Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

India abstained from a UN General Assembly resolution demanding the immediate and unconditional return of Ukrainian children allegedly deported by Russia. The resolution was adopted with 91 votes in favour, 12 against and 57 abstentions.

India abstains from UNGA resolution demanding return of Ukrainian children from Russia

India abstained from a UN General Assembly resolution demanding the immediate and unconditional return of Ukrainian children allegedly deported by Russia. The resolution was adopted with 91 votes in favour, 12 against and 57 abstentions.

India abstained in the UN General Assembly from a draft resolution that demanded that Russia ensure the immediate, safe and unconditional return of all Ukrainian children forcibly transferred or deported since the start of the war.
The 193-member General Assembly adopted the draft resolution &lsquo;Return of Ukrainian children&rsquo; Wednesday, with 91 votes in favour, 12 against and 57 abstentions. India was among the nations that abstained in the UNGA on the resolution, along with Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Egypt, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
The resolution expressed deep concern about the impact of the war on children, in particular the fate of all Ukrainian children who have been separated from their families since 2014, including those forcibly transferred within the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine by Russia and those deported to Russia.
The resolution demanded that Russia &ldquo;ensure the immediate, safe and unconditional return of all Ukrainian children who have been forcibly transferred or deported&rdquo; and urged Moscow to cease, without delay, any further practice of forcible transfer, deportation, separation from families and legal guardians, change of personal status, including through citizenship, adoption or placement in foster families, and indoctrination of Ukrainian children.
It stressed the need to investigate and ensure accountability for those responsible for forcible transfers and deportations of children, in accordance with international law.
The resolution deplored the legislative and administrative measures taken by Russia since 2022 that &ldquo;simplify&rdquo; the procedure for obtaining Russian citizenship for Ukrainian children, particularly orphans, children deprived of parental care and unaccompanied children.
Ukraine&rsquo;s Deputy Foreign Minister Mariana Betsa, presenting the draft resolution at the 11th emergency special session of the UNGA, said that as of October 2025, there are 6,395 deported and forcibly transferred children. In total, over 20,000 cases of deportation and forcible transfer are being investigated.
Russia&rsquo;s Deputy Permanent Representative Maria Zabolotskaya, in her remarks in the UNGA, said that the draft resolution is stuffed with &ldquo;mendacious accusations&rdquo;, adding that it contains baseless allegations of Russia's violations of international humanitarian law and does not mention that there may be children evacuated from the combat zone or children who lost ties with their relatives, which in no way can be regarded as violations.
&ldquo;The resolution expresses concern regarding a simplified procedure for Ukrainian refugees to acquire Russian citizenship. Such a procedure is something that refugees around the world would dream about, especially if, as is the case under the Russian legislation, they are not even obliged to renounce their Ukrainian citizenship, not to mention the fact that the procedure is purely voluntary,&rdquo; Zabolotskaya said.
She said that each vote in favor of the resolution is a &ldquo;vote in support of lies, war, and confrontation, while each vote against is a vote for peace.&rdquo;
President of the UN General Assembly Annalena Baerbock said that since February 2022, when Russia launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the General Assembly has reiterated its calls, across eight resolutions adopted during its Eleventh Emergency Special Session, for the immediate, complete, and unconditional withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine&rsquo;s internationally recognised territory.
&ldquo;That is why the question of returning Ukrainian children cannot be viewed in a vacuum, for this issue would neither have arisen nor persisted without the Russian Federation&rsquo;s invasion of Ukraine,&rdquo; she said.
Earlier this year, a resolution adopted by the General Assembly highlighted its concern that the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia has persisted for three years, and continues to have devastating and long-lasting consequences not only for Ukraine, but also for other regions and global stability, Baerbock added.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met global counterparts at the 80th UN General Assembly, discussing bilateral ties, regional developments, and global conflicts including Ukraine and EU relations.

Jaishankar Holds Bilateral Talks at UNGA, Strengthens Global Ties

Jaishankar Strengthens Global Ties at UNGA

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar met global counterparts at the 80th UN General Assembly, discussing bilateral ties, regional developments, and global conflicts including Ukraine and EU relations.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar held a series of bilateral meetings with his counterparts from across the world on the sidelines of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, discussing a wide range of issues, including bilateral ties, regional developments, and global conflicts.
He shared about the meetings in a string of social media posts.
In a meeting with David van Weel of the Netherlands on Tuesday evening in New York, Jaishankar held an "insightful conversation on European strategic positioning and India's approach".
He also met Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, where he "valued his insights on recent developments in Europe" and the ongoing Ukraine conflict. The two ministers also discussed bilateral ties and cooperation between India and the European Union under Denmark&rsquo;s Presidency of the Council of the EU.
With Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, Jaishankar reviewed the progress of bilateral cooperation.
The External Affairs Minister also met with Mauritian Foreign Minister Ritish Ramful and discussed follow-up actions to the recent State Visit of Mauritian Prime Minister Navinchandra Ramgoolam to India.
In a meeting with Maldivian Foreign Minister Abdulla Khaleel, Jaishankar reiterated India&rsquo;s "steadfast" support for the development of the Maldives.
Bilateral ties were also on the agenda in separate meetings with foreign ministers Lejone Mpotjoana of Lesotho, Melvin Bouva of Suriname, Abdisalam Ali of Somalia, Alva Baptiste of Saint Lucia, and Kamina J Smith of Jamaica.
Jaishankar congratulated Smith on her reappointment as Jamaica&rsquo;s Foreign Minister and expressed optimism about strengthening the India-Jamaica partnership.
He also had a "quick chat" with Singapore&rsquo;s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan on the sidelines of the High-Level Meeting of Like-Minded Global South Countries.
In addition to his ministerial engagements, Jaishankar met Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, Group Chairman and CEO of Dubai-based multinational logistics company DP World, to discuss "current developments in the international economy and their implications for connectivity and logistics".
Earlier, he attended an informal meeting of European Union Foreign Ministers, hosted by EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas.
The meeting provided an opportunity for an "open exchange of views on multilateralism, India-EU partnership, Ukraine conflict, Gaza, energy and trade," Jaishankar said.&nbsp;

