Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The Madras High Court pulled up the Chennai municipal corporation on Tuesday with the city grappling with rains and floods for the last 4 days.&nbsp;
Taking the civic body to task, the court asked what it had been doing since the 2015 floods, the worst the city had experienced in a century.&nbsp;
The Madras High Court said&nbsp;it was a pity that half the year residents&nbsp;long for water and rest of the year they are flooded or die in water.&nbsp;
Also watch:&nbsp;Rains continue in Tamil Nadu, rescue and rehabilitation work underway
The court has warned that it would take up the matter on its own if the situation does not improve by Friday or Saturday.
The court made these observations while hearing a plea for clearing of encroachments.
&nbsp;

'What have you been doing since 2015': Madras HC raps Chennai civic body

The Madras High Court pulled up the Chennai municipal corporation on Tuesday with the city grappling with rains and floods for the last 4 days. 

Madras HC takes civic body to task as Chennai grapples with floods
HC to Chennai civic body: what have you been doing since 2015 flood
Madras HC: will take up the matter on our own if situation doesn't improve
'Pity that half the year we long for water and rest of the year we are flooded'

The Madras High Court said&nbsp;it was a pity that half the year residents&nbsp;long for water and rest of the year they are flooded or die in water.&nbsp;

The Madras High Court pulled up the Chennai municipal corporation on Tuesday with the city grappling with rains and floods for the last 4 days.&nbsp;
Taking the civic body to task, the court asked what it had been doing since the 2015 floods, the worst the city had experienced in a century.&nbsp;
The Madras High Court said&nbsp;it was a pity that half the year residents&nbsp;long for water and rest of the year they are flooded or die in water.&nbsp;
Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/rains-continue-in-tamil-nadu-rescue-and-rehabilitation-work-underway-1636370942932">Rains continue in Tamil Nadu, rescue and rehabilitation work underway</a>
The court has warned that it would take up the matter on its own if the situation does not improve by Friday or Saturday.
The court made these observations while hearing a plea for clearing of encroachments.
&nbsp;

Ever since the new IT rules were implemented earlier this year, they have been a matter of contention across a spectrum of digital media platforms and the Indian govt.
The Madras HC on Thursday stayed certain sub-clauses of the newly amended Information Technology Rules, 2021.
The amendment, being termed as Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code by the Modi government, made digital platforms like Whatsapp and Twitter to adhere to new rules albeit reluctantly.
The sub-clauses (1) and (3) of Rule 9, which pertained to adherence to the Code of Ethics, were stayed by Madras HC. Last month, the Bombay HC had stayed the same clauses while terming them as 'manifestly unreasonable' and 'going beyond the IT Act'.
Also watch:&nbsp;Centre defends new IT rules, says will 'prevent misuse of freedom of press'
Madras HC was hearing a batch of PILs by carnatic musician TM Krishna and 13 media outlets when it remarked, 'there was prima facie substance in the petitioners' contention that a control mechanism would rob the media of its independence and democratic principles'.

Madras HC stays clauses of new IT rules, says would rob media of independence

After Bombay High Court, Madras HC has also stayed two clauses of the amendment while terming them as 'robbing media of its independence'.

Ever since the new IT rules were implemented earlier this year, they have been a matter of contention across a spectrum of digital media platforms and the Indian govt.
The Madras HC on Thursday stayed certain sub-clauses of the newly amended Information Technology Rules, 2021.
The amendment, being termed as Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code by the Modi government, made digital platforms like Whatsapp and Twitter to adhere to new rules albeit reluctantly.
The sub-clauses (1) and (3) of Rule 9, which pertained to adherence to the Code of Ethics, were stayed by Madras HC. Last month, the Bombay HC had stayed the same clauses while terming them as 'manifestly unreasonable' and 'going beyond the IT Act'.
Also watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/story/centre-defends-new-it-rules-says-will-prevent-misuse-of-freedom-of-press-1630462293215" target="_blank">Centre defends new IT rules, says will 'prevent misuse of freedom of press'</a>
Madras HC was hearing a batch of PILs by carnatic musician TM Krishna and 13 media outlets when it remarked, 'there was prima facie substance in the petitioners' contention that a control mechanism would rob the media of its independence and democratic principles'.

The Madras HC on Thursday stayed certain sub-clauses of the newly amended IT Rules.&nbsp;Earlier, the Bombay HC had struck down the same clauses.

The Madras High Court on Monday directed the concerned authorities to drop all the cases registered against the protestors involved in the anti-Sterlite agitation in May, 2018. 13 people were killed during the clashes in which the police allegedly opened fire on the protestors.
The bench consisting of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice T S Sivagnanam orally observed that firing upon the innocent public was a scar on Indian democracy and it should not be forgotten.
The protest might not have been legal or legitimate, but citizens could not be fired at on behalf of a corporate body, the court observed. It further said, the State should ensure that this kind of an incident does not happen again.
The hearing for the case has been adjourned till October 25.

