Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Lok Sabha MPs on Tuesday flagged that over 11.4 lakh cases are pending in family courts across the country and called for their speedy settlement. 

Over 11.4 lakh cases pending in family courts, must be settled expeditiously: LS MPs

The issue came up during a debate in the Lok Sabha on the Family Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which was moved for consideration by Law Minister Kiren Rijiju.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.editorji.com/search?q=Lok+Sabha+" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lok Sabha</a> MPs on Tuesday flagged that over 11.4 lakh cases are pending in family courts across the country and called for their speedy settlement.
The issue came up during a debate in the Lok Sabha on the Family Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which was moved for consideration by Law Minister Kiren Rijiju.
Participating in the discussion, Kaushalendra Kumar of the Janata Dal (United) said the number of pending cases in family courts is increasing and stands at over 11.4 lakh. He called for a speedy settlement of the cases.
Bhartruhari Mahtab of the Biju Janata Dal also echoed his views and said the government should say what is it doing to settle the pending cases in the family courts.
"There are 715 family courts in the country in 26 states and Union territories.... Parliament is supreme in changing law and giving it effect but the interpretation will be done by the courts. Which court will decide that the application would be retrospective should also be laid down," he said.
When such courts are being opened, is it not the duty of the Centre to find out whether a notification has been done, Mahtab asked.
Also Watch| <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/4-congress-lok-sabha-mps-suspended-for-rest-of-the-session-over-protests-1658755392343" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4 Congress Lok Sabha MPs suspended for rest of the session over protests</a>
Initiating the discussion, Sunita Duggal of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) said more appointments should be made in family courts so that the cases are resolved expeditiously.
The Family Courts Act was enacted in 1984 to set up family courts to promote conciliation and secure a speedy settlement of disputes related to marriage and family affairs. There are 715 family courts functioning across 26 states and Union territories.
Two family courts were established in Nagaland in 2008 and three in Himachal Pradesh in 2019 through notifications issued by the respective state governments.
The issue of lack of jurisdiction of the family courts in Himachal Pradesh came to the fore during proceedings of the Himachal Pradesh High Court last year.
Another petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court stated that the central government had not issued any notification extending the Family Court Act to Himachal Pradesh and the state government directives to establish such courts were without any legal authority.
The family courts in Nagaland too were operating without any legal authority since 2008.
The Family Courts (Amendment) Bill seeks to insert a provision in sub-section 3 of section 1 to provide for the establishment of family courts in Himachal Pradesh with effect from February 15, 2019 and in Nagaland with effect from September 12, 2008.
The Bill also seeks to insert a new section 3A to retrospectively validate all actions under the said Act taken by the governments of Himachal Pradesh and Nagaland and the family courts of those states.
Setting up family courts and their functioning fall within the domain of the state governments in consultation with the respective high courts.
Also Watch| <a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/politics/19-opposition-mps-suspended-from-rajya-sabha-for-a-week-1658836176046" target="_blank" rel="noopener">19 Opposition MPs suspended from Rajya Sabha for week</a>

In an unusual case, a couple has sued their son and daughter-in-law in Uttarakhand's Haridwar. Their grievance - that they are yet to get a grandchild, despite having married their son off 6 years ago.
Sanjeev Ranjan Prasad and his wife have sought a grandchild within a year, or Rs 5 crore from their son and daughter-in-law. Prasad also cited his financial problems, while speaking with reporters.
He said, "We married them off in 2016 with a lot of hope that we would see grandchildren soon. My wife is on medication. We treated our daughter-in-law like our daughter. There were fights. She didn't visit us. We used to request that we would bring the child up. We would be happy with a grandson or granddaughter. It's our misfortune that we don't have grandchildren."
Prasad added, "I spent all my money on my son. I sent my son to America for training. I gave him a lot of money even after he came back. I don't have any money now. I spent all my money on my son. We have made a claim of Rs 2.5 crore each against our son and daughter-in-law. We spent our life savings on him."

'Give grandchild or else...': Parents warn son, daughter-in-law with ₹5 crore lawsuit in Uttarakhand's Haridwar

Uttarakhand couple Sanjeev Ranjan Prasad and his wife have sought a grandchild within a year, or Rs 5 crore from their son and daughter-in-law.

In an unusual case, a couple has sued their son and daughter-in-law in Uttarakhand's Haridwar. Their grievance - that they are yet to get a grandchild, despite having married their son off 6 years ago.
Sanjeev Ranjan Prasad and his wife have sought a grandchild within a year, or Rs 5 crore from their son and daughter-in-law. Prasad also cited his financial problems, while speaking with reporters.
Watch |<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/madhya-pradesh-sisters-end-up-with-wrong-grooms-due-to-power-cut-1652175218507" target="_blank">&nbsp;Madhya Pradesh: sisters end up with wrong grooms due to power cut</a>
He said, "We married them off in 2016 with a lot of hope that we would see grandchildren soon. My wife is on medication. We treated our daughter-in-law like our daughter. There were fights. She didn't visit us. We used to request that we would bring the child up. We would be happy with a grandson or granddaughter. It's our misfortune that we don't have grandchildren."
Prasad added, "I spent all my money on my son. I sent my son to America for training. I gave him a lot of money even after he came back. I don't have any money now. I spent all my money on my son. We have made a claim of Rs 2.5 crore each against our son and daughter-in-law. We spent our life savings on him."

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that denial of the hearing of a bail request by courts violates the rights of the accused. It added that urgent cases involving personal liberty should be taken up for hearing without any delay.
The top court said not listing an application for a regular bail "impinges upon the liberty of the person in custody".
The Supreme Court made these observations while hearing a plea by an industrialist, whose bail plea was pending in the Punjab and Haryana High court since February 2020. He approached the Supreme Court after the high court rejected his request for an early hearing.
The Supreme Court said under the current circumstances of the pandemic, at least half of the judges should sit on alternative days "so that hearing is accorded to the person in distress."

Denial of bail hearing violates rights of accused: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that denial of the hearing of a bail request by courts violates the rights of the accused

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that denial of the hearing of a bail request by courts violates the rights of the accused. It added that urgent cases involving personal liberty should be taken up for hearing without any delay.
The top court said not listing an application for a regular bail "impinges upon the liberty of the person in custody".
The Supreme Court made these observations while hearing a plea by an industrialist, whose bail plea was pending in the Punjab and Haryana High court since February 2020. He approached the Supreme Court after the high court rejected his request for an early hearing.
The Supreme Court said under the current circumstances of the pandemic, at least half of the judges should sit on alternative days "so that hearing is accorded to the person in distress."

courts

Categories