Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

NASA's new moon rocket sprouted more fuel leaks Wednesday in a test ahead of a possible launch attempt next week, but engineers managed to get them down to acceptable levels.
There was no immediate word on whether NASA would try for a liftoff Tuesday given the sporadic nature of the hydrogen leaks, which have bedeviled the launch team for months.
"Leaving a lot of folks scratching their heads on this one," said Launch Control's Derrol Nail.
The daylong demo had barely begun when hazardous hydrogen fuel began escaping at the same place and same time as before, despite new seals and other repairs. Engineers halted the flow and warmed the lines in hopes of plugging the leak, and proceeded with the test. But the leak persisted before dropping to acceptable levels. Hours later, another leak cropped up elsewhere.
Nail said all test objectives were met. But managers need to review the results before determining whether the 98-metre rocket is ready for its first test flight, a lunar-orbiting mission with mannequins instead of astronauts.
Hydrogen leaks spoiled the first two launch attempts, as well as earlier countdown tests. So much hydrogen escaped during the countdown earlier this month that it exceeded NASA's limit by more than double. Wednesday's leak almost got that big again.
After hours of fits and starts, NASA finally managed to load nearly 4 million litres of fuel into the rocket. It was unclear whether the earlier gusher would nix a Tuesday launch attempt. In a separate matter, NASA still needs the U.S. Space Force to extend the certification of on-board batteries that are part of the flight safety system.
After the September 3 launch delay, NASA replaced two seals in the leaky line. One seal had a tiny indentation; it measured a mere one-hundredth of an inch.
"Now that doesn't sound like a lot, but again we're dealing with hydrogen," the smallest element on the periodic table, said mission manager Mike Sarafin.
NASA also altered the fuelling process, easing slowly into the loading of the super-cold liquid hydrogen and oxygen. After Wednesday's big leak appeared, the launch team moved even more slowly to subject the plumbing to even less stress.
Once launched, the crew capsule atop the rocket will be the first to orbit the moon in 50 years. The USD 4.1 billion mission should last more than five weeks, ending with a splashdown in the Pacific. Astronauts would climb aboard for the second test flight, dashing around the moon in 2024. The third mission, targeted for 2025, would see a pair of astronauts actually landing on the moon.
NASA's Space Launch System rocket is more powerful than the Saturn V rocket that sent Apollo astronauts to the moon during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The engines and boosters are carryovers from the now retired space shuttles. Just like now, NASA struggled with elusive hydrogen leaks during the shuttle era, especially during the early 1990s.

NASA fuels moon rocket in test, hit again with pesky leaks

NASA said all test objectives were met. But managers need to review the results before determining whether the 98-metre rocket is ready for its first test flight, a lunar-orbiting mission with mannequins instead of astronauts

NASA said all test objectives were met. But managers need to review the results before determining whether the 98-metre rocket is ready for its first test flight, a lunar-orbiting mission with mannequins instead of astronauts

NASA's new moon rocket sprouted more fuel leaks Wednesday in a test ahead of a possible launch attempt next week, but engineers managed to get them down to acceptable levels.
There was no immediate word on whether NASA would try for a liftoff Tuesday given the sporadic nature of the hydrogen leaks, which have bedeviled the launch team for months.
"Leaving a lot of folks scratching their heads on this one," said Launch Control's Derrol Nail.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/artemis-1-nasa-to-launch-its-new-lunar-programme-with-a-test-flight-today-1661770877165">Artemis 1: NASA to launch its new lunar programme with a test-flight today</a>
The daylong demo had barely begun when hazardous hydrogen fuel began escaping at the same place and same time as before, despite new seals and other repairs. Engineers halted the flow and warmed the lines in hopes of plugging the leak, and proceeded with the test. But the leak persisted before dropping to acceptable levels. Hours later, another leak cropped up elsewhere.
Nail said all test objectives were met. But managers need to review the results before determining whether the 98-metre rocket is ready for its first test flight, a lunar-orbiting mission with mannequins instead of astronauts.
Hydrogen leaks spoiled the first two launch attempts, as well as earlier countdown tests. So much hydrogen escaped during the countdown earlier this month that it exceeded NASA's limit by more than double. Wednesday's leak almost got that big again.
After hours of fits and starts, NASA finally managed to load nearly 4 million litres of fuel into the rocket. It was unclear whether the earlier gusher would nix a Tuesday launch attempt. In a separate matter, NASA still needs the U.S. Space Force to extend the certification of on-board batteries that are part of the flight safety system.
After the September 3 launch delay, NASA replaced two seals in the leaky line. One seal had a tiny indentation; it measured a mere one-hundredth of an inch.
"Now that doesn't sound like a lot, but again we're dealing with hydrogen," the smallest element on the periodic table, said mission manager Mike Sarafin.
NASA also altered the fuelling process, easing slowly into the loading of the super-cold liquid hydrogen and oxygen. After Wednesday's big leak appeared, the launch team moved even more slowly to subject the plumbing to even less stress.
Also watch: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/nasa-releases-sounds-from-black-hole-listen-to-the-spooky-audio-1661320330682">NASA releases sounds from black hole: listen to the spooky audio</a>
Once launched, the crew capsule atop the rocket will be the first to orbit the moon in 50 years. The USD 4.1 billion mission should last more than five weeks, ending with a splashdown in the Pacific. Astronauts would climb aboard for the second test flight, dashing around the moon in 2024. The third mission, targeted for 2025, would see a pair of astronauts actually landing on the moon.
NASA's Space Launch System rocket is more powerful than the Saturn V rocket that sent Apollo astronauts to the moon during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The engines and boosters are carryovers from the now retired space shuttles. Just like now, NASA struggled with elusive hydrogen leaks during the shuttle era, especially during the early 1990s.