32 including India, China abstain from vote on Ukraine resolution at UNGA

Ruchira Kamboj said that as the General Assembly marks a year of the Ukrainian conflict, &ldquo;it is important that we ask ourselves a few pertinent questions.

India abstained in the UN General Assembly on a resolution that underscored the need to reach &ldquo;comprehensive, just and lasting peace&rdquo; in Ukraine, as New Delhi questioned whether the world was &ldquo;anywhere near a possible solution&rdquo; acceptable to both Moscow and Kyiv a year into the Ukrainian conflict.
India was among the 32 nations that abstained as the 193-member General Assembly adopted the resolution &lsquo;Principles of the Charter of the United Nations underlying a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine&rsquo; Thursday, put forward by Ukraine and its supporters.
The resolution, which received 141 votes in favour and seven against, underscored the &ldquo;need to reach, as soon as possible, a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine in line with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&rdquo;
In the Explanation of Vote after the resolution was adopted, India&rsquo;s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Ruchira Kamboj said that as the General Assembly marks a year of the Ukrainian conflict, &ldquo;it is important that we ask ourselves a few pertinent questions.
&ldquo;Are we anywhere near a possible solution acceptable to both sides? Can any process that does not involve either of the two sides, ever lead to a credible and meaningful solution? Has the UN system, and particularly its principal organ, the UN Security Council, based on a 1945-world construct, not been rendered ineffective to address contemporary challenges to global peace and security?&rdquo; Kamboj said.
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/pakistan-rakes-up-j-k-during-unga-session-on-ukraine-india-hits-back-1677206221953">Pakistan rakes up J&amp;K during UNGA session on Ukraine; India hits bac</a>k

Pakistan rakes up J&K during UNGA session on Ukraine; India hits back

Yet again, India slammed Pakistan after it referred to Jammu and Kashmir during a special session on Ukraine in the UN General Assembly.

Yet again, India slammed Pakistan after it referred to Jammu and Kashmir during a special session on Ukraine in the UN General Assembly.
Terming the provocation as &ldquo;regrettable and misplaced&rdquo;, Counsellor in India&rsquo;s Permanent Mission to the UN Pratik Mathur called out Islamabad&rsquo;s track record of harbouring and providing safe havens to terrorists with impunity.
&ldquo;I'm taking the floor today to say that India chooses this time not to respond to Pakistan's mischievious provocations. Our advice to the delegate of Pakistan is to refer to our numerous Rights of Reply that we have exercised in the past,&rdquo; Counsellor in India&rsquo;s Permanent Mission to the UN Pratik Mathur said.
Mathur exercised India&rsquo;s Right of Reply on Thursday after Pakistan&rsquo;s envoy at the UN Munir Akram referred to Jammu and Kashmir while delivering the explanation of vote on the UN General Assembly resolution on Ukraine during the Emergency Special Session.&nbsp;
With Inputs from PTI
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/us-govt-says-terrorist-designation-of-hizbul-mujahideen-pakistan-taliban-cannot-be-revoked-1676619407135">US govt says terrorist designation of Hizbul Mujahideen, Pakistan Taliban cannot be revoked</a>

On the reform of the UN Security Council, the UNGA president urged the member states to make compromises and consider even making partial agreements under a step-by-step approach for reform of the UNSC

UNGA president: inability to tackle Ukraine war reflects UNSC's 'dysfunctional' system

On the reform of the UN Security Council, the UNGA president urged the member states to make compromises and consider even making partial agreements under a step-by-step approach for reform of the UNSC

The "dysfunctional" system of the UN Security Council has been reflected in the "absurd" situation arising out of one of its permanent members attacking Ukraine and the global body's failure to address the crisis reinforces the urgent need for its reform, UN General Assembly President Csaba Korosi said on Monday.
In an address at a think-tank, Korosi strongly pitched for reform of the UN Security Council to reflect the changing balance of global power and economic heft of various countries and criticised the slow process that was started around 17 years back to bring the changes.
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/bbc-documentary-russia-accuses-british-broadcaster-of-waging-information-war-1675092965544">BBC documentary: Russia accuses British broadcaster of 'waging information war'</a>
The Hungarian diplomat, who is currently serving as the President of the 77th United Nations General Assembly, commended India's call during its recent membership of the UN Security Council for peace in Ukraine and its humanitarian aid for people hit by the conflict.
Korosi said the war in Ukraine has caused untold sufferings, displacements and "unleashed" an energy and food crisis across the globe.
(PTI)

The Taliban took over Kabul in August 2021 while Myanmar's military junta staged a coup in February 2021 to bring down Aung San Suu Kyi's government.

