Name: CBI pressurised Amit Shah to frame Modi under UPA rule? Here's what he said
Uploaded: 2023-03-30T10:22:37.000+05:30
Duration: T00M30S
Channel: PTI
Description: Shah said this in response to a question on Opposition's charge that the Narendra Modi government is "misusing' central agencies to target them.

The Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.

Article 370 verdict | Jammu and Kashmir didn't retain sovereignty when it acceded to India: SC

The Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, the Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.
Citing the Instrument of Accession, CJI DY Chandrachud said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain an element of sovereignty when it joined the Union of India.
He added that a proclamation issued by Yuvraj Karan Singh in 1949 said the Constitution of India would supersede all other constitutionals provisions in the state.
The proclamation reflects the full and final surrender of sovereignty by Jammu and Kashmir to its sovereign ruler India, said Chandrachud.
The CJI further said that the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir was only to further define the relationship between the Union of India and the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Leaders of political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have claimed that they were put under house arrest ahead of SC's verdict on Article 370

Omar Abdullah vs J&K Lieutenant Governor as SC announces 370 verdict

Leaders of political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have claimed that they were put under house arrest ahead of SC's verdict on Article 370

Leaders of National Conference and PDP posted pictures of locks on the gates of their houses in Kashmir and claimed that they have been put under house arrest ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on abrogation of Article 370.&nbsp;
J&amp;K Lieutenant Goveror Manoj Sinha denied the claims and said it is an attempt to spread rumours. He said no one has been put under house arrest or been arrested due to political reasons.&nbsp;
Reacting to Sinha's comments, NC leader Omar Abdullah posted pictures of his gates and said 'Dear Mr LG these chains that have been put on my gate have not been put by me so why are you denying what your police force has done. It&rsquo;s also possible you don&rsquo;t even know what your police is doing? Which one is it? Are you being dishonest or is your police acting independent of you?'
upheld the government's decision to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and said steps should be taken to conduct elections in the assembly by September 30 next year.
Writing the judgement for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant, Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said Article 370 of the Constitution was a temporary provision and the president has the power to revoke it.
The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019.
The erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir does not have internal sovereignty different from other states of the country, he said.
(with PTI inputs)
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/abrogation-of-article-370-is-legal-supreme-court-1702276211210">Abrogation of Article 370 is legal: Supreme Court</a>

Omar Abdullah has said that he is disappointed but not disheartened with the Supreme Court's verdict on pleas challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution.

SC verdict on Article 370: Omar Abdullah is disappointed but not...

Omar Abdullah has said that he is disappointed but not disheartened with the Supreme Court's verdict on pleas challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution.

National Conference leader Omar Abdullah has reacted to the Supreme Court verdict upholding Centre's decision to remove provisions of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir.&nbsp;
'Disappointed but not disheartened. The struggle will continue. It took the BJP decades to reach here. We are also prepared for the long haul,' the former J&amp;K chief minister tweeted.&nbsp;
Ahead of the verdict, he had tweeted that pictures of locks on the gates of his house and said that he has been put under house arrest.&nbsp;
He tweeted 'Dear Mr LG these chains that have been put on my gate have not been put by me so why are you denying what your police force has done. It&rsquo;s also possible you don&rsquo;t even know what your police is doing? Which one is it? Are you being dishonest or is your police acting independent of you?'
PDP also claimed that their leader Mehbooba Mufti was put under house arrest ahead of the verdict.&nbsp;
Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has denied these claims
The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the Centre's August 5, 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed a special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and said steps should be taken to conduct elections to the Assembly in the Union Territory by September 30 next year.
The apex court also directed that statehood to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir be restored at the earliest.

Editorji is your personalised video news platform, we learn about your interests in order to show the news that matters to you! Watch it on your phone, tablet or TV.

ABOUT US

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Cyclone Michaung

Shah said this in response to a question on Opposition's charge that the Narendra Modi government is "misusing' central agencies to target them.