Sold to an unidentified bidder at a whopping $2,772,500 by New York based Sotheby's, the jacket also becomes the only piece of clothing ever from the 1969 space mission to have been sold

Buzz Aldrin's historic first moon landing jacket bought for a record $2.8m

Sold to an unidentified bidder at a whopping $2,772,500 by New York based Sotheby's, the jacket also becomes the only piece of clothing ever from the 1969 space mission to have been sold

Former American astronaut Buzz Aldrin's jacket from the historic moon mission with Neil Armstrong has been auctioned at a record value of $2.8m. It is the most valuable American space artefact to be auctioned.
Sold to an unidentified bidder at a whopping $2,772,500 by New York-based Sotheby's, the jacket also becomes the only piece of clothing ever from the 1969 Apollo 11 moon mission to have been sold.
Also Watch| <a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/russia-to-opt-out-of-international-space-station-after-2024-1658845884686">Russia to opt out of International Space Station after 2024</a>
Features like fire-resistant beta cloth used in the jacket with Aldrin's name inscribed is what perhaps led to the buyer wanting to own this jacket.
It's one of the several other belongings that the 92-year-old former astronaut has put up for sale including a flight plan that was bought for $819,000.
Aldrin is currently the only surviving member of three-men crew of Apollo 11's command module Columbia&nbsp;

In a few weeks’ time, a rocket launched in 2015 is expected to crash into the Moon.
The fast-moving piece of space junk is the upper stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket which hoisted the Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite off our planet. It has been chaotically looping around Earth and the Moon ever since.
Asteroid-hunter Bill Gray has been keeping tabs on the 4-tonne booster since its launch. This month he realised his orbit-tracking software projected the booster will slam into the lunar surface on March 4, moving at more than 9,000 kilometres per hour.
The booster is tumbling wildly as it travels, which adds some uncertainty to the timing and location of the predicted impact. It is likely to occur on the far side of the Moon, so it won’t be visible from Earth.
Some astronomers say the collision is “not a big deal”, but for space archaeologist it’s quite exciting.
It will be the Moon’s newest archaeological site, joining more than 100 other locations that document human activity on the Moon and in cislunar space.
A history of crash landing on the Moon The impact will leave a new crater on the dark side of the Moon.
The very first human-made artefact to make contact with the Moon was the Soviet Luna 2 in 1959 - an extraordinary feat, as it was only two years after the launch of Sputnik 1, the first artificial Earth satellite.

A rogue rocket is on course to crash into the Moon: all you need to know

Rocket junk in space since 2015 set to crash into the Moon SpaceX&nbsp;Falcon 9 rocket was launched in February 2015&nbsp;
Booster of rocket in chaotic orbit around Earth and Moon&nbsp;
Booster will crash into the Moon on March 4: experts&nbsp;
Will crash on dark side of the moon, invisible from Earth&nbsp;
100 more locations on the Moon document human activity
1959: Soviet Luna 2, first human-made object, crashed into Moon

The booster is tumbling wildly as it travels, which adds some uncertainty to the timing and location of the predicted impact. It is likely to occur on the far side of the Moon, so it won&rsquo;t be visible from Earth.

