Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Babri demolition: what CBI judge said in his verdict 

'Accused BJP&nbsp;leaders in fact tried to stop mosque demolition,' the CBI&nbsp;judge noted while acquitting&nbsp;the accused. Here are some other observations from the historic Babri&nbsp;Masjid verdict.&nbsp;

Babri demolition verdict: what the CBI judge said The CBI special court judge BK Yadav who acquitted all the 32 accused in the case of conspiracy to demolition the 16th century&nbsp;Mughal Mosque noted that the razing of the Babri Maasjid by the karsevaks on December 6, 1992 was not planned. Rejecting claims of 351 witnesses and 600 documents that the CBI had submitted as evidence, the judgement also notes that there is not much proof against the accused which included BJP veterans LK Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi. The judge noted that the authencity of audios and videos submitted by the CBI can't be proven. Noting that the audio of their speeches were not clear, Judge Yadav went on to note that ant-social elements tore down the mosque and the accused leaders had in fact tried to stop them.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Babri demolition: a look at SC role and CBI probe 

With the Supreme Court setting August 31 as the deadline and later extending it by a month for the CBI court to give its verdict&nbsp;in&nbsp;Babri&nbsp;demolition, the trial court started day-to-day hearing to complete the task in time.&nbsp;The central agency produced 351 witnesses and 600 documents as evidence before the court. Charges were framed against 48 people, but 17 have died during the course of trial.&nbsp;The trial under the serious criminal conspiracy charges commenced against the&nbsp;accused&nbsp;after having been dropped by the trial court in 2001. The verdict was upheld by the Allahabad High Court in 2010, but the apex court ordered restoration of the conspiracy charge against them on April 19, 2017.&nbsp;The top court ordered daily hearing in the high-profile case and directed the special judge to conclude it in two years.&nbsp;

With the Supreme Court setting August 31 as the deadline and later extending it by a month for the CBI court to give its verdict&nbsp;in&nbsp;Babri&nbsp;demolition, the trial court started day-to-day hearing to complete the task in time.&nbsp;The central agency produced 351 witnesses and 600 documents as evidence before the court. Charges were framed against 48 people, but 17 have died during the course of trial.&nbsp;The trial under the serious criminal conspiracy charges commenced against the&nbsp;accused&nbsp;after having been dropped by the trial court in 2001. The verdict was upheld by the Allahabad High Court in 2010, but the apex court ordered restoration of the conspiracy charge against them on April 19, 2017.&nbsp;The top court ordered daily hearing in the high-profile case and directed the special judge to conclude it in two years.&nbsp;&nbsp;Before the 2017 verdict of the apex court, two sets of cases were being heard in Lucknow and Raebareli.&nbsp;

600 documents

Categories