UNGA postpones decision on Afghanistan, Myanmar assembly seat

The Taliban took over Kabul in August 2021 while Myanmar's military junta staged a coup in February 2021 to bring down Aung San Suu Kyi's government.

The UN General Assembly has postponed the decision on whether representatives of the Taliban authorities in Afghanistan and Myanmar&rsquo;s military junta can take their countries&rsquo; seats in the 193-member world body.
After the August 2021 takeover of Kabul by the Taliban, the group has sought to send its representative to the UN as an envoy.
Following the February 2021 coup in Myanmar, its military rulers have said the country&rsquo;s Ambassador to UN Kyaw Moe Tun has been dismissed and they want their representative to replace him.
Allowing both these representations at the UN General Assembly will be tantamount to a move towards international recognition of the Taliban administration and the military junta in Myanmar.
Also read|<a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/eu-parliament-suspends-vice-president-as-lobbying-row-simmers-1670846119493">EU parliament suspends vice-president as lobbying row simmers</a>
The UN Credentials Committee had before it two communications concerning the representation of Afghanistan at the 77th session of the general assembly, indicating different individuals as representatives to the current session.
The first was dated September 6 this year from the Charge d&rsquo;affaires of Afghanistan to the United Nations in New York. The second was dated September 17 in 2022 from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan.
The committee also had before it two communications concerning the representation of Myanmar at the 77th session of the General Assembly, indicating different individuals as representatives to the 77th session of the assembly.
The first was dated August 19 in 2022 from the Permanent Representative of Myanmar to the United Nations in New York. The second was dated August 24 in 2022 from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Myanmar.
Afghanistan joined the UN on November 19 in 1946 and Myanmar has been a UN member since April 19, 1948.

 India hits back after Pakistan rakes Jammu & Kashmir issue at UNGA

The General Assembly held a plenary meeting on Thursday on the issue of UN Security Council reforms during which Pakistan yet again raked up the issue of Jammu and Kashmir.

&nbsp;India has slammed Pakistan after it raked the Jammu and Kashmir issue during a plenary meeting of the UN General Assembly on Security Council reforms, saying Islamabad&rsquo;s desperate attempts to peddle falsehoods and its bad habit of abusing the sanctity of multilateral forums deserves the international community&rsquo;s collective contempt.
The General Assembly held a plenary meeting on Thursday on the issue of UN Security Council reforms during which Pakistan yet again raked up the issue of Jammu and Kashmir.
&ldquo;I am taking the floor today to exercise India's Right of Reply to respond to Pakistan's continued abuse of this august Assembly,&rdquo; Counsellor in India&rsquo;s Permanent Mission to the UN here Pratik Mathur said.
Mathur said that while the UNGA is meeting to discuss the "extremely important&rdquo; topic of UN Security Council reforms, the representative of Pakistan has yet again made &ldquo;unwarranted references&rdquo; to Jammu and Kashmir.
ALSO WATCH: <a title="'Some countries...': PM Modi's indirect swipe at Pakistan | Anti-terror conference" href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/some-countries-pm-modi-s-indirect-swipe-at-pakistan-anti-terror-conference-1668752519498">'Some countries...': PM Modi's indirect swipe at Pakistan | Anti-terror conference</a>
&ldquo;Jammu and Kashmir, let me repeat once again for his benefit, remains an integral and inalienable part of India, irrespective of what the representative of Pakistan believes or covets. Pakistan's desperate attempts to peddle falsehoods and a bad habit of abusing the sanctity of multilateral forums deserve our collective contempt and perhaps some sympathy as well,&rdquo; Mathur said.
Earlier in the day, India&rsquo;s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Ruchira Kamboj had addressed the plenary meeting, delivering a statement on behalf of the G4 nations of Brazil, Germany, India and Japan. She had asserted that the longer the Security Council reform is "stalled, the greater its deficit in representation. And representation is &ndash; an inescapable precondition for its legitimacy and effectiveness.&rdquo; The G4 nations said that the Inter-Governmental Negotiations process simply cannot be allowed to cocoon itself in perpetuity without letting the collective aspirations of the member states take a definite shape. &ldquo;We hope this year's IGN process will not be another missed opportunity,&rdquo; Kamboj had said.&nbsp;

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Saturday that no rhetoric, however sanctimonious, can ever cover up blood stains and asserted that nations who defend proclaimed terrorists in the UN neither advance their own interests nor their reputation, in a clear signal to China and Pakistan on the issue of terrorism.
In his address to the high-level UN General Assembly session here, Jaishankar said those who politicise the UNSC 1267 Sanctions regime, sometimes even to the extent of defending proclaimed terrorists, do so at their own peril.
“Having borne the brunt of cross-border terrorism for decades, India firmly advocates a ‘zero- tolerance’ approach. In our view, there is no justification for any act of terrorism, regardless of motivation. And no rhetoric, however sanctimonious, can ever cover up blood stains,” he said.
“The United Nations responds to terrorism by sanctioning its perpetrators. Those who politicise the UNSC 1267 Sanctions regime, sometimes even to the extent of defending proclaimed terrorists, do so at their own peril. Believe me, they advance neither their own interests nor indeed their reputation,” he said.
This was strong, though veiled attack against Pakistan and its all-weather ally China, which has on multiple occasions blocked bids and proposals by India and its allies to designate Pakistan-based terrorists under the 1267 sanctions regime of the UN Security Council.
"India has always espoused a cooperative, inclusive, and consultative approach to international relations. We believe that multipolarity, rebalancing, fair globalisation and reformed multilateralism cannot be kept in abeyance," he said.
This month, China has put a hold on a proposal moved at the United Nations by the US and co-supported by India to designate Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Sajid Mir, wanted for his involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attacks, as a global terrorist.
Beijing put a hold on the proposal moved by the US and co-designated by India to blacklist Mir under the 1267 Al Qaeda Sanctions Committee of the UN Security Council as a global terrorist and subject him to assets freeze, travel ban and arms embargo.
Last month, China put a hold on a proposal by the US and India at the United Nations to blacklist Abdul Rauf Azhar, the brother of Jaish-e Mohammed (JEM) chief Masood Azhar and a senior leader of the Pakistan-based terror organisation.