In a few weeks&rsquo; time, a rocket launched in 2015 is expected to crash into the Moon.
The fast-moving piece of space junk is the upper stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket which hoisted the Deep Space Climate Observatory satellite off our planet. It has been chaotically looping around Earth and the Moon ever since.
Asteroid-hunter Bill Gray has been keeping tabs on the 4-tonne booster since its launch. This month he realised his orbit-tracking software projected the booster will slam into the lunar surface on March 4, moving at more than 9,000 kilometres per hour.
The booster is tumbling wildly as it travels, which adds some uncertainty to the timing and location of the predicted impact. It is likely to occur on the far side of the Moon, so it won&rsquo;t be visible from Earth.
Some astronomers say the collision is &ldquo;not a big deal&rdquo;, but for space archaeologists it&rsquo;s quite exciting.
It will be the Moon&rsquo;s newest archaeological site, joining more than 100 other locations that document human activity on the Moon and in cislunar space.
A history of crash landing on the Moon. The impact will leave a new crater on the dark side of the Moon.
The very first human-made artefact to make contact with the Moon was the Soviet Luna 2 in 1959 - an extraordinary feat, as it was only two years after the launch of Sputnik 1, the first artificial Earth satellite.

NASA is delaying putting astronauts back on the moon until 2025 at the earliest, missing the deadline set by the Trump administration.
The space agency had been aiming for 2024 for the first moon landing by astronauts in a half-century.
Announcing the delay Tuesday, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said Congress did not provide enough money to develop a landing system for its Artemis moon programme.
In addition, a legal challenge by Jeff Bezos' rocket company, Blue Origin, stalled work on the Starship lunar lander under development by Elon Musk's SpaceX.
A federal judge last Thursday rejected a lawsuit by Blue Origin against the US government challenging Nasa's decision to award a $2.9 billion lunar lander contract to SpaceX.
NASA is still targeting next February for the first test flight of its moon rocket, the Space Launch System, or SLS, with an Orion capsule. No one will be on board. Instead, astronauts will strap in for the second Artemis flight, flying beyond the moon but not landing in 2024, a year later than planned. That would bump the moon landing to at least 2025, according to Nelson.
"The human landing system is a crucial part of our work to get the first woman and the first person of colour to the lunar surface, and we are getting geared up to go," Nelson told reporters.
Officials said technology for new spacesuits also needs to ramp up before astronauts can return to the moon.
NASA's last lunar landing by astronauts occurred during Apollo 17 in 1972. Altogether, 12 men explored the moon's surface.

NASA pushes human moon landing to 2025, Jeff Bezos is to blame

NASA pushes human moon landing, Jeff Bezos is to blame. Here are the details

NASA says US astronaut mission to moon will wait until 2025

NASA is delaying putting astronauts back on the moon until 2025 at the earliest, missing the deadline set by the Trump administration.
The space agency had been aiming for 2024 for the first moon landing by astronauts in a half-century.
Announcing the delay Tuesday, NASA said Congress did not provide enough money to develop a landing system for its Artemis moon programme.
In addition, a legal challenge by Jeff Bezos' rocket company, Blue Origin, stalled work on the Starship lunar lander under development by Elon Musk's SpaceX.
A federal judge last Thursday rejected a lawsuit by Blue Origin against the US government challenging Nasa's decision to award a $2.9 billion lunar lander contract to SpaceX.
The US Apollo program sent six human missions to the moon from 1969 to 1972, the only crewed spaceflights yet to reach the lunar surface.
&nbsp;

The US space agency had been aiming for 2024 for the first moon landing by astronauts in a half-century
&nbsp;

