime.
It continues "propagating anti-national sentiments and radicalising a particular section of society" with the intention to create disaffection against the country, it said.
Welcoming the Centre's decision to ban PFI, Home Minister Araga Jnanendra said it is a right move for the country's unity and integrity, and to maintain peace and order.

Pakistan’s media watchdog has banned broadcasting live speeches of former prime minister Imran Khan on all satellite television channels with immediate effect.

Pak media watchdog imposes ban on broadcasting ex-PM Imran Khan’s live speeches

Pakistan’s media watchdog has banned broadcasting live speeches of former prime minister Imran Khan on all satellite television channels with immediate effect, hours after he threatened state institutions and government officials while addressing a rally in Islamabad. 

During a rally was organised by Khan&rsquo;s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party to express solidarity with Gill and stage a protest against what Khan claimed was &ldquo;blatant fascism&rdquo; prevalent under the &ldquo;imported regime&rdquo; of prime minister Shehbaz Sharif.&nbsp;

Pakistan&rsquo;s media watchdog has banned broadcasting live speeches of former prime minister Imran Khan on all satellite television channels with immediate effect, hours after he threatened state institutions and government officials while addressing a rally in Islamabad.
Khan, while addressing a public gathering here on Saturday, threatened to file cases against top police officials, a woman magistrate, the Election Commission of Pakistan and political opponents over the treatment meted out to his aide Shahbaz Gill, who was arrested last week on charges of sedition.
The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) in a communique issued on Saturday said that television channels despite repeated warnings had failed to implement a time-delay mechanism to stop the broadcast of material against &ldquo;state institutions&rdquo;.
"It has been observed that Mr Imran Khan, Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, in his speeches/statements is continuously alleging state institutions by levelling baseless allegations and spreading hate speech through his provocative statements against state institutions and officers which is prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order and is likely to disturb public peace and tranquility," it said.
The regulator said Khan&rsquo;s speeches were in violation of Article 19 of the Constitution and against the code of conduct for media.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/somalia-hotel-siege-by-al-shabab-ends-after-30-hours-13-civilians-killed-report-1661073017069">Somalia hotel siege by Al-Shabab ends after 30 hours, 13 civilians killed: Report</a>
"The competent authority i.e. Chairman PEMRA in view of the above-mentioned background and reasons, in exercise of delegated powers of the authority vested in Section 27(a) of the PEMRA Ordinance 2002 as amended by PEMRA (Amendment) Act 2007, hereby prohibits broadcast of live speech of Imran Khan on all satellite TV channels with immediate effect," it added.
PEMRA, however, said Khan&rsquo;s recorded speech would only be permitted to be aired after an effective delay mechanism to ensure monitoring and editorial control.
Saturday&rsquo;s rally was organised by Khan&rsquo;s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party to express solidarity with Gill and stage a protest against what Khan claimed was &ldquo;blatant fascism&rdquo; prevalent under the &ldquo;imported regime&rdquo; of prime minister Shehbaz Sharif.
During the rally, Khan didn&rsquo;t spare Pakistan&rsquo;s Army, calling it &ldquo;neutrals&rdquo;, and urged his supporters to stand with the nation rather than the &ldquo;gang of thieves&rdquo;, in a veiled reference to the coalition government.
He also lashed out at the judiciary, terming them as &ldquo;biased&rdquo;.
While the Pakistan Army has not responded to Khan&rsquo;s barb, political parties such as Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, Pakistan Peoples Party, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl and Mutahida Quami Movement Pakistan have asked the judiciary to take legal action against Khan and his aides for threatening a female judge and intimidating police officers.
Meanwhile, Khan has said that he will address a rally at Rawalpindi&rsquo;s Liaquat Bagh ground later on Sunday.
Since he was ousted from power in April, Khan, the cricketer-turned-politician has repeatedly claimed that the no-trust motion against him was the result of a &ldquo;foreign conspiracy&rdquo;.
Khan has also emphasised that his party would not deal with or accept the &ldquo;imported government&rdquo; headed by prime minister Sharif.

Rugby became the second sport to ban Transgender women after the world swimming body FINA adopted a new gender inclusion policy. 
After the newly imposed ban, Transgender players will be not allowed to compete in the women's World Cup, hosted by England, in October. 
Also read: FIFA to review transgender eligibility rules after change in FINA swimming's policy
International Rugby League said in the statement that they need further consultation before finalising their Transgender policy. 
Swimming was the first international sport to ban Transgender women.
Also read: World swimming body bans transgender athletes from women's competitions
Meanwhile, World Athletics followed FIFA's suit and is currently reviewing their Transgender Policy as well. 
In a conversation with BBC, World Athletics president Lord Coe hinted that sport could follow FINA's move, adding fairness is non-negotiable. 

Rugby follows FINA's move, bans Transgender players for women's world cup in October

With many international sports organisations reviewing trans athletes' participation, Rugby has become the second sport to ban transgender women

Rugby follows FINA's move, bans transgender players for Women's World Cup in October

With several international sports organisations reviewing trans athletes' participation, the International Rugby League has banned transgender players from women's international competitions.