‘Defend terrorists at own peril’: India's veiled attack at China, Pakistan on terrorism

‘Defend terrorists at own peril’: India veiled attack at China, Pakistan on terrorism

While speaking UN General Assembly session he said that nations who defend proclaimed terrorists at the UN neither advance their own interests nor their reputation.&nbsp;

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Saturday that no rhetoric, however sanctimonious, can ever cover up blood stains and asserted that nations who defend proclaimed terrorists in the UN neither advance their own interests nor their reputation, in a clear signal to China and Pakistan on the issue of terrorism.
In his address to the high-level UN General Assembly session, Jaishankar said those who politicise the UNSC 1267 Sanctions regime, sometimes even to the extent of defending proclaimed terrorists, do so at their own peril.
&ldquo;Having borne the brunt of cross-border terrorism for decades, India firmly advocates a &lsquo;zero- tolerance&rsquo; approach. In our view, there is no justification for any act of terrorism, regardless of motivation. And no rhetoric, however sanctimonious, can ever cover up blood stains,&rdquo; he said.
ALSO WATCH: <a title="India sends strong response to Pakistan&rsquo;s &lsquo;seek peace with India&rsquo; remark at UNGA" href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/india-sends-strong-response-to-pakistan-s-seek-peace-with-india-remark-at-unga-1664005143798">India sends strong response to Pakistan&rsquo;s &lsquo;seek peace with India&rsquo; remark at UNGA</a>
&ldquo;The United Nations responds to terrorism by sanctioning its perpetrators. Those who politicise the UNSC 1267 Sanctions regime, sometimes even to the extent of defending proclaimed terrorists, do so at their own peril. Believe me, they advance neither their own interests nor indeed their reputation,&rdquo; he said.
This was strong, though veiled attack against Pakistan and its all-weather ally China, which has on multiple occasions blocked bids and proposals by India and its allies to designate Pakistan-based terrorists under the 1267 sanctions regime of the UN Security Council.
"India has always espoused a cooperative, inclusive, and consultative approach to international relations. We believe that multipolarity, rebalancing, fair globalisation and reformed multilateralism cannot be kept in abeyance," he said.
This month, China has put a hold on a proposal moved at the United Nations by the US and co-supported by India to designate Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Sajid Mir, wanted for his involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attacks, as a global terrorist.
Beijing put a hold on the proposal moved by the US and co-designated by India to blacklist Mir under the 1267 Al Qaeda Sanctions Committee of the UN Security Council as a global terrorist and subject him to assets freeze, travel ban and arms embargo.
Last month, China put a hold on a proposal by the US and India at the United Nations to blacklist Abdul Rauf Azhar, the brother of Jaish-e Mohammed (JEM) chief Masood Azhar and a senior leader of the Pakistan-based terror organisation.
ALSO WATCH: <a title="Bhutan reopens to tourists after 2 years. See how much Indians will have to pay as levy" href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/bhutan-reopens-to-tourists-after-2-years-see-how-much-indians-will-have-to-pay-as-levy-1663994294849">Bhutan reopens to tourists after 2 years. See how much Indians will have to pay as levy</a>

In a strong response to Pakistan, India has said in the UN General Assembly that a country that claims to seek peace with its neighbours would never sponsor cross-border terrorism nor would it shelter planners of the horrific Mumbai terrorist attack, disclosing their existence only under pressure from the global community.
India exercised the Right of Reply in the UN General Assembly on Friday to respond sharply to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who had raked up the issue of Jammu and Kashmir during his address to the high-level General Debate earlier in the day.
“It is regrettable that the Prime Minister of Pakistan has chosen the platform of this august assembly to make false accusations against India,” First Secretary in the Permanent Mission of India to the UN Mijito Vinito said in the Right of Reply.
“He has done so to obfuscate misdeeds in his own country and to justify actions against India that the world considers unacceptable,” the young Indian diplomat said.
In his address, Sharif reiterated that Pakistan wants to have peace with India but added that long-lasting, enduring peace can only be “insured and guaranteed” through a just and fair solution to the issue of Kashmir under the UN Charter and Security Council resolutions.
India responded that a “polity that claims it seeks peace with its neighbours would never sponsor cross-border terrorism, nor would it shelter planners of the horrific Mumbai terrorist attack, disclosing their existence only under pressure from the international community.” Vinito said such a country would not make unjustified and untenable territorial claims against neighbours, it would not covet their lands and seek to illegally integrate them with its own.
“But it is not just about the neighbourhood that we have heard false claims today. It is about human rights, about minority rights and about basic decencies,” he said.
“When young women in the thousands from the minority community are abducted as an SoP (Standard Operating Procedure) what can we conclude about the underlying mindset? India asserted that the desire for peace, security and progress in the Indian subcontinent is real. It is also widely shared and it can be realised.
“That will surely happen when cross-border terrorism ceases, when governments come clean with the international community and with their own people. When minorities are not persecuted and not least, when we recognise these realities before this Assembly.” Pakistan then exercised its Right of Reply in response to the comments by India.

