Name: Karnataka education minister defends move to remove hijab ban in exams
Uploaded: 2023-10-24T08:38:32.000+05:30
Duration: T00M35S
Channel: Editorji News Desk
Description: Karnataka education minister MC Sudhakar defended his government's decision to allow hijabs during exams.

Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said highlighted the plight of people who migrated from Jammu and Kashmir from 1989 to 1990. He said the migration was voluntary.

Part of population left J&K in 1989-90, it was not voluntary migration: Justice Kaul

Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said highlighted the plight of people who migrated from Jammu and Kashmir from 1989 to 1990. He said the migration was voluntary.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul recommended setting up a 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission'. He stressed on the need to understand the human rights violation.
Justice Kaul said that the valley of Kashmir carries a historical burden and that the people are victims of conflicts.
He noted that a part of the population migrated from J&amp;K in 1989-90. "It was not a voluntary migration," said Justice Kaul.
He noted that parts of Kashmir are occupied by foreign nations.
The Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370 and ordered Election Commission to hold assembly elections by September 30, 2024.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of the Kammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.

Hold J&K Assembly elections before September 30, 2024: CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of the Kammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the abrogation of Article 370. However, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud called for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood as soon as possible.
"We direct that steps shall be taken by the Election Commission of India to conduct elections to the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir constituted under Section 14 of the Reorganisation Act by September 30, 2024. Restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible," the CJI said.
Justice Chandrachud referred to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's statement that Jammu and Kashmir's statehood will be restored, except for the carving out of the Union Territory of Ladakh.
"In view of the statement we do not find it necessary to determine whether the reorganisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories of Ladakh and Jammu and Kashmir is permissible under Article 3.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said there is a need to understand the human rights violation in Jammu and Kashmir. He suggested forming a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Article 370 verdict | Form Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Justice Kaul

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul said there is a need to understand the human rights violation in Jammu and Kashmir. He suggested forming a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, Supreme Court Justice SK Kaul recommended setting up a 'Truth and Reconciliation Commission'. He stressed on the need to understand the human rights violation.
Justice Kaul said that truth telling provides an opportunity for the victims to share their experiences and helps heal the wounds. He added that it also paves the way for reconciliation.&nbsp;
Justice Kaul further said that the human rights violation in the Valley must by both state and non-state actors must be recorded. He also drew attention to the part of population that migrated from Kashmir in 1989-90.
The Supreme Court upheld the abrogation of Article 370 and ordered Election Commission to hold assembly elections by September 30, 2024.

Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Mahua Moitra moves SC against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Mahua Moitra moves SC against expulsion from Lok Sabha
TMC MP was expelled in cash-for-query case
Moitra accused of taking money to ask questions in Parliament

Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court against expulsion from Lok Sabha

Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has challenged her expulsion from the Lok Sabha in Supreme Court.&nbsp;
Moitra was expelled from the Lok Sabha on Friday after an ethics panel said in its report that the parliamentarian had engaged in 'unethical conduct'.&nbsp;
The panel found her guilty of of accepting gifts and illegal gratification from a businessman to further his interest. She was accused of taking money to ask questions in Parliament.&nbsp;
The ethics panel had recommended her expulsion and on Friday the Lok Sabha acted on it and expelled her.&nbsp;
&nbsp;

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.

Article 370 a temporary provision, not permanent: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.

The Supreme Court has said that Article 370 was a temporary provision and not a permanent one.
Chief Justice of Indian DY Chandrachud said, "Article 370 was introduced to serve two purposes. First, the transitional purpose to provide for an interim arrangement until the Constituent Assembly of the state was formed."
It was an interim arrangement in the view of the special circumstances because of the war conditions in the state, the CJI added.
The court also said that when Jammu and Kashmir acceded to India, it did not retain its sovereignty. Justice Chandrachud said that a proclamation issued by Yuvraj Karan Singh in 1949 said the Constitution of India would supersede all other constitutionals provisions in the state.
The proclamation reflects the full and final surrender of sovereignty by Jammu and Kashmir to its sovereign ruler India, said the CJI.

The Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.

Article 370 verdict | Jammu and Kashmir didn't retain sovereignty when it acceded to India: SC

The Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.

Announcing the verdict on Article 370, the Supreme Court said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it acceded to India.
Citing the Instrument of Accession, CJI DY Chandrachud said that Jammu and Kashmir did not retain an element of sovereignty when it joined the Union of India.
He added that a proclamation issued by Yuvraj Karan Singh in 1949 said the Constitution of India would supersede all other constitutionals provisions in the state.
The proclamation reflects the full and final surrender of sovereignty by Jammu and Kashmir to its sovereign ruler India, said Chandrachud.
The CJI further said that the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir was only to further define the relationship between the Union of India and the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Leaders of political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have claimed that they were put under house arrest ahead of SC's verdict on Article 370

Omar Abdullah vs J&K Lieutenant Governor as SC announces 370 verdict

Leaders of political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have claimed that they were put under house arrest ahead of SC's verdict on Article 370

