Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

The Delhi High Court seeks NIA guidance on allowing MP Rashid's Parliament attendance while in custody amid terror charges.

Delhi HC asks NIA stand over custody parole to jailed MP Engineer Rashid

Delhi HC asks if MP Rashid, facing terror charges, can attend Parliament via custody parole. NIA cites security concerns.

Court seeks input on whether MP Rashid can attend Parliament under custody parole despite terror charges.

&nbsp;The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the stand of the NIA on allowing jailed MP Engineer Rashid, facing trial in a terror funding case, to attend the ongoing Parliament session on custody parole. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;"He can, in the meantime, attend the session in judicial custody. He is an elected MP. What is the difficulty in sending him in custody?" asked Justice Vikas Mahajan. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;The court granted time till February 7 to the National Investigation Agency's (NIA) counsel to seek instructions on the issue. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;The NIA counsel said the matter was "not that simple" as there was an issue of security as well. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Custody parole entails a prisoner being escorted by armed police personnel to the place of visit. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;The court was hearing Rashid's petition alleging he was left without any remedy after the NIA court dealing with his bail application left him in a limbo post his election to the Lok Sabha last year as it wasn't a special MP/MLA court. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;During the hearing, the counsel appearing for the high court administration said an application was filed in the Supreme Court for a clarification and it would be mentioned on February 7 for listing. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;According to the top court's website the matter would come up on February 10 or 11, he added. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Senior advocate N Hariharan, appearing for Rashid, submitted the first leg of the Parliament session was ending on February 13 and his client ought to be permitted to represent his constituency. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;He urged court to grant him custody parole and said, "He (Rashid) can be handed over to the parliamentary marshalls." &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;During the hearing, the court questioned the senior counsel on its jurisdiction to decide to a plea for bail, observing such an issue had to be looked into by a division bench in appeal. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;The NIA opposed Rashid's plea seeking interim bail to attend the ongoing Parliament session and said he had no such "right" as a parliamentarian. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;NIA also opposed grant of bail to Rashid in the case and asserted that his plea was not maintainable. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Rashid was elected from the Baramulla constituency in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and has been lodged in Tihar Jail since 2019 after the NIA arrested him under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in the 2017 terror-funding case. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;In his petition, Rashid sought the high court to either direct the expeditious disposal of his pending bail plea by the NIA court or decide the matter itself. He also prayed for an interim bail to attend the budget session of Parliament, which began on January 31 and concludes on April 4. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;As an alternative, Rashid sought custody parole during the budget session. On December 24 last year, the NIA court requested the district judge to transfer the case to a court designated to try lawmakers while dismissing his plea for an order on the pending bail application in the case. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;With the matter sent back to him by the district judge, the trial judge said in his decision that he could only decide the miscellaneous application and not the bail plea.

The petition, moved by advocates Hrishikesh Baruah and Akshay Kumar, had demanded that the directive issued by the IOA ad-hoc committee with regard to the two categories (men's freestyle 65kg and women's 53kg) be quashed

Delhi HC refuses to interfere with Asian Games trials exemption to wrestlers Vinesh Phogat, Bajrang Punia

Delhi High Court dismisses the plea moved by wrestlers Antim Panghal and Sujeet Kalkal against the exemption granted to Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia!

Tap to know more...

The petition, moved by advocates Hrishikesh Baruah and Akshay Kumar, had demanded that the directive issued by the IOA ad-hoc committee with regard to the two categories (men's freestyle 65kg and women's 53kg) be quashed

The Delhi High Court Saturday refused to interfere with the exemption granted to top wrestlers Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia from Asian Games trials.
Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed the petition by Under-20 World Champion Antim Panghal and Under-23 Asian Champion Sujeet Kalkal against the direct entry allowed to Phogat and Punia to participate in the tournament.
&ldquo;Writ petition is dismissed,&rdquo; the judge said.
A detailed copy of the order is awaited. &nbsp;Phogat (53kg) and Punia (65kg) were given direct entry for the Asian Games by the Indian Olympic Association's ad-hoc committee on Tuesday, while other wrestlers will have to earn their places in the Indian squad through selection trials on July 22 and 23.
Panghal and Kalkal moved the high court on July 19 challenging the exemption and demanded a fair selection process for the quadrennial showpiece event.
The petition, moved by advocates Hrishikesh Baruah and Akshay Kumar, had demanded that the directive issued by the IOA ad-hoc committee with regard to the two categories (men's freestyle 65kg and women's 53kg) be quashed and the exemption granted to Phogat and Punia set aside.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.editorji.com/sports-news/cricket/joshua-da-silva-s-mother-breaks-down-after-meeting-virat-kohli-ind-vs-wi-1690010681698">Joshua Da Silva's mother breaks down after meeting Virat Kohli | IND vs WI</a>

While the ad-hoc panel had granted the exemptions, other wrestlers protested against the panel's decision.

Delhi High Court reserves judgement in wrestlers' plea against Asian Games trials exemption 

<h2>While the ad-hoc panel had granted the exemptions, other wrestlers protested against the panel's decision.</h2>

The Delhi High Court has reserved its judgement on a plea against the exemption granted to Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia for Asian Games trials and informed that the pronouncement will take place on 22nd July.&nbsp; Vinesh &amp; Bajrang were among the 6 grapplers who were protesting against the former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and had earlier requested the Indian Olympic Association for more time to prepare for the upcoming Asian Games. However, the ad-hoc panel instead gave them exemptions, a move that hasn't gone down well with the wrestling community. Wrestlers Antim Panghal and Sujeet Kalkal have challenged the decision of the ad-hoc committee of the Indian Olympic Association in the Delhi High Court, asking for withdrawal of exemptions granted to Phogat and Punia in the trials for women's 53 kg and men's freestyle 65 kg categories earlier this month.

Delhi High Court directs WFI to file affidavit in response to wrestlers' plea, matter listed for hearing on July 21. 

Delhi HC seeks WFI response to Antim Panghal, Sujeet Kalkal's plea against exemption to Bajrang, Vinesh

Delhi High Court directs WFI to file an affidavit in response to wrestlers' plea, matter listed for hearing on Friday.

Delhi High Court directs WFI to file affidavit in response to wrestlers' plea, matter listed for hearing on July 21.&nbsp;

The Delhi High Court sought a response from the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) on the plea moved by wrestlers Antim Panghal and Sujeet Kalkal challenging Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia's exemption.&nbsp;
Justice Subramonium Prasad directed the counsel appearing for IOA's ad-hoc panel that's running the WFI to file the affidavit by Thursday itself and listed the case for hearing on July 21.
Panghal and Kalkal challenged the IOA ad-hoc panel's decision to exempt Bajrang Punia and Vinesh Phogat from trials for Asian Games, granting them direct entry into the wrestling squad in the 65 KG and 53 KG respectively.&nbsp; The wrestlers' joint petition demands fair trials without granting any exemption to any grappler and the whole process should be videographed.&nbsp;

delhi high court

Categories