Editorji is a popular short video news and information platform based in India. It was founded in 2018 by Vikram Chandra, one of India’s leading journalists, and has risen to prominence in the digital news space in a relatively short span of time. The platform is primarily designed for mobile devices, with applications available for Android and iOS.

ABOUT US:

about us editorji

Latest Video News: Editorji provides the latest news video headlines, latest videos clip from India and the World. Get all breaking news videos on Entertainment, Business, Coronavirus, Elections, Politics and more.

Latest Video News, Breaking News, Bollywood, Political, Sports, Business News | Editorji

+91 11 4035 6666 / info@editorji.com
3rd floor, Plot B, Khasara no 360, Sultanpur, New Delhi, Delhi 110030
<a title="mail to us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Send Feedback</a>
<a title="Contact Us" href="mailto:info@editorji.com">Contact Us</a>

REACH US

Contact for any questions, suggestions, comments, feedback or advertisement on Editorji.com, we are always looking forward to hearing from you.

Contact Us for Feedback, Suggestions and Advertising 

Editorji content is better experienced in our app.

Babri demolition: what CBI judge said in his verdict 

'Accused BJP&nbsp;leaders in fact tried to stop mosque demolition,' the CBI&nbsp;judge noted while acquitting&nbsp;the accused. Here are some other observations from the historic Babri&nbsp;Masjid verdict.&nbsp;

Babri demolition verdict: what the CBI judge said The CBI special court judge BK Yadav who acquitted all the 32 accused in the case of conspiracy to demolition the 16th century&nbsp;Mughal Mosque noted that the razing of the Babri Maasjid by the karsevaks on December 6, 1992 was not planned. Rejecting claims of 351 witnesses and 600 documents that the CBI had submitted as evidence, the judgement also notes that there is not much proof against the accused which included BJP veterans LK Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi. The judge noted that the authencity of audios and videos submitted by the CBI can't be proven. Noting that the audio of their speeches were not clear, Judge Yadav went on to note that ant-social elements tore down the mosque and the accused leaders had in fact tried to stop them.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Babri demolition: charges against BJP veterans explained

So&nbsp;what are the charges against BJP veterans.&nbsp;The&nbsp;CBI&rsquo;s&nbsp;charge of conspiracy is in addition to the charges against them for promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion.&nbsp;The accused are also facing charges of having made assertions&nbsp;&lsquo;prejudicial to national integration and injuring or defiling a place of worship&rsquo;.&nbsp;The other charges against them include indulging in "deliberate and malicious" acts intended to outrage religious feelings, uttering statements leading to public mischief, rioting and unlawful assembly.&nbsp;The CBI argued that the accused conspired and instigated 'kar&nbsp;sevaks' to demolish the 16th century mosque.&nbsp;But the accused pleaded innocence maintaining that there is no evidence to prove their guilt and claimed they were implicated by the then Congress government at the Centre as a political vendetta.&nbsp;

So&nbsp;what are the charges against BJP veterans.&nbsp;The&nbsp;CBI&rsquo;s&nbsp;charge of conspiracy is in addition to the charges against them for promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion.&nbsp;The accused are also facing charges of having made assertions&nbsp;&lsquo;prejudicial to national integration and injuring or defiling a place of worship&rsquo;.&nbsp;The other charges against them include indulging in "deliberate and malicious" acts intended to outrage religious feelings, uttering statements leading to public mischief, rioting and unlawful assembly.&nbsp;The CBI argued that the accused conspired and instigated 'kar&nbsp;sevaks' to demolish the 16th century mosque.&nbsp;But the accused pleaded innocence maintaining that there is no evidence to prove their guilt and claimed they were implicated by the then Congress government at the Centre as a political vendetta.&nbsp;

16th century

Categories