Leaders of National Conference and PDP posted pictures of locks on the gates of their houses in Kashmir and claimed that they have been put under house arrest ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on abrogation of Article 370.&nbsp;
J&amp;K Lieutenant Goveror Manoj Sinha denied the claims and said it is an attempt to spread rumours. He said no one has been put under house arrest or been arrested due to political reasons.&nbsp;
Reacting to Sinha's comments, NC leader Omar Abdullah posted pictures of his gates and said 'Dear Mr LG these chains that have been put on my gate have not been put by me so why are you denying what your police force has done. It&rsquo;s also possible you don&rsquo;t even know what your police is doing? Which one is it? Are you being dishonest or is your police acting independent of you?'
upheld the government's decision to abrogate Article 370, which bestowed special status on the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and said steps should be taken to conduct elections in the assembly by September 30 next year.
Writing the judgement for himself and Justices Gavai and Surya Kant, Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said Article 370 of the Constitution was a temporary provision and the president has the power to revoke it.
The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019.
The erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir does not have internal sovereignty different from other states of the country, he said.
(with PTI inputs)
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/abrogation-of-article-370-is-legal-supreme-court-1702276211210">Abrogation of Article 370 is legal: Supreme Court</a>

Editorji is your personalised video news platform, we learn about your interests in order to show the news that matters to you! Watch it on your phone, tablet or TV.

ABOUT US

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Cyclone Michaung

Karnataka education minister MC Sudhakar defended his government's decision to allow hijabs during exams.

Karnataka education minister defends move to remove hijab ban in exams

Karnataka education minister MC Sudhakar defended his government's decision to allow hijabs during exams.

Karnataka Education Minister MC Sudhakar has defended the state government&rsquo;s decision to allow students to wear the hijab while appearing for competitive and recruitment examinations.
This comes after some pro-Hindutva groups threatened to protest, while BJP legislator Yashpal Suvarna urged the Congress government to reconsider its decision.
In response, the Congress leader said people who are protesting should verify the guidelines of the NEET exam, which allows wearing hijabs.
Last year, a ban on hijab was imposed under the BJP regime.
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/local/two-dead-three-hurt-in-mumbai-building-fire-1698058351071">Two dead, three hurt in Mumbai building fire</a>

Owaisi on SC Article 370 verdict:  biggest losers will be Dogras, Buddhists

Owaisi on SC Article 370 verdict:  biggest losers will be Dogras, Buddhists

In his response to the Supreme Court verdict on Article 370, AIMIM chief Assaduddin Owaisi asked why the apex court didn't set a timeline for the restoration of statehood of Jammu and Kashmir.&nbsp;

AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi on Monday said the biggest losers of the Union's decision to abrogate Article 370 will be the Dogras of Jammu and Buddhists of Ladakh, who will have to face demographic change.
He responded to the Supreme Court verdict upholding the Centre's decision to abrogate Article 370 on X (formerly Twitter).
"The biggest losers of the Union's decision will be the Dogras of Jammu and Buddhists of Ladakh, who will have to face demographic change," he said.
He asked as to why there is no timeline on the reinstatement of statehood.
"It&rsquo;s already been five years of Delhi rule in J&amp;K. Assembly elections should be held in the state at the earliest. Along with Lok Sabha elections in 2024," he said.
There was no doubt that the state is an integral part of India, but being an integral part does not mean that it did not have a distinct constitutional relationship with the Union, he claimed.
"This constitutional relationship was made permanent after the dissolution of the constituent assembly of Kashmir," he said.
He alleged that once the Centre's decision on abrogation of Article 370 is legitimised, there is nothing stopping the Union Government from making Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad or Mumbai a Union Territory.
"I have said it once and I will say it again. Once this has been legitimised, there is nothing stopping the union govt from making Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad or Mumbai a Union Territory," he said.
Citing the example of Ladakh, Owaisi said it is being ruled by Lt. Governor, with no democratic representation at all.
Article 370 was abrogated without any public deliberation taking place in Kashmir and without an elected legislative assembly in place, he alleged.
Owaisi quoted the Chief Justice of India (CJI) having said at a seminar in 2019 that "public deliberation will always be a threat to those who achieved power in its absence." "The question is whether you can abrogate the special status of a state by putting the whole state in curfew, while it is subject to Article 356, and without an elected legislative assembly in place? Who in Kashmir had the right to deliberate on August 5?," he said.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/sc-verdict-on-article-370-omar-abdullah-is-disappointed-but-not-1702281513817">SC verdict on Article 370: Omar Abdullah is disappointed but not...</a> &nbsp;
The Supreme Court in the Bommai judgement had said that federalism is part of the basic structure of the constitution.
"Federalism means that the state has its voice and in its area of competence, it has complete freedom to operate. How is it that Parliament can speak in place of the Assembly? How is it that Parliament can pass a resolution that was to be passed by the Assembly in the constitution?" he said.
For him, Owaisi said, the manner in which Article 370 was abrogated was a violation of constitutional morality.
Even worse, the abrogation, bifurcation and downgrading of the state to union territory is "a grand betrayal of the solemn promise that the Union of India had made to the people of Kashmir," he claimed.
The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously upheld the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 bestowing special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and directed restoration of statehood "at the earliest" as well as elections to the assembly by September 30 next year.