Firing on Sterlite protestors a scar on democracy: Madras HC

'Scar on democracy', Madras HC raps Tamil Nadu&nbsp;authorities over Sterlite&nbsp;protests firing

The Madras High Court on Monday directed the Tamil Nadu authorities to drop all the cases registered against the protestors involved in the anti-Sterlite agitation in May, 2018.
13 people were killed during the clashes in which the police opened fire on the protestors.
The bench consisting of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice T S Sivagnanam orally observed that firing upon the innocent public was a scar on Indian democracy and it should not be forgotten.
The court observed that the protest might not have been legal or legitimate, but citizens could not be fired at on behalf of a corporate body. It further said, the Tamil Nadu&nbsp;government should ensure that this kind of an incident does not happen again.
The hearing for the case has been adjourned till October 25.

The Madras High Court&nbsp;orally observed that firing upon the innocent public was a scar on Indian democracy.&nbsp;13 people were killed during the clashes in which the police allegedly opened fire on the protestors.

Madras High Court has put a stay on single bench judgment which had imposed ₹1 lakh fine on Tamil actor Vijay&nbsp;and&nbsp;passed adverse observations against him for filing a petition challenging the levy of entry tax on his Rolls Royce.&nbsp;
HC issued a stay after the actor told the court that&nbsp;he was not challenging the entry tax demand, and was only challenging the scathing observations in the judgment.&nbsp;
While staying the single bench order, HC&nbsp;directed Vijay to pay the balance 80% entry tax within a week of demand challan issued by the tax department.
&nbsp;

Relief for Tamil actor Vijay in Rolls Royce case, HC puts on hold ₹1 lakh fine

Tamil actor Vijay's Rolls Royce case: Madras HC puts on hold ₹1 lakh fine

Big relief for Tamil star Vijay&nbsp;in Rolls Royce tax evasion case Madras HC stays single bench judgment in Vijay's Rolls Royce case HC put a stay on&nbsp;fine after actor said&nbsp;he was not challenging the entry tax Actor:&nbsp;was challenging the scathing observations in the judgment
 
&nbsp;

Madras HC puts on hold ₹1 lakh fine in&nbsp;Tamil actor Vijay's Rolls Royce case. HC asked the actor to play 80%&nbsp;entry tax within a week.

Madras High Court has stayed a payment of ₹1 lakh fine on Tamil actor Vijay&nbsp;for filing a petition challenging the levy of entry tax on his Rolls Royce.&nbsp;
HC issued a stay after the counsel representing the actor said he was ready to pay the entire tax amount, but wanted the &ldquo;uncharitable&rdquo; remarks made by the single judge against the &ldquo;actors community at large&rdquo; to be expunged.&nbsp;
Earlier a judge had said 'these actors portray themselves as champions of social justice, but evade tax and act in a manner that is not in consonance with provisions of the statutes'
While staying the single bench order, HC&nbsp;directed Vijay to pay the balance entry tax within a week of receiving demand challan issued by the tax department.
&nbsp;

Madras High Court has banned medical attempts to cure sexual orientation. The Court has also ordered strict action against those found to be indulging in attempts to cure/change sexual orientation.
The judgment was rendered on a plea by a lesbian couple seeking protection from their relatives.
Besides it has suggested host of other measures to sensitise the society and various branches of the State including Police and judiciary to remove prejudices against LGBTQIA+ community
The Court also issued interim directions to safeguard and protect the rights of the people in the LGBTQ community.

Madras HC bans medical attempts to cure sexual orientation, suggest measures to sensitise society 

Madras HC bans medical attempts to cure sexual orientation
'Strict action' against those indulging in cure/change sexual orientation
HC suggests measures to sensitise society, police, judiciary&nbsp;
Directions to safeguard &amp; protect right of the LGBTQIa+ community

Madras High Court has banned medical attempts to cure sexual orientation. The Court has also ordered strict action against those found to be indulging in attempts to cure/change sexual orientation.
The judgment was rendered on a plea by a lesbian couple seeking protection from their relatives.
Besides it has suggested host of other measures to sensitise the society and various branches of the State including Police and judiciary to remove prejudices against LGBTQIA+ community
The Court also issued interim directions to safeguard and protect the rights of the people in the LGBTQIA+ community.