India sends strong response to Pakistan’s ‘seek peace with India’ remark at UNGA

India exercised the Right of Reply in the UN General Assembly on Friday to respond sharply to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.&nbsp;
&nbsp;

In a strong response to Pakistan, India has said in the UN General Assembly that a country that claims to seek peace with its neighbours would never sponsor cross-border terrorism nor would it shelter planners of the horrific Mumbai terrorist attack, disclosing their existence only under pressure from the global community.
India exercised the Right of Reply in the UN General Assembly on Friday to respond sharply to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who had raked up the issue of Jammu and Kashmir during his address to the high-level General Debate earlier in the day.
&ldquo;It is regrettable that the Prime Minister of Pakistan has chosen the platform of this august assembly to make false accusations against India,&rdquo; First Secretary in the Permanent Mission of India to the UN Mijito Vinito said in the Right of Reply.
&ldquo;He has done so to obfuscate misdeeds in his own country and to justify actions against India that the world considers unacceptable,&rdquo; the young Indian diplomat said.
In his address, Sharif reiterated that Pakistan wants to have peace with India but added that long-lasting, enduring peace can only be &ldquo;insured and guaranteed&rdquo; through a just and fair solution to the issue of Kashmir under the UN Charter and Security Council resolutions.
India responded that a &ldquo;polity that claims it seeks peace with its neighbours would never sponsor cross-border terrorism, nor would it shelter planners of the horrific Mumbai terrorist attack, disclosing their existence only under pressure from the international community.&rdquo; Vinito said such a country would not make unjustified and untenable territorial claims against neighbours, it would not covet their lands and seek to illegally integrate them with its own.
&ldquo;But it is not just about the neighbourhood that we have heard false claims today. It is about human rights, about minority rights and about basic decencies,&rdquo; he said.
&ldquo;When young women in the thousands from the minority community are abducted as an SoP (Standard Operating Procedure) what can we conclude about the underlying mindset? India asserted that the desire for peace, security and progress in the Indian subcontinent is real. It is also widely shared and it can be realised.
&ldquo;That will surely happen when cross-border terrorism ceases, when governments come clean with the international community and with their own people. When minorities are not persecuted and not least, when we recognise these realities before this Assembly.&rdquo; Pakistan then exercised its Right of Reply in response to the comments by India.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/raids-against-child-porn-cloud-storage-facilities-under-cbi-lens-1664009193542">Raids against child porn: cloud storage facilities under CBI lens</a>

French President Emmanuel Macron told world leaders at the UN General Assembly session that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was right when he told Russian President Vladimir Putin that this is not the time for war.
Modi, who met Putin last week on the sidelines of the 22nd meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Uzbekistan's Samarkand, had told the Russian leader that "today's era is not of war". He has spoken to Putin several times over the phone regarding this issue and underlined the importance of democracy, diplomacy and dialogue.
"Narendra Modi, the prime minister of India was right when he said the time is not for war. It is not for revenge against the West or for opposing the West against the East. It is the collective time for our sovereign equal states to cope together with challenges we face," Macron said during his address at the General Debate of the 77th Session of the UN General Assembly on Tuesday.
"This is why there's an urgent need to develop a new contract between the north and the south – an effective contract which is respectful for food, for biodiversity, for education. It's no longer time for block thinking but to build a coalition of specific action to reconcile legitimate interests and common goods," he said.
In Samarkand, Putin had told Modi that he knows his "position on the conflict in Ukraine and the concerns that you constantly express".
"We will do our best to make it stop as soon as possible. However, unfortunately, the opposing side, the leadership of Ukraine, announced that it was abandoning the negotiation process and declared that it wants to achieve its goals by military means, 'on the battlefield', as they say. Nevertheless, we will always keep you informed of what is happening there," Putin had said.
At the UNGA session on Tuesday, Macron expressed hope the international community can commit to the reform of the UN Security Council "so that it is more representative, welcome new permanent members and remain able to play its full role by restricting the use of veto in cases of mass crimes".
In his address on the opening day of the General Debate, the French president said "there are countries that have chosen a form of neutrality vis-à-vis this war. Those who are saying that they're non-aligned are wrong. They are making a historic error".
"The combat of the non-aligned movement is a fight for peace. They fought for peace, the sovereignty of states and territorial integrity. Those who are keeping silent today are in a way complicit with a cause of new imperialism, a new order that is trampling over the current order, and there's no peace possible here." "Russia is today seeking to uphold a double standard but the war in Ukraine must not be a conflict that leaves anyone indifferent," Macron said. 

‘PM Modi was…’ : here’s what French Prez Emmanuel Macron said on Modi’s message to Putin 

In Samarkand, Putin had told Modi that he knows his "position on the conflict in Ukraine and the concerns that you constantly express".

