Bengaluru, Jun 30 (PTI) – A recent controversy has erupted over the Italian luxury brand Prada's use of footwear that closely resembles the traditional Kolhapuri chappals. Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge has emphasized the need for recognition of the artisans from the state who craft these iconic chappals, insisting that their names, work, and legacy should not be sidelined.
In a pointed remark, Kharge noted that Prada is selling these Kolhapuri-like chappals for Rs 1.2 lakh per pair. He took to 'X' to highlight that many artisans who create these renowned chappals reside in Karnataka's Athani, Nippani, Chikkodi, Raibag, and other areas of Belagavi, Bagalkot, and Dharwad districts.
"These artisans have been making these chappals for generations and selling them in nearby towns, especially Kolhapur, which eventually became synonymous with the market and the brand," he explained.
Kharge also recalled his past efforts as the Social Welfare Minister, particularly around the time when Maharashtra was pushing for exclusive GI tag rights over Kolhapuris. "Through Dr. Babu Jagjivan Ram Leather Industries Development Corporation Ltd (LIDKAR), a state-owned entity that deals in leather products, we argued for the inclusion of Karnataka's artisans. I am proud to say we prevailed, and the GI tag was eventually granted jointly to four districts each in Karnataka and Maharashtra. This was never a contest between the two states but rather a mission to preserve our shared heritage and grant our artisans the legal recognition they deserve," he stated.
The Minister underscored that the Prada incident serves as a reminder that obtaining a GI tag alone isn’t enough. He emphasized the importance of cultural entrepreneurship.
"We must invest in the skilling, branding, design innovation, and global market access for these artisans. They not only deserve acknowledgment but also better prices, increased exposure, and the opportunity to build sustainable and dignified livelihoods from their craftsmanship," he asserted.
Kharge further added that when international fashion houses adopt Indian designs, they should highlight the names, work, and legacy of Indian artisans instead of sidelining them. "The GI tag confers legal rights, but it is now our responsibility to provide these artisans with global platforms," he concluded.
(Only the headline of this report may have been reworked by Editorji; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)