Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has apologised to a court in London as she declared that she had no intention to mislead the court in her account related to her privacy case against the Mail on Sunday's publishers.
The Court of Appeal, hearing the Associated Newspapers' appeal seeking to overturn a previous judgment in favour of the Duchess, heard she had asked an aide to pass on information to the authors of a biography &ndash; despite having earlier said she "did not contribute".
In a witness statement to the court, hearing the case this week, the wife of Prince Harry said she accepted that her aide did provide information to the authors of the book with her knowledge but she said the "extent of the information he shared is unknown to me".
Also Watch:&nbsp;Global Citizen concert: Harry, Meghan appeal for Covid vaccine equity
She said: "When I approved the passage... I did not have the benefit of seeing these emails and I apologise to the court for the fact that I had not remembered these exchanges at the time.
"I had absolutely no wish or intention to mislead the defendant or the court." Associated Newspapers is trying to overturn a ruling after it published a letter from Markle to her father. Earlier this year, the 40-year-old now based in the US with Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, had won her privacy case against the publishing house.
The Associated Newspapers legal team are now seeking to overturn the judgment at the Court of Appeal, disputing that this was simply a private and personal letter &ndash; and have argued that it was crafted with the "possibility of public consumption" in mind.
The case is expected to conclude this week, with a ruling likely to be at a later date.

Meghan Markle apologizes to UK court for misleading statements in privacy case

Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle's apology came as part of a British newspaper group's appeal against a UK High Court ruling that it breached Markle's privacy, by publishing parts of a letter she wrote to her father.

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has apologised to a court in London as she declared that she had no intention to mislead the court in her account related to her privacy case against the Mail on Sunday's publishers.
The Court of Appeal, hearing the Associated Newspapers' appeal seeking to overturn a previous judgment in favour of the Duchess, heard she had asked an aide to pass on information to the authors of a biography &ndash; despite having earlier said she "did not contribute".
In a witness statement to the court, hearing the case this week, the wife of Prince Harry said she accepted that her aide did provide information to the authors of the book with her knowledge but she said the "extent of the information he shared is unknown to me".
She said: "When I approved the passage... I did not have the benefit of seeing these emails"
Earlier this year, the 40-year-old now based in the US with Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, had won her privacy case against the publishing house.
The case is expected to conclude this week, with a ruling likely to be at a later date.

Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle's apology came as part of a British newspaper group's appeal against a UK High Court ruling that it breached Markle's privacy, by publishing parts of a letter she wrote to her father.

<a href="https://www.editorji.com/story/meghan-and-harry-s-time-magazine-cover-called-out-for-looking-too-cgi-1631786247464" target="_blank">Meghan Markle,</a> the Duchess of Sussex, has apologised to a court in London as she declared that she had no intention to mislead the court in her account related to her privacy case against the Mail on Sunday's publishers.
The Court of Appeal, hearing the Associated Newspapers' appeal seeking to overturn a previous judgment in favour of the Duchess, heard she had asked an aide to pass on information to the authors of a biography &ndash; despite having earlier said she "did not contribute".
In a witness statement to the court, hearing the case this week, the wife of Prince Harry said she accepted that her aide did provide information to the authors of the book with her knowledge but she said the "extent of the information he shared is unknown to me".
Also Watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/world-news/global-citizen-concert-harry-meghan-appeal-for-covid-vaccine-equity-1632663360557" target="_blank">Global Citizen concert: Harry, Meghan appeal for Covid vaccine equity</a>
She said: "When I approved the passage... I did not have the benefit of seeing these emails and I apologise to the court for the fact that I had not remembered these exchanges at the time.
"I had absolutely no wish or intention to mislead the defendant or the court." Associated Newspapers is trying to overturn a ruling after it published a letter from Markle to her father. Earlier this year, the 40-year-old now based in the US with Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, had won her privacy case against the publishing house.
The Associated Newspapers legal team are now seeking to overturn the judgment at the Court of Appeal, disputing that this was simply a private and personal letter &ndash; and have argued that it was crafted with the "possibility of public consumption" in mind.
The case is expected to conclude this week, with a ruling likely to be at a later date.

Two people have been arrested by the special cell of the Delhi Police in connection with the killing of a jailed gangster in a&nbsp;shootout inside a Delhi courtroom. The police has also recovered the car used by the attackers.&nbsp;
Two gunmen posing as lawyers shot gangster Jitender Gogi thrice in a Delhi court&nbsp;on Friday. The attackers were killed in retaliatory fire by the policemen escorting the gangster.&nbsp;
The shooting was the result of a rivalry of years between Jitender Gogi's gang and the rival 'Tillu gang', the police had said.
Following the incident,&nbsp;a plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking directions to the Centre and the states to take immediate steps to ensure security in subordinate courts.