French President Emmanuel Macron told world leaders at the UN General Assembly session that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was right when he told Russian President Vladimir Putin that this is not the time for war.
Modi, who met Putin last week on the sidelines of the 22nd meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Uzbekistan's Samarkand, had told the Russian leader that "today's era is not of war". He has spoken to Putin several times over the phone regarding this issue and underlined the importance of democracy, diplomacy and dialogue.
"Narendra Modi, the prime minister of India was right when he said the time is not for war. It is not for revenge against the West or for opposing the West against the East. It is the collective time for our sovereign equal states to cope together with challenges we face," Macron said during his address at the General Debate of the 77th Session of the UN General Assembly on Tuesday.
"This is why there's an urgent need to develop a new contract between the north and the south &ndash; an effective contract which is respectful for food, for biodiversity, for education. It's no longer time for block thinking but to build a coalition of specific action to reconcile legitimate interests and common goods," he said.
In Samarkand, Putin had told Modi that he knows his "position on the conflict in Ukraine and the concerns that you constantly express".
"We will do our best to make it stop as soon as possible. However, unfortunately, the opposing side, the leadership of Ukraine, announced that it was abandoning the negotiation process and declared that it wants to achieve its goals by military means, 'on the battlefield', as they say. Nevertheless, we will always keep you informed of what is happening there," Putin had said.
At the UNGA session on Tuesday, Macron expressed hope the international community can commit to the reform of the UN Security Council "so that it is more representative, welcome new permanent members and remain able to play its full role by restricting the use of veto in cases of mass crimes".
In his address on the opening day of the General Debate, the French president said "there are countries that have chosen a form of neutrality vis-&agrave;-vis this war. Those who are saying that they're non-aligned are wrong. They are making a historic error".
"The combat of the non-aligned movement is a fight for peace. They fought for peace, the sovereignty of states and territorial integrity. Those who are keeping silent today are in a way complicit with a cause of new imperialism, a new order that is trampling over the current order, and there's no peace possible here." "Russia is today seeking to uphold a double standard but the war in Ukraine must not be a conflict that leaves anyone indifferent," Macron said.&nbsp;
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/4-dead-in-noida-wall-collapse-8-workers-rescued-1663657351030">4 dead in Noida wall collapse, 8 workers rescued</a>

As the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on Tuesday to proclaim March 15 as International Day to Combat Islamophobia, India expressed concern over phobia against one religion being elevated to the level of an international day, saying there are growing contemporary forms of religiophobia, especially anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist and anti-Sikh phobias.
The 193-member UN General Assembly adopted a resolution, introduced by Pakistan’s ambassador Munir Akram under agenda item Culture of peace, to proclaim March 15 as the International Day to Combat Islamophobia.
The resolution, introduced by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), was co-sponsored by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
Reacting to the adoption of the resolution, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador T S Tirumurti said in the UN General Assembly that India hopes the resolution adopted "does not set a precedent” which will lead to multiple resolutions on phobias based on selective religions and divide the United Nations into religious camps.
“Hinduism has more than 1.2 billion followers, Buddhism more than 535 million and Sikhism more than 30 million spread out around the world. It is time that we acknowledged the prevalence of religiophobia, rather than single out just one,” he said.
“It is important that the United Nations remains above such religious matters which may seek to divide us rather than bring us together on one platform of peace and harmony and treat the World as One Family,” he said.
Following the adoption of the draft resolution, Tirumurti said that while India condemns all acts motivated by antisemitism, Christianophobia or Islamophobia, such phobias are not restricted to Abrahamic religions only.
“In fact, there is clear evidence that over decades such religiophobias have, in fact, affected the followers of non-Abrahamic religions as well. This have contributed to the emergence of contemporary forms of religiophobia, especially anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist and anti-Sikh phobias,” he said.
He noted that the Member States should not forget that in 2019, August 22 has already been proclaimed as the International Day commemorating the victims of acts of violence based on religion or belief, which is fully inclusive in nature.
“We even have an International Day of Tolerance observed on 16 November. We are not convinced that we need to elevate phobia against one religion to the level of an international day,” he said.
Tirumurti asserted that these contemporary forms of religiophobia can be witnessed in the increase in attacks on religious places of worship like gurudwaras, monasteries and temples or in the spreading of hatred and disinformation against non-Abrahamic religions in many countries.
He cited that several examples of these abound, including the destruction of the Bamyan Buddhas in Afghanistan by the Taliban, violation of gurudwara premises, massacre of Sikh pilgrims in gurudwara, attack on temples, glorification of breaking of idols in temples.
He said these contribute to the rise of contemporary forms of religiophobia against non-Abrahamic religions.
“It is in this context that we are concerned about elevating the phobia against one religion to the level of an international day, to the exclusion of all the others.
Celebration of a religion is one thing but to commemorate the combatting of hatred against one religion is quite another. In fact, this resolution may well end up downplaying the seriousness of phobias against all other religions,” Tirumurti said in his statement after the adoption of the resolution.
He said India is proud that pluralism is at the core of its existence.
“We firmly believe in equal protection and promotion of all religions and faith. It is, therefore, unfortunate that the word ‘pluralism’ finds no mention in the resolution and the sponsors have not found it fit to take on board our amendments to include the word “pluralism in the text for reasons best known to them.” Tirumurti said that as a pluralistic and democratic country that is home to almost all religions of the world, India has always welcomed, over the centuries, those persecuted around the world for their faith or belief.
"They have always found in India a safe haven shorn of persecution or discrimination. This is true whether they were Zoroastrians or Buddhists or Jews or people of any other faith,” he said.
Tirumurti expressed deep concern over the rise in instances of discrimination, intolerance and violence directed against members of many religious communities in various parts of the world.
He emphasised that it is with deep concern that India views the growing manifestation of intolerance, discrimination or violence against followers of religions, including rising sectarian violence in some countries.
France’s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Nicolas de Riviere, speaking after Tirumurti, said that by creating an international day to combat Islamophobia, the resolution does not respond to the concern that “we all share to fight against all forms of discrimination”.
“Because they create division within the fight against religious intolerance by only selecting one religion to the exclusion of others without reference to the freedom to believe or to not believe,” he said.
He said society is made up of diversity, with individuals practising a variety of religions or not practising any at all.
“Must we expect the creation of days dedicated to each religion, to each degree of belief or non-belief. There may not be enough days in the year to satisfy all these demands,” de Riviere said.
The French envoy said the text of the resolution that is submitted on Tuesday did raise a number of difficulties with regard to the determination to fight against discrimination based on religion or belief.
“The term Islamophobia does not have any agreed definition in international law, contrary to the freedom of religion or belief,” he said, adding that the resolution is very “unsatisfactory" as it currently stands and none of the proposals mooted by France were taken into consideration. (PTI)