NASA is delaying putting astronauts back on the moon until 2025 at the earliest, missing the deadline set by the Trump administration.
The space agency had been aiming for 2024 for the first moon landing by astronauts in a half-century.
Announcing the delay Tuesday, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said Congress did not provide enough money to develop a landing system for its Artemis moon programme.
In addition, a legal challenge by Jeff Bezos' rocket company, Blue Origin, stalled work on the Starship lunar lander under development by Elon Musk's SpaceX.
A federal judge last Thursday rejected a lawsuit by Blue Origin against the US government challenging Nasa's decision to award a $2.9 billion lunar lander contract to SpaceX.
NASA is still targeting next February for the first test flight of its moon rocket, the Space Launch System, or SLS, with an Orion capsule. No one will be on board. Instead, astronauts will strap in for the second Artemis flight, flying beyond the moon but not landing in 2024, a year later than planned. That would bump the moon landing to at least 2025, according to Nelson.
Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/lifestyle-news/beyond-the-milky-way-galaxy-nasa-makes-a-striking-discovery-1635241624540" target="_blank">Beyond the Milky Way Galaxy: Nasa makes a striking discovery</a>
"The human landing system is a crucial part of our work to get the first woman and the first person of colour to the lunar surface, and we are getting geared up to go," Nelson told reporters.
Officials said technology for new spacesuits also needs to ramp up before astronauts can return to the moon.
NASA's last lunar landing by astronauts occurred during Apollo 17 in 1972. Altogether, 12 men explored the moon's surface.

The world's richest man Jeff Bezos is desperate to get a pie in the sky and is willing to forego&nbsp;$2 billion for it. Blue Origin founder Bezos&nbsp;has told NASA it will waive fees to in order to secure NASA's&nbsp;contract to develop a human landing system for the moon.In an open letter to the space agency Bezos&nbsp;questions the decision to award&nbsp;Elon Musk&rsquo;s SpaceX with a sole&nbsp;$2.89 billion contract&nbsp;to build the next crewed lunar lander under its Human Landing Systems program.&nbsp;He said that NASA &ldquo;veered from its original dual-source acquisition strategy&rdquo; when it selected Elon Musk&rsquo;s&nbsp;Space Exploration Technologies."&nbsp;Read/Watch Also: Musk wants to go to Jupiter NowUrging NASA&nbsp;to reconsider it's decision Jeff Bezos&nbsp;emphasised&nbsp; that&nbsp; &ldquo;Instead of this single source approach, NASA should embrace its original strategy of competition,&rdquo; Bezos said. &ldquo;Without competition, a short time into the contract, NASA will find itself with limited options as it attempts to negotiate missed deadlines, design changes, and cost overruns.&rdquo;Making a case to select/consider Bezos' space firm, the tech pioneer said that&nbsp;Blue Origin will accept a firm, fixed-priced contract for this work, cover any system development cost overruns, and shield NASA from partner cost escalation concerns.Read the full letter here: Bezos&nbsp;to NASA

Bezos vs Musk: Here is what Jeff Bezos wrote to NASA as he takes on Musk in a space war

Bezos vs Musk: Here is what Jeff Bezos wrote to NASA as he takes on Musk in a space war to the moon

Billionaire Space War

Jeff Bezos offered to cover up to $2 billion of NASA costs in exchange for a contract to build a lunar lander to land astronauts on the moon.

The world's richest man Jeff Bezos is desperate to get a pie in the sky and is willing to forego&nbsp;$2 billion for it. Blue Origin founder Bezos&nbsp;has told NASA it will waive fees to in order to secure NASA's&nbsp;contract to develop a human landing system for the moon. In an open letter to the space agency Bezos&nbsp;questions the decision to award&nbsp;Elon Musk&rsquo;s SpaceX with a sole&nbsp;$2.89 billion contract&nbsp;to build the next crewed lunar lander under its Human Landing Systems program.&nbsp;He said that NASA &ldquo;veered from its original dual-source acquisition strategy&rdquo; when it selected Elon Musk&rsquo;s&nbsp;Space Exploration Technologies."&nbsp; Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.edtr.ai/9yq3">Elon Musk wants to go to Jupiter now</a> Urging NASA&nbsp;to reconsider it's decision Jeff Bezos&nbsp;emphasised&nbsp; that&nbsp; &ldquo;Instead of this single source approach, NASA should embrace its original strategy of competition,&rdquo; Bezos said. &ldquo;Without competition, a short time into the contract, NASA will find itself with limited options as it attempts to negotiate missed deadlines, design changes, and cost overruns.&rdquo; Making a case to select/consider Bezos' space firm, the tech pioneer said that&nbsp;Blue Origin will accept a firm, fixed-priced contract for this work, cover any system development cost overruns, and shield NASA from partner cost escalation concerns. Read the full letter here: <a href="https://blueorigin.com/news-archive/open-letter-to-administrator-nelson">Bezos&nbsp;to NASA</a>

moon landing

Categories