Delhi court shooting: 2 people arrested, car used by them recovered

Two people have been arrested by the special cell of the Delhi Police in connection with the killing of a jailed gangster in a shootout inside a Delhi courtroom.

2 people arrested in connected with killing of a gangster in a Delhi court
2 men dressed as lawyers opened fire at gangster Jitender&nbsp;Gogi&nbsp;on Friday
Attackers were killed in retaliatory fire by policemen
Police: shooting was the result of a rivalry of years between two gangs

The shooting was the result of a rivalry of years between Jitender Gogi's gang and the rival 'Tillu gang', the police had said.

Two people have been arrested by the special cell of the Delhi Police in connection with the killing of a jailed gangster in a&nbsp;shootout inside a Delhi courtroom. The police has also recovered the car used by the attackers.&nbsp;
Two gunmen posing as lawyers shot gangster Jitender Gogi thrice in a Delhi court&nbsp;on Friday. The attackers were killed in retaliatory fire by the policemen escorting the gangster.&nbsp;
Also Watch:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.editorji.com/india-news/dramatic-video-shootout-inside-delhi-court-gangster-3-others-dead-1632475897734">Dramatic video: Shootout inside Delhi court, gangster dead</a>
The shooting was the result of a rivalry of years between Jitender Gogi's gang and the rival 'Tillu gang', the police had said.
Following the incident,&nbsp;a plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking directions to the Centre and the states to take immediate steps to ensure security in subordinate courts.

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a man suffering from 'Peter Pan Syndrome' in connection with a case of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
The lawyer for the 23-year-old accused stated that his client is suffering from the 'Peter Pan Syndrome'- a term used to describe an adult who is socially immature.
"The victim's family knew about their relationship. But, her family didn't like their relationship due to the boy's illness and poor background and also had a grudge against his family members," the defence lawyer told the court.
The lawyer further said the victim had the knowledge of what she was doing and got into the relationship voluntarily.
The court noted that the victim's statement "prima facie shows she herself left her parents' house and joined the company the accused".

Mumbai: Man with 'Peter Pan Syndrome' gets bail case of sexual assault on minor 

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a man suffering from 'Peter Pan Syndrome' in connection with a case of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.

Mumbai: Man with 'Peter Pan Syndrome' gets bail in sexual assault case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a man suffering from 'Peter Pan Syndrome' in connection with a case of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
The lawyer for the 23-year-old accused stated that his client is suffering from the 'Peter Pan Syndrome'- a term used to describe an adult who is socially immature.
"The victim's family knew about their relationship. But, her family didn't like their relationship due to the boy's illness and poor background and also had a grudge against his family members," the defence lawyer told the court.
The lawyer further said the victim had the knowledge of what she was doing and got into the relationship voluntarily.
The court noted that the victim's statement "prima facie shows she herself left her parents' house and joined the company the accused".

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the sessions court which acquitted Tarun Tejpal of rape, to redact information about the victim&rsquo;s identity from it judgement before uploading it on the court&rsquo;s website.&nbsp;
The sessions court had made several references to the victim's identity. In its over 500-page judgement, the court had disclosed names of the victim&rsquo;s mother, husband and also her email ID.&nbsp;The appeal was filed by the Goa govt which criticised the judgement for its insensitivity towards the victim and called it &lsquo;astonishing&rsquo;.&nbsp;
Tarun Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of Tehelka&nbsp;magazine, was acquitted by the sessions court in a 2013 rape case on Monday. The court held that the victim did not exhibit any kind of &lsquo;normative behaviour&rsquo; which a victim of sexual assault might show.

Redact victim’s identity from judgement: Bombay HC tells court that acquitted Tejpal 

//&nbsp;Tejpal&nbsp;case:&nbsp;Bombay HC tells court to not disclose victim's identity&nbsp; // Sessions court made references to vicitm's identity in judgment&nbsp; // 'Astonishing':&nbsp;Goa&nbsp;govt challenged Tejpal's&nbsp;acquittal in rape case // Judgement holds that victim didn't show 'normative behaviour'&nbsp;

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the sessions court which acquitted Tarun Tejpal of rape, to redact information about the victim&rsquo;s identity from it judgement before uploading it on the court&rsquo;s website.&nbsp;
The sessions court had made several references to the victim's identity. In its over 500-page judgement, the court had disclosed names of the victim&rsquo;s mother, husband and also her email ID.&nbsp;The appeal was filed by the Goa govt which criticised the judgement for its insensitivity towards the victim and called it &lsquo;astonishing&rsquo;.&nbsp;
Tarun Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of Tehelka&nbsp;magazine, was acquitted by the sessions court in a 2013 rape case on Monday. The court held that the victim did not exhibit any kind of &lsquo;normative behaviour&rsquo; which a victim of sexual assault might show.