CBI pressurised Amit Shah to frame Modi under UPA rule? Here's what he said

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday said the CBI put pressure on him to "frame" Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Shah said this in response to a question on Opposition's charge that the Narendra Modi government is "misusing' central agencies to target them.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday said the CBI was "putting pressure" on him to "frame" Prime Minister Narendra Modi in an alleged fake encounter case in Gujarat when he was being questioned by the probe agency during the Congress-led UPA government.
Shah said this at the 'News 18 Rising India' programme in response to a question on Opposition's charge that the Narendra Modi government is "misusing' central agencies to target them.
The CBI "was putting pressure" on me to "frame Modi ji" (when he was Gujarat CM) in an alleged fake encounter case during the Congress government," he said, adding that the BJP never raised a ruckus despite this.&nbsp;
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/no-foreign-diplomat-what-jaishankar-said-on-rahul-gandhi-disqualification-row-1680138852901">'No foreign diplomat...': what Jaishankar said on Rahul Gandhi disqualification row</a>

Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said highlighted the plight of people who migrated from Jammu and Kashmir from 1989 to 1990. He said the migration was voluntary.

Part of population left J&K in 1989-90, it was not voluntary migration: Justice Kaul

Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said highlighted the plight of people who migrated from Jammu and Kashmir from 1989 to 1990. He said the migration was voluntary.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul recommended setting up a 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission'. He stressed on the need to understand the human rights violation.
Justice Kaul said that the valley of Kashmir carries a historical burden and that the people are victims of conflicts.
He noted that a part of the population migrated from J&amp;K in 1989-90. "It was not a voluntary migration," said Justice Kaul.
He noted that parts of Kashmir are occupied by foreign nations.
The Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370 and ordered Election Commission to hold assembly elections by September 30, 2024.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of the Kammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.

Hold J&K Assembly elections before September 30, 2024: CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of the Kammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the abrogation of Article 370. However, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.
"We direct that steps shall be taken by the Election Commission of India to conduct elections to the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir constituted under Section 14 of the Reorganisation Act by September 30, 2024. Restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible," the CJI said.
Justice Chandrachud referred to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's statement that Jammu and Kashmir's statehood will be restored, except for the carving out of the Union Territory of Ladakh.
"In view of the statement we do not find it necessary to determine whether the reorganisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories of Ladakh and Jammu and Kashmir is permissible under Article 3.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said there is a need to understand the human rights violation in Jammu and Kashmir. He suggested forming a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Article 370 verdict | Form Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Justice Kaul

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said there is a need to understand the human rights violation in Jammu and Kashmir. He suggested forming a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul recommended setting up a 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission'. He stressed on the need to understand the human rights violation.
Justice Kaul said that truth telling provides an opportunity for the victims to share their experiences and helps heal the wounds. He added that it also paves the way for reconciliation.&nbsp;
Justice Kaul further said that the human rights violation in the Valley must by both state and non-state actors must be recorded. He also drew attention to the part of population that migrated from Kashmir in 1989-90.
The Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370 and ordered Election Commission to hold assembly elections by September 30, 2024.

Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Mahua Moitra moves SC against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Mahua Moitra moves SC against expulsion from Lok Sabha
TMC MP was expelled in cash-for-query case
Moitra accused of taking money to ask questions in Parliament

Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has challenged her expulsion from the Lok Sabha in Supreme Court.&nbsp;
Moitra was expelled from the Lok Sabha on Friday after an ethics panel said in its report that the parliamentarian had engaged in 'unethical conduct'.&nbsp;
The panel found her guilty of of accepting gifts and illegal gratification from a businessman to further his interest. She was accused of taking money to ask questions in Parliament.&nbsp;
The ethics panel had recommended her expulsion and on Friday the Lok Sabha acted on it and expelled her.&nbsp;
&nbsp;

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.

Article 370 a temporary provision, not permanent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.
Chief Justice of Indian DY Chandrachud said, "Article 370 was introduced to serve two purposes. First, the transitional purpose to provide for an interim arrangement until the Constituent Assembly of the state was formed."
It was an interim arrangement in the view of the special circumstances because of the war conditions in the state, the CJI added.
The court also said that when Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India, it did not retain its sovereignty. Justice Chandrachud said that a proclamation issued by Yuvraj Karan Singh in 1949 said the Constitution of India would supersede all other constitutionals provisions in the state.
The proclamation reflects the full and final surrender of sovereignty by Jammu and Kashmir to its sovereign ruler India, said the CJI.

Highlights

Latest news

CBI pressurised Amit Shah to frame Modi under UPA rule? Here's what he said

Up Next

More videos

Categories

Trending topics