India raises problems with Islamophobia resolution at UN: 'Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist phobias also'

THUMBNAIL TEXT INDIA'S STAND ON ISLAMOPHOBIA RESOLUTION
&nbsp;
 VO: With the United Nations General Assembly adopting a resolution to declare March 15 as International Day to Combat Islamophobia, India raised several issues with the proclamation, centred around the fact that focusing on one religion would widen divides. India's permanent ambassador to the UN explained the country's position.
 BYTE T.S. TIRUMURTI, INDIA'S PERMANENT AMBASSADOR TO U.N. https://twitter.com/IndiaUNNewYork/status/1503766099011280904
(0:12 - 4:48) MARCH 15, 2022
 ==========================================
 CAPTIONS 'Combat Islamophobia' resolution by UNGAIndia raised several issues with resolution 'Express deep concern on religious bias' 'India pluralistic, democratic country' India has always been safe haven Condemn acts motivated by anti-semitism Condemn Christianophobia, Islamophobia Such phobias not limited to Abrahamic faiths Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist phobias also there Attacks seen on temples, gurudwaras etc Breaking of idols in temples glorified

<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-weight: 400; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 12pt; line-height: inherit; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: #000000; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: #ffffff; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution to declare March 15 as International Day to Combat Islamophobia.</div>

As the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on Tuesday to proclaim March 15 as International Day to Combat Islamophobia, India expressed concern over phobia against one religion being elevated to the level of an international day, saying there are growing contemporary forms of religiophobia, especially anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist and anti-Sikh phobias.
The 193-member UN General Assembly adopted a resolution, introduced by Pakistan&rsquo;s ambassador Munir Akram under agenda item Culture of peace, to proclaim March 15 as the International Day to Combat Islamophobia.
 The resolution, introduced by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), was co-sponsored by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
 Reacting to the adoption of the resolution, India&rsquo;s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador T S Tirumurti said in the UN General Assembly that India hopes the resolution adopted "does not set a precedent&rdquo; which will lead to multiple resolutions on phobias based on selective religions and divide the United Nations into religious camps.
 &ldquo;Hinduism has more than 1.2 billion followers, Buddhism more than 535 million and Sikhism more than 30 million spread out around the world. It is time that we acknowledged the prevalence of religiophobia, rather than single out just one,&rdquo; he said.
 &ldquo;It is important that the United Nations remains above such religious matters which may seek to divide us rather than bring us together on one platform of peace and harmony and treat the World as One Family,&rdquo; he said.
 Following the adoption of the draft resolution, Tirumurti said that while India condemns all acts motivated by antisemitism, Christianophobia or Islamophobia, such phobias are not restricted to Abrahamic religions only.
 &ldquo;In fact, there is clear evidence that over decades such religiophobias have, in fact, affected the followers of non-Abrahamic religions as well. This have contributed to the emergence of contemporary forms of religiophobia, especially anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist and anti-Sikh phobias,&rdquo; he said.
 He noted that the Member States should not forget that in 2019, August 22 has already been proclaimed as the International Day commemorating the victims of acts of violence based on religion or belief, which is fully inclusive in nature.
 &ldquo;We even have an International Day of Tolerance observed on 16 November. We are not convinced that we need to elevate phobia against one religion to the level of an international day,&rdquo; he said.
 Tirumurti asserted that these contemporary forms of religiophobia can be witnessed in the increase in attacks on religious places of worship like gurudwaras, monasteries and temples or in the spreading of hatred and disinformation against non-Abrahamic religions in many countries.
 He cited that several examples of these abound, including the destruction of the Bamyan Buddhas in Afghanistan by the Taliban, violation of gurudwara premises, massacre of Sikh pilgrims in gurudwara, attack on temples, glorification of breaking of idols in temples.
 He said these contribute to the rise of contemporary forms of religiophobia against non-Abrahamic religions.
 &ldquo;It is in this context that we are concerned about elevating the phobia against one religion to the level of an international day, to the exclusion of all the others.
 Celebration of a religion is one thing but to commemorate the combatting of hatred against one religion is quite another. In fact, this resolution may well end up downplaying the seriousness of phobias against all other religions,&rdquo; Tirumurti said in his statement after the adoption of the resolution.
 He said India is proud that pluralism is at the core of its existence.
 &ldquo;We firmly believe in equal protection and promotion of all religions and faith. It is, therefore, unfortunate that the word &lsquo;pluralism&rsquo; finds no mention in the resolution and the sponsors have not found it fit to take on board our amendments to include the word &ldquo;pluralism in the text for reasons best known to them.&rdquo; Tirumurti said that as a pluralistic and democratic country that is home to almost all religions of the world, India has always welcomed, over the centuries, those persecuted around the world for their faith or belief.
 "They have always found in India a safe haven shorn of persecution or discrimination. This is true whether they were Zoroastrians or Buddhists or Jews or people of any other faith,&rdquo; he said.
 Tirumurti expressed deep concern over the rise in instances of discrimination, intolerance and violence directed against members of many religious communities in various parts of the world.
 He emphasised that it is with deep concern that India views the growing manifestation of intolerance, discrimination or violence against followers of religions, including rising sectarian violence in some countries.
 France&rsquo;s Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Nicolas de Riviere, speaking after Tirumurti, said that by creating an international day to combat Islamophobia, the resolution does not respond to the concern that &ldquo;we all share to fight against all forms of discrimination&rdquo;.
 &ldquo;Because they create division within the fight against religious intolerance by only selecting one religion to the exclusion of others without reference to the freedom to believe or to not believe,&rdquo; he said.
 He said society is made up of diversity, with individuals practising a variety of religions or not practising any at all.
 &ldquo;Must we expect the creation of days dedicated to each religion, to each degree of belief or non-belief. There may not be enough days in the year to satisfy all these demands,&rdquo; de Riviere said.
 The French envoy said the text of the resolution that is submitted on Tuesday did raise a number of difficulties with regard to the determination to fight against discrimination based on religion or belief.
 &ldquo;The term Islamophobia does not have any agreed definition in international law, contrary to the freedom of religion or belief,&rdquo; he said, adding that the resolution is very &ldquo;unsatisfactory" as it currently stands and none of the proposals mooted by France were taken into consideration. (PTI)