Union Minister DV Sadananda Gowda on Thursday asked if government representatives should "hang themselves" for not being able to provide Covid-19 vaccines to the people. He said the court has said with good intention said that everyone should be vaccinated but asked should they hang themselves if they cannot provide vaccine doses as directed by the judiciary.
Replying to queries on the shortage of vaccine, the Union Minister stressed on the plan of action of the government and said its decisions are not guided by any political gain or by any other reason. Gowda said the government has been doing its job sincerely and honestly, but agreed that some shortcomings have surfaced.

Should we hang ourselves if vaccines not produced yet, Union Minister asks

&lsquo;Should we hang ourselves if vaccines not available, Union Minister asks
Statement after court pulled up govt over slow pace of vaccinations
Gowda:&nbsp;govt doing job sincerely, some shortcomings have surfaced
Gowda: govt's decisions&nbsp;not guided by any political gain

Union Minister DV Sadananda Gowda on Thursday asked if government representatives should "hang themselves" for not being able to provide Covid-19 vaccines to the people. He said the court has said with good intention said that everyone should be vaccinated but asked should they hang themselves if they cannot provide vaccine doses as directed by the judiciary.
Replying to queries on the shortage of vaccine, the Union Minister stressed on the plan of action of the government and said its decisions are not guided by any political gain or by any other reason. Gowda said the government has been doing its job sincerely and honestly, but agreed that some shortcomings have surfaced.

A Delhi Court on Thursday granted bail to former JNU&nbsp;student&nbsp;Umar Khalid in a case related to the violence in Delhi on February 24, 2020 over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests.
The court said that Khalid had been chargesheeted on insignificant material which is unwarranted, adding that there is no evidence of Khalid&rsquo;s presence at the scene of crime.
Opposing his bail, the prosecution had argued that many people related to the &lsquo;riotous mob&rsquo; are yet to be identified, but the Court said that Khalid cannot be incarcerated in jail for infinity just because others who were part of the mob have not yet been identified and arrested.
The charge sheet also accused Umar&nbsp;Khalid of &lsquo;criminal conspiracy&rsquo; in connection with former AAP counsellor&nbsp;Tahir Hussain and alleged that he had planned violence during the former US President Donald Trump's visit to Delhi. The court went on to say that it could not find any rationale in the act of the police involving Khalid in this isolated case for the offence of conspiracy.
The court, however gave him bail on several conditions - Khalid has been asked to furnish a personal bond of Rs 20,000, appear before the Court on every date of hearing, furnish his mobile number to the police upon his release from the jail and also install the &ldquo;Aarogya Setu App&rdquo;.

‘Chargesheeted on insignificant material’: Court grants bail to Umar Khalid in Delhi riots case

A Delhi Court on Thursday granted bail to former JNU&nbsp;student&nbsp;Umar Khalid in a case related to the violence in Delhi on February 24, 2020 over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) protests.
The court said that Khalid had been chargesheeted on insignificant material which is unwarranted, adding that there is no evidence of Khalid&rsquo;s presence at the scene of crime.
Opposing his bail, the prosecution had argued that many people related to the &lsquo;riotous mob&rsquo; are yet to be identified, but the Court said that Khalid cannot be incarcerated in jail for infinity just because others who were part of the mob have not yet been identified and arrested.
The charge sheet also accused Umar&nbsp;Khalid of &lsquo;criminal conspiracy&rsquo; in connection with former AAP counsellor&nbsp;Tahir Hussain and alleged that he had planned violence during the former US President Donald Trump's visit to Delhi. The court went on to say that it could not find any rationale in the act of the police involving Khalid in this isolated case for the offence of conspiracy.
The court, however gave him bail on several conditions - Khalid has been asked to furnish a personal bond of Rs 20,000, appear before the Court on every date of hearing, furnish his mobile number to the police upon his release from the jail and also install the &ldquo;Aarogya Setu App&rdquo;.

Bombay HC reserves order on Rhea's bail plea

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday reserved its order on the bail pleas of Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty and her brother&nbsp;Showik Chakraborty&nbsp;who have been arrested&nbsp;in a drug case.

Rhea bail plea reserved by Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday reserved its order on the bail pleas of Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty and her brother&nbsp;Showik Chakraborty&nbsp;who have been arrested&nbsp;in a drug case. Opposing the bail pleas, the Narcotics Control Bureau told the High Court that the offences were non-bailable as the crime involved was 'worse than murder or culpable homicide'.
While Rhea was sent to judicial custody for 14 days after her arrest on September 8, her brother Showik is in Narcotics Control Bureau remand since September 4.

court

Categories