Supreme Court questions creation of 'parasite' class through freebies

In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India raised serious concerns over the practice of political parties promising freebies ahead of elections. The court suggested that such practices might discourage people from working, potentially fostering a "class of parasites" in society.

During discussions on the right to shelter for homeless urban individuals, Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih noted that people were receiving provisions and financial aid without contributing labor.

Justice Gavai specifically mentioned schemes like Maharashtra's 'Ladki Bahin', which provides women aged 21-65 with Rs 1,500 monthly if their annual family income is under Rs 2.5 lakh. He criticized these pre-election promises, stating they detract from motivating people to join the workforce and engage in nation-building.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan suggested people are willing to work if given opportunities. However, Justice Gavai countered with an example from his agricultural background in Maharashtra, where announced freebies prior to elections led to a shortage of laborers for farmers.

The court emphasized the necessity for balance. Although there is consensus on addressing homelessness, there is also a need to consider the broader implications of distributing freebies.

Attorney General R Venkataramani mentioned the government's efforts in finalizing an urban poverty alleviation mission to address issues like homelessness.

The court cautioned against political rhetoric when a petitioner argued that the government's compassion was skewed towards the wealthy. Justice Gavai dismissed these claims, reiterating the impartiality required in addressing such issues.

This hearing is part of ongoing deliberations on the matter, with attention also drawn to previous criticisms by the Supreme Court over free ration distribution. A similar sentiment was echoed by another bench in December, which questioned the prolonged provision of such benefits without creating sustainable employment solutions.

The debate over freebies also extends to political arenas. The Delhi High Court refrained from hearing a petition against promises made by political parties ahead of the Delhi Assembly elections, suggesting the petitioner approach the Supreme Court instead. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has frequently criticized parties like AAP and Congress for allegedly using freebies to secure votes, while those parties argue the funds effectively improve citizens' lives amid rising inflation and unemployment. The Supreme Court is set to revisit the matter in six weeks.