Rugby became the second sport to ban transgender women after the world swimming body FINA voted to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in elite women's competitions.&nbsp;
After the newly imposed ban by the International Rugby League (IRL), transgender players will be not allowed to compete at the women's World Cup in England later this year.
Also read: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news/football/fifa-to-review-transgender-eligibility-rules-after-change-in-swimming-s-policy-1655789664759" target="_blank">FIFA to review transgender eligibility rules after change in FINA swimming's policy</a>
The IRL said in the statement that they need further consultation before finalising their transgender policy.&nbsp;
Swimming was the first international sport to ban Transgender women.
Also read: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news/others-sports/world-swimming-body-bans-transgender-athletes-from-women-s-competitions-1655707847599" target="_blank">World swimming body bans transgender athletes from women's competitions</a>
Meanwhile, World Athletics and FIFA are currently reviewing their transgender policy as well.&nbsp;
In a conversation with the BBC, World Athletics president Sebastian Coe hinted that they could follow FINA's move, adding that 'fairness is non-negotiable'.&nbsp;

Days after Elon Musk bought Twitter, the social media giant banned a high-profile account. CEO of the pillow company MyPillow Mike Lindell was banned from Twitter - for the second time - on May 1.
Twitter said that Lindell's new account was permanently suspended for violating the social media platform's rules on ban evasion.
The ban is grabbing headlines since Twitter's new owner Elon Musk has been critical of the company's censorship rules. Musk claimed to be a "free speech absolutist" who would allow all kinds of content on Twitter as long as it wasn't illegal.
Mike Lindell had first been banned by Twitter in January 2021 over his claims on the US Presidential election. Lindell had repeatedly claimed that Donald Trump had won the 2020 election, insinuating that Joe Biden rigged the election. Twitter had banned Lindell for "repeated violations" of its civic integrity policy.
Donald Trump himself was banned by Twitter following the riots at Capitol Hill in January 2021.

Elon Musk's Twitter bans CEO of MyPillow Mike Lindell after he creates new account to avoid 2021 suspension

Elon Musk's Twitter bans CEO of MyPillow Mike Lindell's new account made to avoid 2021 suspension

Days after Elon Musk bought Twitter, the social media giant banned a high-profile account. CEO of the pillow company MyPillow Mike Lindell was banned from Twitter - for the second time - on May 1. Twitter said that Lindell's new account was permanently suspended for violating the social media platform's rules on ban evasion. The ban is grabbing headlines since Twitter's new owner Elon Musk has been critical of the company's censorship rules. Musk claimed to be a "free speech absolutist" who would allow all kinds of content on Twitter as long as it wasn't illegal. Mike Lindell had first been banned by Twitter in January 2021 over his claims on the US Presidential election. Lindell had repeatedly claimed that Donald Trump had won the 2020 election, insinuating that Joe Biden rigged the election. Twitter had banned Lindell for "repeated violations" of its civic integrity policy. Donald Trump himself was banned by Twitter following the riots at Capitol Hill in January 2021.
&nbsp;
 ==================================
&nbsp;
CAPTIONS Twitter banned MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell banned again Musk recently bought TwitterMusk a 'free speech absolutist' Lindell first banned in 2021 Lindell claimed US polls rigged

<div class="elementToProof" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 12pt; line-height: inherit; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff;">
<div class="elementToProof" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-weight: 400; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 14px; line-height: inherit; font-family: 'Segoe UI', 'Segoe UI Web (West European)', 'Segoe UI', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: #000000; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 12pt; line-height: inherit; font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; display: inline !important;">Mike Lindell was first banned by Twitter in 2021 - a year before Elon Musk's takeover - for<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 12pt; line-height: inherit; font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: #000000;">&nbsp;claiming Donald Trump won the 2020 US Presidential election.</div>
</div>

Days after Elon Musk bought Twitter, the social media giant banned a high-profile account.&nbsp;CEO of the pillow company MyPillow Mike Lindell was banned from Twitter - for the second time - on May 1.
Twitter said that Lindell's new account was permanently suspended for violating the social media platform's rules on ban evasion.
The ban is grabbing headlines since Twitter's new owner Elon Musk has been critical of the company's censorship rules.&nbsp;Musk claimed to be a "free speech absolutist" who would allow all kinds of content on Twitter as long as it wasn't illegal.
ALSO WATCH:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/donald-trump-s-big-move-after-elon-musk-buys-twitter-first-post-on-truth-social-says-covfefe-1651293342052" target="_blank">Donald Trump&rsquo;s big move after Elon Musk buys Twitter: first post on Truth Social, says &lsquo;Covfefe&rsquo;</a>
Mike Lindell had first been banned by Twitter in January 2021 over his claims on the US Presidential election.&nbsp;Lindell had repeatedly claimed that Donald Trump had won the 2020 election, insinuating that Joe Biden rigged the election. Twitter had banned Lindell for "repeated violations" of its civic integrity policy.
Donald Trump himself was banned by Twitter following the riots at Capitol Hill in January 2021.
ALSO WATCH:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/editorji-specials/the-india-story/the-india-story-episode-4-will-elon-musk-be-able-to-solve-twitter-s-disinformation-problem-1651236587447" target="_blank">The India Story Episode 4 | Will Elon Musk be able to solve Twitter's disinformation problem?</a>

ban

Categories