BJP picks Mohan Yadav as next CM of Madhya Pradesh

BJP picks Mohan Yadav as next CM of Madhya Pradesh

Mohan Yadav, the BJP MLA from Ujjain South, will be the new Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, where the saffron outfit has retained power after the just held assembly polls, party sources said on Monday.
Yadav (58), an OBC leader, was elected as the BJP's legislature party leader in Madhya Pradesh at a meeting in Bhopal held in the evening in presence of central observers, they said.
He was serving as minister for higher education in the outgoing Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan's cabinet.&nbsp;
Also watch:<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/ej-quixplained-how-sc-s-verdict-on-article-370-will-impact-bjp-s-chances-in-2024-1702296026969"> EJ quixplained: how SC's verdict on Article 370 will impact BJP's chances in 2024</a>

A piece of shocking news has come to light that unknown vandals tried to damage Zafar Mahal, a 19th-century structure in Mehrauli

Zafar Mahal targeted by vandals in Delhi, lattice screen destroyed

Vandals damaged Zafar Mahal, a 19th-century structure in Mehrauli, which was to host the grave of Bhadur Shah Zafar if he had not been set to exile by the British after the 1857 mutiny.&nbsp;

Zafar Mahal, a 19th-century structure in Mehrauli, was damaged by unknown vandals recently, the Archaeological Survey of India said. The vandals destroyed a jali (lattice) screen that was situated near the entrance to the premises.&nbsp;
The lattice screen that was damaged surrounds the empty grave of Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar, who intended to be burried there before being exiled to Burma by the British.&nbsp;
The Indian Express reported that the monument's in-charge filed a complaint with local police. However, there are conflicting reports that suggest that the police claim not to have received any such complaint from the ASI.&nbsp;
As the social media users came across this news, they started outraging over it. Historian William Dalrymple, known for his work on Mughal history, criticised the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for negligence, calling the incident "appalling."
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/local/tamil-nadu-man-builds-taj-mahal-like-memorial-for-late-mother-for-a-whopping-1687005436509">Tamil Nadu man builds Taj Mahal-like memorial for late mother for a whopping...</a>

A contractor has been booked for allegedly printing the tricolour upside down on the banners for a Viksit Bharat event in Maharashtra.

 Tricolour upside down on Viksit Bharat banners, printer booked

A contractor has been booked for allegedly printing the tricolour upside down on the banners for a Viksit Bharat event in Maharashtra.

An offence has been registered against a contractor for allegedly printing the tricolour upside down on banners that served as a backdrop for an event organised in Maharashtra's Thane district to view Prime Minister Narendra Modi's interaction with beneficiaries of Viksit Bharat Sankalpa Yatra, police said on Monday.
The banners were displayed on the stage during the programme held on the premises of Kalher gram panchayat in Bhiwandi on December 9, an official said.
Based on a complaint lodged by the block development officer of Bhiwandi, an offence under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, has been registered against the contractor, the official from Narpoli police station said.
A probe is underway, and no arrest has been made so far, he said.
The contractor was asked to print banners for the programme organised by the Thane Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti, the official said.
Instead of printing the sample of the background provided by the authorities, he allegedly printed the tricolour upside down, he said.
Union Minister of State Kapil Patil, Thane Guardian Minister Shamburaj Desai and Collector Ashok Shingare, among other dignitaries, were present for the event, it was stated.&nbsp;

SC verdict on Article 370 gives a boost to the BJP ahead of the Lok Sabha elections in 2024

EJ quixplained: how SC's verdict on Article 370 will impact BJP's chances in 2024

SC verdict on Article 370 gives a boost to the BJP ahead of the Lok Sabha elections in 2024

The Supreme Court's seal of validity on the Centre's move to remove provisions of Article 370 that gave Jammu and Kashmir its special status means that the BJP has now fulfilled two out of its three core promises.&nbsp;
BJP's parent organisation the Jan Sangh was founded on three core agendas - building the Ram temple, full integration of J&amp;K into India by removing its special status and implementins Uniform Civil Code.&nbsp;
Coalition compulsions prevented the BJP from outrightly taking steps to fulfill these agendas but after it received a thumping majority for a second consecutive time in 2019, they moved swiftly.&nbsp;
First the BJP govt stripped J&amp;K of its special status in August 2019, then in November same year the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Ram Mandir movement. On December 11 this year, the move to water down Article 370 received the top court's approval. In January next year, the new Ram Mandir in Ayodhya will be inaugurated.&nbsp;
BJP's third agenda, Uniform Civil Code, is now expected to take centrestage in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;

Highlights

Latest news

Karnataka education minister defends move to remove hijab ban in exams

Up Next

More videos

Categories

Trending topics