In a significant legal development, a federal judge has temporarily halted a controversial initiative led by billionaire Elon Musk aimed at drastically reducing the size of the U.S. government by encouraging federal employees to accept a mass buyout.
The injunction, issued on Thursday by a federal judge in Massachusetts, delays the plan's initial deadline of midnight Thursday to the following Monday, pending a court hearing on the matter.
The buyout plan, directed at over two million federal workers, offers eight months' pay for those who choose to resign, with the alternative being potential future layoffs.
Thus far, over 40,000 employees have taken the offer, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, although this represents a small fraction of the total workforce.
The move is spearheaded by Musk through an organization known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with the backing of former President Donald Trump.
It has faced opposition from labor unions representing around 800,000 civil servants and Democratic members of Congress, who question the legality of threatening to fire government employees.
The initiative is part of a broader campaign for budget cuts, which, fueled by anti-government rhetoric from Trump and his allies, has already disrupted major federal departments and agencies.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), for instance, has been significantly impacted, with plans to reduce its workforce from over 10,000 to just under 300 staff globally.
Critics argue that such drastic cuts would halt essential operations, including food distribution—critical comments were made by Randy Chester, vice president of the American Foreign Service Association.
The legality of Musk's involvement and the extent of his access to sensitive government data have also raised concerns. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attempted to quell fears by stating that Musk's access is limited and monitored.
Amidst these developments, questions remain over the legal authority of Trump's administration to implement such a sweeping buyout plan and whether participants would ultimately receive promised benefits.
The plan's deployment mirrors strategies Musk previously utilized when acquiring Twitter, now known as X, by sending sweeping communications that implied ultimatum-like choices for employees. Unions have urged federal employees to scrutinize the offers carefully, highlighting the potential risks of agreeing to terms that may lack congressional approval.
This unfolding situation underscores tensions surrounding the initiative's impact on the federal workforce and its implications for the structure and future governance of U.S. governmental agencies.