'No application of mind by RBI': what dissenting SC judge said on demonetisation

Updated : Jan 04, 2023 12:52
|
Editorji News Desk

The Supreme Court in a 4:1 majority verdict on Monday upheld the government's 2016 decision to demonetise the Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denomination notes, saying the decision-making process was not flawed.

There has to be great restraint in matters of economic policy and the court cannot supplant the wisdom of the executive by a judicial review of its decision, a five-judge Constitution bench of the apex court, headed by Justice S A Nazeer, said.

Justice B V Nagarathna dissented from the majority judgment on the point of the Centre's powers under section 26(2) of the RBI Act and said the scrapping of the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 series notes had to be done through a legislation and not through a notification.

"Parliament should have discussed the law on demonetisation, the process should not have been done through a gazette notification. Parliament cannot be left aloof on an issue of such critical importance for the country," Justice Nagarathna said.

She also said there was no independent application of mind by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and only its opinion was sought, which cannot be said to be a recommendation.

Also Watch| Demonetisation verdict: Supreme Court calls Modi govt's note ban decision valid

DemonetisationSupreme CourtRBI

Recommended For You

editorji | India

Middle East conflict: 80 international flights cancelled at Delhi airport

editorji | India

Safety of one crore Indians top priority, says India as West Asia conflict widens

editorji | India

Middle East conflict: Over 250 flights cancelled at four airports

editorji | India

Sonia Gandhi slams Modi govt's silence on Khamenei killing, demands debate in Parliament

editorji | India

Rahul Gandhi questions PM Modi's silence on assassination of Iran’s supreme leader Khamenei