The Supreme Court on Thursday while hearing the Election Commission&rsquo;s pettion complaining against the media reports on the Madras High Court&rsquo;s &lsquo;booked for murder&rsquo; remark, said Constitutional authorities can do better than to complain and ask for fetters on the media. The Madras High Court told the poll body it should be booked for murder for not stopping political rallies amid Covid.
The apex court said &lsquo;Open access to courts is a valuable safeguard to constitutional freedom and that freedom of the press is a facet of constitutional freedom of speech and expression&rsquo;.
The top court however admitted that the remarks made by the Madras High Court were "harsh and the metaphor improper" and that judicial restraint was necessary. &nbsp;
&nbsp;

'Stop complaints on media reports': SC dismisses EC's plea in Madras HC remark case

'Stop complaints on media reports': SC on the Madras HC remark case

SC: Constitutional bodies shouldn't complain about court reporting by media
SC: Madras HC's remarks on Election Commission were "harsh"
EC challenged Madras HC's&nbsp;'murder charges' remark in SC
Madras HC slammed EC for allowing political rallies amid pandemic

The Supreme Court on Thursday while hearing the Election Commission&rsquo;s petition complaining against the media reports on the Madras High Court&rsquo;s &lsquo;booked for murder&rsquo; remark, said Constitutional authorities can do better than to complain and ask for fetters on the media. The SC said it will be retrograde to restrain HCs from making observations or gagging the media from reporting observations.
The apex court said &lsquo;Open access to courts is a valuable safeguard to constitutional freedom and that freedom of the press is a facet of constitutional freedom of speech and expression&rsquo;.
The top court however admitted that the remarks made by the Madras High Court were "harsh and the metaphor improper" and that judicial restraint was necessary. &nbsp;
&nbsp;

The Supreme Court on Monday told the Election Commission that media cannot be stopped from reporting oral observations made by the court. A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud was hearing the poll panel's plea challenging the Madras HC's 'murder charges' remark. The Madras High Court had slammed the Election Commission of India for allowing political rallies amid a deadly second wave of Covid-19. The Supreme Court told the Election Commission that their prayer to stop media from reporting oral observations is too far-fetched and cannot be permitted.
.

SC to EC: Media cannot be stopped from reporting discussions in higher courts

Media cannot be stopped from reporting discussions in higher courts, Supreme Court tells EC

The Supreme Court on Monday told the Election Commission that media cannot be stopped from reporting oral observations made by the court. A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud was hearing the poll panel's plea challenging the Madras HC's 'murder charges' remark. The Madras High Court had slammed the Election Commission of India for allowing political rallies amid a deadly second wave of Covid-19. The Supreme Court told the Election Commission that their prayer to stop media from reporting oral observations is too far-fetched and cannot be permitted.
.

The Election Commission moved the Madras High Court against the "murder charges" comment and said says media should not report oral comments made by court.

EC tells Madras HC to stop media from reporting oral observations

EC tells Madra HC to stop media from reporting oral observations

EC moves Madras HC against its 'murder charge' remark
EC to HC: stop media from reporting court's oral observations
Madras HC: EC responsible for covid&nbsp;situation, should face murder charge

The Election Commission moved the Madras High Court against the "murder charges" comment and said media should not report oral comments made by court. The poll body said it is aggrieved with media report of the Madras High Court's oral observations that EC is "singularly responsible for the situation prevalent today" and that it should face murder charges.
In its petition it has asked the court to direct the media houses to refrain from reporting on oral observations made during court proceedings in a case concerning COVID protocol for vote counting in Tamil Nadu.

Madras HC issues notice to AR Rahman over tax evasion case

The Madras High court has issued a notice to Music Maestro AR Rahman&nbsp;seeking an explanation for&nbsp;allegedly&nbsp;routing an income of over ₹3 crores&nbsp;through his&nbsp;AR Rahman Foundation to evade tax.&nbsp;
According to a report in a leading daily, the&nbsp;Income Tax Department filed a case against Rahman&nbsp;after he music composer's&nbsp;received an income of ₹3.47 crore in the year 2011-12 based on a contract with a UK-based telecom company to compose&nbsp;exclusive ringtones.&nbsp;
Reportedly Rahman&nbsp;is accused of&nbsp;instructing the company to directly pay the remuneration to his charitable foundation &amp; evade taxes.&nbsp;

Madras HC seeks AR Rahman's&nbsp;reply in tax evasion case
Rahman&nbsp;accused of routing payments through his trust
&nbsp;

The Madras High court has issued a notice to music maestro AR Rahman&nbsp;seeking an explanation for&nbsp;allegedly&nbsp;routing an income of over ₹3 crores&nbsp;through his&nbsp;AR Rahman Foundation to evade tax.&nbsp;
According to a report in a leading daily, the&nbsp;Income Tax Department filed a case against Rahman&nbsp;after the music composer received an income of ₹3.47 crore in the year 2011-12 based on a contract with a UK-based telecom company to compose&nbsp;exclusive ringtones.&nbsp;
Reportedly Rahman&nbsp;is accused of&nbsp;instructing the company to directly pay the remuneration to his charitable foundation &amp; evade taxes.&nbsp;

madras hc

Categories