India on Wednesday again abstained from voting against Russia at the UN. While New Delhi supported the international community's call for an immediate ceasefire, it abstained on a UN General Assembly resolution that strongly deplored Russia's aggression against Ukraine.
This is India's third abstention in less than a week in the world body on resolutions against Russian aggression.
In a statement, India's ambassador to UN TS Tirumurti said India has decided to abstain in view of the "totality of the evolving situation"
The 193-member General Assembly Wednesday voted to reaffirm its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and “deplores in the strongest terms” Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.
The resolution was adopted with 141 votes in favour, five Member States voting against and 35 abstentions. The General Assembly broke into an applause as the resolution was adopted.
India demanded “safe and uninterrupted” passage for all its nationals, including students still stranded in Ukraine and cities in the conflict zones.
Reports quoting government sources said that a "lot of background negotiations with Russians have been going on. Now Russians, in fact, are helping India in evacuation". 

Ukraine war: India abstains from UN vote against Russia for the 3rd time in a week

India on Wednesday again abstained from voting against Russia at the UN. While New Delhi supported the international community's call for an immediate ceasefire, it abstained on a UN General Assembly resolution that strongly deplored Russia's aggression against Ukraine.
This is India's third abstention in less than a week in the world body on resolutions against Russian aggression.
In a statement, India's ambassador to UN TS Tirumurti said India has decided to abstain in view of the "totality of the evolving situation"
India demanded &ldquo;safe and uninterrupted&rdquo; passage for all its nationals, including students still stranded in Ukraine and cities in the conflict zones.
Reports quoting government sources said that a "lot of background negotiations with Russians have been going on. Now Russians, in fact, are helping India in evacuation".

India's ambassador to UN TS Tirumurti said India has decided to abstain in view of the "totality of the evolving situation"

India on Wednesday again abstained from voting against Russia at the UN. While New Delhi supported the international community's call for an immediate ceasefire, it abstained on a UN General Assembly resolution that strongly deplored Russia's aggression against Ukraine.
This is India's third abstention in less than a week in the world body on resolutions against Russian aggression.
In a statement, India's ambassador to UN TS Tirumurti said India has decided to abstain in view of the "totality of the evolving situation"
The 193-member General Assembly Wednesday voted to reaffirm its commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and &ldquo;deplores in the strongest terms&rdquo; Russia&rsquo;s aggression against Ukraine.
Also Watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/indian-students-taken-hostage-by-ukrainian-soldiers-used-as-human-shields-claims-russia-reports-1646243234466" target="_blank">Ukraine | 'Ukrainian soldiers took Indians hostage, used as human shields': Putin told Modi, say reports</a>
The resolution was adopted with 141 votes in favour, five Member States voting against and 35 abstentions. The General Assembly broke into an applause as the resolution was adopted.
India demanded &ldquo;safe and uninterrupted&rdquo; passage for all its nationals, including students still stranded in Ukraine and cities in the conflict zones.
Reports quoting government sources said that a "lot of background negotiations with Russians have been going on. Now Russians, in fact, are helping India in evacuation".

unga

Categories